Professional Documents
Culture Documents
................................................................................................................................... Specialization......................................................................................................
Student ID Number (s) ................................................................................... Grenoble main Campus Off site (state which one)
I hereby declare that the attached assignment is my own work and understand that if I am suspected of plagiarism or other form of cheating; my
work will be referred to the Disciplinary Committee, which may result in my exclusion from the program.
Note below your comments on content, structure and presentation. Comments on specific points should be written on the assignment. Enter grade out of 20
on the bottom of this page. Please indicate whether this is a first or a second grading.
Signature .............................................................................................................
Sustainability
Thru
Corporate
Social
Responsibility
in
Developing
Countries
Aashish
Dilip
Maloo
(G0887943K)
Masters
in
International
Business
(MIBD0904)
9th
June
2010
-‐ Abstract 1
-‐ Introduction 2
“..For
any
business
to
be
sustainable,
the
community
the
business
served
should
be
sustainable”
–
Neville
Isdell
–
Chairman
and
CEO,
Coca-‐Cola
(March
2008)
Abstract
In
the
globalizing
world,
all
the
MULTINATIONALS
are
focusing
on
the
developing
economies,
countries
such
as
India,
African
countries
like
South
Africa,
Zimbabwe,
Nigeria,
China,
Russia
are
the
hot
property
for
the
companies.
Every
company,
big
or
small
wants
to
enter
the
developing
countries.
It
is
also
a
cheaper
option
for
the
companies
to
shift
their
production
units
to
these
countries
due
the
availability
of
resources
in
abundance
and
at
a
much
cheaper
cost.
Countries
such
Africa
and
India
with
high
population
and
literacy
rates
these
companies
can
get
cheap
labour
and
use
the
resources
how
very
they
want
with
very
little
to
give
in
return.
This
paper
discusses
what
and
how
do
the
companies
deliver
the
value
back
to
the
country.
Introduction
There
have
been
a
lot
of
Socially
responsible
practices
in
the
developed
countries
but
this
paper
is
about
how
do
companies
practice
CSR
in
the
developing
countries.
All
the
multi
nationals
are
now
exploring
the
markets
of
developing
countries
and
even
using
these
countries
production
capacity
to
meet
their
global
needs,
this
paper
deals
with
how
do
these
companies
conduct
the
CSR
in
these
countries,
by
what
means
and
what
measures
do
they
use
to
conduct
CSR
and
how
effective
is
it.
This
paper
also
answers
the
questions
of
the
importance
of
CSR.
In
today’s
world
customers
and
investors
are
looking
for
companies
which
are
socially
responsible,
for
example
if
we
go
to
buy
a
Aircon,
we
would
look
for
which
company
is
energy
efficient,
because
that
will
preserve
our
environment
and
is
beneficial
for
us
as
well.
So
companies
today
in
order
to
be
sustainable
have
to
look
after
many
things
just
apart
from
profit,
like
if
a
Industry
helps
the
people
it
is
serving
to
in
other
ways
it
creates
a
brand
image
for
the
company
and
people
tend
to
like
the
company.
For
e.g.
Tata
in
India,
it
is
one
the
most
socially
responsible
companies
in
India
it
is
known
for
its
best
customer
care
and
employer
care
and
also
works
for
the
society,
that
is
the
reason
it
is
the
most
successful
company
in
India.
This
paper
clearly
justifies
that
in
order
to
survive
and
to
sustainable
in
the
market
today
CSR
is
very
important.
Literature Review
Wayne,
considers
drivers
as
one
of
the
most
powerful
way
to
determine
CSR
in
developing
countries
and
he
distinguishes
these
drivers
as:
• Political Reform:
CSR
cannot
be
separated
from
the
political
reforms
in
a
country,
because
political
reform
is
the
key
driver
for
a
business
in
country
towards
ethical
and
social
behavior.
• Socio-‐Economic Priorities:
It
is
the
socio-‐economic
condition
in
which
the
business
works
that
persuades
the
business
to
set
up
its
priorities.
• Governance gaps
It
depends
on
the
governments
will
to
share
the
responsibility
with
the
corporate
to
develop
the
society.
• Crisis
Response
It
is
a
company’s
response
to
the
natural
calamities
or
disaster
prevailing
in
the
country.
• Market
Access
• International Standardization
CSR
also
works
on
the
standards
imposed
by
multinationals
on
its
subsidiaries
in
developing
countries.
• Investment Incentives
CSR
in
developing
countries
acts
a
way
to
attract
investment
from
unknown
foreign
firms.
People
hold
companies
responsible
for
the
societies
down
fall
or
up
liftment
so
it
is
way
to
attract
stakeholders.
• Supply Chain
Its is the Wal-‐Mart effect, i.e. CSR adds value to all its suppliers.
Pedersen
here
explains
us
that
the
key
organizations
of
the
society
need
to
partner
with
the
smaller
organizations
and
work
in
congruence
for
the
betterment
of
the
society,
and
this
is
only
possible
when
both
come
in
to
complete
agreement
over
their
tasks.
He
also
recognizes
the
key
and
small
organization
as
follows:
Pedersen
sees
corporate
citizenship
as
development
done
by
the
private
sector
and
PSD
programs
can
be
used
as
an
effective
tool
to
develop
corporate
citizenship.
PSD
programs
are
the
most
effective
way
used
to
support
private
initiatives
such
as
better
working
condition
and
fighting
HIV/AIDS.
PSD
programs
affect
the
whole
partnership
process;
by
providing
advice
and
financial
support
PSD
programs
has
influence
on
everything
right
from
initial
meetings
to
the
development
of
partnership.
The
PSD
program
process
consist
of
three
stages:
The
preparatory
phase
consist
of
the
research
part,
i.e.
recognizing
the
right
opportunity.
The
implementation
phase
consist
of
the
legal
formalities
and
to
fulfill
other
requirement
to
start
the
partnership
and
the
maintenance
and
improvement
looks
over
the
working
and
contribution
of
the
partners.
-‐The
Role
of
Development
Agencies
in
Driving
Corporate
Citizenship
-‐
Esben
Rahbek
Pedersen
To be a leader, you have to lead human beings with affection -‐ J.R.D. Tata.
CSR
is
a
young
movement
in
the
developing
nation
and
too
much
contribution
in
too
little
time
is
expected
from
the
small
firms
in
the
developing
countries,
which
does
not
look
possible
at
every
layman’s
scale.
It
is
the
subsidiaries
and
counter
parts
of
multinationals
from
the
developed
countries
that
set
the
standards
of
CSR
in
developing
countries
and
they
are
also
expected
to
lead
the
movement.
But
even
in
the
short
time
and
low
scale
it
has
been
proved
that
small
companies
in
are
embracing
the
CSR
into
their
business
practices
and
also
publish
their
environmental
practices
(Jeremy
Baskin).
CSR
in
developing
countries
in
majorly
for
those
firms
that
are
involved
internationally
in
their
business
practices.
CSR
gives
these
firms
a
competitive
advantage
over
the
others
in
the
global
market.
CSR
in
different
countries
is
looked
upon
differently,
like
it
is
not
much
practiced
in
Malaysia
and
Pakistan
as
they
do
not
follow
the
what
Islam
says
about
the
business
ethics,
similarly
Ghana
believes
that
CSR
in
the
help
of
the
private
sector
where
the
government
falls
short.
Industries
in
developing
countries
practice
irresponsible
reporting
to
show
that
they
are
socially
responsible,
this
it
self
is
no
CSR.
Thus
the
developing
countries
need
more
time
to
adapt
and
conduct
CSR
successfully.
-‐ Corporate
Social
Responsibility
in
Emerging
Economies
–
Jedrzej
George
Frynas
(
Greenleaf
Publishing,
Winter
2006)
Jenkins
considers
the
development
agencies
as
the
key-‐driving
factor
of
CSR
for
transnational
companies
in
the
developing
countries,
like
United
Nations
Millennium
Development
Goal
(MDG),
which
gave
strategy
and
rules
for
the
companies
to
help
the
developing
countries
with
issues
such
as
health,
education
and
mostly
poverty.
Jenkins
consider
the
main
responsibility
of
Corporate
in
developing
countries
is
to
eradicate
poverty.
The
NGO’s
play
a
vital
role
in
utilizing
the
CSR
of
multinationals
to
help
the
people
of
the
state.
They
are
the
link
between
the
common
people
and
the
companies.
Alan Winters recognizes a framework for the eradication of poverty thru FDI:
• Enterprise Channel:
FDI
directly
creates
employment
and
when
the
employment
increases
and
shortage
of
unskilled
labor
creates
more
employment
for
the
poor.
• Distribution Channel:
This
channel
treats
the
poor
as
the
consumer
and
providing
them
with
the
products
that
are
affordable
by
them.
Jenkins
in
this
channel
argues
that
FDI
provides
revenue
for
the
govt.
in
terms
of
taxes
that
should
be
utilized
by
the
govt.
to
eradicate
poverty.
-‐
Globalization,
Corporate
Social
Responsibility
and
poverty
-‐
Rhys
Jenkins
(International
Affairs
81,
2005)
The
argument
given
by
Payne
in
the
journal
is
what
I
find
to
be
the
most
reasonable
argument
for
a
company
to
be
socially
responsible,
he
says
that
‘if
a
country
and
its
people
help
to
meet
your
development
need
then
it
is
also
your
duty
to
help
them
meet
their
development
need’.
When
a
multinational
is
working
in
new
country
and
with
new
environment
it
does
not
know
what
are
the
need
of
the
people
and
the
society,
so
similar
to
Pedersen
Payne
also
suggests
that
like
business
partnerships
where
you
partner
with
a
respective
firm
who
is
good
at
their
field,
similarly
in
CSR
partner
with
an
organization
which
understand
the
society’s
needs
and
is
able
to
deliver
it
to
them.
And
Payne
argues
his
suggestion
with
a
series
of
examples
of
different
companies
in
different
countries
like
the
American
tobacco
partnered
with
4
NGO’s
to
protect
Bio
Diversity.
Do
not
look
at
the
bad
ethics
cases
where
the
companies
have
got
into
trouble
but
instead
look
at
those,
which
have,
given
companies
profit
because
of
excellent
CSR.
-‐
Corporate
social
responsibility
and
sustainable
development
–
A.
Payne
(Journal
of
Public
Affairs
Aug-‐Nov
2006)
.
Jason
Lunday,
thru
many
examples
tries
to
explain
us
that
sustainability
and
profit
come
to
you
when
you
deliver
good
deeds
to
society.
If
the
society
and
the
environment
in
which
the
company
is
working
is
happy
and
prospering
the
company
will
also
definitely
prosper,
like
the
example
of
Levis
Strauss.
Co.,
due
to
its
employment
relations
it
came
across
its
most
radical
product
of
DOCKERS
and
in
tuff
times
for
the
company,
the
workers
and
the
employees
readily
accepted
pay
cuts
rather
than
protesting
like
in
the
other
companies.
Another
such
example
is
that
of
3M,
investing
in
saving
the
environment
and
preventing
pollution
ultimately
led
3M
into
profits
of
more
that
500million
$.
With
such
examples
Lunday
conveys
the
message
that
deliver
what
the
society
want
and
the
society
will
give
what
the
company
wants
(Profits).
Milton
here
explains
us
the
relation
between
a
the
social
responsibility
of
a
business
and
of
an
individual,
like
an
individual
serves
his
responsibility
of
meeting
his
social
obligations
like
taking
care
of
its
family,
doing
charity,
for
some
may
be
serving
the
nation
similarly
Business
is
not
only
about
making
profit
thru
the
business
activities
but
it
also
has
a
social
responsibility
towards
society
of
delivering
what
the
society
wants,
after
all
it
is
the
society
that
serves
the
business.
A
person
operating
a
business
must
some
times
keep
aside
his
business
motives
and
full
fill
the
social
obligation
the
business
owes,
like
not
increasing
the
price
in
times
of
inflation
even
if
it
is
not
it
the
companies
best
interests,
like
incurring
more
expenditure
to
prevent
pollution
even
if
its
is
not
profitable
for
the
company.
It
also
a
company’s
duty
that
not
to
get
into
undue
government
practices
such
as
bribing
for
its
own
benefit,
or
not
to
use
its
CSR
a
mere
way
to
prevent
taxes,
A
company
should
fulfill
its
social
obligation
in
full
faith
like
an
Individual
fulfill
his.
-‐ The Social Responsibility Of Business is to Increase its Profits – Milton Friedman
Deck
after
examining
over
70
corporations
has
come
to
some
conclusions
such
as
the
STAKEHOLDERS
Theory,
in
which
he
explains
that
most
of
the
successful
companies
now
no
longer
considers
share
holder
as
the
most
important
stake
holders
in
the
company,
now
the
customers,
employees
and
suppliers
are
also
equally
important.
As
far
as
ethics
in
workplace
is
considered,
Deck,
after
a
research
in
more
than
200
corporate
understood
that
it
is
the
explicit
and
the
implicit
factors
that
determine
the
work
ethics
or
a
company.
Explicit
elements
consist
of
the
things,
which
an
organization
believes
in
and
it
revolves
around
the
corporate
code.
This
corporate
code
serves
a
variety
of
purpose
such
as
image
enhancing,
doing
the
right
thing.
Analysis
of
these
corporate
codes
made
it
clear
that
there
are
three
types
of
codes,
‘Code
of
ethics’,
‘Code
of
conduct’,
and
‘Code
of
practice’.
Code
of
ethics
defines
the
purpose
of
the
company,
its
statements
of
values
and
purpose.
Code
of
Practice
is
the
illustration
that
affects
the
decision
maker
and
the
working
of
a
company.
And
Code
of
Conduct
states
that
what
an
individual
must
or
must
not
do
in
the
company.
Methodology
Taking
in
consideration
how
Coca-‐cola
India,
after
being
criticized
so
much
for
its
unethical
practices
in
2006
and
the
product
being
condemned
by
the
people,
how
it
came
up
again
to
be
one
of
the
most
ethical
companies
in
India
and
receiving
the
golden
peacock
award
for
Corporate
Social
responsibility
in
2008.
It
did
so
many
things
around
India
to
help
the
people
and
preserve
its
natural
resource
of
water.
This
shows
that
a
company
can
become
profitable
and
sustain
in
a
market
thru
CSR,
it
is
not
only
the
product
which
matter
to
the
public
but
the
over
all
impact
of
the
product.
Keeping
in
mind
how
CSR
can
help
to
sustain
and
make
profits
and
gathering
information
and
literature
by
different
authors
with
the
help
of
Ebsco
and
Perspective
in
Business
Ethics
by
Laura
P
Hartman
and
their
view
on
the
similar
topic.
The
various
literatures
show
various
ways
to
be
socially
responsible
in
countries
and
still
being
profitable
and
able
to
sustain
the
business
There
are
different
frame
works
such
as
the
Internal
and
External
drivers
by
WAYNE,
then
the
Pedersen’s
Congruence
pyramid
shows
how
big
organizations
should
work
with
the
small
one.
Pedersen
also
tell
about
the
different
stages
of
a
PSD
program.
The
paper
also
includes
the
framework
to
eradicate
poverty
thru
FDI
by
Winters.
Conclusion
Coke
was
severely
criticized
by
NGO’s
and
people
in
India
for
its
Wastage
of
water,
and
destroying
the
land
thru
discharging
of
chemicals,
and
using
pesticides
in
its
drinks.
But
coke
came
clear
of
most
of
the
allegations
and
today
it
working
with
the
society
and
running
a
successful
business
in
the
country.
Coke
also
promised
India
that
it
would
maintain
a
zero
water
balance
that
is
it
will
give
the
country
all
the
water
it
uses,
and
it
is
doing
it
through
restoring
many
wells,
recharging
rain
water,
rain
water
harvesting,
it
is
also
educating
the
poor
children’s
thru
opening
schools
in
the
rural
are
and
also
educating
people
about
the
use
of
water
and
its
importance.
Today
coke
has
won
many
awards
for
its
contribution
to
the
society
and
the
company
in
terms
of
profit
is
doing
tremendously
well.
This
shows
that
how
criticized
you
are
how
bad
name
people
can
get
you
but
you
work
towards
the
society
can
make
up
all
for
it.
There
are
many
ways
to
be
socially
responsible
in
developing
countries,
like
Wayne
with
the
help
of
drivers
that
are
the
internal
and
external
drivers
explains
how
we
have
to
use
this
drivers
and
work
with
them
to
help
the
society.
Pedersen
show
how
the
big
companies
and
organization
should
partner
and
work
in
congruence
with
the
small
ones
to
help
the
society
and
a
similar
argument
in
given
by
Payne,
With
the
help
of
Jenkins
literature
we
understand
how
FDI
can
we
used
as
a
tool
to
promote
social
activities.
All
the
frame
works
explained
are
way
to
sustain
the
business
with
being
Socially
Responsible.
Bibliography
-‐ Corporate
social
responsibility
and
sustainable
development
–
A.
Payne
(Journal
of
Public
Affairs
Aug-‐Nov
2006)
-‐
Perspectives
In
Business
Ethics-‐
pg.
246,
Third
Edition,
Laura
P.
Hartman,
McGraw
Hill,
Singapore
-‐ Perspectives
In
Business
Ethics-‐
pg.
280,
Third
Edition,
Laura
P.
Hartman,
McGraw
Hill,
Singapore
-‐ Perspectives
In
Business
Ethics-‐
pg.
248,
Third
Edition,
Laura
P.
Hartman,
McGraw
Hill,
Singapore
-‐ Coca
Cola
India’s
Corporate
Social
Responsibility
Strategy
–
Hadiya
Faheem