Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Urban
Mobility as
a general
problem
area
Session 02 - Initial Thoughts on Creating a Design Brief for Urban Informatics Projects
1- Identifying a general problem area
Socio-
Spatial Financial Temporal
economical
limitations limitations limitations
limitations
What about
social
interaction?
Session 02 - Initial Thoughts on Creating a Design Brief for Urban Informatics Projects
1- Identifying a general problem area
Optimization of use of existing infrastructures of mobility, focusing on lifestyle choices and consumption of space
Session 02 - Initial Thoughts on Creating a Design Brief for Urban Informatics Projects
1- Identifying a general problem area
Session 02 - Initial Thoughts on Creating a Design Brief for Urban Informatics Projects
2- Narrowing down to a problem set
-socially un-cool -congested and uncomfortable -un-reliable and un-certain - inflexible both in terms of time
• -Socio-economic image of • -out-of-vehicle wait in extreme • -unknown wait time and space
owning a car weather conditions • -un-reliable wait schedule • - public transport commuters
• -Dear fellow rider, I need some need to seek to a multi-modal trip
personal space! plan
• -Multi-modal transport systems
require a fixed infrastructure of
distributed hubs where change of
mode of transportation is
accommodated
• -fleet scarcity and wait times
Session 02 - Initial Thoughts on Creating a Design Brief for Urban Informatics Projects
2- Narrowing down to a problem set
-Single-driver, private, vehicle mobility choice vs. public transport
-Solution: A ubiquitous, multi-modal public transport, offering a quality rider’s experience
Session 02 - Initial Thoughts on Creating a Design Brief for Urban Informatics Projects
3. Identifying Relevant Urban Information Relevant Urban Information
-Problem :Single-driver, private, vehicle mobility choice vs. public transport
-Solution :A ubiquitous, multi-modal public transport, offering a quality rider’s experience -weather condition
-traffic/congestion
-number of riders
-crowd spotting
-number of waiting riders
-number of riding riders
-Sensor networks
• -Infrastructural sensor networks
-Semantic web •• -Wireless
-Wireless sensor
sensor networks
networks
information searching • -centralized
-centralized vs.
vs. peer-to-peer
peer-to-peer sensor
sensor networks
networks
virtual bots •• -self-reporting
-self-reporting vs. request-based sensor
vs. request-based sensor
networks
networks
•• -power
-power considerations
considerations
•• -information transmission bandwidth and
-Surveillance network coverage
coverage considerations
considerations
Session 02 - Initial Thoughts on Creating a Design Brief for Urban Informatics Projects
5. Characteristics of the Dataset
-Problem :Single-driver, private, vehicle mobility choice vs. public transport
-Solution :A ubiquitous, multi-modal public transport, offering a quality rider’s experience
Session 02 - Initial Thoughts on Creating a Design Brief for Urban Informatics Projects
6. Risks of Sharing Data
-Problem :Single-driver, private, vehicle mobility choice vs. public transport
-Solution :A ubiquitous, multi-modal public transport, offering a quality rider’s experience
• -filtering data
• - anonymizing data
• -aggregation data
• - privacy issues
• -safety and security issues
• - improper use
• -crowd-mentality issues (what if everybody has access to the same
information? Would they act in a way that negates the initial purpose of
making the dynamics transparent?
• -big brother effect
• -information overload effect
Session 02 - Initial Thoughts on Creating a Design Brief for Urban Informatics Projects
7. Information flow and its architecture
-Problem :Single-driver, private, vehicle mobility choice vs. public transport
-Solution :A ubiquitous, multi-modal public transport, offering a quality rider’s experience
information:
delivery of
Modes of
Platforms for
delivery of
Delivered?
information
should be
how the Data
Identifying • -public domain vs.
• -Public screens, embedded screens
passport protected
• -hand-held devices
• -access levels
• -free vs. paid-per-view
vs. subscription
• -contribution in return for
access – point systems
• -push vs. pull services
Session 02 - Initial Thoughts on Creating a Design Brief for Urban Informatics Projects
8. Technology and its shortcomings
-Problem :Single-driver, private, vehicle mobility choice vs. public transport
-Solution :A ubiquitous, multi-modal public transport, offering a quality rider’s experience
How to deal with technology short comings
Technology
• -always ofon-line
transmission-bridging
storage-bridging time distance
• -off-line
• -memory
-one to one services
ofvs.
pastone to many vs. many to many vs. many to one
• -combinatory
• -anticipation
-infrastructure approach
of future
• -low-rez
• -pattern
• -wired vs. high-rez solutions
recognition
• -hard
• •-always
-wireless real-time vs. soft memory,
storing in running real-time archiving,
solutions a combinatory approach
• - Information
• -selective storage, low-resolution storage, failures
-effective range bottle-necks and system limited storage, no-storage
• -server
-bandwidthfarms: the physical reality of the virtual dimension
• -coverage
Available technologies for sensing and actuatin, display and user participation
Session 02 - Initial Thoughts on Creating a Design Brief for Urban Informatics Projects
9. How to use the data
-Problem :Single-driver, private, vehicle mobility choice vs. public transport
-Solution :A ubiquitous, multi-modal public transport, offering a quality rider’s experience
Session 02 - Initial Thoughts on Creating a Design Brief for Urban Informatics Projects
9. Implementation action plan
-Problem :Single-driver, private, vehicle mobility choice vs. public transport
-Solution :A ubiquitous, multi-modal public transport, offering a quality rider’s experience
Prototypical implementation
Session 02 - Initial Thoughts on Creating a Design Brief for Urban Informatics Projects