Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Minutes EXACT Meeting MG Excl. Annexes
Minutes EXACT Meeting MG Excl. Annexes
March 20 2010
505609-LLP-1-2009-1-NL-KA4-KA4MP
"This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication
[communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held
responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein."
1. AGENDA
2. LIST OF PARTICIPANTS
3. MINUTES MEETING
4. ANNEXES
a. Partner presentations
b. Meeting presentations and hand-out
EXACT – Minutes meeting Mönchengladbach Germany March 18 –
March 20 2010
505609-LLP-1-2009-1-NL-KA4-KA4MP
1. AGENDA
EXACT Kick-off Meeting - 18/19/20 March 2010 - Monchengladbach
Make acquaintance
Develop a common understanding of the project objectives, tasks and expected results.
Clarify project management and administrative procedures.
Develop a timetable for the upcoming period.
12:30 Lunch
15:00 Group session 1: objectives, goals, envisaged outcomes, ways of cooperating, individual
roles of partners, roles of WP-leaders, collective ownership of the project, ….
16:30 Plenary session: agreement on the main proposals developed in the group work sessions
09:00 Presentation of Quality Assurance in the EXACT project and the implications for the
pedagogical-didactic products we want to disseminate, by Barbara Brodigan, leading role in
WP 7 Quality Assurance and standard setting
Submission number: 505609-LLP-1-2009-1-NL-KA4-KA4MP
09:45 Group session 2: discussion on the basic principles presented by Barbara Brodigan and the
consequences for cooperation in the EXACT project
12:30 Lunch
505609-LLP-1-2009-1-NL-KA4-KA4MP
2. LIST OF PARTICIPANTS
EXACT – Minutes meeting Mönchengladbach Germany March 18 –
March 20 2010
505609-LLP-1-2009-1-NL-KA4-KA4MP
3. MINUTES
EXACT – Minutes meeting Mönchengladbach
Germany March 18 – March 20 2010
505609-LLP-1-2009-1-NL-KA4-KA4MP
"This project has been funded with support from the European
Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views
only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible
for any use which may be made of the information contained
therein."
Content
EXACT – Minutes meeting Mönchengladbach Germany March 18 –
March 20 2010 .................................................................................... 1
Day 1 – March 18 2010 ................................................................... 3
Welcome Reinhold Schiffers ....................................................... 3
Welcome Jacques Jansen ............................................................ 3
Institutional presentations.......................................................... 4
Presentation of EXACT ................................................................ 5
Group session Project EXACT ...................................................... 7
Cultural event Abteiberg Museum ............................................. 8
Day 2 – March 19 2010 ................................................................... 9
Presentation about quality assurance by Barbara Brodigan ...... 9
Group session on quality aspects and position of CoE ............... 9
The development work packages ............................................. 14
The dissemination work packages ............................................ 20
Project management ................................................................ 22
Next EXACT-meeting ................................................................. 22
Day 3 – March 20 2010 ................................................................. 23
Minutes meeting EXACT Mönchengladbach
March 18 – March 20 2010
505609-LLP-1-2009-1-NL-KA4-KA4MP
page 1 of 25
Introduction Youth Summit Nörrkoping ................................... 23
Internal and external communication ...................................... 24
External evaluation ................................................................... 25
List of decisions ......................................................................... 25
Institutional presentations
All the presentations are attached in the annexes.
1. E2CNörrkopping
2. Arcus College
3. Ingrado
4. OFI
5. Doncaster College
6. Ass. Art. 27
7. CESIE
8. Die Berater
9. E2C Gijon E2C Champagne Ardenne
10. ADREP
11. WBK
Centre of Excellence
1. DEVOTED 2. EXACT
Figure 1: towards CoE, the relation and difference between DEVOTED and EXACT
Group 1
1. Scope of project
Project management and quality for whole project life cycle
Development in two work packages
Dissemination and exploitation in remaining (three) work
packages
2. In how far is your institution interested in the CoE?
Empower teachers
Using methods developed in previous projects
More inventive in tackling the target group (of youngsters)
3. Do you have concrete expectations/what is your own role?
Group 2
1. Scope of project
Physical or digital?
One or more centres?
How broad is target group?
• What determines what is a good practice? (validation)
2. In how far is your institution interested in the CoE?
• interested yes, but group can be broadened
3. Do you have concrete expectations/what is your own role?
• everyone has to contribute in diss., dev. and expl.
Problem of translation; online in English or in each language;
various languages are a necessity
Regular contact between partners
Group 3
1. Scope of project
Ware house idea
Experienced and start up schools
Platform for teachers to enhance training for new and “old”
teachers
Content is unclear (rules of resources?)
2. In how far is your institution interested in the CoE?
• Finances are a question
Linked to existing structures
Relation between providers
3. Do you have concrete expectations/what is your own role?
Language is debatable.
It should contribute to motivating teachers
(creative/innovative/qualitative).
Cooperation between partners.
Within four groups (G1 t/m G4) these questions are discussed and, if
possible, answered;
G1
G2
1.
a. Production phase (validated by users and trainers;
products in standardized template for accessibility
and usability; what are the indicators for the quality
of a product)
b. Testing
c. Using
2. Template
3. Action research
G3
G4
The following partners take part in this work package: CESIE (WP
Leader), OFI, Art. 27, E2C Gijon, Ingrado, Arcus College,
Weiterbildungskolleg. In accordance with the application the
Objectives
• Identify min. 5 EU projects that facilitate the acquisition of
learning for life competences
• Identify min. 6 local preventative actions that facilitate the
acquisition of learning for life competences
• Develop Handbook and Inventory of preventative actions
Products
The following partners take part in this work package: E2C Châlons
(WP Leader), Arcus College, Die Berater, ADREP, E2C Nörrkoping.
WP 5
Within WP 5 five steps are identified to reach the objectives. First
step is a reader to be made by the WP Leader
(Weiterbildungskolleg); two weeks to make the reader, than two
weeks to react. The reader goes into detail concerning the way of
approaching the professionals. Second step is to form national
expert groups by the end of April 2010, so that they can apply for
the teacher training conference in Mönchengladbach in October
2010, in relation to the second teachers meeting of the European
second chance schools (step 3). This meeting is seen as a first
dissemination spot. In any case double funding should be avoided
concerning this meeting! Fourth step is to qualify the national
expert groups in training. Last step is to deliver the blue print for the
Minutes meeting EXACT Mönchengladbach
March 18 – March 20 2010
505609-LLP-1-2009-1-NL-KA4-KA4MP
page 20 of 25
conference model. The following shows the step up to the next
meeting within this work package:
WP 6
Within WP 6 the more general marketing and dissemination strategy
of EXACT and the later CoE are discussed. The discussion within the
work package took place alongside the deliverables:
Project management
By the project management a presentation is held regarding the
management of the project. The enclosed presentation (annex)
gives an overview of the items handled. The project management
will provide the time sheet and the declaration form at short notice
accompanied with guidelines to use them. Thereby two proposals
will be made regarding the financial management.
Next EXACT-meeting
Depending on the budget, the proposal is to have five instead of
four transnational meetings. The planning of the next meeting is
important, because of a) the remaining project time and b) the
upcoming interim report. The next meeting will be held from
October 20 – October 23 2010; first option is Gijon (ES), second
option is Doncaster (UK). During the second meeting will be decided
whether EXACT will have four or five meetings.
External evaluation
External evaluation will be done by the Open University. The Open
University will be invited to attend at least two transnational
meetings. After the contract is signed between Open University and
the project coordinator, an evaluation plan will be developed by
Open University.
List of decisions
WP Topics Deadline
1 Minutes and timetable 27-3-2010 draft - PM
11-4-2010 reply - partners
18-4-2010 final - PM
1 Timesheets and declaration form plus instruction 4-4-2010
2 Explanation of “work to be done” to be integrated 27-3-2010 – CESIE
in minutes (incl. timetable)
3 According to picture --
4 Stakeholder analysis 20-4-2010 Instrument - Die Berater
Decision makers analysis
5 According to picture --
6 Cooperation with WP 4 – Die Berater
7 Appointment of critical friends (monitoring)
7 Review of documents 27-3-2010 draft – Doncaster
4-4-2010 reply – partners
11-4-2010 final – partners
7 Logo ASAP – Art. 27
7 Website Structure
Construction