Professional Documents
Culture Documents
R ATIO A NALYSIS
Ratio Ratio
Analysis Analysis
Ratio
Analysis
ALLAH
THE MOST GRACIOUS & THE MOST MERCIFUL
DECLARTION
E C L A R T I O N
I declare that this project report entitled “Ratio Analysis” is original and
bonafide work of my own in the partial fulfillment of the requirements for the
Khyber.Pakhton.Khwa.
The data that has been collected by me is truly authentic and contains true and
complete information.
(Romana Nargus )
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
C K N O W L E D G E M E N T
Romana Nargus
b r i e f c o n t e n t s
BRIEF CONTENTS
Introduction
Chapter-1
Ratio Analysis 2
Types of Ratio Analysis 2
Tools Of Analysis 2
Objectives of Analysis 3
Liquidity Ratio Chapter-
2
Net working Capital Ratio 2
Current Ratio
3
Quick (Acid Test )Ratio 3
Activity Ratio
Chapter-3
Leverage Ratio
Chapter-4
Debt Ratio 2
Debt Equity Ratio 3
Time Interest Earned 4
Profitability Ratio
Chapter-5
Gross Profit Margin 2
Profit Margin 3
Return On Total Assets
3
Return On Common Equity
4
Market Value
Chapter-6
Earning Per Share 2
Price/Earning Ratio 3
Book Value Per Share 2
Dividend Per Yield 3
Dividend Pay Out 3
Text Reference
Web Reference
INTRODUCTION
N T R O D U C T I O N
• Ratio Analysis
• Types or Ratio Analysis
• Cross Section Analysis
• Time Series Analysis
• Combine Analysis
• Tools of Analysis
• Objectives of Ratios Analysis
Romana Nargus MBA (Banking & Finance), 2009-2011 GU .D.I.Khan
RATIO ANALYSIS
Ratio analysis involves methods of calculating and interpreting financial ratio to analyze and
monitor the firm performances. The basic inputs to ratio analysis are the firm’s balance sheet
and income statement.
Time-Series Analysis
Evaluation of the firm s financial performance over time using financial ratio analysis
means comparison to current to past performance using ratios enables analyst to
access the firm progress.
Combined Analysis
A combined view makes it possible to access the trend in the behavior of the ratio in
the relation to the industry.
TOOLS OF ANALYSIS
1. Comparative Statement.
2. Absolute Increase/Decrease in % ages.
3. Trend Percentages.
4. Common Size Percentages.
5. Ratio Analysis.
1. COMPARATIVE STATEMENT
In this statement two or more than two years data is presented for comparison.
2. ABSOLUTE INCREASE/DECREASE
It is a type of Horizontal analysis. It gives changes in absolute data intern of Rupees amount.
It enables the analyst to point out the direction of business.
3. TREND PERCENTAGE
Page | 2
Romana Nargus MBA (Banking & Finance), 2009-2011 GU .D.I.Khan
This is the second type of horizontal analysis. It is adopted to know the tendencies of
business position. In it one year is chosen as base year and item of financial statement of base
year related with other years relevant items.
5. RATIO ANALYSIS
Ratio is mathematical relationship of one item to other items. For analysis these ratios are
compared with other year’s relevant ratios or with the ratios of other companies of the same
nature are industrial averages. Ratios are really adopted to know the liquidity, stability and
profitability position of the company.
Page | 3
Romana Nargus MBA (Banking & Finance), 2009-2011 GU .D.I.Khan
BALANCE SHEETS
OF THE HALF YEARS ENDED
(2008 – 2010)
Assets (Rupee in Thousands) Year 2008 Year 2009 Year 2010
Current Assets
Page | 4
Romana Nargus MBA (Banking & Finance), 2009-2011 GU .D.I.Khan
INCOME STATEMENTS
OF THE HALF YEARS ENDED
(2008 – 2010)
Page | 5
LIQUIDITY R ATIO
I U I D I T Y A T I O
• Liquidity Ratio
• Net Working Capital Ratio
• Current Ratio
• Quick (Acid Test) Ratio
Romana Nargus MBA (Banking & Finance), 2009-2011 GU .D.I.Khan
LIQUIDITY RATIOS
Liquidity ratios measure of the amount of funds a company can quickly use to settle its debts.
30000000
25000000
20000000
Percentage 15000000
10000000
5000000
0
2008 2009 2010
Years
Interpretation
The analysis shows that Net Working Capital Ratio has increased in 2010 to 26408512 but it has
decreased in 2009 to 9768022, and in 2008 to 8501696.
pg. 2
Romana Nargus MBA (Banking & Finance), 2009-2011 GU .D.I.Khan
Current Ratio
It measures the firm’s ability to meet its short term obligation. The current ratio is the ratio of
current assets to current liabilities: It is expressed as follows.
2
1.5
Percentage 1
0.5
0
2008 2009 2010
Years
Interpretation
The analysis shows that Current Ratio has increased in 2010 to 1.182, but it has decreased to
1.605 in 2009, and in 2008 to 1.065.
Quick(Acid-Test) Ratio
It measures ability to meet short-term cash needs more rigorously by eliminating inventory.
pg. 3
Romana Nargus MBA (Banking & Finance), 2009-2011 GU .D.I.Khan
1.2
1
0.8
Percentage 0.6
0.4
0.2
0
2008 2009 2010
Years
Interpretation
Analysis shows that Quick (Acid-Test) Ratio has decreased to 0.090 in 2008 as compared to
2010 which is 0.914. It again strengthened in 2009 to 0.969.
pg. 4
C T I V I T Y A T I O
ACTIVITY R ATIO
In this section topics are:
• Activity Ratio
• Account Receivables Turnover
• Average Collection Period
• Inventory Turnover
• Average Age of Inventory
• Total Assets Turnover
Romana Nargus MBA (Banking & Finance), 2009-2011 GU .D.I.Khan
ACTIVITY RATIO
Activity ratios measure how quickly a firm converts non-cash assets to cash assets.
It gives the number of times accounts receivables is collected during the year.
0.5
0.4
0.3
Times
0.2
0.1
0
2008 2009 2010
Years
Pg. 2
Romana Nargus MBA (Banking & Finance), 2009-2011 GU .D.I.Khan
Interpretation
Analysis shows that Account Receivable Turnover Ratio has decreased to 0.010 in 2008
as compared to 2009 which is 0.164. It again strengthened in 2010 to 0.435.
It measures the average amount of the time that needed to collect accounts receivables.
40000
35000
30000
25000
D ays 20000
15000
10000
5000
0
2008 2009 2010
Years
Interpretation
Analysis shows that Average Collection Period has decreased to 839.0 in 2010 as
compared to 2009 which is 2225.6. It again strengthened in 2008 to 35500.
Inventory Turnover
Pg. 3
Romana Nargus MBA (Banking & Finance), 2009-2011 GU .D.I.Khan
0.6
0.5
0.4
D ays 0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2008 2009 2010
Years
Interpretation
Analysis shows that Inventory Turnover has decreased to 0.033 times in 2008 as
compared to 2010 which is 0.054 times. It again strengthened in 2009 to 0.468 times.
Formula = ______365_______
Inventory Turnover
Pg. 4
Romana Nargus MBA (Banking & Finance), 2009-2011 GU .D.I.Khan
0.033 times
12000
10000
8000
D ays 6000
4000
2000
0
2008 2009 2010
Years
Interpretation
Analysis shows that Average Age Inventory has decreased to 751 days in 2009 as
compared to 2010 which is 6759 days. It again strengthened in 2008 to 11060 days.
It indicates the efficiency with which the firm uses it assets to generate sales.
Pg. 5
Romana Nargus MBA (Banking & Finance), 2009-2011 GU .D.I.Khan
0.1
0.08
0.06
Percentage
0.04
0.02
0
2008 2009 2010
Years
Interpretation
Analysis shows that Total Assets Turnover has decreased to 0.060 in 2008 as compared
to 2009 which is 0.075. It again strengthened in 2010 to 0.083.
Pg. 6
Romana Nargus MBA (Banking & Finance), 2009-2011 GU .D.I.Khan
0.1
0.08
0.06
Times
0.04
0.02
0
2008 2009 2010
Years
Interpretation
Analysis shows that Current Assets Turnover Ratio has decreased to 0.063 in 2008 times
as compared to 2009 which is 0.079 times. It again strengthened in 2010 to 0.088 times.
Pg. 7
Romana Nargus MBA (Banking & Finance), 2009-2011 GU .D.I.Khan
0.1
0.08
0.06
Times
0.04
0.02
0
2008 2009 2010
Years
Interpretation
Analysis shows that Fixed Assets Turnover has decreased to 0.006 times in 2000 as
compared to 2009 which is 0.075 times. It again strengthened in 2010 to 0.083 times.
Pg. 8
Romana Nargus MBA (Banking & Finance), 2009-2011 GU .D.I.Khan
E V E A R G A T I O
LEVEARG R ATIO
In this section topics are:
• Leverage/Debt Ratio
• Debt Ratio
• Debt Equity Ratio
• Time Interest Earned
Romana Nargus MBA (Banking & Finance), 2009-2011 GU .D.I.Khan
Leverage/ Capital Structure/ Debt ratios measure the firm's ability to repay long-term debt.
Debt Ratio.
Debt/Equity Ratio.
Time Interest Earned.
Debit Ratio
It measures the proportion of the total assets financed by the firm’s credit.
0.942
0.94
0.938
0.936
Percentage 0.934
0.932
0.93
0.928
2008 2009 2010
Year
Interpretation
Analysis shows that Debt Ratio has decreased to 0.932 in 2010 as compared to 2009 which is
0.933. It again strengthened in 2008 to 0.940.
Pg | 2
Romana Nargus MBA (Banking & Finance), 2009-2011 GU .D.I.Khan
It significant measure of solvency since a high degree of debt in the capital structure may
make it difficult for the company to meet interested charges and principles payments at
maturity.
11053230
2008 = 130672708 = 15.21%
8587430
16
14
12
10
Percentage 8
6
4
2
0
2008 2009 2010
Year
Interpretation
Analysis shows that Debt Equity Ratio has decreased to 11.82 in 2010 as compared to 2009
which is 13.44. It strengthened in 2010 to 15.21.
Interest (Expenses)
Pg | 3
Romana Nargus MBA (Banking & Finance), 2009-2011 GU .D.I.Khan
35677
2008 = 2859081 = 0.886 times
21234
7
6
5
4
Times 3
2
1
0
2008 2009 2010
Years
Interpretation
Analysis shows that Time Interest Earned /Interest Coverage Ratio have decreased to 0.155
in 2007 as compared to 2006 which is 0.184. It again strengthened in 2008 to 2.28 while
dropped to 0.20 in 2009.
Pg | 4
R O F I T A L I T Y A T I O
PROFITABLITY R ATIO
In this section topics are:
• Profitability Ratio
• Gross Profit Margin
• Profit Margin
• Return on Total Assets
• Return on Common Equity
Pg | 1
PROFITABILTY RATIO
Profitability ratios measure the firm's use of its assets and control of its expenses to generate
an acceptable rate of return.
It expresses the relationship of gross profit to net sales and is expressed in terms of
percentage. This ratio is a tool that indicates the degree to which selling price of goods per
unit may decline without resulting in losses.
0 .5
0 .4
0 .3
P er cen ta g e
0 .2
0 .1
0
2008 2009 2010
Y ea r s
Pg | 2
Interpretation
Analysis shows that Cash Ratio has decreased to 0.155 in 2007 as compared to 2006 which is
0.184. It again strengthened in 2008 to 2.28 while dropped to 0.20 in 2009.
This ratio establishes a relationship between cost of goods sold plus other operating expenses
and net sales. This ratio is calculated mainly to ascertain the operational efficiency of the
management in their business operations.
0.9
0.85
Percentage 0.8
0.75
0.7
2008 2009 2010
Years
Interpretation
Analysis shows that Operating profit Margin has decreased to 0.782 in 2008 as compared to
2009 which is 0.814. It again strengthened in 2010 to 0.890.
Pg | 3
It measures the overall effectiveness of management in generating profits with its available
assets also at ROI.
0.0142
0.014
0.0138
0.0136
Percentage 0.0134
0.0132
0.013
0.0128
0.0126
0.0124
2008 2009 2010
Years
Interpretation
Analysis shows that Return on Total Assets has increased to 0.014 in 2010. While it again
decreased in 2009 to 0.013% while dropped to 0.013% in 2008.
It measures the return earned on the common stock holder’s investment in the firms.
Pg | 4
2004333
2008 = 2021996 = 1.008%
2004333
1.2
1
0.8
Percentage 0.6
0.4
0.2
0
2008 2009 2010
Years
Interpretation
Analysis shows that Return on Total Equity has decreased to 0.891% in 2010 as compared to
2008 which is 1.008%. It again strengthened in 2009 to 1.112%.
It measures ability to meet short-term cash needs more rigorously by eliminating inventory.
Pg | 5
1.2
1
0.8
Percentage 0.6
0.4
0.2
0
2008 2009 2010
Years
Interpretation
Analysis shows that ART Ratio …..has decreased to 0.155 in 2007 as compared to 2006
which is 0.184. It again strengthened in 2008 to 2.28 while dropped to 0.20 in 2009.
Pg | 6
A R K E T A L U E
M ARKET VALUE
In this section topics are:
• Market Value
• Earning Per Share
• Price/Earnings Ratio
• Book Value Per Share
• Dividend Per Yield
• Dividend Pay Out
pg. 7
MARKET VALUE
Market ratios measure investor response to owning a company's stock and also the cost of
issuing stock. it relates a firm market value as erasure by its current share pries to certain
accounting value.
It measures ability to meet short-term cash needs more rigorously by eliminating inventory.
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
percentage 0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
2008 2009 2010
year
Interpretation
Analysis shows that Cash Ratio has decreased to 0.891% in 2010 as compared to 2009 which
is 1.112%. It again strengthened in 2008 to 1.341%.
pg. 8
Pries /Earning Ratio
It relates earnings per common share to the market price at which the stock trades, expressing
the “multiple” that the stock market places on a firm’s earnings.
120
100
80
Percentage 60
40
20
0
2008 2009 2010
Year s
Interpretation
Analysis shows that Price Earning Ratio has decreased to 0.155 in 2007 as compared to 2006
which is 0.184. It again strengthened in 2008 to 2.28 while dropped to 0.20 in 2009.
Dividend Yield
pg. 9
5573149
2009 = 2694106 = 69.06%
3901279
2008 = 1638357 = 54.13%
3026550
10000000
9500000
9000000
Percentage
8500000
8000000
7500000
2008 2009 2010
Years
Interpretation
Analysis shows that Dividend Yield has decreased to 54.13% in 2008 as compared to 2010
which is 60.47%. It again strengthened in 2009 to 69.06%.
Dividend Payout
It determined by the formula cash dividends per share divided by earnings per share.
pg. 10
10 0 00 000
95 00 0 00
90 00 0 00
Percentage
85 00 0 00
80 00 0 00
75 00 0 00
2 00 8 2 00 9 2 0 10
Years
Interpretation
Analysis shows that Dividend Payout has decreased to 54.13% in 2008 as compared to 2010
which is 60.47%. It again strengthened in 2009 to 69.06%.
Text References
∗ Managerial Finance by JAE K. SHIM, JOEL g. SIEGEL.
∗ Principle of Managerial Finance 11th Edition by Lawrence J.Gitman.
∗ Askari Bank Quarterly Report March of (2010) of ACBL.
Web References
www.google.com
www.docstoc.com
www.scribd.com/shanza malik
pg. 11