sentences in a language • Descriptive rules, not necessarily prescriptive • Each rule “rewrites” a constituent into one or more constituents A Simple Set of Phrase Structure Rules S NP +VP NP art + (adj*) + N VP V + NP + (PP*) PP Prep + NP N sailor, cat, horse, bridge, V saluted, kissed, fried adj drunken, puzzled, gregarious art a, the prep on, under From this simple set of rules we can generate many, many sentences, including: A cat saluted a horse. A cat saluted a horse on the bridge. A gregarious horse fried the cat. The drunken sailor saluted the puzzled cat. The puzzled, gregarious sailor on a horse saluted the drunken cat on the bridge. Phrase Structure Tree: Derivation of a Sentence S
NP VP
art adj N V NP
The drunken sailor saluted art adj N
the puzzled cat
Sentences with ambiguous meanings have different phrase structure trees S
NP VP adj N aux V adj
Visiting relatives can be boring
S NP VP Ger N aux V adj
Visiting relatives can be boring
Transformational Rules • Rules that transform deep structure into surface structure • Apply to constituents not to individual words • Involve movement, insertion, and deletion of constituents • Conditions of occurrence: Transformations will not apply under all conditions Some Transformations • Particle-movement – “John called up the woman.” – “John called the woman up.” • T1” V + part + NP V + NP + part – John called up the interesting woman up. – John called the interesting woman up. – John called up the woman with the curly hair. – John called the woman with the curly hair up. – *John called the woman up with the curly hair. Other Transformations • Passive: – Arlene played the tuba. – The Tuba was played by Arlene. – T2 NP1 + V + NP2 NP2 + be +V + –en by + NP1 • Wh- Question: Why is Arlene playing the tuba? • Negation: Arlene is not playing the tuba? • Compound: Arlene is playing the tuba and the drums. Derivational Theory of Complexity • If transformational grammar is how language is actually done, then – Untransformed sentences > transformed sentences – Simpler transformations > complex transformations – Should see this both in acquisition and in adult processing of sentences – But there are many exceptions to this prediction – Compound Sentences • “The zoo has llamas and gnus” is derived from “The zoo has llamas and the zoo has gnus.” Whence Transformational Grammar? • Revolutionary approach to the study of language, though the specifics have not stood up well. Revised approaches include • Parameter Setting (Chomsky, 1981, 1986, 1995) – All possible linguistic variations are hard-wired, the parameters that are set depend on exposure to language. • Lexical-Functional Grammars (Bresnan, 1982, Pinker, 1984, 1990) – Grammar is actually in the lexicon, e.g. an entry for a verb entails its argument structure and restrictions as well as meaning.