Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BEI questions, on the other hand, focus on the premise that the best
predictor of future performance is past behavior. Answers to BEI questions are
drawn from the applicant’s actual experiences. By focusing on personal
experiences that directly relate to the requirements of the job, the selecting
official can better assess how competently the candidate will perform in the
position. In addition, with BEI, a more defensible selection decision is seen
because they are based on job-related criteria.
1. One-to-One Interview:
This method is typical for most positions. One person, normally the selecting
official, conducts and evaluates the interviews.
Advantage: This method is more efficient because one person does all the
interviewing and evaluating. Also, it is less intimidating to the candidate because most
candidates are used to one-on-one interviews.
2. Panel Interview:
A panel interview involves two or more interviewers (no more than five) where
each asks the candidate one or more questions. In a modified panel interview, one
member asks the questions and the others observe and take notes.
1 1. All panel members participate in evaluating the candidates.
2 2. The panel may include a facilitator who explains the interview process,
introduces the panel members, clarifies any questions, monitors the time allotted, and
facilitates the evaluation process.
3 3. The selecting official responsible for the selection decision receives the
applications, interview notes, and evaluations.
4 4. Panel interviews are typically used to interview a large number of candidates
and to fill multiple and complex positions.
Disadvantage:
Once the interview format is selected, an interviewer first reads the lead question
for the first competency, and then proceeds to obtain an overview of the event. A lead or
opening question (sets the context and the stage for subsequent probing questions)
followed by a series of probing questions elicit responses containing detailed information
on roles, situations, actions and outcomes from past job-related experiences, events, or
accomplishments. They go beyond hypothetical “what would you do if..” situations by
asking for real life examples. It is believed that more the recent and longstanding past
behaviour, the greater the predictive power. Hence, the questions asked should be based
on the job description, the performance indicators, the skills/personal qualities required
and the interviewer's knowledge of operating in the role because the interviewer is
interested in
(b) The values of the candidate and the outcome of the situation.
Thus, the major step in the BEI interview is to elicit behavioral events. The
interviewee is asked to describe, in detail, the five or six most important situations he or
she has experienced in a specific job. The situations should include two or three high
points, or major successes, and two or three low points, or key failures. The candidate is
asked to answer five key questions.
Do’s:
1. The question should be open ended but not designed to lead to specific answers
that may advantage some candidates.
2. Question should not limit an candidate’s response to the criterion by being too
specific or by combining two selection criteria into one question.
3. Avoid general hypothetical questions but encourage answers based on the
candidate’s past behavior.
4. Keep questions brief and to the point.
5. Interview questions should aim at eliciting information, not intimidating or
catching candidates out.
6. General questions typically generate only positive responses. In behavioral
interviews, the interviewer also wants to know the potential negatives to
understand the circumstances in which the candidate will not be able to
demonstrate the required competencies.
7. Questions should be agreed by the panel before commencing the interview and all
the candidates should be given the same questions in the same order.
Don’ts
1. Avoid questions which make it easy for candidates to bluff their way through the
interview such as “What is your greatest weakness?
2. Don’t inadvertently screen candidates out because they don’t fit your non-job
related pre-conceived notions about your ideal candidate (e.g. Caucasian,
attractive, mid thirties, plays golf, no foreign accents)
3. Make sure that you don’t inadvertently telegraph the right answers to the
candidates (e.g. “We are a very fast-paced company. How well do you deal with
pressure?”) This is a very common interviewing error.
4. Don’t get so caught up in the thrill of high growth that you fail to do some long
term manpower planning. Decisions made in haste because filling a particular
position is left until the need is urgent can be costly.
5. Don’t leave the bulk of the hiring up to inexperienced managers and then fail to
give them adequate training or tools.
Step #1. Identify what you are looking for by completing a job analysis and/or
reviewing a recently updated position description.
Step #5. Prepare the interview panel members before interviewing candidates.
Step #6. When the interview process is concluded, review all of the information
gathered in a fair and objective way.
Task - describe the task that the situation required or ideas for resolving the problem.
Care should be taken by the candidate to describe the situation or task in detail so that the
interviewer can analyze the skills properly. The candidate can refer to an event from
his/her previous job, from a volunteer experience, or any other relevant event.
Action - describe the action taken, obstacles overcome. Here the candidate should talk of
what was done by him/her and not what the team has done or what was supposed to be
done.
Results - highlight outcomes achieved that is, what happened? How did the event end?
What was accomplished? What was the learning?
The candidate needs to answer all 4 elements, to get full marks for the question. Action is
the most important because it describes what he/she did, what steps he/she took etc.
Merits of BEI
The benefits of undertaking a behavioural style interview include:
Removing the impact of misunderstandings about past experiences as the
candidate can describe in detail the situation and their performance.
Reducing the impact of personal impressions and therefore allowing the candidate
to highlight good performance regardless of their projected image.
Reducing the chance of the candidate faking the interview as they are required to
provide real-life examples of what they have done, not what they would do.
Allowing the panel to hear information about the candidate’s performance and not
just theory from a textbook.
The interviews provide an in-depth perspective of the job’s challenges and the
competencies needed to master them.
When average and low performers are interviewed as well as high performers,
BEIs clearly discriminate between the competencies required for top performance and
the baseline competencies needed for acceptable performance.
BEIs are an excellent method for identifying the interpersonal and management
competencies that are often difficult to define.
The very specific descriptions of effective and ineffective behaviors produced in
BEIs can be used to develop behavioral examples for competency models or case
studies, role plays, or other simulations for training.
Demerits of BEI
• BEIs are time and labor intensive. Up to a full day can be required to conduct an
interview and then analyze the data.
• A highly trained and skilled interviewer is essential to obtain accurate
information. The interviewer must have strong analytical ability and experience in
competency identification to accurately infer the competencies.
• BEIs are not practical for analyzing a series of jobs because of the time, expense,
and expertise required for administration and data analysis.
• BEIs focus solely on current and past behaviors, which may be different from
those needed in the future.
• Because BEIs focus on critical incidents, the competencies needed for the more
routine aspects of work may be missed.
• The data collected may not be widely accepted by stakeholders because it is
provided by a small number of interviewees.