Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Presented by: Aleena Inayat Hassan Hanif Haseeb Abid Kiani M. Naeem Riaz
Presentation layout
Introduction of textile sector Introduction of companies
Ahmad
achieve & sustain good reputation in international market by manufacturing quality products. Management of timely deliveries & quality assurance. Ensure a consistent quality & timely deliveries & shipments, by carrying all the time cotton yarn stock of 90-180 days production
Premier Quality Company, Providing Quality Products and Maintaining an Excellent Level of Ethical and Professional Standards become a leading manufacturer of textile products in the International & local markets and to explore new era to Achieve the highest level of success
Mission statement
To
Products
Cotton
To transform the Company into a modern and dynamic yarn, cloth and processed cloth and finished product manufacturing Company that is fully equipped to play a meaningful role on sustainable basis in the economy of Pakistan To provide quality products to customers and explore new markets to promote/expand sales of the Company through good governance and foster a sound and dynamic team, so as to achieve optimum prices of products of the Company for sustainable and equitable growth and prosperity of the Company
Mission statement
Except for in 2009 where trade debts rose significantly as compared to increase in net sales the ratio has been fairly consistent. Days sales in receivables
35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Days sales in receivables
The ratio indicates a poor ability of the company to manage its receivable which improved only slightly after 2009.
days sales in receivable the ratio is significantly higher in 2009 due to an increase in trade debts.
The ratio has been consistent until it started rising after 2008 and in 2009 because of increase in inventory the ratio was the highest after which the sales improved and the ratio started improving. Days sales in inventory
120 100 80 60 Days sales in inventory 40 20 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Inventory turnover
2006 Inventory turnover 4.55 2007 4.59 2008 4.66 2009 3.78 2010 4.56
The ratio is fairly consistent except for in 2009 due to increase in the average inventory. Inventory turnover
5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Inventory turnover
The ratio increased in 2009 due to disproportionate increase in inventory as compared to net sales. Inventory turnover in days
120 100 80 60 Inventory turnover in days 40 20 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Operating cycle
2006 Operating cycle 100.95 2007 98.72 2008 98.4 2009 123.23 2010 103.98
The operating cycle increased in 2009 due to increase in inventory turnover in days. Operating cycle
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Operating cycle
Current ratio
2006 Current ratio 0.85 2007 0.82 2008 0.67 2009 0.76 2010 0.73
The firms current ratio is already indicating that its current liabilities are greater than current assets and to make matter worst the ratio is deteriorating from 2006 to 2010.
Acid-test ratio
2006 Acid-test ratio 0.16 2007 0.17 2008 0.14 2009 0.18 2010 0.16
Uses current assets to indicate the short term debt paying ability. In 2009 due to increase in trade debts the companys acid-test ratio increased.
Cash ratio
2006 Cash ratio 0.011 2007 0.026 2008 0.0075 2009 0.001 2010 0.00087
The fluctuations in the cash ratio are due to changes in the shortterm investments held for sale by the company.
Debt ratio
2006 Debt ratio 0.78 2007 0.80 2008 0.71 2009 0.74 2010 0.703
Debt ratio indicates the firms long-term debt paying ability. On average over 70% of the companys assets are financed by its creditors indicating a poor debt paying ability.
Debt/Equity ratio
2006 Debt/equity ratio 3.5 2007 4.02 2008 7.19 2009 8.49 2010 6.73
This ratio helps determine how well creditors are protected in case of insolvency. An increase in the ratio till 2009 indicates that the creditors are well protected.
The company was doing very poorly because of lower sales and higher administrative and other expenses but sales soared and the company gained profit to increase its net profit margin in 2010.
It indicates the activity of assets and the ability of the company to generate sales through the use of its assets. The drastic decrease in 2009 is a result of not enough sales for the company for the year and the company ending up in loss. Total asset turnover
1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total asset turnover
Return on Assets
2006 Return on assets -0.40% 2007 0.174% 2008 -3.02% 2009 -2.189% 2010 2.03%
Due to the fact the company reported losses in the year 2008 and 2009 the companys return on assets was negative. After 2009 its sales increased and so did the return on assets. Return on assets
3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Return on assets
This ratio includes only the income from the main line of operations of the business. The company was not doing well in 2008 because of lower sales and greater expenses.
The decrease in 2007 was due to increase in the operating assets but a decrease in operating income for the year.
It is an indicative of how much return you are receiving on your operating assets. It shows and increase towards an end due to increase in sales and subsequently the operating income.
Due to the fact that the company reported loss in 2008 and 2009 the return on total equity for the two year was negative after improving in 2010 when the companys operations improved.
Conforming to the industry standards because of changes in the process of textile products the gross profit margin increased after 2007. In 2007 the significant decrease was due to increase in cost of sales.
This reflects the companys report of loss in the year 2008 and 2009.
The ratio has increased from 2006 to 2009 after decreasing in 2010. This can be attributed to the increased number of sales on credit out of which a large portion could not be recovered.
The overall trend here is negative because the companys position in 2006 was fairly stronger after which it started deteriorating because the company increased its credit sales to boost the overall sales and thus the accounts receivable turnover decreased till 2009.
Similar to days sales in receivables this ratio is deteriorating till 2008 after which it reaches stability in 2009 before it starts improving. This can be attributed to a better credit policy on behalf of the company that increases sales as well as improves receivable collectability
Inventory turnover
2006 Inventory turnover 3.26 2007 4.25 2008 3.41 2009 3.73 2010 4.45
The overall trend for this ratio is positive with a minor setback in 2008 which was overcome. Overall the company performed close to the market leader.
The company has been showing positive trends suggesting a better and effective way of managing its inventory.
Operating cycle
2006 Operating cycle 135.31 2007 114.89 2008 149.17 2009 139.94 2010 114.36
Except for the time period between 2007 and 2008 the operating cycle of the company is becoming shorter and conforming with the industry standards.
Current ratio
2006 Current ratio 0.85 2007 0.93 2008 0.96 2009 1.02 2010 1.07
It is increasing from 2006 to 2010 indicating that the company is increasing its ability to pay its current liabilities using current assets.
Acid-test ratio
2006 Acid-test ratio 0.19 2007 0.29 2008 0.27 2009 0.35 2010 0.30
The company is able to effectively manage its receivables and increase its cash equivalents. However, there is a slight decrease in the year 2010.
Cash ratio
2006 Cash ratio 0.02 2007 0.04 2008 0.01 2009 0.02 2010 0.03
The ratio is the highest in 2007 and lowest in 2008 where the firms cash reserves depleted after it started improving its position thereafter.
Debt ratio
2006 Debt ratio 0.38 2007 0.72 2008 0.71 2009 0.66 2010 0.53
The ratio shows an increase in 2007 which was due to increased short term borrowings secured after which the company developed its assets compared to its liabilities and the position started getting better.
Debt/Equity ratio
2006 Debt/Equity 1.57 2007 2.88 2008 2.65 2009 2.09 2010 1.20
With the exception of 2007 the creditors of the company are fairly protected and the firms debt paying ability is strengthening.
The companys margin was decreasing till 2009 because of the increased finance costs after which in 2010 its sales soared and net income margin reached 9.02%.
The company has improved its ability to utilize its total asset to produce net income 2006 onwards with only a slight and insignificant decrease in 2008.
Return on Assets
2006 Return on assets 5.06% 2007 3.81% 2008 1.88% 2009 2.48% 2010 13.37%
Return on assets was deteriorating until 2008 after which it increased slightly in 2009 and significantly in 2010 due to increased number of sales.
The operating income margin is fairly stable but declining from 2006 to 2008 after which it started increasing.
The ratio has increased significantly from 2006 to 2010 indicating an increased ability of the company to utilizing its operating assets for its core line of business.
With the exception of 2008 where the net sales were comparatively lower the return on operating assets showed a positive trend.
It declined from 20% in 2006 to 7% in 2008 after which it increased slightly and then soared to 35% which was the highest of the three companies in consideration.
The gross profit margin decreased but not as significantly as it rose after 2008. The changes were due to increase in the prices of the textile products.
The most the earning per share the more attractive it becomes for the investor. As the company performed tremendously in 2010 the earnings per share also increased dramatically.
Earnings per share
160 140 120 100 80 Earnings per share 60 40 20 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Inventory turnover
2006 Inventory turnover 4.64 times 2007 4.69 times 2008 4.52 times 2009 4.73 times 2010 5.03 times
Inventory turnover
5.1 5 4.9 4.8 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Inventory turnover
Operating cycle
2006 Operating cycle 108.6 days 2007 105.27 days 2008 107.73 days 2009 103.09 days 2010 97.91 days
Operating cycle
110 108 106 104 102 100 98 96 94 92 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Operating cycle
Current ratio
2006 Current ratio 1.38 2007 1.74 2008 1.19 2009 0.86 2010 1.11
Current ratio
2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Current ratio
Acid-test ratio
2006 Acid-test ratio 1.35 2007 1.22 2008 0.76 2009 0.33 2010 0.42
Acid-test ratio
1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Acid-test ratio
Cash ratio
2006 Cash ratio 0.624 2007 1.07 2008 0.61 2009 0.16 2010 0.16
Cash ratio
1.2 1 0.8 0.6 Cash ratio 0.4 0.2 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Debt ratio
2006 Debt ratio 0.32 2007 0.24 2008 0.51 2009 0.39 2010 0.32
Debt ratio
0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 Debt ratio 0.2 0.1 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Debt/equity ratio
2006 Debt/equity ratio 0.48 2007 0.31 2008 0.51 2009 0.63 2010 0.47
Debt/equity ratio
0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Debt/equity ratio
Return on assets
2006 Return on assets 6.15% 2007 4.78% 2008 3.31% 2009 3.53% 2010 7.51%
Return on assets
8.00% 7.00% 6.00% 5.00% 4.00% 3.00% 2.00% 1.00% 0.00% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Return on assets
Days sales in receivables Nishat Days sales in receivables Ahmad Hassan Days sales in receivables Bhanero
2007
2008
2009
2010
2006
25
20 Accounts receivable turnover Nishat Accounts receivable turnover Ahmad Hassan Accounts receivable turnover Bhanero
15
10
2006
45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Accounts Receivable turnover in days Nishat Accounts Receivable turnover in days Ahmad Hassan Accounts Receivable turnover in days Bhanero
2006
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Days sales in inventory Nishat Days sales in inventory Ahmad Hassan Days sales in inventory Bhanero
2006
Inventory turnover
Inventory turnover
Inventory turnover Nishat Inventory turnover Ahmad Hassan Inventory turnover Bhanero
2006
Inventory turnover in days Nishat Inventory turnover in days Ahmad Hassan Inventory turnover in days Bhanero
2006
Operating cycle
Operating cycle
Operating cycle Nishat Operating cycle Ahmad Hassan Operating cycle Bhanero
2007
2008
2009
2010
2006
Current ratio
Current ratio
Current ratio Nishat Current ratio Ahmad Hassan Current ratio Bhanero
2007
2008
2009
2010
2006
Acid-test ratio
Acid-test ratio
Acid-test ratio Nishat Acid-test ratio Ahmad Hassan Acid-test ratio Bhanero
2007
2008
2009
2010
2006
Cash ratio
Cash ratio
1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Cash ratio Nishat Cash ratio Ahmad Hassan Cash ratio Bhanero
2006
Debt ratio
Debt ratio
0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Debt ratio Ahmad Hassan Debt ratio Bhanero Debt ratio Nishat
2006
debt/equity ratio
Debt/Equity ratio
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Debt/Equity ratio Ahmad Hassan Debt/Equity ratio Bhanero Debt/Equity ratio Nishat
2006
12.00% 10.00% 8.00% 6.00% 4.00% 2.00% 0.00% -2.00% -4.00% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Net income margin Nishat Net income margin Ahmad Hassan Net income margin Bhanero
2006
1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total Asset Turnover Nishat Total Asset Turnover Ahmad Hassan Total Asset Turnover Bhanero
2006
Return on assets
Return on Assets
16.00% 14.00% 12.00% 10.00% 8.00% 6.00% 4.00% 2.00% 0.00% -2.00% -4.00% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Return on Assets Ahmad Hassan Return on Assets Bhanero Return on Assets Nishat
2006
16.00% 14.00% 12.00% 10.00% 8.00% 6.00% 4.00% 2.00% 0.00% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Operating income margin Nishat Operating income margin Ahmad Hassan Operating income margin Bhanero
2006
Operating asset turnover Nishat Operating asset turnover Ahmad Hassan Operating asset turnover Bhanero
2008
2009
2010
2006
45.00% 40.00% 35.00% 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Return on operating assets Nishat Return on operating assets Ahmad Hassan Return on operating assets Bhanero
2006
Return on total equity Nishat Return on total equity Ahmad Hassan Return on total equity Bhanero
2007
2008
2009
2010
2006
20.00% 18.00% 16.00% 14.00% 12.00% 10.00% 8.00% 6.00% 4.00% 2.00% 0.00% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Gross profit margin Nishat Gross profit margin Ahmad Hassan Gross profit margin Bhanero
2006
Earnings per Share Nishat Earnings per Share Ahmad Hassan Earnings per Share Bhanero
2007
2008
2009
2010
conclusion
Set backs for textile sector
Government
abolished R&D programs Implementation of 18% Value Added Tax Decline in machinery imports due to enhanced interests on loans
Global financial and economic crisis- 2008 Increased competition in international market Depreciation of rupee Short fall of power supply