Professional Documents
Culture Documents
International Financial
Management
Є60.1
XR $/Є $ 98
Forward 1.6 3
Є61.3
XR $/Є $ 100
Adverse movement
of exchange rate
Reimbursement
+ +
Rate of Rate of
contract contract
0 0
1,500 1,600 1,700 Rate 1,500 1,600 1,700 Rate
- -
Loss of
additional
windfall profit
Future Contract Pricing
Formula for forward rate calculation:
1Y Euro
1Y USD
A company needs funds make borrow expensive in or cheaper in USD but face XR risk.
It can : sale USD for by 1.4 for tomorrow (spot) and
purchase USD for by 1.39 for 1 year (forward)
Option
• Option – the right to choose, to buy (call option) or
to sell (put option) in any moment between two
given dates.
• For this right to buy/sell, the buyer/seller will
pay the other party called the writer a fee
(premium) which will be forfeited if the option is
not exercised before the day of maturity.
Back-to-back loan
• Such loan involve two companies in
different countries funding the other
parties’ operations.
Inc.
Inc.
Currency Basket
Currency Basket
RUR UAH
SMALL COFFEE BREAKE
What Risks Should be Hedged?
If firms should only concern themselves with risks that
have real economic costs associated with them, upon
which of our measures of exposure should we focus?
1. Translation exposure
Across-the-board changes in the balance sheet will
generally have little effect on the ongoing operations of the
firm. Cash flows are ignored and balance sheet entries are
measured in terms of book values.
The only possibility here is the tax gain/loss asymmetry. If
the firm operates in a high inflationary environment, it may
find the translation adjustment reported to the income
statement taxed more when positive than credited when
negative.
What Risks Should be Hedged?
Likewise, a firm may find changes in foreign borrowing
subject to asymmetric treatment of capital gains/losses.
But this is really part of a larger point.
In general, if firms need to worry about the balance sheet,
it will be due to an anticipated sale or discontinuation of
the firm’s operations or due to changes in the firm’s
capital structure - when firm value is no longer in NPV of
cash flows.
If this is the case, the appropriate measure of exposure will
generally be net worth exposure - with assets and
liabilities recorded at market values.
Any balance sheet exposure hedging activities must focus
on net worth exposure and be justified from this
standpoint.
What Risks Should be Hedged?
2. Transaction exposure
Transaction exposure is similarly limited as it focuses
solely on known, contractual cash flows.
Nonetheless, because these cash flows are almost always
denominated in pre-determined nominal amounts, hedging
them will perfectly insulate the firm against exchange rate
changes - nominal or real. Since the cash flows do not
change with inflation, they move entirely with nominal
rates.
Also, because transaction exposure focuses only known,
contractual amounts and as such will generally only
include cash flows of short horizon, financial instruments
for hedging them will be easily available and quite
inexpensive.
What Risks Should be Hedged?
3. Economic Exposure
Economic exposure is ultimately what the firm should be
concerned with. For ultimately investors are concerned
with the value and riskiness of the firm itself.
Indeed, even transaction exposures should be evaluated in
terms of whether they are associated with an underlying
economic exposure.
When considering hedging a know outflow or cost, the
firm needs to evaluate the revenue side operations; and
when considering a known inflow or revenue, the firm
needs to evaluate the cost side.
For whenever the currency movement affects revenues
and costs equally, only the profit margin is truly exposed.
What Risks Should be Hedged?
For treating economic exposure, financial hedges have
two main shortcomings:
1. Horizon. Outside of swaps, most financial hedges
become quite expensive over longer horizons. While
swaps can provide an inexpensive way to construct a
series of long-dated forward contracts, they require
accurate assessment of future cash flows.
For hedging future cash flows are uncertain, long-
horizoned futures contracts are unavailable, and the costs
of long-horizoned options will be prohibitively large.
What Risks Should be Hedged?
2. Real vs. Nominal. Financial hedges can only hedge
nominal amounts. If there are real changes in home
currency costs and revenues, nominal hedges may be
quite ineffective.
As we have seen, real and nominal exchange rates
coincide reasonably well in developed countries, but the
correspondence is usually weak for emerging economies.
Economic Exposure in the Long Run
Recall that economic exposure is only concerned with
changes in the market value of the firm that result from
real exchange rate changes.
Hence, if RPPP holds in the long run, changes in the real
exchange rate should balance out in the long run.
This is what we saw with most of the developing countries
that saw large short-term swings in the real exchange rate.
Thus, long-term hedging activity may not be entirely
needed or productive.
Where then is the value in hedging economic exposure?
Economic Exposure in the Long Run
Recall that most of our arguments for hedging activities
focus on the short-run:
1. Ensuring that the firm (or manager) gets to the long run.
2. Minimizing systematic shareholder risks.
3. Achieving short-run tax, monitoring, and investment
efficiencies.
Hence, a shorter-horizon perspective which focuses on the
economic exposure of highly-known nominal cash flows
may be reasonable after all.
In other words, only exposures which pose a material
threat to the value of the firm’s periodic cash flows should
be hedged.
What else can be done?
In addition to financial hedges, a number of operational
activities exist which can be used to efficiently reduce the
risks posed by exchange rate movements.
Whereas financial hedges effectively eliminate the
exposure of certain cash flows by creating an offsetting
position, other activities exist which can mitigate the
overall level of cash flow exposures themselves.
Essentially these activities fall into two categories:
1. Marketing management.
2. Production management.
Marketing Management
Marketing management focuses on increasing sales in
countries in which the real exchange rate has appreciated
and restructuring sales in countries where the real
exchange rate has declined. Marketing management has
three main dimensions:
1. Promotional strategy. If the marginal cost of promoting
a product does not rise as much as the marginal benefit in
response to an appreciation, it will make sense to shift
promotional resources from undervalued currencies
towards overvalued currencies.
Marketing Management
2. Product design and development.
Although new products will generally be introduced based
on long-run competitive merits calculated at the long run
real exchange rate, the optimal time to introduce new
products may be when the exchange rate is high.
When revenues are relatively high in home currency terms,
it may be easier to justify high market entry costs -
particularly if these costs are partially determined in the
home currency.
Effectively, having a new product to introduce to a market
is like owning a long-dated call option. When the currency
becomes sufficiently appreciated, the option should be
exercised - the product should be introduced.
Marketing Management
3. Pricing strategy. If firms have some flexibility to adjust
prices and ‘pass-through’ the exchange rate effects, they
may want to take advantage of this in responding to
exchange rate changes.
Specifically, firms selling in overvalued currencies will
want to lower the local currency price to capture larger
market share, while those operating in undervalued
currencies will raise prices to maintain profit margins.
Certainly firms in more competitive industries face less
flexibility in terms of their pricing schedules.
Production Management
Just as marketing activities focus on firms that are
overvalued, production activities will focus on countries
where currencies are undervalued.
Certainly a firm will face less flexibility on the production
side than on the sales side. Nonetheless, to the extent
possible, a firm has a number of potential production
responses to shifts in exchange rates:
1. Since the costs of labor-intensive production activities
are most likely to fluctuate with real exchange rate
changes, they should be shifted from overvalued to
undervalued currencies.
In this way, having a flexibility with respect to production
sourcing acts as a portfolio of currency options which
benefit from exchange rate variability.
Production Management
2. Similarly, input components can be sourced from
countries with depreciated exchange rates at the expense
of countries with high exchange rates.
This activity is essentially enforcing the law of one price
for traded goods, and as such, opportunities may be
limited.
3. While expansions of capacity, introductions of new
technology, and other efforts to improve productivity
should be based on long-run comparative advantage and
real exchange rates, again, the optimal time to introduce
such changes may be when the currency is depreciated.
The investment can be easily justified since its costs are
likely to be lower and the facility is already realizing a
comparative advantage and operating at high volume.
Production Management
Similar to new product introduction, opportunities to
expand capacity or introduce new production
technologies behave as a put option on the currency.
The option should be exercised when the currency is
depreciated and costs are low.
Generally, production management will require a high
degree of flexibility from the outset. Since this flexibility
will generally take the form of excess capacity, it must
come at some cost.
Nonetheless, the option-like nature of this flexibility adds
value to the firm from both risk management and profit
maximization standpoints.
Foreign Exchange Risk Management
In managing foreign exchange risk several points are
worth keeping in mind:
1. Focus attention on risks which have a material impact
on the expected value and systematic risk of the firm
to shareholders.
2. Measure exposures and risks accurately:
- recognize any potentially offsetting effects in costs,
revenues, quantities, or pass-through.
- take into account offsetting movements in
exposures to other currencies.
- apply appropriate measures of risk: RPPP for
exposures not linked to interest rates and UIP for
those that are interest sensitive (i.e. cash deposits).
Foreign Exchange Risk Management
3. Use risk management to control risks in the short-run,
while relying on firm, manager, and exchange rate
fundamentals to dominate in the long-run.
4. Don’t ignore opportunities to manage exchange rate
risks from the operational side.
5. Recognize that risk management often creates more
risk than it eliminates - no firm (or municipality) ever
went bankrupt solely due to insufficient risk
management, plenty have gone bankrupt as a result of
too much.
6. Keep in mind that investment banks make more
money when you worry about FX risk than when you
don’t.