Extend the overview and the Baudrillard analysis at the top of the floating Pik, all of their arguments

are
completely nonresponsive to my genealogical interpretation to their moral relativistic ontologies. Their entire
pataphysical construct is a meaningless simulacra that stimulates the hyperreal construct of society. Group the
first 3 arguments on the link, they don’t solve back to my inherency arguments at the top of the 2ac, and there
is NO INTERNAL WARRANT for any of their Delgado cards, and it doesn’t answer back to our technocratic
mangerialism impact on their case or our pre-fiat impacts on the TerrTalk K.
Now go to theory
Their counterinterpretation does not answer back to the 2nd 7th and 9th standards off of the 1st T-shell, it doesn’t
matter how often they rant about permutations, there is no reciprocity for conditional counterplans. 1st,
multiple perms are still weighed using the same post-fiat utility calculus, conditional counterplans require the
aff combat 3 impact calculi in three worlds

Cross-apply the 6th t-shell to their predictability analysis. Reciprocal DA and Pic ground may be restricted but
there is no link to any education voter so it’s an RVI on timesynch and reciprocity

Go to their Lacan K:
a. Your theory strips life of joy because it tries to repress desires that bring happiness. This should
be on face rejected because it was this repression of values our Seem evidence indicates is
responsible for allowing fascism to grown inside us, ushering in a depressive tone of life.
Deleuze and Guattari in the 1NC impact turn this theory:
Positioning desire in relation to lack creates actions devoid of benevolence or purpose and prevents
checks against the worst of atrocities
Deleuze and Guattari 1972, Anti-Oedipus, 342
Let us recall the major traits of a
molar formation or of a form of gregariousness (herd instinct). They effect a unification, a totalization of the
molecular forces through a statistical accumulation obeying the laws of large numbers. This unity can be the biological
unity of a species or the structural unity of a socius: an organism, social or living, is composed as a whole, as a global or complete object. It
is in relation to this new order that the partial objects of a molecular order appear as a lack, at the same time that the whole
itself is said to be lacked by the partial objects. In this way desire will be fused to lack. The myriad breaks-flows that determine the
positive dispersion in a molecular multiplicity are fitted over vacuoles of lack that perform this fusion in a statistical constellation of a molar order. Freud
demonstrated clearly in this respect how one went from psychotic multiplicities of dispersion, founded on the breaks or schizzes, to large vacuoles
determined globally, of the neurosis and castration type: the neurotic needs a global object in relation to which the partial objects can
be determined as a lack, and inversely.:" But on a more general level, the statistical transformation of molecular
multiplicity into a molar constellation is what organizes lack on a large scale. Such an organization belongs essentially to
the biological or social organism-species or socius. There is no society that does not arrange lack in its midst, by variable
means peculiar to it. (These means are not the same, for example, in a despotic type of society, or in a capitalist society where the market economy
raises them to a degree of perfection unknown before capitalisrn.) This welding of desire to lack is precisely what gives desire
collective and personal ends, goals or intentions-instead of desire taken in the real order of its production, which behaves
as a molecular phenomenon devoid of any goal or intention.

Extend Seem and DnG , the deterritorialized oedipal flows of desiring-production of their discursive
methodological usage creates a microfascist implosive genocide. Our alt

Our alt solves the counterperm and the floating Pic, you affirm on-face off of the first 6 a prioris, on the 8
theory shells, at the rvi at the bottom of theory, or off of deleuze impact turn off of Lacan.