Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Spicejet (Modluf) : Jetsetgo
Spicejet (Modluf) : Jetsetgo
Rs crore
1500
2010, taking the overall market to more than 70 million passengers. 0
Rs
1000 -1
-2
Lowest cost among peers 500
-3
0 -4
SpiceJet follows the pure LCC model. This has helped it achieve the lowest
FY06 FY07 FY08E FY09E
cost in the industry – its per unit cost is 20% lower than peers in the LCC Net Sales EPS (RHS)
segment, and 40% lower than players in the full-service carrier (FSC)
segment. We believe this would help it achieve breakeven ahead of others in
Stock metrics
an improving yield scenario.
Promoters holding 12.91%
Market Cap Rs 1,227 crore
Fleet expansion to help achieve breakeven
52 Week H/L 68 / 36
We expect the company to post profits at the net level by FY09E as an
Sensex 18,908
optimal fleet size is achieved, and fixed costs are absorbed over a higher
Average volume 494,811
capacity (ASKM). It has unveiled a phased capacity expansion plan which
will see the addition of 15 aircrafts by FY10E, and another 8 in FY11-12E,
taking its total fleet size to 34 aircrafts. Comparative return metrics
Stock return 3M 6M 12M
Valuations SpiceJet -11% 15% 20%
Globally, LCCs trade at a premium over FSCs because of the sustainability of Deccan Airlines 8% 33% 38%
their business model, and greater reach among masses. SpiceJet is Jet Airways 13% 14% 33%
currently in a growth phase and yet to achieve an optimal size. We believe
the company is set for a turnaround given the growth in the Indian aviation
sector and its cost leadership. We value the stock at 4.5x it FY09E
EV/EBIDTAR with a 12-15 months price target of Rs 68, an upside potential
of 33%.
Jun-05
Aug-05
Oct-05
Dec-05
Feb-06
Apr-06
Jun-06
Aug-06
Oct-06
Dec-06
Feb-07
Apr-07
Jun-07
Aug-07
Oct-07
2|Page
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
The number of domestic air passengers grew at a healthy 38.5% with 35.3
million passengers flying in FY07 against 25.5 million in FY06. The Centre for
Asia Pacific Aviation (CAPA) has predicted that the domestic traffic would
grow at 25%-30% annually until 2010, taking the overall market to more than
70 million passengers. Aircraft manufacturer Boeing has raised its 20-year
market forecast for Indian commercial aircraft purchases to $86 billion from
$72 billion last year.
80
70
60
50
40
30
20 CAPA has predicted domestic
10 passenger traffic would grow at
25%-30% annually until 2010
0
FY96
FY97
FY98
FY99
FY00
FY01
FY02
FY03
FY04
FY05
FY06
FY07
FY08E
FY09E
FY10E
3|Page
LCCs – best positioned to capture the growth
B737-800 (dual)
Number of seats 189 economic
28 seats in business class & Higher yield per aircraft
per aircraft class
126 seats in economy class
LCCs are set to benefit from
Turnaround time 20-25 minutes 30-45 minutes High aircraft utilization, the high growth in the Indian
higher revenues per aviation sector
Flying hours
12 hrs per day 10.7 hrs per day aircraft, High yields
per day
Focus on direct
Distribution Primary use of agents for ticket
distribution Lower commission cost
model distribution
avoiding agents
A LCC is able to contain costs in areas that are under the control of the airline.
Things like fuel ciost, airport handling & navigation, and maintenance charges
are beyond the control of an airline. The ability of LCCs to offer tickets at lower
prices has made them popular in India, where consumers are very price
sensitive.
4|Page
Consolidation to result in increase in fares and yields
Recently there has been a consolidation in the domestic aviation sector. From
a fragmented sector with more than 10 players, today there are 3 major
players, and a couple of other smaller players in the LCC space. These three
together have a combined market share of around 80%.
We believe consolidation would help the industry, which was hitherto plagued
by low yields and excess capacity. These large groups have already initiated a
route–rationalisation exercise, which will help in pulling out excess capacity
from sectors that are susceptible to heavy discounting. Consolidation has also
triggered rationalisation of fleet expansion plans. We expect average yields in
the industry would go up by around 5%-10% over the next few quarters,
which will help pure LCCs like SpiceJet to achieve early breakeven.
The anticipated investment in airport development during the 11th Five Year
Plan (2007-11) is over Rs 40,000 crore.
We feel that these initiatives would structurally benefit the industry in the long-
term though medium term concerns regarding infrastructure would persists.
5|Page
INVESTMENT RATIONALE
6|Page
Rationalised operations
SpiceJet focuses on a few destinations, and maximises frequencies between
them. This helps the company amortise the fixed costs of setting up bases at
airports over a larger number of seats. At present, the airline operates from16
airports, and plans to increase the number to 18 by the end of FY08E, and
further to 22 by FY09E.
25
22
20 18
14
15
11
10
6
5
0
FY05
FY06
FY07
FY08E
FY09E
40
34
35
30 SpiceJet plans to expand its
30 26 fleet significantly
25 23
20 17
15 11
10 6
5 3
0
FY05
FY06
FY07
FY08E
FY09E
FY10E
FY11E
FY12E
7|Page
Pure LCC model -- helps achieve lowest cost per unit
SpiceJet follows the pure LCC model used globally. This has helped it in
achieving the lowest cost in the industry.
Its per unit cost is 20% lower than other LCC competitors, and 40% lower than
players in the FSC segment. Going ahead, we expect the cost per unit to
reduce further on account of fleet expansion, which would absorb the high
fixed cost over a larger base.
SpiceJet’s model
SpiceJet’s strategy is to provide safe, reliable travel at low cost from point-to-
point by maximising the efficiency of all resources, keeping processes simple,
and without incurring expenditure on components which do not support the
basic function of travel.
8|Page
High seat density
SpiceJet’s aircraft are configured in a single economy class having 189 seats,
which is among the highest in the industry. This is possible as the airline
focuses on maximum space utilisation for generating more revenue per
aircraft. SpiceJet accommodates 21% more seats than a dual (business and
economy) configuration. With costs like fuel, lease, maintenance remaining
same per aircraft, its per-seat costs comes down by around 20%.
14
12.0 11.6 11.3
12 10.7
9.8 9.7
10
8
6
4
2
0
Airways
RyanAir
SpiceJet
EasyJet
Southwest
Deccan
Jet
9|Page
SpiceJet has been consistently reporting high aircraft utilisation (around 12
hours a day), in line with international benchmarks. This is possible because of
its high on-time performance (82% within 15 minutes) and a low turnaround
time of 20-25 minutes as compared to 40-45 minutes takes by FSC. No loading
of meals or complex cargo and faster check-in system helps in reducing turn
around time. Overall it reduces fixed cost absorption by 15-20%.
Earlier, airlines used to sell huge inventory of tickets at low or near zero prices
(Re 1/- to Rs 9/- base fare per ticket) to attract traffic and gain market share. Average yields set to improve
With consolidation, the large players have shifted their focus on profitability from Rs 2,430 per passenger in
from market share. As a result, the yields per ticket have been improving and FY08E to Rs 2,700in FY09E
the practice of heavy discounting has declined. SpiceJet, which has the lowest
cost in the industry, will be the first beneficiary, when the yields start
improving.
We expect the yield (average revenue per passenger) for SpiceJet to stabilise
at the current levels of Rs 2,430 for this financial year, and improve to around
Rs 2,700 in FY09E. This will bring in the break-even at EBIDITA levels.
10 | P a g e
Load factor to be maintained above industry average
Ever since its launch, SpiceJet has maintained the highest load factor in the
industry. In FY06, the company achieved a PLF (passenger load factor) of 86%,
which declined to 78% in FY07. Heavy discounting by airlines led to this
decline, even as SpiceJet continued to sell fewer tickets at very low prices.
Addition of new fleet by the company and increase in the overall industry
capacity also laid pressure on load factor. Going forward, we expect the
company to maintain PLF in the range of 74%-75% relatively higher than
industry levels of 65%.
1400
45000
1200
Cost of rising ATF prices,
40000 passed on to the customers by
1000 way of fuel surcharge
RS / ticket
Rs / KL
35000 800
600
30000
400
25000
200
20000 0
Mar-05
Mar-06
Mar-07
Jan-05
May-05
Jul-05
Sep-05
Nov-05
Jan-06
May-06
Jul-06
Sep-06
Nov-06
Jan-07
May-07
Jul-07
Sep-07
Nov-07
Source: IOC (Prices at 4 Metros including Sales Tax for domestic airlines), Company, ICICIdirect Research
11 | P a g e
Aviation Turbine Fuel (ATF) forms a major part of the overall cost for airlines in
India. It accounts for 40%-50% of total operating costs, the highest in the
world. ATF prices in India are 60% higher than international prices. The major
component of the ATF prices is taxes (see Exhibit 18), which account for 53%
of the base price.
ATF prices in India are based on the "International Import Parity Prices", and
directly linked to the benchmark of Platt's publication of FOB Arabian Gulf ATF
prices (AG); and do not relate to the actual cost of producing ATF in India.
ATF prices for domestic operations also include freight charges from the Gulf
to India, customs duty of 10% ad-valorem (which adds up to an effective rate
of approx 20% inclusive of the CVD and cess), domestic transportation and
other charges, excise duty of 8.24% (including cess), sales tax (levied by state
governments) averaging across the country at 25% as add-ons to the AG
prices, besides the oil companies' marketing margin, and throughput charges
paid to the Airports Authority.
Sensitivity analysis
In our estimates, we have assumed ATF prices would increase to Rs 45 per
litre in FY09E from Rs 44 per litre (as on Nov 1, 2007). Any further rise in the
fuel prices will have a negative impact on our estimates.
12 | P a g e
Fleet expansion, funding on track
SpiceJet has unveiled a phased capacity expansion over FY08-FY12. From a
fleet of 11 aircrafts at the end of FY07, it plans to add 15 by FY10E, and another
8 in FY11-12E, which will take its total fleet size to 34.
The company has already secured financing arrangement for the next phase of
its expansion. In December 2005, it raised US$ 80 million through an FCCB
(foreign currency convertible bonds) issue, proceeds of which are being
utilised for the Pre-Delivery Payments (PDP) of first ten aircrafts. The
subscribers to the bond issue include Goldman Sach, and Istithmar, the private
equity arm of Government of Dubai.
The company also has a sale and lease back arrangement with Babcock &
Brown Aircraft Management and Nomura Babcock & Brown, for all 16 aircrafts
to be purchased during 2007-09. The deal is valued at over US$ 1.1 billion
based on the manufacturer’s list prices.
Further, in January 2007, the company raised US$ 67 million (Rs 297 crore)
through preferential equity allotment to strategic investors like the Tata Group,
Istithmar, KBC Financial Products (UK) and BNP Paribas.
13 | P a g e
RISK AND CONCERNS
14 | P a g e
FINANCIALS
1500
Rs crore
1000
500
0
FY06 FY07 FY08E FY09E
15 | P a g e
Break-even to be achieved by FY09E
We expect the company to post profits at the net level by FY09E, as the
optimal fleet size is achieved and fixed cost being absorbed over a higher
capacity (ASKM). From a net loss of Rs 70.7 crore in FY07, it is likely to
turnaround and post a net profit of Rs 69.8 core in FY09E. Net margins are
expected to improve to 3.3% in FY09E from a negative margin of 11% in FY07.
80 6
60 4
2
40
0
20
Rs crore
-2
0
(%)
-4
FY06 FY07 FY08E FY09E
-20
-6
-40
-8
-60 -10
-80 -12
20
15
10
5
0
-5
(%)
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
FY06 FY07 FY08E FY09E
16 | P a g e
VALUATIONS
At the current price of Rs 51, the stock is trading at a market cap-to-sales ratio
of 0.9x FY08E sales and 0.6x FY09E sales. On an EV/EBIDTAR (earnings before
interest, depreciation, tax, amortisation & aircraft rentals) basis, the stock is
available at 8.9x FY08E earnings and 3.4x FY09E earnings.
We value the stock at 4.5x it FY09E EV/EBIDTAR (a discount of 40% over Jet’s
FY09E EV/ EBIDTAR of 7.5x). We rate it an OUTPERFORMER with a 12-15
months price target of Rs 68, an upside potential of 33%.
17 | P a g e
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
18 | P a g e
Cash Flow Statement (Rs crore)
Year to March 31 FY06 FY07 FY08E FY09E
Opening Cash Balance 28.97 63.43 351.05 376.62
Profit after Tax -41.42 -70.74 -5.94 69.78
Misc Expenditure w/off 14.08 -12.74 0.00 0.00
Dividend Paid 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Depreciation 8.16 5.85 8.23 11.79
Provision for deffered tax 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Cash Flow before WC Changes -19.19 -77.64 2.29 81.57
Net Increase in Current Liabilities 70.85 523.36 -194.25 -322.74
Net Increase in Current Assets 16.00 41.89 96.00 21.41
Cash Flow after WC Changes 35.66 403.84 -287.95 -262.59
Purchase of Fixed Assets (366.73) (336.63) 363.35 271.00
(Increase) / Decrease in Investment 0.00 (81.22) 25.00 20.00
Increase / (Decrease) in Loan Funds 306.60 11.43 -74.82 -13.00
Increase / (Decrease) in Equity Capital 58.93 290.20 0.00 0.00
Net Change in Cash 34.46 287.61 25.57 15.41
Closing Cash Balance 63.43 351.05 376.62 392.03
Ratio Analysis
Year to March 31 FY06 FY07 FY08E FY09E
EPS (Rs) -2.57 -2.80 -0.25 2.90
Book Value (Rs) -0.69 7.67 7.42 10.32
Enterprise Value (Rs. Crore) 1297.45 1308.43 1208.03 1179.62
EV/Sales (x) 3.09 2.04 0.90 0.55
EV/EDITDAR (x) 116.30 -47.75 7.53 3.10 The stock is available at
EV/EBIDTA (x) -38.53 -23.25 195.66 12.38 attractive valuations.
Market Cap to sales (x) 2.24 1.92 0.92 0.57
Price to Book Value (x) -73.64 6.65 6.87 4.94
Operating Margin (%) -8.03 -8.79 0.46 4.45
Net Profit Margin (%) -11.27 -10.52 -0.44 3.26
RONW (%) 370.41 -36.50 -3.32 28.09
ROCE (%) -10.25 -10.07 -0.38 14.09
Debt/ Equity (x) -32.96 2.34 2.00 1.39
Current Ratio 0.92 0.82 1.33 3.96
Debtors Turnover Ratio 58.94 47.44 56.15 66.36
Fixed Assets Turnover Ratio 8.55 13.24 16.72 24.22
19 | P a g e
ANNEXURE
Glossary
Term Description
Aircraft utilisation Represents the average number of block hours operated per day per
aircraft for the total aircraft fleet
ATF Aviation turbine fuel
Available Seat Represents the aircraft seating capacity multiplied by the number of
Kilometres (ASKM) kilometres the seats are flown
Average stage length Represents the average number of kilometres flown per flight
Block hours Refers to the elapsed time between an aircraft leaving an airport gate
and arriving at an airport gate
Cost per ASKM Represents total cost less cargo revenue net of commissions, excess
baggage, other income and non-operating revenue including interest
income, divided by the ASKMs
EBITDA Earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation and amortization
excluding Non-operating Revenues and excluding any adjustments to
profit
EBITDAR Earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation, amortisation and
aircraft rentals (fixed), excluding Non-operating Revenues and
excluding any adjustments to profit
Seat Factor Revenue passenger kilometres expressed as a percentage of available
seat kilometres.
Revenue passengers Represents the total number of fare paying passengers flown on all
flight segments (excludes passengers redeeming their frequent flyer
miles).
Revenue Passenger Represents the number of kilometres flown by revenue passengers
Kilometres (RPKM)
Revenue per ASKM Net Passenger Revenue divided by ASKMs.
Yield Average revenue earned per passenger
20 | P a g e
RATING RATIONALE
ICICIdirect endeavours to provide objective opinions and recommendations. ICICIdirect assigns ratings to its
stocks according to their notional target price vs current market price and then categorises them as
Outperformer, Performer, Hold, and Underperformer. The performance horizon is 2 years unless specified and
the notional target price is defined as the analysts' valuation for a stock.
research@icicidirect.com
Disclaimer
The report and information contained herein is strictly confidential and meant solely for the selected recipient and may not be altered
in any way, transmitted to, copied or distributed, in part or in whole, to any other person or to the media or reproduced in any form,
without prior written consent of ICICI Securities Ltd (I-Sec). The author of the report does not hold any investment in any of the
companies mentioned in this report. I-Sec may be holding a small number of shares/position in the above-referred companies as on
date of release of this report. This report is based on information obtained from public sources and sources believed to be reliable, but
no independent verification has been made nor is its accuracy or completeness guaranteed. This report and information herein is
solely for informational purpose and may not be used or considered as an offer document or solicitation of offer to buy or sell or
subscribe for securities or other financial instruments. Nothing in this report constitutes investment, legal, accounting and tax advice
or a representation that any investment or strategy is suitable or appropriate to your specific circumstances. The securities discussed
and opinions expressed in this report may not be suitable for all investors, who must make their own investment decisions, based on
their own investment objectives, financial positions and needs of specific recipient. This report may not be taken in substitution for the
exercise of independent judgement by any recipient. The recipient should independently evaluate the investment risks. I-Sec and
affiliates accept no liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of the use of this report. Past performance is not
necessarily a guide to future performance. Actual results may differ materially from those set forth in projections. I-Sec may have
issued other reports that are inconsistent with and reach different conclusion from the information presented in this report. This report
is not directed or intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality,
state, country or other jurisdiction, where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law, regulation or
which would subject I-Sec and affiliates to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. The securities described
herein may or may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain category of investors. Persons in whose possession this
document may come are required to inform themselves of and to observe such restriction.
21 | P a g e