NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE
ORAL HISTORY PROGRAM
INTERVIEW WITH ROBERT S. MCNAMARA
By
R. CARGHLL HALL
WASHINGTON, DC
25 March 1999Preface
This brief oral history interview with former Secretary of Defense Robert 8, McNamara
Focused on the origins and fist years of the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) and the
American leoders involved with it and the National Reconnaissance Program (NRP), In the
course of the interview it became clear that Mr. McNamara, though certain of his reasons for
creating the NRO and Defense Intelligence Agency, for example, had left the management of
them to trusted subordinates. He did not recall details of their operation or of the institutional
tensions of tie day. Nevertheless, his recollections of the 1960 Presidential election and its
“missile gap” controversy, of the importance of reconnaissance satellite intelligence for
‘American leaders in the 1960s, and of the iment to protect these vital national assets by
restricting the development of space weapons, contribute significantly to our understanding of
this particular period in the Cold War.
This interview is unclassified,
R Cargill Hall
Chief Historian
‘National Reconnaissance OfficeProceedings
all: This is an interview with Robert S, McNamara in Washington, DC, ot his offices.
‘The date is March 25, 1999."The interviewer is Cargill Hall
‘To begin, Joseph Charyk remained in office after the Kennedy Administration came in, in
charge of the Reconnaissance Satellite Office for the Air Force. In the Spring and Summer of
1961 plans were mage 10 bring all of the overhead reconnaissance programs together into a
single office, What is your recollection of those plans?
‘McNamara: Well, I have a very hazy recollection of the details, but I was anxious 10
strengthen overhead reconnaissance and everything having to do with it because I almost
instinctively placed a great value on it. Secondly, | had tremendous regard for Charyk—his
intelligence, his experience and his judgment, And thirdly, I had found when I came into defense
a fragmented Department on many issues. Tl give you an illustration. One of the reasons why
the missile gap became such a controversial issue in the 1960 presidential campaign was that the
intelligence services were so fragmented that they held disparate views, which were never at all
reconciled. And the same thing was true of many of the military logistic supply agencies, so I set
up a defense-wide supply department and, similarly, a defense-wide intelligence agency—the
Defense Intelligence Agency—while allowing the services to maintain what I am going to call
“tactical intelligence.” And I thought that by concentrating the overhead intelligence service
responsibilities in one office and under an intelligent, wise, responsible director we could
strengthen it. I wanted to see it strengthened because it had potentially tremendous value to the
Department. I think, all that proved correct. But I don’t deserve any real credit for it.
Ht ‘When Joseph Charyk left the federal government to become president of the
COMSAT Corporation in early 1963, he wrote for you an end-of-tour report in which hecautioned that DCI Join MeCone was unhappy with the DOD/CIA arrangement for the National
Reconnaisance Program, and that he seemed intent on weakening the authority of the Director of
the NRO. Do you recell how this came about?
M: —Tdon't recall very much about it, but what I do recall is that there was plenty of
evidence that concentrating the authority for these black activities led to expedited action and
much more effective action, I don’t think the U-2 would ever have been developed had not Dick
Bissell had the power he hed, and the Skunk Works had the power it had, And similarly, I think:
the overhead intelligence activities—reconnaissance activities benefited from a similar
concentration of power. Beyond that, McCone was well known for building up what Pll call “the
power of his activity.” whether it was justified or not. McCone was an able person, and I had a
tremendous regard for the CIA, But in this particular activity.—this reconnaissance activity —we
were getting into such highly technical matters that it seemed to me that it was perfectly
appropriate that the Defense Department, Joo Charyk, and this reconnaissance activity be
concentrated, and that's why I favored it.
H: —Charyk’s successor was Brockway MeMillan who came into office in March of
"63. Do you recall who selected him?
Mi — Tdon’t. Iwas very close to Joe and had a lot to do with his appointment and his
activities in the organization, and what he did and so on. But by the time he left, things were
‘moving on rather well, and so I didn't have to pay a lot of attention to it and T didn’t have a lot to
do with Brock McMillan
H: When Dr. McMillan could ot secure agreement with or the compliance of his
CIA counterparts who were running what was then the CORONA part of the story, it’s my
impression that you delegated to the Undersecretary of Defense, Roswell Gilpatric, and DDR&E,Eugene Fubini, authority to deal with McCone on these matters, Is that impression correct?
‘M: I think that is correct because I had tremendous confidence in both Ros Gilpatric
and Gene Fubini, Gene was a superb—I was going to say technician, but he was much more than
that—he was a superb scientist and I had immense confidence in his technical judgments. Ros
‘was an old veteran in the government bureaucracy and between the two of them, T was pretty
sure that matters would be handled properly. So Tet them take care of it
H: Well, they were the ones that negotiated with McCone for that period between ‘61
and ‘65 when the final agreement was ironed out. There was this sort of a constant, it seems to
me, jockeying for a position between DOD and CIA over whether the Director of the NRO
would be « CEO, and direct the whole thing as you intended, or would he be a chairman of the
board as MeCone preferred?
M: — No, what T intended was... he (the DNRO) would ran it, He would be
technically qualified and administratively qualified to mun it, and it seemed to me that was the
best way to do it, That's the way T wanted it done.
H: On 10 July 1962, President Kennedy issued his National Security Council Action
2454 on space policy, which said in effect that the US would continue in intemational fora to
seek acceptance for the legitimacy of reconnaissance from outer space and would make no
Aistinetion between civil and military earth observation, There was subsequently a cancellation
of the SAINT anti-satellite interceptor and it has ofien appeared to me that there was a conflict,
between insulating these vital—what were now becoming vital—national assets for intelligence
from unwanted disturbances, and the desire to put weapons in orbit that could altack other
sacellites. Did that consideration play a role in the decision to end SAINT, do you recall?
‘Oh, T think it probably did. I know T was always opposed to starting an orbitalarms race that would put some of our vital space assets at risk. If we put satellites up there to
shoot down other satellites, the Soviets would go and do the same, and we had satellites we
didn't want shot down, At least, I didn’t want them sho: dawn, so T am sure that played a part. I
don’t recall exactly how we came to the conclusion to drop it, but J think thet was the reason.
H: I know that before the election in November 1960, Kennedy was not briefed by
Eisenhower on the intelligence information returned by the U-2 and the first of the CORONAS,
and that shortly after entering office, when you held that press conference and acknowledged that
there was no “missile gap,” in terms of @ report that had been prepared, it created quite a stir.
M: Oh,
sure as Hell did. The reporters were in a room and the first question was
“what do you think of the missile gap?” 1 said, “well, it's obviously a matter of tremendous
importance. 1 spent @ good portion of my first few weeks examining it, and I have finally
concluded there isn't a gap and if there is it is in our favor.” My God, you couldn't keep them in.
They broke down the door to get to their editors. The late edition of the Evening Star had that
report in it.The next day, Senator Dirkson demanded my resignation and & rerun of the election
because he said that Kennedy had won on faise grounds.
But the point of the story, as it relates to some of the things you're talking about, is that it
doesn’t indicate that anybody lied. Whea T got into it, Ros Gilpatrio and T personally tracked
down the source of the report that there was a missile gap. It was the A2 of the Air Force, a
Major General, the ACSI, I can't think of his name at the moment. And at that time, because
there wasn't a Defense Intelligence Agency, the Army, Navy, and Air Force issued separate
intelligence reports, The others believed there wasn't a missile gap and the Air Force believed
there was. The report—the CIA report—came out with all these views shown and in fact dida’t
say that one was more credible than the other. The Air Force, I believe, leaked theit version toSenator Symington, who had been the Air Force Secretary, and he leaked it to Kennedy.
Kennedy used it, believing it was correct
So when we came in, I got these intelliges
repons, and [ found the Air Force had
it and on what basis. So Ros
reported there was a serious gap. T wanted 10 know who repo.
and L went up and we met with the A2 snd we asked nim. We didn’t question his honesty, we
just said we wanted to know what the
idence was. So he got out all of his photographs. We
‘went over them, and it didn't
ve to me that there was a missile gap. But he was not lying, He
was looking at the photographs through Air Force-colored giasses. This is @ typical human
weakness—we all do that—so T concluded several things. One: that we ought to have one
defense intelligence agency, and not several, each representing a particular service with
operational interests involved in it, And number two: we ought to improve our intelligence
‘gathering capability as best we could. And that’s why I was particularly interested in satellite
reconnaissance.
H: In fact, I just interviewed the Air Foree intelligence chief that followed him, I
think the A2 was a Major General James Walsh, Tam not sure now, but Jack Thomas was the
‘one that followed him. He said that indeed your views are based on your perception of the Soviet
‘Union and the threat it represented. And if they have seen three or four missiles at three bases,
and say, “wel, that's about 10 percent of the total, so we've got 30 bases and... .” so its all
extrapolated in a way that can cause all sorts of grief when you haven't got concrete data,
M: Yes, there's no question about it, As T say, they weren’t lying. Ik wasn’t that, it
‘was just their inherent biases because of their association with foreign Air Forces and missiles,
H; The final Memorandum of Agreement that reorganized the NRP and the NRO
‘was secured with the CIA and signed in August of ‘65 by Admiral Rayoum who was then DCI,and Deputy Secretary of Defense Cyrus Vance.
arate agency
of the DOD with the Secretary of Defense named as Exec NRP, and the DCI
now named as the Senior US Intelligence Advisor to it, What can you tel. me of the deliberations
that preceded this agreement.
M: — Tean't.
H: —Yoncan’t, You weren't directly involved?
M: No. I'm sure Cy kept me fully informed but the aaswer is T can't,
H: OK. Perhaps we could tum to McCone briefly since you were acquainted with
hhim and his period at the Agency. One of the aspects that intrigued me sas that he had served
previously under President Bisenhower,
M: Yes, but notin the Agency.
H: No, No, The AEC, I think, But President Kennedy selected him as DCL I don’t
think he had any great experience in intelligence.
M: No, don't either.
H: He was known to be an effective manager?
M: Yes.
H: Can you tell me what the reasons might have
for that selection?
M: No, I can"s, I think Keanedy wanted :o 21
‘he Administration and the security
field, foreign policy, the cast of bi-parisenship, He did have Doug Dillon, who was @ card
carrying Republican, as the Secretar
of the Treas!
y. Kennedy actually thought T was a
Republican when he appointed me, I was not, but ne thought I was. The reason he thought so
‘was because I was from Califomia, When you first registered to vote in California you had to
indicate a party preference, and I had pat down Republican, though I did not vole Republicanafter that, But I think he brought in McCone because he had a reputation in business and some in
Rovemment, and be was a Republican, I think Kennedy wanted to try to avoid the charge of
partisanship in connection with intelligence.
H: You have partly answered my last question in advance, but I'll return to it,
M: Sure,
H: Strategic space reconnaissance in the 1960s came to play a critical role in shaping
US foreign policy and in the conduct of intemational affairs. It not only provided indications and
‘warning of impending hostilities, and the disposition and kinds of strategic forces an adversary
possessed, but it permitted formulating negotiation strategies in these other settings as well.
‘When you and Presidents Kennedy and Johnson came to office in the early and mid-60s, did the
potemtial value of th
1232 overhead intelligence astets appear self-evident or did it only become
apparent to you later?
M: Well, it éidn't appear self-evident to me, but it certainly became evident very
sickly, within # matter of weeks, But I didn't know anything about it when I came in.
So by the time oF the Culban missile tiss
Sf Ohyit ure as Hell was evident
In October “62, you knew what the missile count was?
That's right. [knew how important vo the nation it was,
Toe concludes my questions. My thanks for your time,
United States v. Edwin Francis Link, Robert Noble Casale, Louis John Ippolito, Barbara Jean Pace, Donald D'amico, United States of America v. Frank Carcaise, 921 F.2d 1523, 11th Cir. (1991)