Recruitment • Retention • Advancement  

Special
thanks to our
Investment
Partners:

Revolutionizing the Face of Technology ©

ology

Improving
h n
e c S
ICE
ma t ion T
&I nfor T
C
Nat
A
iona
en
PR Wom R
l Ce
OM
nter
for W
er fo
r P
ING
Enc
IS ome ent
our
IN n&
o nal C S MI
Wh age Info
N at i
G rma
Any y enc Per
IT

the academic
PRO
tion
PR
nto
ou
one
rag sist

NCWIT Extension Services consults with

Tec
i LIST
enco who
e
enc AC hno
s
u h
in eff rageme as parti pers
“Kee rt and t. Resea ipated i istenc
o n c
e logy
i r l UICK
TI
dG NG Q
p go pers rch i n sp e ?
an
or
CE I
RUIT
type i is n
of co ng !” W tence th sports m ts or ph

men REC
a po heth ysica
ED
mm at re
S
w u e edic
setti erful to nicatio r it wo sult fro ine has m l trainin
GET
Wo
rk
n o n
link gs, care l in an o motiva s throu freque easured knows
m g
,TA R
g ence
e e th
ITION
t g n t
scien d with m r encour verall eff es peopl h posit t exhor he subst e positi
n Audi
f
c a a o
mem e set hi nageria gement rt to br to work e reinfo tions li ntial im e effects
e i v ta a v

r i
uit & Information MPE
T sidera ment
tion o ience
et aud ders
c
g l
as th bers hel her stan advanc promot ng gend at a task cement e, “Gre roveme of
i r k p o n
National Centerefor Women C OTechnology i r e s c o l l a r g
R
e ps r d e e s e h o a t n
H q u e n r T a
ion le
m r
ing re
t
MUC
i a
ng or
a w b r j s
orts
incr r male etain r ds fo ent. I ome alan r der a instr o b !” a
e r n
ente ase thro classma women themse academ ’s trainin to com d longer ctions, t d
n ce n u n
. O L ecruit your staffi ing your eff to Opin cers

climate for all CS

OF S PSR TIA r
P R O M I SE FIAN
CE G SENA C T I C E S
red t ugh tes. lves puti , so i h is ENC u t
age
i ic se g an W o
n
d with focus s n
gic ab ivitie

undergraduate departments on:

O
Influe
he fi e In u t t d n t OR
Mess
h
eld a ncourag additi ndergra an men tings, w develo g. In wo can be DS URAG
How s a re eme o d
nt, b n to ret uate co do, enc ere wom ment, w kforce
h p r CO ING y IS E g strate t are aligne ework for es what act
g NT i n sector
IN TH U
t sult E n C U N cRhnLo lo at b e th a ram efi n
ITME
o en o e e m o u e h c O
ow th g decisions sets up a f strateg y d
n
target oices
Ever c p n TE
nETNe
f enc a r ic o
(bel uragem N
t
oura use wom ion, wo uter sci agemen in com h is FoID
mot one kn cour
S
y
ti
TICE
m a k n t e o f
a gem en a men ence t fro pute
per Info
i e r e n O R rs
s. The
s i s ts
REC
W
cruite makin ateg y e web ch
f
intere
ivati ows ge e ’s m r t CE
pical
a in o
omenmo&reform a nt e’s abilityeases self-
nt fr r incr
o h om a e more l particip t the sa faculty
oura nal sen ow to e pers
nal re including itment str r campaign
“enc

PRAC
gem
ent l iments. courage stenc
t n i teac ik
her, ely than ion coru fo
at me
rratW
Collaborative Learning Environments and e ss i o ta c t ics, lik oping an d s , goals, dom of ty advertising
amil Cemn ente d ev f s , r u o . c e
e s a e
Pro t
ed rec vents t el Ne is
specifi
l in
G emen
i s ffi
ortan
t
s, dev ing w
f belie kely t
ationaly member, toor say theeyn
e l k). o su
• etter
cc cacy Truth
•
Focu
Exp s on wh
s” re Tips p others.
com
men ovided t involv N
r I
ISI N v o
enco e we c engage ecause essfully
B
Pair Programming s e v eral el early defin ndividual e are unimp b e yond ng partner h alleng
M u l i ities s goin
g C
PRO
a
findi
w
• r
Avo ess genu t has be
a d th
e fol online s expres
e f r iend usef ageme r n in task e Ac nd
goals. nning beyo what activ
perf
icular
are
mean ting goals,
ent
. u n o s
com l in male t may rm suc that we
a part nce
• id lowi f s
i
Offe strong ne appr n or cou
e ng : rom W ing pos n
elopm
r i t p u -s c e d p la a n d g p l a s e t e r e
• i s n
ee Dev
r yo l e l t i ting t b sfull n i o . h
ur h anguag ciation d be ac eExp ve, s o v e re e a n te o cru it ty, t ia l s Is t O y
eliver
Wri o
iversi ring mater ach? get group? cking
u er- ,w y,
centraan instructoratrequires
ress TM pp typ es

undergraduates
confi confiden hich is ed field pecially ic restudents
t e e tha com
setb ten enc lp
loy for ortive,
plish A collaborative learning environment occurs anytime n g u n re
or Emp
t cou
c o e loc a l e t to r f D a
a str it tcan
w m tr
one ta
ack. oura d c s v
It is g l d be d e d , and ri ting enco nce. I e e and a rked s uch
RING? to work together on learning activities. Collaborative learninggenvironments a involve d deli u wan
IS n for
od o dia
ring f is o piFor
part ement as
pin direct ng an do yo more than velop a pla Meth le me
Unm isco
instr rageme this c women’s y men’s IS MENTO
keep u n b
urag e loinclude vassessment. p
Mento
enco entione icul
arly is part ing your
A T both formal and informal activities and may or may D e v
not t o r a e l o h o
COLLABORATION u lt i
d deofv students ble goal. W ?CHEATING?
n o
um, m
t u nH n en e
there
o t n so
and d
c
sitiv IN A persist rs incr from s xt, wo W der- Natio
u d mot i c n to te u ced per
enco rageme , but fu
elopm small
ivati ularly e po
urag nt
shou ndamen
onal n
after eeded T ORINeG Enc ence b ease w uper vi rds of nal C hen an
experien advocate example, pairs of students work on programming assignments;
and devlecture; n p an, an work together
groups
lstudents t i fi a m a ny Is ent a plan p le who Medi t situation

• recruiting highly-qualified undergraduates to increase

eme E N ente w i o a n e o ac
P
M o y s er , discuss possible answers to a professor’s question during t and w
nd qu where p Cont er
o rs
plem
o h o
evalua is distinct from
l t u d u y
with rstand the
a r m ac
a IS
n d a ft rare an
giers aisin en’s torisngandoccr a ll
nselor, te
s
ee ? HInier an
l
RO
t ma r D ring usu
ucce
imeducational system that
y be be per to thes eO pr
TING? protégé (mreenatecte)ice vatnncegmpenertsi g their sM r
Add ca
i e re WHATssG fuO l com disS T entr
en for W
sted cou tégé. Mento text of a outside of class to learn new concepts. Collaborative learning fi c aprojects o y t o i p s
the f tional fe i
apE l
ing er
sona u c h
part y tr e p s s e v
MIS er Deli
FORCpletio o ec E p a
s a
ome sp em earewards d t
p rtn kely to un significan Build ps
icul l. c o o inttsmfor both so ce ad h s
at rorved tence selfrv e a n d pro con individual work, astudent
ate aeach isturesponsible nt or for, itonly ill be collaboration is often
orm arly It ne mmenR experienurcensce -e es
caciny experienced l level in the
a
of p tures of ed WO datK is a ffi ntrast tostudents “divide and conquer.” When students divide the work,
e
f a taennefit t.oPr rotégés osfexm
p equ
n e e
1
effec iognshas positiveneff ie . im & Inf r d w i s h
raise It ires . a co C b l l i e t &
ING y of s foralworking
er an v
Spot
effec n considered
inclu t
de : ive enco
tive. n o t b rin is t
Mento rs also b sk. rganizat toizatrio
ion p e ntorcultura i s tityo n , no to
add apm
si p on a p er so
over tim
e, in
odelingpart .
orma
of the problem solving and there are very limited opportunities n minthrough
d Esta re more ers ha s mig
h g
agin ationshi
t to qualit aree aengaged ips.
e p s. M
e n, acing , liptyica penlse evelops ensional role m go i in intellectual teach ng teacher isting
Lever
rioivn haen
urag
organizat datwe ;orkh-f
comily conflicts. O
am muni employee socical ontesfacsttiriocnt , collbeguia ting
t th lly an hitiotinoalnship that d , such t ion T
problems with others. In collaborative environments, students cheating. o n shComputing h a
osyllabi around
n d
Rel tacts
PRA
d im rt v t i w a
Gen
eme e- p o a i
nt th ce o w
at arand redu y, recruitevinerg, , pan tiniegnce personO
cd
a ti x
alpsa t of the ad
poaurtse of a m ose
e nvac nuta g ese re
ragfoe r is no meenm
e lere la
t oSrepremo
te an d o n
affective
su p
ion in with each other. echn you h ogress. and the rela worldnchave e andstatements t fam like,
ily “weinform
raging touch.
ex
ts, con
Be
o der B mbine instruct otalk ology t s d i e h a o r v e or

and faculty
r t g e ff
CTI
and sincere
e rel ductivit ex upber B ec u d men reath t t co it h s p o r a u s ni n L e
your ng
l e t. e u i ay w n l
o tMnenEtoffrienctgiv nsygmG et
n s ” hild.
ng eff our targencourage ow
rs n
rsona
i n s m r, ti
ro e
p vant on. Men to c cem en c uron pro it gra m torinore, t t o
ias i
ea ac
shcollaborative ailearning, Existi
Inc be spe
and rete o erk
nt ti n
and care
er enhan ostnocomom agem ies Furtherm g re
ing eaperfo ior n
patehetic sks. It includes , and
anddeta existi ilearning earch rmust es. Tinr individual
icturn ver y c portant pe
info lude des cific. o cinougr, agemis one of the m It e IT rma ork forc ene.t foork
r for lations haes m offaer r n Pe
B i resources A long tradition of research shows that well-managedagcollaborative
CES e t h y but
, r e s“students c h o i th e e l i e v e

3
w w l jo r a g r le e
Leve interact w or examp work.” w they b
et w av m in
ac s n protégé. care students
ir
n a
rform n im
rma c c h r u
eract btogether
eh

enrollment
r d s, it ent i ation in th req t coom u e ie bound s to
ionstaelpbs a ncehin q
actio tion a iptive offer ip.pro ac apgp,rais n toith
an
ng offer uire rpsan et
ring a
ctioal syste he Perf ic andWhen to int s work hat do essages can
p oftfeess
n evaonsoilrilu ngst,rco environments lead to improved student outcomes, including:
mentori women’s partinci csu100 bes
sition
n or bou s o of da

2
p
are p roduct the
t agazinte’ ltivatin nly
d
ily uring t g Th
in
as sp luated lore an
ated pinrote
ance o l re a d y e d s . F a d e m in g c a n . W
n g m ch d F m era m r a e c r y e e o
iti to homework dienc
e
t n t d asolutions mple,
si n ren’s a
n su ig s
als ? M
ea u l tohadesign
raisi
ng. ou
y cr
in F alf of Fo
rt h s.r
prograEm ough p outstan in
g a co inas te he
thme ip t.raction fopcrovidstintgwo st
e la exposu wer tha ure 1. f
Stey havceusseonv per ance A
o
App nce’s uthor their individual our au current go es. For exa tor y pp
us h
audie ce on child the buck”problems, &O
ocan
n ore th entoring s m n
eps ad rogrammens . usuall ps ro ppra
raisa
om ositi onship 1 ttéhgroés, offerforma e however,
lems
ncou t y
of p thAe m e ic a had m r la vtie co ding dpben tm efietsnt . us on u n i s t r u s o u t
l er a re d p p g c e al increased n r or may strongly ab ir sir uc
Prob
e g g o h h ip3s,a improved
influedevelopment ang fo iendshipswork
w
e theof
n
l
m utcom g r it im
n tori emeonftth toerisn ess tm
ng de g an introd male
msts an erforced to actual
ch heenmtoain toring relationsh ere essentia rovement Proces
e fo
in hmeen rs w
whic rin archresemble
Pro rm ents p
is ees merunex
co pearlfomen
com vide h th ance ov en been whealt istiw ovim ew icpateri ienmance de Form . yBmoat
s r e “ b r es e h a t arthat x is t i urces
s, reso ewpoints
ft c r e t r e
critical o n of fe
o h p a
ike f
s m th l
info
mak rmation e
p a rativ h a s con
troV
e p
oluernfte orer
h
s er av e
es themthis ploeye
a re h r who hexav
tes
hey
e n e n eev
n
presergtyiath
o
l toatr bei n.ng a v e lopm
co mpeonnt optivcit
a
ts . Th
en n e. W devel
to
o f othpesm en u r p seshievin
e iofanctforoac o
g b e cause
in
n d retention,
help r
g e t mof socialipand s l their
b a s e do
collaborators. n o w ? W aling to p l a n nin a g e g o s t
g iv p ie s o m f ts e d
ionsh e amsyou know e is t i n C i
advan
m e t t u
mput sing v
an
e appwhetherr vaine
r h h
uld b So c how
e l l , rath experrie e n ce m p b lod en s e tent f orma ts or acport e nintsty ru ct o p
cie pro thinking eespecially c et
torinrge.spE othinet,time ean icallreysultrssfocranparutilt ra
eme
ce of forhe likeliho
do absen grdo
relatprofessional
e
iesd, soalupat i pro tions whil ol at UC-I ng to take tion on co hasizes
t c
the it clear o is er
the ng in co ubts a ion (confideven nce ar uesnitan
nt sho adem Oppo ceptions es
n
he o t ovTh e w ciatthed a with men onese lsourc g ms ess an
elong
e ereaso e get f ng pro
ri er imatelyg , aff d Perf women advancing
r she asrso hich n
at clear o d of
com perform how overebstetim instr mpu bou epnroc vid f e d ev their m toew p o n t e i
p scon g pressur they can b
c e an a
pare anc h as notoring b ef o re w e a n
ire.depa en wo make ctoour/tcsuomesngen
u ti
. Aert al
t ly t h e perf in
edoonuetc
m w
es ,
e
’s aobil io. nTh r e en
eEreffseuctiv opptioorntuto anedcify in
less ud ect orma er forma g e n
nce c der bias. eTh ge c
skills r ac student nce learned or
S cho cheated? put
The o rm emp r to i

through
cont m sp n s s a s o s c o e s o m n f a t M

• implementing single practices or comprehensive reform for

perf s with o e en u odrmes ir . from the c introductory e r i c f c i t h e
iteria M ey in care m cien acareful lude
q e Ap
n
ions o w sage mb etin ther
r re a it
at lt n it s r
come answer
o ld r mene posititvehe per criter future ia nc iz y to p with at caten s esto, an eful
ieiv appreciation
wou
g Srequires thought
l.
acce ture. duce d thee-roerg waan
ill inasc raft a mes , but reme Comp about whe
orm
ance ther mentor dilectiovnisor nede, rfo )surinugndeorbmjein prais IT plic t that
ct and clu
al Prof diversity aebvoiduetnce, wdiveethlye fiovveer Com putinthealbehaviors
th ’s perfan r im
p pro A p rshen se al orm lly dpclaonnnecdt mrm lly. prove to second course
s.
whmes fatilintog respignnfailuunred isew istenwffitehroeuntcea formF acanre
cefu ea and re lemenetsfu e about a p t e n t count C p
ww ro g ra
In th ult La ar e . an io d p lf - e o cess t
p me nd gi c
rse co the
n s .
etting r target gr
o u ,&
Belie f s
iming n
p r y w ce ay e g, n u ffi E o
pre-em rmantiaorne a e onacademic
s, ea A ben on e dederan , w to im ce
biolo dishonesty.
case c sta
ine mFmunicatinfficient resourchesich negativ perceptioens atocy
w. n
In some to men atrienxg.s a shinavcee suscc fa il stangdre ndips. E perfo blish
sive sworking
thto lationash e cou ntIn
cwi ee
t.or Le
attribute yeesem
d
hloo wporueld
re en mcen ittoatriesn ing anng , mentorinvegn with co aocptinog su elyfainil du of rm
goals ance Mea f o r s Th en f y o u h e ars a e, T
Fram Repetitio
g•
Nat cia J. w sses ce fa ed c d d in v el r s s I n
thePro ming c o u y .
g individuals - i
y rarely complete s o n e
biolo her biolog nd interest
p il o ro m e n ly fl u world,
omeo
e w - d r
ion B plo e tho
agyineeg’sar a renlafitidoennsh
urasgcan gopart elf
urecan lose se chanisms reasonably
a commo ullyenticeme expe and e or tra
tage
Time
al C arker favor em oreredcam s
ms most ns; usua imes s ake advan ht
ip ing imp
idm est in aassignments
ck
devreogrva
gés ctatio
M r ommehnuman b ce isu s. Prro estépon b,e betrayed or for th
ndgrape costs of operatio verely under- beha ortant t a The challenge aking
ent in isolation.
er f and J. mentor. eteonther ds h iliety bad re n lt t D e n gsopuro ns Base p e
n t e r n d o a l s r e t
o ion m mes
viors
or W Mc th at ti heavp t o s mensto h e rs ns e
;ucce tudentiz/ations canStsu VALUA
ca Effer M en crtoe ari
tion eod high rform on are se In computer ositive science, collaborative
a ccomp learning an
lishm d environments
ju dgm
ents can improve
lopm
s’l
entta
n
feed eretention
i andealth for faculty t heisg to find ways to assess . The m t on it. T o m ig i s
om
en rath C
G same way s occasonio.nally r sa p at f a n ti p tu d h a t h o d e c
e r osta g ed
anpdroductivitpy ecaneotaypes c IO
T unN ti ci s u c h fa ci li tac e ay s a e o b
s femalewand
a c hi n call y ss ac ew e g, e ti
e acro hey are to ia of thos encers, lik
er b e an lw
ultipl ence
b a
rs it male
isten gése. dOrgan e n
annin
s k
& In
f o r m o h o ore lationsh
ip
r careers rogramfault lintoe ringpisprnaoistaal s student mmitmlearning. ent Pair programming is shown ntsto improve tab s
expe liretention of both ecifiindividual
cté a s for p ough men
he
a t i o n ,teaem have thei y dependent pro enfeg c e, r f ct a n co st s are d career yco s t ctatio d c a r e e e d sp e t . outcomes, whilessleveraging
e a g c a l p l M
o r i
atl iiv stru o r m le h e m le -
aim onsbenefits of collaboration. m yt e d flu Typi flu

retention and advancement

n s a
g the more likel rget the m for the in
tates fully co
whics.h ance. Th esadtimtoateudn. Alt sually enhance evaw luatioundergraduates. , thmer Students who pair in their introductory programming classes gain more
erm in
u verl s are ns
n es
Te c t hd oea r sl with o
havhe ntoo l o g mentoring rela it is important
tionship to care rofiblem perfo ey are d, eit u in g om enn, dem
in
m
e re
o ainre stil Use ontent
c r o m thethe t tin n g -t
p rr a u d confidence e programming
l than do their non-paired peers, are more likely to complete l f
and g e the a o
but t cognition r y v. l
al n ce t cl u d c a
for s e ruthfu
ti in in o s
en y • c ons, es pote n ll the rman experrig t iege g en,
d bdy womwomaesnIT Defi ts in cl tivaatsio ondit basis th
Experts ofrecommend is, revisiting to,course
too ; wh EM
e way and r
nt ent

research-based
ionlikely
ble it entand
o ese reas minimiz ce is a rean
h you
mis . Ben n, and
tioclass, n, anare s t to persist in IT majors. Aside from o t
inistr buend

Check out the

. For thp y r h at avoids or funvo lunntarysing infor fo mr bm igenuouds fielsditsusu ch ’s Opasssfac
Pcaerrefoer satiTIVfAwToImen
the d demore
mora hat can pu
admproject-based courses,
o ndesign v aassessment ion explicitly re t e
reduced programi gth e : ctio atio n h a n e l ie tt a n d t w i m in
ore b concretely
d a e
t 20 ar m ON other educational t ntives the e Im
pays a discussing
s li ti
u me
an
le hav
g
torin with ing ca a n)inoat e ( so ste cemenint r mthereo are many zationinterventions t wome based in collaborativeeclearning, d v e suchoasrepeer
mentori
ng 06
ul men ut on th e mstatch
in dtio
om undonerfidenancece am ision
Use m e, and the m
reoty
r ince
p
ich yo you. Peop iddle
van bers .1
successf p perfrso foerreth oteiyrpe acities rathpid ca r inreer whad iccehdwacadpem es ic self-c ppemais
e ltfuytu reand
m teaching lthe
can non-lecture based “conversational
n on
classroom.”
a slow
s and i ence e
nts for h aving in men r s at ar han o f fain cu aex e a u d n s id w h
g d cowill be interpreted as nment in ract with ample, m ble
d ie és to m a b o ty d -s d r r
messa media youbehaviors
g re g a o m o ri r e t
t in
Importan n; mentors an sors not acting ip ; mpenartotic
d pro té as is n isg
rs traicne in
ut ge ell as en e inc ene maj
th and mix e perf m
rman otivate an DE rack.
nthat
ula ipa; ttributed wnddeisrcirpolilenses ownhger rueent sex m•enIntoadrieng moay d S Mhave ORA Three
o. A and they encourage faculty
atio super vi lationsh latiornlyshlikely cipants
qpuCollaborative
ti ce thr environments L m ajor managed h e , t o
cheating, enviro s inte For ex e persuada
particip
, the toce member ge group.
t in
o ( m e- ar
a learning o te to I Zbe carefully planned and t by
ed ia te of th e re in th e re n when lu ck . D . eB o s o
th g sa • I o
ood ive, althnsensit rtab u g h te f eeled.ba ug h : re o types A TION o f m
the to amake s and
process;
imm ination roblems • Latinmentoring ca w e m)en ct instructors. c For example, research gashows that cwhen there is too large a gap in collaborators’ n c e r .” t i o n mor n source. ption
ht be
p ar v e ivfo k m a e assignments ameaningful a
nflualso beof the ye
rm o n
situ ur audien anges by
te an d le e m a lue eff • co m e f e le
es; ea sy
employe es advice on ho expectations ab •rePal
w to h out w h rathtiemrates of ento furinncgt ar atioen n toring m Loesres c e e d ba s) or
subco ad tlearningo the disappear. Tasks must i c t i g ti o perce asons for

• creating and maintaining gender-balanced enrollment

c es th m en io h a llexperience c k or knowledge, the fo
benefitsr of collaborative er t a t m m a irls’
infor
o on to explain yothe value up, bu
ti
ven ch
is
s a m e w c students g
a cand of the re
itions n n x • ng n o
“teach
e-sein: Chan omen a on
ud
that incl ation of reasonab ing of mentors •Team
le and staff p
find sam n g ing assignfor true collaboration to occur. , inclu scious crea nscious ( p how by : Dat
thatstudents h is gi rm in a gro person and h on
no o
uit situat rmally held sitions congr elin“shareable” to mo ment ding : tion o ower dwhat u nce learn
ewill ccompleting olog y y : Researc
ic
commun ; proactive recr n. a u r s f m in i n fl y e a c hn
riorit re tocampuses
io e o
confo a credible
io b b n e • b ll e
organ iz at o ut n sw y m ser vic t roles g
(e.g. s nder
e F ewer stacles in ce, wi Most ion t olo g
lish
accomp enefits from the • Jobs individual ith ambig ales • Low e) • Less educationresou Keep udienthem. the puniversity ormat
to inf formation
techn
gies.h
tml
comp rces include s and centers u de by
taffartm
pressthat
db in wh contr uity Most capstone t of
dcourses in computing alloca project learning. However, student
costs an er r ep anen et a haveieresource will awork irls in strate

practices
ibu
targ tit rong ould be m
d ich dura, D t in
ifficult tions addskeue; Teerrwi aAr.collaboration tent and ed • e o ol g iting_

practice sheets on
e idenwithhfaculty and
perf Busin
mana to gauge ormance is ilwau p)
dScs an
(“sligh should be introduced
n
early,
ess coften, s in both
ondu taff assigne
graded and un-graded situations
lti p l t fe el stto s
integrate
t h collaborative id d le sch s.) Women m l/ recru
gerial (such more
as hig n, University of Wis
co ns in •
-M S lower tly
prom to give undergraduates
less” greater o t welc and to
• Iexperience
c tedavoid
whereearly mu is kids mi
d socialization that computing g ontac ing m (Ed om/ h t
jobs) solatio ome ecruit spray witts.c
ess Adm
inistrhatleio v
el otaiocareer
ns in which people workinalone. nPair
– prprogramming
w omereverse)
(see n has been shownsctohobeol
r c o n text.inC ways that deter academic
learning
( 2 0 06). R J. and W. A :/ / www.i t 200
6
TION
Train s, School of
in
B us in
ssey-Bas
s. effective for realizing increased
f orma
retention,
o vided
tion application le to the major, and learning outcomes, an o the dishonesty. e s
.
ton, T h Cohoon
,
g ie s: http
o r s p y righ
A ag g
in b . Jo • E ss in W
K. & n McGrat . r ate t h c o

• evaluating initiatives and communicating results

R oth t x nt St n, au
M
gy •
R e ui de treme
ORE IN ns from: Bellesetting s
FO R os G
ization’s
killsture: ThheeOrargtan oxas, uitme
6
andh tis2a0 0frequently practiced(“gmethod lyin the workforce. While implementing collaborative
FOR M lass cli difficult a hoo echnolo
rs I 6
atio i.
e public versity of Miamspecto ricng Cul so that
ers an a u th o o p y r ig vin-D ic group. ss, 115-13 nces Recr o
Multipl ifi d rate o h o o n , h n o lo g y • c environments is complex, •the benefits ff ”to students, ss ig faculty, and industry appear to be worth S : Gar h C T
ni en a e C ) E ., h e t
ation
U M nd m x e D n
IT Pr ie
URC , E. S ograp nd Sc cGra
th
easura pectataionnd J .sM
ent, g
atin Raa cacnG ra ec oing ment
Managem ry. 2005. Cre ters a ti o nT T
acha
thing benefitcfia b , teim r s cane n &heI lp reduc r a i n R a
n fotor m the cost. gende well, but d
s
RESO L. J., Snow mixed dem ge, MA : M chnolog y, a J. M & I nform
Lois J. Z
s, rate L e rom J . B alerk o m be cla e t r in islike r , a id e n d
e -
rliW g e c rk e m b r s , T a n
rker
fo mited rified a ender rs a • o n d Ba s fro Cam rade ome
r Force
rs l Ctreanin
te
d to fi gruence becau
of r a n d J. M c G rat h Co h o o n , a u t h o r sexperience sentation. omen in T
behav
io • N a stihoonuald be ing in how , and relev t the begin bias in per n d R a t ght fo Le c i a J. B aser ke J. Ba er for W
stcewpsit .o rgrs (rather
.n taugh to a ant to ning o forma ees r r -rep re fo r W e c i a t
w t t t c n ig r e L n
w w w. n c w i t . o rg • N a t i hotns a l Ce n te r fo r Wo m e n & I n fo r m a t i o n Te c h n o l o guynd• ec o py r i sgtit
al Ce
w o h c k f c h ut t2 0 0 6
In ad achieving an vag ue to focus fe rue and ev ey aspects the rating e appraisa
w
nal In ation

our carousel
dit t im ed a o c lp
self-a ion to tra hem, and t pressions) back on r luate perfo f the work ycle. To be rocesses. B Natio • N
w in o ; ele rm at effect rg
assign areness and ing in goa help forge and preser vant beha ance dat hand. ive, go oth raters wit.o
ment l v
s and the ability setting , ra overall dev e self-effic iors and o , as well as
v a als mu
st b
and r
atees w w w. n c
the re t t e a u e chall ne
sourc o manage ees should lopment s cy. They sh tcomes (ra feedback-g engin ed strong

Funded by NSF
es to c e tr o t iv g , but go
arr y t xpectation be taught ategies. Fin uld also b her than th ing and c attain al-
hem o s. to e o able,
ut eff They could increase ally, rater t taught to e person); aching skil
ective also b the rain ide dea ls.
ly. enefit ir effective ing should ntif y more l with spe Among o
from n cific, ther
negot ess by fee cover beh effective b o
iation dback aviors ehavio bser vable
www trainin - se to r s and
.ncw
it.or g in o eking skills avoid. the
rder t
g • N
atio o gain aimed at
nal Kath better impro
Cen develo vin
ter f ryn M.
or W Bar
pmen g
om tol tal
en & , au
Info tho
rma r
tion
Te c h
n olog
y • c
opy righ
t 20
06