Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Supreme Court Scorecard: 2010 v. 2009, Part II

    Uploaded by

    Richard Binder
    125 views1 page
    2009 vs. 2010 - Lawyers and Cases No. Of Lawyers Arguing No. Of Cases Argued 193 Total Arguments 193 No. Of Law Firms with arguments 69 % of lawyers in private practice 54% Term Term 2010 - Advocates with Multiple Cases Lawyers with more than one argument No. Of arguments Average # of arguments 2. % of all Supreme Court arguments 46% Private Firms with Multiple Arguments 9 No. By those firms 18 % of Supreme Court argument

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    2009 vs. 2010 - Lawyers and Cases No. Of Lawyers Arguing No. Of Cases Argued 193 Total Arguments 193 No. Of Law Firms with arguments 69 % of lawyers in private practice 54% Term Term 2010 - Advocates with Multiple Cases Lawyers with more than one argument No. Of arguments Average # of arguments 2. % of all Supreme Court arguments 46% Private Firms with Multiple Arguments 9 No. By those firms 18 % of Supreme Court argument

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    125 views1 page

    Supreme Court Scorecard: 2010 v. 2009, Part II

    Uploaded by

    Richard Binder
    2009 vs. 2010 - Lawyers and Cases No. Of Lawyers Arguing No. Of Cases Argued 193 Total Arguments 193 No. Of Law Firms with arguments 69 % of lawyers in private practice 54% Term Term 2010 - Advocates with Multiple Cases Lawyers with more than one argument No. Of arguments Average # of arguments 2. % of all Supreme Court arguments 46% Private Firms with Multiple Arguments 9 No. By those firms 18 % of Supreme Court argument

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    2009 vs.

    2010 - Lawyers and Cases


    No. of Lawyers Arguing No. of Cases Argued
    82

    Total Arguments
    193

    No. of Law Firms with arguments


    69

    % of lawyers in private practice


    54%

    2009 2010

    Term

    136

    Term

    139

    86

    195

    52

    49%

    2009 vs. 2010 - Advocates with Multiple Cases


    Lawyers with more than one argument No. of arguments Average # of arguments
    2.8

    % of all Supreme Court arguments


    46%

    Private Firms with Multiple Arguments


    9

    No. of arguments by those firms


    18

    % of all Supreme Court Arguments


    9%

    2009 2010

    Term

    31

    88

    Term

    31

    87

    2.8

    45%

    24

    12%

    Solicitor Generals Office Arguments


    2010 Arguments
    Neal Kumar Katyal Leondra R. Kruger Malcolm L. Stewart Anthony A. Yang Curtis E. Gannon Edwin S. Kneedler Eric D. Miller Matthew D. Roberts Nicole A. Saharsky Pratik A. Shah William M. Jay Joseph R. Palmore Melissa Arbus Sherry Benjamin J. Horwich Ginger D. Anders Jeffrey B. Wall Roy W. McLeese, III Sarah E. Harrington Michael R. Dreeben Ann OConnell Eric J. Feigin Acting Solicitor General Acting Deputy Solicitor General Deputy Solicitor General Assistant to Solicitor General Assistant to the Solicitor General Deputy Solicitor General Assistant to the Solicitor General Assistant to the Solicitor General Assistant to the Solicitor General Assistant to the Solicitor General Assistant to the Solicitor General Assistant to the Solicitor General Assistant to the Solicitor General Assistant to the Solicitor General Assistant to the Solicitor General Assistant to the Solicitor General Acting Deputy Solicitor General Assistant to the Solicitor General Deputy Solicitor General Assistant to the Solicitor General Assistant to the Solicitor General 6 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1

    2009 Arguments
    5 3 4 2 2 4 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 1 2 2 0 1 4 0 0

    You might also like