You are on page 1of 5

Objectives

CHAPTER 4
 What is business ethics?
– Examples of ethical dilemmas
 What are some of the approaches of dealing
Business Ethics and with ethics?
Ethical Decision – Utilitarianism
Making – Universalism
– Rights
 Why should companies be concerned with
ethics?
 Which theories should be used?

What is business ethics? Some Surveys

 Ethics – study of what is good and evil, right  International Survey of more than 300
and wrong, and just and unjust companies worldwide – top ethical issues
 Business ethics - study of what is good and – Employee conflict of interest 91%,
evil, right and wrong, and just and unjust in – Inappropriate gifts 91%,
business – Sexual Harassment 91%,
– Principles and standards that guide behavior – Unauthorized Payments 85%
 Discussions of business ethics frequently  Wall Street J survey of 1400 working women
emphasize unclear situations – Managers lying, expense-account abuses, office
 However, applying clear guidelines resolves nepotism, taking credit for other’s work
the majority of them

Surveys - Incidence of unethical behaviors


in areas (from a Wall Street Journal survey): Common examples

– Government: 66% – Finance 33%  Individual values and the company


– Sales 51% – Medicine 21% – Receiving or offering kickbacks
– Law 40% – Banking 18% – Stealing from the company
– Media 38% – Manufacturing – Padding expense accounts to obtain
reimbursements for questionable business
14% expenses
– Divulging confidential information or trade secrets
– Using company property and materials for
personal use
– Conflict of interest

1
Individual Rights and the Company Business Operations

 Firing an employee for whistle-blowing  Financial and cash management procedures


 Employee screening and privacy  Conflicts between codes and practices
 Sexual Harassment  Practices in foreign countries
 Affirmative action  Payments to foreign officials
 Employee rights  Workplace safety
 Employment at will  Environmental issues etc
 Corporate due process

Determinants of Business Ethics Language of Ethical Lapse

 Individual factors  Everybody else does it


 Organizational factors/relationships – Not a valid choice – specially if law is being broken
– Organizational culture  If we don’t do it, someone else will
– Ethical climate  That’s the way it has always been done
 Opportunity/environment  We’ll wait until the lawyers tell us it’s wrong
– What encourages or discourages unethical – What’s legal may not be ethical
behavior?
 It doesn’t really hurt anyone
 The system is unfair

Individual determinants Other determinants

 Religion  Moral philosophy


– Many religions converge in the area of ethics – Kohlberg’s stages of development
– Belief that the divine reveals the nature of right and  Cultural differences
wrong in all areas of life
 Ethical philosophies
– Ex: Reciprocity, promise keeping, fairness, charity
and responsibility to others – all found in Buddhism,
Confucianism, Hinduism, Islam and Christianity
 Bible is source of ethics for Christian managers

2
Common approaches to Business
Ethics Utilitarianism

 Utilitarianism – basic premise is that an action  Moral worth of an action is determined solely
is judged as right or wrong depending on the by its consequences
consequences of the action
 What makes an action right or wrong is the
 Universalism – the means justify the ends of an good or evil that is produced by the act
action, not the consequences
 Rights – based on entitlements and  Action is right if it produces the best possible
unquestionable claims balance of good consequences over bad
consequences for all parties affected
 It involves the consideration of alternatives and
how they affect all parties concerned

Essential Features Utilitarianism

 Utilitarianism is committed to the maximization  Involves the following steps


of the good and minimization of harm and evil – 1. Determining the alternative actions that are
available in any specific decision situation
 Society ought to produce the greatest balance – 2. Estimating the costs and benefits that a given
of positive value or minimum balance of action would produce for parties affected by the
negative value for all affected action
– Ex: Cost and benefit analysis – 2. Choosing the alternative that produces the
greatest sum of utility or least amount of disutility
– Risk assessment
– Management by objectives
 Efficiency is key

Problems with Utilitarianism Major issues with utilitarianism

 Not always possible to calculate utility or to analyze  Action that produces the greatest balance of
massive amounts of information – consider the case of
oil rigs in Alaska
value for the greatest number of people
– What about the minority?
 Ignores distribution of good – is it uniformly distributed
or favors specific groups? – Ex: What if society decides that it is in the best
interest of the public to deny health insurance to
 No common definition of what is ‘good’?
those testing positive for AIDS?
 Assumes that all can be measured in a common
numerical scale

3
Shadow Pricing- Assigning value to non-
economic goods Kantian Ethics

 What is the value of a limb? Of a hand? Of a  Consequences are regarded as morally


life? Of Peace and Quietness? irrelevant
– Analysts use the shadow pricing technique
 What matters is respect for the human
– They compare prices of houses near airports,
highways to less noisy neighborhoods – and they being
can infer the value people place on peace  People must NOT be treated exclusively
– To estimate the value of a hand, consider the
amount of extra pay that is needed to get workers to
as a means to an end
accept risky jobs
– Middle-income Americans value their lives between
$3million to $5million

How does it work? Application of Kantian Ethics

 For an action to be moral,  Universality – it counters the natural temptation


– 1. It has to be universal – something that is moral to make exceptions for ourselves or to apply
for one person has to be moral for everyone, for ex: double standards
dishonesty cannot be justified as a valid moral
principle  Also provides hypothetical answers underlying
– 2. Respect for rational beings – people should be the common question “What if everyone did
treated with dignity; and not as means to ends that?”
– 3. Autonomy – action has to respect people’s
freedom to choose; people are to treat each other  Provides a strong foundation for rights
fairly and equally

Weaknesses Scenario

 Does not lend itself to precise method for  You are the CEO of a company contemplating
decision making closing a plant in a city in Ohio. Your options
 Difficult to think of all humanity each time a are
decision has to be made – Close the plant and relocate/fire employees
– Keep the plant and continue operations
 Places greater emphasis on the welfare of
every person, but does not really draw a line  Questions
– Using utilitarianism, discuss how you reach a
 Hard to resolve conflicts when criteria has to decision and which decision?
treat everyone equally – decisions typically – Using Kantian ethics, discuss rationale and which
involve conflicts of interests decision makes sense?
– What are some problems with either approach?

4
Why be concerned with ethics? The cost of unethical business practices?

 Laws are insufficient and do not cover all  Consider Food Lion and labor violations or E.F.
aspects or gray areas of a problem Hutton and its fraudulent activities or Enron or
 Free-market and regulated-market WorldCom or Martha Stewart
mechanisms do not effectively inform owners  In all cases, companies had to pay fines or are
and managers about how to respond to suffering bad publicity
complex crises  But do unethical behaviors hurt organizations
financially?

The nature of ethical decisions –


Baucus & Baucus (2000) Complex and Difficult

 Singled out 67 companies out of the Fortune 500 that  Managers confront facts and values when
had at least one illegal act – ex: antitrust, product making decisions
liabilities, discrimination  Good and evil are not always clear-cut – ex:
 Performance of the convicted firms were compared to genetic products
unconvicted firms (five year after the fraud was
committed)  Knowledge of consequences are limited
 Convicted firms experienced significantly lower return  Existence of multiple constituencies – conflicts
on sales (three year lag) of interest
 Multiple convictions are more disastrous  Multiple constituencies can also use ethical
 Unethical activities can affect long term performance arguments to justify their position

Conclusion

 Nature of ethical problems


– Ethical standards change over time
– Human reasoning is imperfect
– Ethical standards and principles are not always
adequate to resolve conflicts
 Which theory should be used?
– Each approach has strengths and weaknesses
– Need to look at situation and apply best
analysis/judgment

You might also like