Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Project of Water Supply and Sanitation Program in Binh Dinh province (WSSP) organises a
feasibility study: "Valorization of organic waste in Binh Dinh province" to identify and analyze
viable options for recycling and re-valuating for organic waste in four target districts such as An
Nhon, Tay Son, Hoai Nhon, Phu My. The ultimate goal is maximize the amounts of waste that
re-used, and hence to reduce the waste to be dumped, incarnated or buried. Moreover, in overall
terms to contribute to the protection of environment and create positive social and economic
impact.
To determine the amount of organic waste which will be generated from four districts during 10
years from 2011 to 2020, we need to determine the volume of waste generated from households,
markets, schools, offices, factories, farms, etc. We have carried out the surveys and interviews in
order to calculate the volume of organic waste in four districts.
To calculate the daily amount of waste in four districts, this should be based on the number of
people living and working in there. There are many methods to calculate population by 2020.
The group has analyzed the rate of population growth based on the rate of natural increase of
population, including of social - economic situation, birth rates, death rates on population growth.
According to statistics from the master plan for solid waste management in Binh Dinh province
by 2020, the rate of natural population increases of 1%. However, following the survey data,
researching materials and statistics for 2009 without receiving an estimate for the coming years;
the birth rate in 2009 of Binh Dinh province was 1.67% and the death rate was 0.51%, the rate of
natural population growth was 1.16%. Therefore, we take the rate of natural population growth
for 2009 which is 1.16% and calculate for 2010 to 2020.
How to get data collection, we collect solid waste information through field surveys (Sub-Annex
No.1) and work with the WSSP, the other partners of the project; PCs district, the official
departments under PCs districts such as General Economic Division, Departments of Urban,
Department of Environment, Department of Industry, Agricultural Extension Station, the
Management Board of Industrial Zones; Department of Agriculture and Rural Development
under Binh Dinh province; the Urban Environmental Company in Qui Nhon City; the Urban
Environmental Company and Waste Management Cooperatives in four districts of Binh Dinh
province; Market Management Boards, etc. We can gather their awareness about solid waste,
waste volumes, the executors of waste management and treatment, sorting at source, public or
private sector, their role, the development of community, awareness activities, garbage collection
methods, how to transport and treat garbage, how to socialize, the expectation of feasible location
for installing equipment and waste treatment works to make plans for producing fertilizer
suitable for 4 districts, etc. (Sub-Annex No.2). We have identified that organic component is the
most important part in order to offer a plan for making suitable fertilizer plant for 4 districts by
analyzing biologically treatable waste stream from households and markets.
Through the survey of solid waste in four districts in October, 2010; we analyzed that the
garbage volume collected, transported and buried from households, markets, streets, industrial
parks, etc. is 101 tons/day, which accounted for 27%, the rest of 73% garbage are treated or
threw out public places by residents themselves. In the four districts, 101 tons of collected
garbage in which has 59 tons of organic waste with organic component is around 58.42% (it is
the highest component compared with other components such as plastic, paper, metal, etc.) and
has ability for producing fertilizer for industrial crops.
In general, through surveying in four districts, Phu My, Tay Son, An Nhon, Hoai Nhon in Binh
Dinh province, we identified that the solid waste stream has high organic component; most of
them are from household and market wastes. Source of organic waste from industrial zones is
negligible and source of organic waste from farms often used for farmers purposes, so it is not
be discharged into a solid waste stream to be collected and treated by district companies.
Picture 1.1 (a): The current map of waste collection in communes and towns in Phu My district.
01
Average
population
(People)
5,447
02
Phu My Town
10.55
11,325
1,073
03
04
My Duc Commune
My Chau Commune
6
8
32.65
31.61
7,157
8,330
219
264
05
My Thang Commune
27.88
10,566
379
06
07
My Loc Commune
My Loi Commune
9
8
36.87
25.88
7,229
7,285
196
281
08
My An Commune
21.50
8,343
388
09
10
My Phong Commune
My Trinh Commune
11
8
35.46
51.44
8,612
6,275
243
122
11
My Tho Commune
12
34.76
14,689
423
12
13
My Hoa Commune
My Thanh Commune
7
9
42.98
35.12
8,809
10,407
205
296
14
My Chanh Commune
16
22.52
13,740
610
15
16
6
7
23.85
23.33
4,371
6,705
183
330
17
My Hiep Commune
17
55.65
13,493
242
18
19
My Tai Commune
My Cat Commune
12
4
28.69
8.72
10,302
6,560
359
752
166
550.46
169,645
308
No.
Places
Villages
Area
(km2)
Total
Population density
(Person/km2)
1,362
Year
2009
2010
2015
2020
169,645
171,613
181,800
192,592
Population
(People)
170,000
165,000
192,592
190,383
188,200
186,042
181,800
179,715
177,655
175,617
175,000
171,613
180,000
173,604
185,000
169,645
Population (People)
190,000
183,909
195,000
160,000
155,000
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Year
Chart 1.1 (c): The increasing population of Phu My district from 2009 to 2020.
Phu My Districts Division of Industry and Commerce provided all the remaining
information in the district: industry, markets, farms, the waste treatment companies;
Through the survey, the total of solid waste is collected in the district is 13 tons/day, while the
amount of generating waste which calculated per person is 91 tons/day. Including: waste from
markets (3 tons/day) and waste from households, streets and two industrial parks (10 tons/day).
The company focused on collecting in Binh Duong town (collected rate of 60%), Phu My town
(60%), center of My Hiep commune (20%), My Thang, My An, My Chanh Communes (collected
rate of 20%), My Quang and My Phong communes (collected rate of 5%). It is estimated that the
total generating waste until 2020 shown in table 1.1 (d), (Sub-Annex No.4-a, b, c):
Table 1.1 (d): The total generating waste in the Phu My District until 2020
Year
2010
2015
2020
Generating waste
(Ton/day)
91
107
113
Phu My district is the only unit in 4 districts in which has one states company collection,
transportation and treatment of solid waste.
Transportation of Public Works Enterprise has only one 5.3 m3 compact truck, with three trips
per day, which collects garbage from 60 public waste containers (type of 240 liters) in 30- 35
different places. It also collects garbage from households, Phu My, Binh Duong and Tam Xuan
market. Waste collection time is divided reasonably between Phu My district (from 5:30 AM to
12:00 AM) and Binh Duong town (from 12:00 AM to 5:00PM). They collect garbage in two Phu
My and Binh Duong markets everyday from 3:00 to 5:00PM.
Waste market which is stored in a simple storage point of 50 m2 uncovered from 9:00 AM in the
previous day to 9:00 AM in the following day, then is collected and transported to landfill. Tan
Xuan market waste is not collected every day because there is one fair/5 days. Besides, the
company also collects garbage in My Hiep town 2 times a week. According to statistics, waste
generated is about 30 tons/day in the annual holidays. Beside, garbage in My Thang, My An, My
Phong, My Chanh, My Quang is collected by spontaneous private teams by handle self vehicle.
Waste collection rate average for the whole Phu My district is 14.5%. There is one temporary
landfill at Chanh Thuan village in My Hinh commune, used for burying garbage in Phu My
district, My Hiep commune and near communes, has been used since 2005 with 5,800 m2 and
was widen with 4.000 m2 in 2008. It is used 60% and its height is 3 meters. There is also a 550
m2 temporary landfill, whose height is 3.5m, used 70% to bury garbage in Binh Duong town. The
company is proposing to expand the 500 m2 landfill to the southeastern. There are 3,600 tons of
average waste amount treated annually.
Picture 1.2 (a) The current map of waste collection in communes and towns in Tay Son district.
agricultural products accounted for 24.8%; business services 42.7%; and manufacturing
industries 32.5%.
According to statistics in 2009, the total population in Tay Son district is 123,339 people,
population density is 178 persons/km2; including 14 communes and 1 town. They are shown in
table 1.2(b):
Table 1.2. (b) Average population in Tay Son District in 2009
No.
Places
Villages
Area
(km2)
Average
population
(People)
Population
density
(Person/km2)
01
10
11.54
20,017
1,735
02
110.65
6,146
56
03
77.66
7,060
91
04
40.84
7,212
177
05
74.29
11,296
151
06
53.10
9,225
174
07
Tay An Commune
10.51
4,883
465
08
13.66
8,208
601
09
7.11
5,393
759
10
35.22
9,028
256
11
7.08
6,471
914
12
Vinh An Commune
104.97
1,158
11
13
36.65
5,545
151
14
49.50
13,447
272
15
60.18
8,350
139
76
692.96
123,339
178
Total
Year
2009
2015
2020
Population
123,339
132,176
140,022
(People)
of the district. To know the amount of generating waste in the present and estimate until 2020,
the survey team collected data, information based on available forms and on following people:
-
Tay Son district Department of Statistics has provided sufficient information in the
district: industry, markets, farms, agricultural situation, the amount of generating waste
from agriculture or organic fertilizer that is necessary for the plant;
Phu Phong Co-operative Agricultural & General Services is the only private unit for
waste management and treatment company in Tay Son district.
Beside, garbage is collected by spontaneous private teams by handle self vehicle in their
commune.
Through the survey, the total of solid waste is collected in the district is 22 tons/day, in which
waste from markets is 1 ton/ day and waste from households is 21 tons per day, and only
collected in Phu Phong town (collected rate of 80%), Tay Giang commune (50%) and Binh Hoa
commune (20%), Tay Binh commune (40%), Tay Xuan (20%), Binh Nghi commune (20%) and
Tay Phu (20%). If Tay son district organized the collection well, it would be collected all
generating waste, which is 72 tons/day for 2010. The result of generating waste shown in the
table 1.2 (d), (Sub-Annex No.6-a, b, c):
Table 1.2 (d): The total of generating waste in the Tay Son District until 2020
Year
2010
2015
2020
Generating Waste
(Ton/day)
72
81
86
Phu Phong Agricultural & General Services Cooperative manages and treats solid waste in Tay
Son district. Household wastes in Phu Phong town are collected by trolleys with 200kg
bucket/trolley every day and moved to number 27 Nguyen Lu Street at 8:00 AM & 11 AM and it
is collected and transported to landfill by 8 m3 truck then. They collect household waste from
6:30 AM to 5:00 PM in Phu Phong town, Binh Thanh and Binh Hoa commune. Markets waste in
Phu Phong Town is collected from stalls and moved to a collected garbage point in the market by
trolleys. They collect garbage at 3:30 PM and store them in 40 kg bamboo baskets and they have
been collected and transported to the landfill directly by 8 m3 truck. Besides, there are
spontaneous private team collect garbage in their areas and also dump garbage in Phu Phong
town landfill in Tay Binh, Tay Xuan, Binh Nghi communes. The collected average rate in Phu
Phong town is 80%, Tay Giang commune (collected rate 50%), Binh Hoa commune (20%), Tay
Binh commune (40%), Tay Xuan (20%), Binh Nghi commune (20%) and Tay Phu commune
(20%).
.
Tay Son district has a temporary landfill used for burying garbage in Phu Phong town, Binh
Thanh and Binh Hoa commune with an area of 0.5 ha and it has been used since 2005. There are
6,205 tons of average waste amount treated annually.
Picture 1.3 (a) The current map of waste collection in communes and towns in An Nhon district.
6.12
Average
population
(People)
17,332
Population
density
(Person/km2)
2,832
5.07
17,110
3,375
Nhon My Commune
17.18
11,280
657
04
12.69
15,574
1,227
05
12
10.88
10,729
986
06
12.27
13,318
1,085
07
8.25
8,485
1,028
08
Nhon An Commune
8.76
10,020
1,144
09
10.69
10,570
989
10
8.33
12,357
1,483
11
8.59
8,515
991
12
12.29
8,878
722
13
27.93
17,999
644
14
61.51
7,751
126
15
32.08
8,806
275
108
242.64
178,724
737
Villages
Area
(km2)
02
ap a Town
03
No.
Places
01
Total
Year
2009
2015
2020
Population
178,724
191,530
202,899
(People)
d. Generating solid waste in An Nhon district.
Generating waste depends on the situation of the population as well as social-economic situation
of the district. To know the amount of generating waste in the present and estimate to 2020, the
survey team collected data, information based on available forms and following people:
+ An Nhon Station Extension, the Market Management Board, the garbage collection
companies showed the social-economic situation as well as agricultural production situation,
the amount of generating waste from agriculture or necessary organic fertilizer for the plant;
+ An Nhon district Department of Economics and Urban Management provided all the
remaining information in the district: industry, markets, farms, the waste treatment companies
in the area;
+ Surveying two private solid waste collection, transportation and treatment companies.
Through the survey, we know the total of solid waste collected in the district is 28 tons/day,
including waste from markets is 5 tons/day and waste from households is 23 tons/day, which
collected in Binh Dinh town (collected rate of 75%), Dap Da town (70%), Nhon Thanh commune
(20%), Nhon Phuc commune (20%), Nhon Hung commune (30%), Nhon Loc commune (20%),
Nhon Hoa commune (20%), Nhon Tho commune (20%). Volume of generating waste shown in
Table 1.3 (d), (Sub-Annex 8 -a, b, c)
Table 1.3 (d) The total of generating waste in the An Nhon District until 2020
Year
2010
2015
2020
Generating Waste
(Ton/day)
101
107
124
There are two private companies in An Nhon district, An Nhon Urban Environment Service Co.,
Ltd and Nhon Tho Development and Investment Joint Stock Company, which collect, transport
garbage and manage landfill. An Nhon Urban Environment Service Co., Ltd collects garbage in
Binh Dinh, Dap Da, Nhon Hung Town, waste market from the town's and communes market,
and industrial waste. Company has three 6-10 m3 compact trucks and one 6 m3 spared truck.
Small compact trucks collect garbage from alleys, big compact trucks collect garbage form
streets/roads, households and waste trolleys. They collect waste household and street from 4:00
AM to 2:00PM, waste market from 5:00 PM to 9:00 PM. On the other hand, Nhon Tho
Development and Investment Joint Stock Company collect garbage mainly in rural areas such as
Nhon Thanh, Nhon Tho, Nhon Phuc, Nhon Hoa commune, and commune markets. Because there
is hardly garbage in rural area, company collects garbage 2 times a week from 7:30 AM to 11:30
AM in the morning and from 2:00 PM to 5:00 PM in the afternoon by one commune/day.
Two companies collect garbage from towns and communes, and then they buried them in two
landfills. Phu Son landfill closed in 2009. Truc Son landfill, which has 4 buried holes with area
of 10,000 m2, has been opened since 2009 and buries 28 tons garbage per day. Market waste in
town is collected in the evening from 6:00 PM to 8:00 PM every day. Market waste in communes
is collected with household waste because rural markets normally start early in day. There are
20,220 tons of average waste amount treated annually.
1.4.
a. Geographical location:
Hoai Nhon district belongs to Binh Dinh province, with an area of 550.46 km2, borders by:
- The Northern borders on Quang Ngai province.
- The Northwestern borders on An Lao District.
- The Southwestern borders on Hoai An district.
- The Southern borders on Phu My district.
- The Eastern borders on the East Sea.
Picture 1.4 (a): The current map of waste collection in communes and towns in Hoai Nhon district.
7.43
Average
population
(People)
11,092
Population
density
(Person/km2)
1,511
11
22.00
17,652
802
12
62.00
9,501
153
04
10
21.25
9,492
447
05
23.00
8,740
380
06
42.66
8,841
207
07
10
7.26
17,281
2,380
9.24
11,718
1,268
37.93
12,585
332
10
14.20
10,912
768
11
10
15.58
12,196
783
12
10.66
16,196
1,519
13
29.00
17,798
614
14
4.99
7,087
1,420
15
9.77
8,228
842
16
Hoai My Commune
11
50.00
13,281
266
17
Hoai uc Commune
10
73.00
14,091
193
153
439.97
206,691
470
Villages
Area
(km2)
02
03
No.
Places
01
08
09
10
Total
Year
2009
2015
2020
Population
206,691
221,500
234,649
(People)
d. Generating solid waste in Hoai Nhon district.
Generating waste depends on the situation of the population as well as social-economic situation
of the district. To know the amount of generating waste in the present and estimate until 2020,
the survey team collected data, information according to available forms and the following
people:
+ Hoai Nhon Station Extension provided us information about the social- economic situation
as well as agricultural production situation, the amount of generating waste from agriculture
or organic fertilizer which is necessary for the plant;
+ Hoai Nhon district Department of Economics and Urban Management provided all the
remaining information in the district: industry, markets, farms, the waste treatment
companies;
+ Two waste collection, transportation and treatment companies provided us information
about the garbage management and treatment in district and identified the places where
households and markets waste are analyzed.
Through the survey, we know the total of solid waste collected in the district is 38 tons/day,
including waste from markets is 5 tons/day and waste from households is 33 tons/day, which
collected in Tam Quan town (80% collected rate), Bong Son town (96%), Hoai Chau Bac
commune (50%), Tam Quan Bac commune (50%), Hoai Thanh Tay commune (50%), Hoai Tay
commune (50%), Hoai Duc commune (50%).
Through the garbage analysis for each district, it is known that Hoai Nhon district has the largest
total of collected solid waste compared with four surveyed districts. Waste collection in town
collected by both private sectors which have many compact trucks, trolleys; so the percentage of
garbage collection is highest as table 1.3 (d), (Sub-Annex No.10 -a, b, c).
Table 1.4 (d): The total of generating waste in the Hoai Nhon District until 2020
Year
2010
2015
2020
Generating Waste
(Ton/day)
113
122
129
Hoai Nhon Department Urban Management manages and treats solid waste in Hoai Nhon
district. However, Bong Son Agriculture Cooperative and Nguyen Tin Company have
responsibility to collect garbage in district. They collect garbage from households, schools,
agencies and few industrial parks and waste markets in district with the corresponding collection
rate: Tam Quan Town (collected rate 85%), Bong Son town (90%), Hoai Chau Bac commune
(50%), Tam Quan Bac commune (50%), Hoai Thanh Tay commune (50%), Hoai Tan commune
(50%), Hoai Duc (50%). Garbage collectors collect and transport waste household to gathered
palaces from 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM by trolley every day. Then 10 m3 compact truck collects
garbage from there and transports them to landfill. Bong Son town waste market is collected in
40 kg bamboo baskets from the stalls, then transported to waste warehouse in the market area.
They collect garbage from 12:00 AM and 10 m3 compact truck will collect garbage at 6:00 PM,
and then transport them to landfill directly.
There are two temporary landfills in Hoai Nhon district: Bong Son towns landfill with area of
5,000 m2 has been opened since 2002 to collect garbage from Bong Son town, Hoai Duc
commune, Hoai Tan commune. Tam Quan Bac commune landfill with area of 1,500 m2 has been
opened since 2002 to collect garbage from Tam Quan town, Tam Quan Bac commune, Hoai
Thanh Tay commune, Hoai Hao commune. The average amount of waste treated annually is
13,870 tones.
number of collected rubbish and the times of garbage collection, the storage points, the collected
time and waste collectors. Basing on this information, analyzed group will give specific numbers
about the volume of waste generated. To be clear for comparing the percentage of organic waste
in markets, we will ask for more detailed information during interview process (the number of
stalls in the market, sale- type of each stall, the area of each stall). From that, we will know the
percentage of organic waste and inorganic waste in each market by preliminary estimates. Then,
the group will analyze waste components (organic, inorganic) based on quantitative method.
+ Quantitative analysis: following the surveyed team guidance, the analyzing group who is waste
collection staff at the market or workers of waste transportation company rent to analyze garbage
components. The quantitative analysis will help the surveyed group know the composition of
each type of waste in general and organic components in particular.
From beginning, we intended to analyze a big volumes of garbage 200-500kg/sample, but we
identified that the garbage components are nearly the same in a number of waste sample with
having different weight, so we mixed the large amount of garbage (about 500kg) by working
tools of workers as rakes, shovels and got 100-200 kg/sample to analyze for saving the time. In
the other hand, we selected the waste plastic packages of households and ripped out of the bag as
the analyzing samples. Besides, the garbage samples are specialized, for example there is a bag
of textiles from the factory, next to the market, in the sample, the analyzed group immediately
removed it out of analyzing samples (because it might be accumulated from several days); so it
will not specialize like market waste component if we mix it into market waste sample.
Four waste market samples analyzed at the central market of the districts should reflect the
typical characteristic. After being analyzed, organic waste component at the town market in the
district varied in about 69% - 90% and an average of 76.41% calculated based on the weighted
average method the volume of waste samples for analysis and components of waste markets are
analyzed in 4 districts. Organic waste components have identical characteristic due to depend on
the type of central markets in which fresh food, cooked food, textiles, clothing, household items,
electrical and electronic goods, etc. are sold without being divided into specialized markets like
HCM City. Compared with the same type markets (all goods are sold in the market) such as An
Khanh Market (District 2, Ho Chi Minh City) accounted for 76% (under the analysis) and An
Dong Market (District 5, Ho Chi Minh City) accounted for 82%, we know that the analyzing
data of market waste components surveyed is reliable for 4 districts. In Ho Chi Minh City the
volume of market wastes organic components has a very large fluctuation from 20.2% (ecommerce market) to 100% (wholesale selling vegetables market). (The analysis of Centema,
2000, 2001, 2003).
Five household waste samples were most analyzed at the waste rendezvous where they
concentrated solid waste collected from the centers of the four districts and four sample results at
main road and alley road of Tay Son district supplied by PPMU. Due to the cultural and political
center of the district, residents are more crowded in town and the amount of garbage also
discharged into environment more than communes in suburban area. After analyzing household
garbage, we determined the organic waste component is around 52% - 60% and 58% average
calculated based on the weighted average the volume of household waste samples and analyzed
garbage components in 4 district centers.
For Industrial Zons waste, we applied the qualitative analysis method for searching volume of
organic waste by interviewing the Industrial Zones Management Board and Manufacturing
companies where they have an organic waste to get more information about the waste collection,
treatment, and waste volumes etc. According to information from Industrial Zones Management
Board, solid wastes generated very few from companies, factories and it is not a major problem
but they are worry about waste water from plan operating not treated or not treated well in its
treatment system.
We have done the survey in 6 chosen factories having the amount of organic waste as the
cognizance of the Industrial Zones Management Board. However, through the survey results, we
determined that the amount of waste from these factories is too low. Most of the organic raw
materials are used to make products, or frozen for exporting or feeding their cattle. Thus, the
amount of waste is low because the companies of processing agricultural product only do operate
in specific season.
Mentioning the solid waste amount at the factories in Industrial Zones discharged by staff and
workers, the amount of waste which is very few is about 5-15kg/day, through the survey.
Because these companies do not need many workers for working (10-20 workers/company), and
most of them are local people so plants dont cook for them.
For the farm waste is analyzed by qualitative methodology as the statistics from the survey
information of Department of Agriculture & Rural Development and Agricultural Extension
Station. Through collected information, farm waste is mainly in two forms, wastes from leaves
and animal dung; leaves waste from farms almost treated by burning (for dry leaves) or made
compost and animal feed (for fresh leaves), so it is not collected with household waste collection.
For the animal dung, its quality and quantity depends on the way how to raise, the amount of
food as well as kind of food. In addition, it is calculated that the total amount of animal dung
generated from farms based on the total number of livestock which were from 2,972 tones/day to
4,889 tones/ day in four districts and An Nhons animal dung is the lowest district.
Method of quantitative (Sub-Annex 20)
Picture 2.2 (1) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of household waste and market waste, and
garbage collection method to rendezvous and transportation to the landfill
Table 2.2 The results of data collection and waste analysis in each district as follows:
Number
District
Waste
volume in
Master Plan
(tons/day)
Waste market
An Nhn
12
28
Hoai Nhon
30
38
Tay Son
22
Phu My
13
50
101
14
Total (tons/day)
The survey results in October, 2010 the units of solid waste collection, transportation and
treatment in four districts following the qualitative analysis method has determined the amount of
garbage collected was 101 tons/day, accounted for 27% of waste generated (different from
master plan in which the amount of garbage is 50 tons/day) and in which waste market is 14
tons/day. Thus, it is possible to accept the amount of solid waste collected in four districts in
2010.
The calculations volume of waste which
will be generated during 10 years from
2011 to 2020 based on the real waste
amount generated per person in the town
(0.8 Kg/person/day) and in the commune
(0.5 kg/person/day), for subtowns
planned to towns, generated garbage rate
is 0.9 kg/person. day, and 0.7 kg/person.
day for communes planned to sub town
and township. And according to the
Ministry of Constructions Master Plan
required to collect from 80% -100%
amount of waste. But, when we surveyed
we only calculated collected garbage rate
is 80%-100% for current collected
communes, for current un-collected
communes is 30%-60%. In addition, we
have considered the data of generated
Picture 5.2.2. (2) Training of solid waste management
waste per person, following report of 4 for 4 districts in October 22th, 2010
districts in the training of solid waste
management in October 22nd, 2010. If
comparing with the big cities in Viet Nam, the waste volume/person in district is lower due to 4
districts are in rural area where they discharge not much waste because of not requiring the high
needs for their lives. Moreover, most of them use organic waste for their garden and the
households in town also use organic waste like this way.
According to Master Plan was issued by the Ministry of Construction for 4 districts until 2015,
towns must collect 80% of waste volume, 70% for communes and towns must collect 100% of
waste volume, 80% for communes in 2020. It is estimated that the amount of garbage must be
collected and treated in 2015 is 234 tons/ day and in 2020 is 347 tons/day. From 2011 to 2020 the
amount of garbage collection will be reached 902,185 tons/10 years (Sub-Annex 11). If the
volume of waste generated is collected 100%, it would be 1,664,473 tons/10 years (Sub-Annex
12).
a. Phu My district
Phu Mys sanitation work has represented by Transportation of Public Works Co, so they
organize to sweep waste on the streets well. They put 240 liters dustbins at collecting waste
places to collect household waste and street waste. We analyzed household waste in two different
places, where they collect 240 liters dustbins and other place they collect household waste. After
analyzing, we determined that the percentage of organic component of dustbins sample is not
very high (44%), due to there are a lot of inorganic waste street, soil and sand while household
waste sample has high organic rate, 67% and the weighted average is 62.49% for both. This
figure compares with the Master Plan is similar.
The organic rate of market waste is 70%. The weighted average from one market waste sample
and four household waste samples in Phu My district are 64.26%. And total amount of organic
waste from markets and households in Phu My district in 2010 is 8.5 tons/day of 13 tons/day
solid waste collected.
Based on the waste volume per person from 0.5 kg (in communes) to 0.8 kg/person/day (in
towns), we estimated waste volume in Binh Duong and Phu My town achieved 80 %, there is 1
village planned to township or subtown so collected rate is 60% in My Hiep, My Chanh, My Tho
communes, 30% for others communes. We also estimate that collection rate will be increased by
following years 2010 and 2015 coming to 2020 in order to meet the requirement of solid waste
management planning in Phu My (Sub-Annex 13).
Table 2.2 (a): Waste volume in Phu My district in each year.
14.5
In 2015
(Estimation)
50.2
In 2020
(Estimation)
75
Ton/day
13
54
85
Ton/day
8.5
35
55
No.
Content
Unit
In 2010
Collection rate
Collection
volume
Organic
collection
volume
2
3
10/26/2010
to meet the requirement of solid waste management planning in Tay son (Sub-Annex 14).
Table 2.2 (b): Waste volume in Tay Son district in each year.
30.7
In 2015
(Estimation)
57.6
In 2020
(Estimation)
77
Ton/day
22
47
66
Ton/day
13.3
28.2
40
No.
Content
Unit
In 2010
Collection rate
Collection
volume
Organic
collection
volume
2
3
10/23/2010
Picture 2.2 (b1) Analyzing household waste in Phu
Phong town.
10/23/2010
Picture 2.2 (b2) Analyzing Phu Phong market
waste
c. An Nhon district
An Nhons sanitation work has carried out by An Nhon Service and Urban Environment Co.,
Ltd., and Nhon Tho Development and Investment Joint Stock Company, so they organize to
sweep on the streets well. We analyzed household waste of Binh Dinh town at Nhon Hoa
communes landfill and determined that the organic rate is not high (52.17 %), because of having
inorganic sweeping waste, soil and sand.
Organic component rate of market waste is 74.8 %. Its weighted average from one market waste
sample and one household waste sample in An Nhon district which is 56.21 %. We conducted the
survey in An Thai rural market in An Nhon district to determine the amount of organic by
qualitative analysis method. An Thai rural market is different from other town markets because it
only is opened from 6:00 AM to 10:00 AM and its garbage is collected 2 times a week (on
Tuesday and Friday). In addition, garbage is contained in 240 liters containers equipped by Dai
Tin Company in An Thai rural market. Most of garbage in An Nhon market is leaves, plastic and
packaging, so they only content about 50% the amount of organic. Total amount of organic waste
from markets and households in An Nhon district in 2010 is 16 tons/day of total garbage
collection (28 tons/day).
Based on the waste volume per person from 0.5 kg (in communes) to 0.8 kg/person/day (in
towns), we estimated waste volume in Binh Dinh subtown planned to town so collected rate is
85% and 80% for Dap Da subtown, 60% for Nhon Hung, 50% for Nhon Thanh, Nhon Phuc,
Nhon Hoa, Nhon Tho communes, 35% for others communes (depending on the distance from the
town/central and collection network) and 30% for remote areas in 2015. We also estimate that
collection rate will be increased by following years 2010 and 2015 coming to 2020 in order to
meet the requirement of solid waste management planning in An Nhon (Sub-Annex 15).
Table 2.2 (c): Waste volume in An Nhon district in each year.
28.1
In 2015
(Estimation)
55.4
In 2020
(Estimation)
80.8
Ton/day
28
66
100
Ton/day
16
36
56
No.
Content
Unit
In 2010
Collection rate
Collection
volume
Organic
collection
volume
2
3
Picture 2.2 (c3) Analyzing household waste in Picture 2.2 (c4) compact truck transport
Binh Dinh town
household waste and market waste to landfill
component rate is not high (52.03 %) because of the amount of inorganic sweeping waste, soil
and sand.
Organic component rate of market waste is 89.67 %, higher than other town markets because it is
fruits and vegetables market. The weighted average from one waste market sample and one waste
household sample in Hoai Nhon district is 57 % and determined that the total amount of organic
waste from markets and households in Hoai Nhon district in 2010 is 22 tons/day in total garbage
collection (38 tons/day).
Based on the waste volume per person from 0.5 kg (in communes) to 0.8 kg/person/day (in
towns), we estimated waste volume in Bong Son subtown planned to Bong Son town in 2015
achieved 95 %. 90% collected rate for Tam Quan subtown because the collection rate in two
towns is 85%-90% at the present; 70% for Hoai Chau Bac, Tam Quan Bac, Hoai Thanh Tay,
Hoai Tan, Hoai Duc commune; 35% for others communes (depending on the distance from the
town/central and collection network) and 50% for remote areas. We also estimate that collection
rate will be increased by following years 2010 and 2015 coming to 2020 in order to meet the
requirement of solid waste management planning in Hoai Nhon (Sub-Annex 16).
Table 2.2 (d): Waste volume in Hoai Nhon district in each year.
33.6
In 2015
(Estimation)
56.8
In 2020
(Estimation)
74.4
Ton/day
38
69
96
Ton/day
22
39
55
No.
Content
Unit
In 2010
Collection rate
Collection
volume
Organic
collection
volume
2
3
10/25/2010
Picture 2.2 (d1) Analyzing household waste in
Tam Quan town
10/25/2010
Picture 2.2 (d2) Analyzing Bong Son market waste
After synthesizing 4 market waste samples in the towns, we determined that average organic rate
is rather high 76.47 % (by weighted average the weight of each garbage sample and organic rate
of each garbage sample) in which Binh Dinh and Bong Son market have higher rates. Binh Dinh
town markets in An Nhon district is the largest fish market in Binh province and Bong Son town
market is fruits market where they sell pineapples, so they discharged so much pineapples peel.
Table 2.2 (2): Waste components in Tay Son, Phu My, An Nhon, Hoai Nhon district.
No
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
COMPONE
NT
SAMPLE 1
(kg)
of Phu
Phong
market in
Tay Son
Kg
%
Organic
(yard waste,
96.2 68.91
food)
Bone
Paper,
1.1
0.79
cardboard
Nylon
16.8 12.03
Textiles
0.2
0.14
Plastic
Rubber
Leather
Glass bottles
Can
Heavy metals
Ceramic
Demolition
waste
Styrofoam
Battery
Others
25.3 18.12
Total
139.6
1
SAMPLE 1
(kg)
of Phu My
market in
Phu My
SAMPLE 1
(kg)
of Binh
Dinh
market in
An Nhon
Kg
%
SAMPLE 1
(kg)
of Bong Son
market in
Hoai Nhon
Kg
TOTAL
Kg
Kg
141.6
69.96
89
74.79
171.9
0.4
0.20
8.6
4.25
4.20
1.8
24.8
1.6
4
3
0.4
12.25
0.79
1.98
1.48
0.20
25
-
21.01
-
17.4
0.6
-
18
202.4
8.89
1
119
191.7
0.40
0.06
43.30 6.63
652.7 100
Table 2.2. (3) : Domestic waste components in 4 districts: Phu My, An Nhon, Tay Son, Hoai Nhon:
No
COMPONEN
T
SAMPLE 2 (kg)
of Phu Phong townlet in Tay Son district
SAMPLE 2 (kg)
of Old market park in Phu My townlet
SAMPLE 2 (kg)
of Binh Dinh town
in An Nhon
district
SAMPLE 2
(kg)
of Tam Quan
townlet in Hoai
Nhon district
AVERAGE
Kg
Kg
Kg
Total
Kg
Kg
Kg
Kg
Total
Kg
Kg
Kg
63.6
267.2
200.8
531.6
45.28%
32
58.5
32
36
158.50
10.94%
38.4
29.81%
67
40.07%
795.5
27.25%
58.8
24.9
87.3
171
14.57%
28
48
319
352
747.00
51.55%
28.8
22.36%
20
11.96%
966.8
33.12%
0.00%
0.00%
6.6
5.4
1.6
13.6
1.16%
7.6
23.60
1.63%
6.4
4.97%
4.8
2.87%
48.4
1.66%
29.4
40.6
58
128
10.90%
20
16
97
125
258.00
17.81%
18.4
14.29%
19.5
11.66%
423.9
14.52%
Organic
(food)
Organic (yard
waste)
Bone
Paper,
cardboard
Nylon
Textiles
2.1
16.6
16.2
34.9
2.97%
17.8
29.8
54.60
3.77%
2.4
1.86%
12
7.18%
103.9
3.56%
Plastic
4.2
23.5
7.9
35.6
3.03%
19
28.00
1.93%
1.6
1.24%
1.6
0.96%
66.8
2.29%
Rubber
6.6
14
11
31.6
2.69%
7.30
5.30
12.60
0.01
0.6
0.47%
44.8
1.53%
Leather
0.00%
0.00%
Glass bottles
0.6
3.8
7.4
11.8
1.01%
0.8
20.6
5.8
32.20
2.22%
1.6
1.24%
45.6
1.56%
Can
0.00%
0.50
0.50
0.03%
0.8
0.62%
1.3
0.04%
10
Heavy metals
1.5
0.7
4.2
0.36%
1.2
1.4
4.60
0.32%
8.8
0.30%
11
0.00%
1.5
0.90%
1.5
0.05%
72.80
8.80
81.6
6.95%
6.80
4.80
11.60
0.01
93.2
3.19%
13
Ceramic
Demolition
waste
Styroform
0.00%
0.00%
14
Battery
0.70
0.20
0.9
0.08%
2.30
1.40
3.70
0.00
4.6
0.16%
15
Others
28.90
100.20
129.1
11.00%
38.8
31.1
35.2
114.10
7.87%
29.8
23.14%
40.8
24.40%
313.8
10.75%
Total
173.4
500.4
500.1
1173.9
562.3 605.3
1449.0
128.8
167.2
1
1
1
2
12
136.4 145.0
2918.9 100.00%
To accurately determine the percentage of organic waste component for four districts, we
calculated two methods (1) The weighted average of organic components of market and
household waste, and (2) The weighted average of organic waste (%) calculated for each district.
Results calculated in two methods shown that the component rate of organic waste is 58.42%
(according to the weighted average of the real amount of garbage collected in the markets,
households and the organic component rate of 13 waste samples). Although the organic
component in each district is different because of not many samples, but they reflect the typical
situation of waste generated that mainly gathered in district centers. Although the rate of organic
waste in 4 the districts is different (according to the survey results table), all 4 districts belong to
rural area, so the data nearly 60% organic waste reflects as Master Plan for the four districts
issued by the Ministry of Construction.
Through the survey in rural markets and direct exchange with people who manage or conduct the
waste collection, transportation, treatment; we determined that the achievable rate of organic
waste only under 50%, perhaps 30% or 40%. Because of the real life of residents living in rural
or towns, they took the organic waste from waste to compost plants in the garden or their
vegetable field. The rest are mostly inorganic are brought out to collected waste points for
compact trucks collecting and burying. In addition, rural markets are poorer than town ones,
because of the low needs for their lives, so organic components are rather low. The 58.42% of
the average of organic waste for four districts is reliable calculation, despite the organic waste
component in Binh Dinh province is lower than other cities such as Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City,
Hai Phong, Da Nang, etc. Even in Qui Nhon city, where there are many closed apartments and
not have little gardens behind the house to take advantage of organic component in the waste.
Here are two statistics in Table 2.2 (4) and Table 2.2 (5) showing the results of the organic
waste rate is nearly 58.42%.
On the other hand, basing on the data in table 2.2 (4), we know that the real percentage of
organic waste components have changed comparing with the different volume of garbage
samples and collected waste.
Content
The organic
market waste
component (%)
76.47
The organic
household waste
component (%)
60.38
78.69
55.16
58.42
Notes:
- Market waste: The highest ppercentage of organic component at Hoai Nhon market has the
highest volume of collection, so when we weighted average we know that the real rate of
organic market waste in four districts is higher than 4 waste samples.
- Household waste: the ppercentage of organic component is lowest in Hoai Nhon district;
however the volume of collection is highest, so when we weighted average we know that
the real rate of organic household waste in 4 districts is lower than 9 waste samples.
-
Weighting average 13 waste samples shows that the rate of organic component of urban
waste in 4 districts is 68.42% did not accurately reflect the real organic component which
is 58.42% with the real collected waste volume in 4 districts.
Table 2.2. (4): The waste market and households average of organic components (The first method) (Sub-Annex 17)
Component
Market
waste in
Tay Son
Market
waste in
Phu My
Market
waste
in An
Nhon
Market
waste
in Hoai
Nhon
Total
%
Total garbage
(ton/day)
Organic (yard
waste, food)
(%)
68.91%
70.16%
Ton/day
domest
domestic
ic
waste in waste
Tay Son in Phu
My
14
21
11.02
59.85%
Total
100
10
domestic
domestic
waste in
waste in
Hoai
An Nhon
Nhon
Total
%
23
62.49% 52.17%
33
52.03%
14
TOTAL
Ton/day Ton/day
87
101
55.16
%
47.99
59.01
58.42
%
100
87
101
100
Table 2.2 (5): The average of organic waste (%) calculated for each district (the second method) (Sub-Annex 18)
Tay Son district
Component
Phu My District
Market
waste
domestic
waste
Average
Total
garbage
(ton/day)
21
22
Organic
(yard waste,
food) (%)
68.91%
59.85%
Total
An Nhon district
Market domestic
Average
waste
waste
10
13
64.26%
Market domestic
Market domestic
Average
Average
waste
waste
waste
waste
23
28
33
38
TOTAL
Ton/day
101
100
59.01
58.42%
101
100
From the samples of the household and market waste, we synthesized four key household waste components such as organic waste, recycled inorganic
waste, irrecycled inorganic waste and hazardous waste as follows:
Table 2.2 (6) Synthesizing 4 key components of household waste.
Phu My Distict
domestic
Average
waste
Market
waste
An Nhon district
domestic
Average
waste
Market
waste
domestic
Average
waste
Market
waste
TOTAL
domestic
Average Ton/day
waste
21
22
10
13
23
28
33
38
101
100
68.91%
59.85%
60.26%
70.16%
62.49%
64.26%
74.79%
52.17%
56.21%
89.67%
52.03%
56.99%
59.01
58.42%
0.79%
30.30%
100
5.55%
34.52%
0.00
100
5.34%
34.33%
0.07%
100
5.73%
24.11%
100
6.14%
31.12%
0.00
100
6.04%
29.50%
0.20%
100
25.21%
0.00%
100
8.07%
39.75%
100
11.13%
32.65%
0.00%
100
1.25%
9.08%
100
3.83%
44.14%
100
3.49%
39.53%
0.00%
100
6.40
35.55
0.04
6.34%
35.20%
0.04%
100
Note:
-
2.3. Rationale and criteria for choosing sites for biological waste treatment operations
Having criteria will be given out for choosing sites in which build the biological waste treatment
systems for business models of small, medium and large scales and which depends on
identification about sources of organic waste and the suitable technology for each area. Criteria
will be established and given points based on more or less importance of the criteria
establishment rationale. Some common rationales to establish criteria for choosing site of
biological waste treatment system the following:
1. The organic waste volume
This is the main rationale to establish important criteria for choosing site for biological waste
treatment system. The chosen site can concentrate on the volume of organic waste which will be
used for input material for plant. According to Viet Nam standards - BXD QCVN 07/2010, the
volume of solid waste treated by some of technologies of recycling, reusing, processing organic
fertilizer, processing burning fuel etc. must achieve 85% and the rate of remaining solid waste
must not exceed 15%.
2. Future planning
The location for constructing plant must be based on urban planning in the future to calculate the
volume of generated waste and the plant power.
The location for constructing fertilizer plant needs to be considered all aspects: It should be
situated near a landfill area because of utilizing easily the garbage volume and got also
advantage in transportation. Nevertheless, the plant will be suitable together with master plan of
landfill area such as the location must be far away from residential areas following the Ministry
of Constructions regulations to be sure not to influence environment air, groundwater, and
surface water source for surrounding residential area. Or the plant is situated not too far from
waste sources so that not leaded to increase transportation costs and also increase production
cost.
3. Market
Fertilizer products will be used in agriculture must be appraised by competent authorities and
issued license in the market according to regulation No. 36/2010-TT BNNPTNT dated on June
24th, 2010 by Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development is about Regulations on
production and business and fertilizer use and direction of the Government Office No.
5367/VPCP-KTN dated on August 4th, 2010 about management solutions to enhance
production and quality fertilizers.
The chosen location for plant must be determined to meet near the market consuming fertilizers
(or compost), or convenient traffic will help the business easier. It has to survey carefully the site
in which has the need in consuming lots of products and how to distribute products to the agents
near the consuming place because most of residents often like buying products closed their
house.
4. Infrastructure
Traffic system: this is the first important criterion for choosing the plants location. Traffic must
be convenient for transportation of organic waste to the plant and products to the market in the
local area.
Water supply system and electricity network: the plant must be constructed in the place where
there are good infrastructure conditions (water supply, drainage and electricity) to construct
conveniently plant and operate easily as well.
30
Allocation with the systems of the different biological waste treatment in the present and in the
future: the chosen place must be in the area where there is no or a few biological waste treatment
systems to control the material and market in the local area.
Land using: chosen land will be planned or not. Considering all abilities of the plants activities
to avoid compensating clearance many times due to increasing urban area.
Ecological landscape: The chosen site must be far from tourist places or not located in tourist
destinations as well as the plan to develop ecological zones of Binh Dinh province, district or
urban neighborhoods.
5. Distance
The location of the treatment and processing solid organic waste into fertilizer must have the
smallest safe environmental distance between the solid organic waste treatment station and
others civil constructions 500m.
6. Local communities
It must be easy place to gather labor resource in chosen location.
7. Natural factors
- Area topography: it is convenient for constructing plant and transportation when plant operates
- Climate and hydrology: chosen plant must not be influenced by climate and hydrology for
example flood, storm, etc.
- Geological: it must ensure for plants activities and dont much cost for plant foundation
building.
- Natural and Mineral resources: It must ensure that it doesnt exploit mineral resources in the
present and the future.
8. Legal and political basis
Paying attention on sponsoring finance and taxes incentives from the state for environmental
projects as fertilizer plant.
Criteria for building fertilizer production plant is based on National technical regulations projects
of urban infrastructure in Vietnam No. 07/2010-BXD promulgated to attach Circular No.
02/2010/TT-BXD dated by the Ministry of Construction on February 5th, 2010 and combine with
real conditions at 4 districts in Binh Dinh province.
Table 2.3 (b): Rationale and criterion for choosing location for biological waste treatment systems
Rationale
No.
Scale
Volume:
- The volume of organic waste
(tons/ year).
- The rate of recycling compared
with the total amount of garbage.
- The rate of buried waste
compared with the total amount of
garbage
Distance:
- The distance from residential
area to plant (m)
Criteria
Small factories
(10- 30
tons/day)
Medium
factories
30- 50 tons/day)
Large factories
(50- 100 tons
/days)
3,500-10,000
10,000 20,000
> 20,000
25%
25%
15%
15%
>500
>1,000
31
25%
15%
>1,500
Rationale
No.
Scale
Criteria
Small factories
(10- 30
tons/day)
>500
Medium
factories
30- 50 tons/day)
>1,000
Large factories
(50- 100 tons
/days)
> 1,500
<2,000
<1,500
< 1,000
Future planning:
The volume of garbage until 2020. <50,000
(tons/ year)
50,000 70,000
>70,000
5.000
5.000 10.000
>10.000
Infrastructure:
- Traffic
- Electricity
- Water supply
- Drainage
- Land using
- Ecological landscape
workers,
engineers
workers,
engineers
workers,
engineers
- Local terrain
Flat, convenient
Flat, convenient
Flat, convenient
- Climate, Hydrology
No flood, storm
No flood, storm
No flood, storm
- Geology
- Mineral Resources
None
None
None
Legal, political
taxes incentives
taxes incentives
taxes incentives
Nature:
soil,
no Hard soil, no
flood
Note: Score from 1-10 with 10 points for each item is the highest.
(*) If fertilizer production plant is near the landfill, there will be advantage to reduce the pressure
on environmental pollution to the residential area and organic content will be higher than the
upstream emission (source 2009 Ho Chi Minh Sub-Annex 21), but has the disadvantage of
transportation route from sources to the plant, which may be too far to increase the production
costs. The collection also valuable for reusing and recycling waste at source and waste collection
points will reduce a significant amount of inorganic waste and increase the amount of organic
waste during transportation to the plant. It is an advantage for manufacturing fertilizer by
reducing the time to separate garbage at the plant to reduce production costs. Thereby leading to
the location of the plant will not depend much on the near or distant landfills.
32
SUB-ANNEX 1
Summary samples to collect data about the type, quantity and quality of organic waste from
households, markets, industrial factories, farms:
+ Form 1:
-
+ Form 1.1:
-
Interviewee: The solid waste management companies, the solid waste collection,
transportation and treatment companies.
The interview content: volume, the ways of solid waste collection, transportation
and treatment in the locality.
+ Form 2:
-
+ Form 2.1:
-
The interview content: Situation arising out of organic waste unit, volume and
way of collection, transportation and treatment of waste production and waste in
companies, enterprises.
+ Form 3:
-
The interview content: The infrastructure of the market, the number of stalls,
meeting market situation; volume, form collection, transportation of solid waste
in a market; market waste management and arising; Status of waste management
around the market area.
+ Form 4:
-
The interview content: volume, ways of solid waste collection, transportation and
treatment in the locality.
The interview content: livestock waste volume, the ways of solid waste collection,
transportation and treatment on the farm. Number of animals and plants and the
ability to arise organic waste.
33
+ Form 6:
-
34
SUB-ANNEX 2
Date
st
Oct 21 ,2010
Oct 21st,2010
Oct 21st,2010
Oct 22nd,2010
Oct 22nd,2010
Interviewees
Location
Telephone
numbers
0905.024.377
Form 3 Market
Management Board
0122.541.5184
Form 3 Market
Management Board
0983.557.145
Form 3 Analysis
of market waste.
056.388.0216
0983.557.145
Oct 22nd,2010
Ta Tan Lap
Oct 22nd,2010
Le Anh Kiet
Oct 22nd,2010
Le Van Giao
Oct 22nd,2010
Vo Thanh Truc
Oct 23 , 2010
Nguyen
Hong
An Nhon environment
services,
investment 0982.180.627
company.
Nguyen
Thanh Hai
rd
rd
Oct 23 , 2010
Thanh
0914.152.382
0987.397.827
35
Survey form
Date
Interviewees
Telephone
numbers
Location
Ngo inh Ba
Phu My Department of
Agriculture and Rural
Development
Oct 25 ,2010
Nguyen
Can
Oct 25th,2010
Phan
Hung
Oct 25th,2010
Le Thi Lan
Oct 25th,2010
Pham
Chung
Oct 25th,2010
Economic Division of
Hoai Nhon district
Oct 25th,2010
Mrs. Duoc
Economic Division of
Hoai Nhon district
Oct 25th,2010
Ho Xuan Canh
Hoai Nhon
Management
Department
Oct 25th,2010
Oct 25th,2010
th
Oct 25th,2010
Oct 25th,2010
th
Oct 26 , 2010
inh
Thanh Transportation
Public Works
&
Urban
Tran Du
Hoang
Hung
Huu
Form 1- general
information
of
province, districts,
0986.958.089
communes
and
Form
6
Agriculture.
Form 1- general
information
of
0914.021.068
province, districts,
communes
Form 1.1 waste
collection,
056.350.5299
transportation and
treatment
Form 1.1 waste
collection,
0913.487.522
transportation and
treatment
Form 1- general
information
of
0905.632.379
province, districts,
communes.
Form 1- general
information
of
0905.089.157
province, districts,
communes
Form 1- general
information
of
0985.654.992
province, districts,
communes
Form 1- general
information
of
0983.479.077
province, districts,
communes
Form 4 Analysis
of household waste
0165.809.1155 - Form 3 Market
056.376.1525
Management Board
Form 3- Analysis of
market waste
Tay
0935.200.556
Survey form
Date
Interviewees
Oct 26 , 2010
Pham
Thanh
Ho inh Thanh
th
th
Oct 26 , 2010
Oct 26th, 2010
Van
Huynh
Quoc
Truong,
Tran
Thi Xuyen
Nguyen
Truc
Nhan
Huynh
Quoc
Truong,
Tran
Thi Xuyen, Tran
Thi Kim Ha,
Nguyen
Thi
Hoan
Location
Form 4- Analysis of
market waste
Phu
My
townlet
0167.787.9364
market, Phu My district
Form 3 Market
Management Board
Phu
My
townlet
market, Phu My district
Form 3- Analysis of
market waste
Oct 27th,2010
Oct 27th,2010
An Nhon
Division
Economic
Oct 27th,2010
Hoa
An Nhon
Station
Extension
Oct 27th,2010
ang
Quoc
Oct 28th,2010
Thanh An Nhon
Division
Economic
0905.072.972
0983.508.064
0122.448.4828
0905.528.788
Truong
Thuy Uc
Phung
Hong
Survey form
Form 1.1- waste
collection,
transportation and
treatment
Form 4 Analysis
of household waste
Nguyen
Minh
Oct 28th,2010
Telephone
numbers
Oct 28th,2010
Truong Ha
Oct 28th,2010
Hai Ha company
37
Form 1- general
information
of
province, districts,
communes
Form 1 - general
information
of
province, districts,
communes
Form
6-
Agriculture
Form 1- general
information
of
province, districts,
communes
Form
6-
Agriculture
Form 2.1- IPs, IZs
and factories
Form 2.1- IPs, IZs
and factories
Form 2.1- IPs, IZs
and factories
PHU MY DISTRICT
Phu My district includes 1 subtown and 17 communes
Population: 171,613
Population rate: 1.16%
38
SUB-ANNEX 3
POPULATION OF PHU MY DISTRICT UP TO 2020
No.
Local
Type
Population
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Binh Duong
Subtown
5,447
5,510
5,574
5,639
5,704
5,770
5,837
5,905
5,973
6,043
6,113
6,184
Phu My
Subtown
11,325
11,456
11,589
11,724
11,860
11,997
12,136
12,277
12,420
12,564
12,709
12,857
My Duc
Commune
7,157
7,240
7,324
7,409
7,495
7,582
7,670
7,759
7,849
7,940
8,032
8,125
My Chau
Commune
8,330
8,427
8,524
8,623
8,723
8,824
8,927
9,030
9,135
9,241
9,348
9,457
My Thang
Commune
10,566
10,689
10,813
10,938
11,065
11,193
11,323
11,454
11,587
11,722
11,858
11,995
My Loc
Commune
7,229
7,313
7,398
7,483
7,570
7,658
7,747
7,837
7,928
8,020
8,113
8,207
My Loi
Commune
7,285
7,370
7,455
7,541
7,629
7,717
7,807
7,898
7,989
8,082
8,176
8,270
My An
Commune
8,343
8,440
8,538
8,637
8,737
8,838
8,941
9,044
9,149
9,256
9,363
9,472
My Phong
Commune
8,612
8,712
8,813
8,915
9,019
9,123
9,229
9,336
9,444
9,554
9,665
9,777
10
My Trinh
Commune
6,275
6,348
6,421
6,496
6,571
6,647
6,725
6,803
6,882
6,961
7,042
7,124
11
My Tho
Commune
14,689
14,859
15,032
15,206
15,383
15,561
15,741
15,924
16,109
16,296
16,485
16,676
12
My Hoa
Commune
8,809
8,911
9,015
9,119
9,225
9,332
9,440
9,550
9,660
9,773
9,886
10,001
13
My Thanh
Commune
10,407
10,528
10,650
10,773
10,898
11,025
11,153
11,282
11,413
11,545
11,679
11,815
14
My Chanh
Commune
13,740
13,899
14,061
14,224
14,389
14,556
14,724
14,895
15,068
15,243
15,420
15,599
15
My Quang
Commune
6,705
6,783
6,861
6,941
7,022
7,103
7,185
7,269
7,353
7,438
7,525
7,612
16
My Hiep
Commune
13,493
13,650
13,808
13,968
14,130
14,294
14,460
14,628
14,797
14,969
15,142
15,318
17
My Tai
Commune
10,302
10,422
10,542
10,665
10,788
10,914
11,040
11,168
11,298
11,429
11,561
11,695
18
My Cat
My Chanh
Tay
Commune
6,560
6,636
6,713
6,791
6,870
6,949
7,030
7,112
7,194
7,278
7,362
7,447
Commune
4,371
4,422
4,473
4,525
4,577
4,630
4,684
4,739
4,793
4,849
4,905
4,962
169,645
171,613
173,604
175,617
177,655
179,715
181,800
183,909
186,042
188,200
190,383
192,592
19
39
SUB-ANNEX 4 (a)
No.
Local
Type
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Binh Duong
Phu My
My Duc
My Chau
My Thang
My Loc
My Loi
My An
My Phong
My Trinh
My Tho
My Hoa
My Thanh
My Chanh
My Quang
My Hiep
My Tai
My Cat
My Chanh Tay
Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Population
(people)
5,510
11,456
7,240
8,427
10,689
7,313
7,370
8,440
8,712
6,348
14,859
8,911
10,528
13,899
6,783
13,650
10,422
6,636
4,422
171,613
Garbage per
person
(kg/person.day)
Total
garbage
(kg/day)
Rate of
collection
(%)
Garbage from
collection
(kg/day)
Rate of
organic
(%)
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
4,408
9,165
3,620
4,213
5,344
3,656
3,685
4,220
4,356
3,174
7,430
4,456
5,264
6,950
3,391
6,825
5,211
3,318
2,211
90,896
60%
60%
20%
20%
5%
20%
5%
20%
-
2,645
5,499
1,069
844
218
1,390
170
1,365
13,199
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
40
Organic
(kg/day)
1,714
3,563
693
547
141
901
110
884
8,552
SUB-ANNEX 4 (b)
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Local
Binh Duong
Phu My
My Duc
My Chau
My Thang
My Loc
My Loi
My An
My Phong
My Trinh
My Tho (*)
My Hoa
My Thanh
My Chanh
(**)
My Quang
My Hiep (*)
My Tai
My Cat
My Chanh
Tay
Type
Population
(people)
Garbage per
person
(kg/person.day)
Total
garbage
(kg/day)
Rate of
collection
(%)
Garbage from
collection
(kg/day)
Rate of
organic
(%)
Organic
(kg/day)
Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
5,837
12,136
7,670
8,927
11,323
7,747
7,807
8,941
9,229
6,725
15,741
9,440
11,153
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
4,670
9,709
3,835
4,463
5,662
3,873
3,903
4,470
4,615
3,362
11,019
4,720
5,576
80%
80%
30%
35%
50%
35%
35%
50%
50%
30%
60%
35%
30%
3,736
7,767
1,150
1,562
2,831
1,356
1,366
2,235
2,307
1,009
6,611
1,652
1,673
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
2,421
5,033
745
1,012
1,834
878
885
1,448
1,495
654
4,284
1,070
1,084
Commune
14,724
0.8
11,780
60%
7,068
64.79%
4,579
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
7,185
14,460
11,040
7,030
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
3,593
10,122
5,520
3,515
50%
60%
30%
30%
1,796
6,073
1,656
1,055
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
1,164
3,935
1,073
683
Commune
4,684
0.5
2,342
30%
703
64.79%
455
130,927
106,750
41
53,606
34,732
SUB-ANNEX 4 (c) TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR PHU MY DISTRICT IN 2020
Phu My district includes 1 subtown and 17 communes
Population: 137,605
Population rate: 1.16%; Rate of garbage collection: 75%
No.
Local
Type
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Binh Duong
Phu My
My Duc
My Chau
My Thang
My Loc
My Loi
My An
My Phong
My Trinh
My Tho (*)
My Hoa
My Thanh
My Chanh (**)
My Quang
My Hiep (*)
My Tai
My Cat
My Chanh Tay
Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Population
(people)
6,184
12,857
8,125
9,457
11,995
8,207
8,270
9,472
9,777
7,124
16,676
10,001
11,815
15,599
7,612
15,318
11,695
7,447
4,962
137,605
Garbage per
person
(kg/person.day)
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
Total garbage
(kg/day)
4,947
10,285
4,063
4,728
5,998
4,103
4,135
4,736
4,888
3,562
11,673
5,000
5,907
12,479
3,806
10,723
5,848
3,724
2,481
113,087
42
Rate of
collection
(%)
95%
95%
60%
70%
70%
70%
70%
70%
80%
60%
80%
70%
60%
80%
80%
80%
60%
60%
60%
Garbage from
collection
(kg/day)
4,700
9,771
2,438
3,310
4,198
2,872
2,895
3,315
3,911
2,137
9,339
3,500
3,544
9,983
3,045
8,578
3,509
2,234
1,489
84,767
Rate of
organic
(%)
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
64.79%
Organic
(kg/day)
3,045
6,331
1,579
2,145
2,720
1,861
1,875
2,148
2,534
1,385
6,051
2,268
2,296
6,468
1,973
5,558
2,273
1,448
965
54,922
43
SUB-ANNEX 5
Local
Phu Phong
Binh Tan
Tay Thuan
Binh Thuan
Tay Giang
Binh Thanh
Tay An
Binh Hoa
Tay Binh
Binh Tuong
Tay Vinh
Vinh An
Tay Xuan
Binh Nghi
Tay Phu
TOTAL
Type
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
2009
20,017
6,146
7,060
7,212
11,196
9,225
4,883
8,208
5,393
9,028
6,471
1,158
5,545
13,447
8,350
123,339
2010
20,249
6,217
7,142
7,296
11,326
9,332
4,940
8,303
5,456
9,133
6,546
1,171
5,609
13,603
8,447
124,770
2011
2012
20,484 20,722
6,289
6,362
7,225
7,309
7,380
7,466
11,457 11,590
9,440
9,550
4,997
5,055
8,400
8,497
5,519
5,583
9,239
9,346
6,622
6,699
1,185
1,199
5,674
5,740
13,761 13,920
8,545
8,644
126,217 127,681
2013
20,962
6,436
7,393
7,553
11,725
9,661
5,114
8,596
5,648
9,454
6,777
1,213
5,807
14,082
8,744
129,162
44
Population
2014
2015
21,205 21,451
6,511
6,586
7,479
7,566
7,640
7,729
11,861 11,998
9,773
9,886
5,173
5,233
8,695
8,796
5,713
5,779
9,564
9,675
6,855
6,935
1,227
1,241
5,874
5,942
14,245 14,410
8,846
8,948
130,661 132,176
2016
21,700
6,663
7,654
7,818
12,137
10,001
5,294
8,898
5,846
9,787
7,015
1,255
6,011
14,578
9,052
133,709
2017
21,952
6,740
7,742
7,909
12,278
10,117
5,355
9,001
5,914
9,901
7,096
1,270
6,081
14,747
9,157
135,260
2018
22,206
6,818
7,832
8,001
12,421
10,234
5,417
9,106
5,983
10,015
7,179
1,285
6,151
14,918
9,263
136,830
2019
2020
22,464 22,725
6,897
6,977
7,923
8,015
8,094
8,188
12,565 12,710
10,353 10,473
5,480
5,543
9,211
9,318
6,052
6,122
10,132 10,249
7,262
7,346
1,300
1,315
6,223
6,295
15,091 15,266
9,371
9,479
138,417 140,022
SUB-ANNEX 6 (a)
No.
Local
Type
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Phu Phong
Binh Tan
Tay Thuan
Binh Thuan
Tay Giang
Binh Thanh
Tay An
Binh Hoa
Tay Binh
Binh Tuong
Tay Vinh
Vinh An
Tay Xuan
Binh Nghi
Tay Phu
Total
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Population
(people)
20,249
6,217
7,142
7,296
11,326
9,332
4,940
8,303
5,456
9,133
6,546
1,171
5,609
13,603
8,447
124,770
Garbage per
person
(kg/person.day)
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Total
garbage
(kg/day)
16,199
3,109
3,571
3,648
7,928
4,666
2,470
4,152
3,819
4,566
3,273
586
2,805
6,801
4,223
71,816
45
Rate of
collection
(%)
80%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
20%
40%
0%
0%
0%
20%
20%
20%
Garbage from
collection
(kg/day)
12,959
3,964
830
1,528
561
1,360
845
22,047
Rate of
organic
(%)
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
Organic
(kg/day)
7,826
2,394
501
922
339
821
510
13,313
SUB-ANNEX 6 (b)
TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR TAY SON DISTRICT IN 2015
Tay Son district includes 1 subtown and 14 communes
Population: 132,176; Population rate: 1.16%; Rate of garbage collection: 57.6%
No.
Local
Type
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Phu Phong
Binh Tan
Tay Thuan
Binh Thuan
Tay Giang
Binh Thanh
Tay An
Binh Hoa
Tay Binh
Binh Tuong
Tay Vinh
Vinh An
Tay Xuan
Binh Nghi
Tay Phu
Town
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Population
(people)
21,451
6,586
7,566
7,729
11,998
9,886
5,233
8,796
5,779
9,675
6,935
1,241
5,942
14,410
8,948
132,176
Garbage per
person
(kg/person)
Total
garbage
(kg)
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
19,306
3,293
3,783
3,864
9,599
4,943
3,663
4,398
4,624
4,837
3,467
620
2,971
7,205
4,474
81,048
46
Rate of
collection
(%)
90%
30%
30%
30%
80%
30%
40%
50%
70%
30%
30%
30%
50%
50%
50%
Garbage from
collection
(kg)
17,375
988
1,135
1,159
7,679
1,483
1,465
2,199
3,236
1,451
1,040
186
1,486
3,603
2,237
46,723
Rate of
organic
(%)
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
Organic
(kg)
10,492
597
685
700
4,637
895
885
1,328
1,954
876
628
112
897
2,175
1,351
28,213
SUB-ANNEX 6 (c)
TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR TAY SON DISTRICT IN 2020
Tay Son district includes 1 subtown and 14 communes;
Population:
140,022 ; Population rate: 1.16%; Rate of garbage collection : 84.7%
No.
Local
Type
Phu Phong
Binh Tan
Tay Thuan
Binh Thuan
Tay Giang (**)
Binh Thanh
Tay An (*)
Binh Hoa
Tay Binh (**)
Binh Tuong
Tay Vinh
Vinh An
Tay Xuan
Binh Nghi
Tay Phu
Town
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Population
(people)
22,725
6,977
8,015
8,188
12,710
10,473
5,543
9,318
6,122
10,249
7,346
1,315
6,295
15,266
9,479
140,022
(*): There are 1 village will be township
(**): There are 1 village will be subtown
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Garbage per
person
(kg/person)
Total
garbage
(kg)
Rate of
collection
(%)
Garbage from
collection
(kg)
Rate of
organic
(%)
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
20,452
3,489
4,007
4,094
10,168
5,236
3,880
4,659
4,898
5,125
3,673
657
3,148
7,633
4,740
85,860
100%
60%
60%
60%
90%
60%
70%
70%
80%
60%
60%
60%
70%
70%
70%
20,452
2,093
2,404
2,456
9,152
3,142
2,716
3,261
3,918
3,075
2,204
394
2,203
5,343
3,318
66,133
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
60.38%
47
Organic
(kg)
12,350
1,264
1,452
1,483
5,526
1,897
1,640
1,969
2,366
1,857
1,331
238
1,330
3,226
2,003
39,934
AN NHON DISTRICT
An Nhon district includes 2 subtown and 13 communes
Population: 180,797
Population rate: 1.16%
48
SUB-ANNEX 7
No.
Local
Type
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Binh Dinh
Dap Da
Nhon My
Nhon Thanh
Nhon Hanh
Nhon Hau
Nhon Phong
Nhon An
Nhon Phuc
Nhon Hung
Nhon Khanh
Nhon Loc
Nhon Hoa
Nhon Tan
Nhon Tho
Total
Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
2009
17,332
17,110
11,280
15,574
10,729
13,318
8,485
10,020
10,570
12,357
8,515
8,878
17,999
7,751
8,806
178,724
2010
17,533
17,308
11,411
15,755
10,853
13,472
8,583
10,136
10,693
12,500
8,614
8,981
18,208
7,841
8,908
180,797
2011
17,736
17,509
11,543
15,937
10,979
13,629
8,683
10,254
10,817
12,645
8,714
9,085
18,419
7,932
9,011
182,894
2012
17,942
17,712
11,677
16,122
11,107
13,787
8,784
10,373
10,942
12,792
8,815
9,191
18,633
8,024
9,116
185,016
2013
18,150
17,918
11,813
16,309
11,236
13,947
8,886
10,493
11,069
12,940
8,917
9,297
18,849
8,117
9,222
187,162
49
Population
2014
2015
18,361 18,574
18,126 18,336
11,950 12,088
16,498 16,690
11,366 11,498
14,109 14,272
8,989
9,093
10,615 10,738
11,197 11,327
13,091 13,242
9,020
9,125
9,405
9,514
19,067 19,289
8,211
8,306
9,329
9,437
189,333 191,530
2016
18,789
18,549
12,228
16,883
11,631
14,438
9,198
10,862
11,459
13,396
9,231
9,624
19,512
8,403
9,546
193,751
2017
19,007
18,764
12,370
17,079
11,766
14,605
9,305
10,988
11,592
13,551
9,338
9,736
19,739
8,500
9,657
195,999
2018
19,228
18,981
12,514
17,277
11,903
14,775
9,413
11,116
11,726
13,709
9,446
9,849
19,968
8,599
9,769
198,272
2019
19,451
19,202
12,659
17,478
12,041
14,946
9,522
11,245
11,862
13,868
9,556
9,963
20,199
8,699
9,883
200,572
2020
19,676
19,424
12,806
17,681
12,180
15,119
9,633
11,375
12,000
14,028
9,667
10,079
20,434
8,799
9,997
202,899
SUB-ANNEX 8(a)
TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR AN NHON DISTRICT IN 2010
An Nhon district includes 2 subtown and 13 communes
Population: 180,797; Population rate: 1.16%; Rate of garbage collection: 28.1%
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Local
Binh Dinh
Dap Da
Nhon My
Nhon Thanh
Nhon Hanh
Nhon Hau
Nhon Phong
Nhon An
Nhon Phuc
Nhon Hung
Nhon Khanh
Nhon Loc
Nhon Hoa
Nhon Tan
Nhon Tho
TOTAL
Note: Based on form 1
Type
Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Population
(people)
17,533
17,308
11,411
15,755
10,853
13,472
8,583
10,136
10,693
12,500
8,614
8,981
18,208
7,841
8,908
180,797
Garbage per
person
(kg/person.day)
Total
garbage
(kg/day)
Rate of
collection
(%)
Garbage from
collection
(kg/day)
Rate of
organic
(%)
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
14,026
13,847
5,705
7,877
5,427
6,736
4,292
5,068
5,346
6,250
4,307
4,490
9,104
3,920
4,454
100,851
75%
70%
20%
20%
30%
20%
20%
20%
10,520
9,693
1,575
1,069
1,875
898
1,821
891
28,342
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
50
Organic
(kg/day)
5,913
5,449
886
601
1,054
505
1,024
501
15,932
SUB-ANNEX 8(b)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Binh Dinh
Dap Da
Nhon My (**)
Nhon Thanh
Nhon Hanh
Nhon Hau
Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
18,574
18,336
12,088
16,690
11,498
14,272
Garbage per
person
(kg/person.day)
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
Nhon Phong
Nhon An
Nhon Phuc
Nhon Hung
Nhon Khanh (*)
Nhon Loc
Nhon Hoa
Nhon Tan (**)
Nhon Tho
TOTAL
Commune
9,093
0.5
4,546
30%
1,364
56.21%
767
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
10,738
11,327
13,242
9,125
9,514
19,289
8,306
9,437
191,530
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.5
5,369
5,664
6,621
6,388
4,757
9,644
6,645
4,718
116,638
35%
50%
60%
40%
50%
50%
50%
50%
1,879
2,832
3,973
2,555
2,379
4,822
3,323
2,359
64,659
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
1,056
1,592
2,233
1,436
1,337
2,711
1,868
1,326
36,347
No.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Local
Type
Population
(people)
Total
garbage
(kg/day)
16,716
14,669
9,671
8,345
5,749
7,136
Rate of
collection
(%)
85%
80%
50%
50%
30%
35%
Garbage from
collection
(kg/day)
14,209
11,735
4,835
4,172
1,725
2,498
Rate of
organic
(%)
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
Organic
(kg/day)
7,987
6,597
2,718
2,345
969
1,404
SUB-ANNEX 8(b)
No.
Local
Type
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Binh Dinh
Dap Da
Nhon My
Nhon Thanh
Nhon Hanh
Nhon Hau
Nhon Phong
Nhon An
Nhon Phuc
Nhon Hung
Nhon Khanh
Nhon Loc
Nhon Hoa
Nhon Tan
Nhon Tho
TOTAL
Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Population
(people)
19,676
19,424
12,806
17,681
12,180
15,119
9,633
11,375
12,000
14,028
9,667
10,079
20,434
8,799
9,997
202,899
Garbage per
person
(kg/person.day)
Total
garbage
(kg/day)
Rate of
collection
(%)
Garbage from
collection
(kg/day)
Rate of
organic
(%)
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.5
17,709
15,539
10,245
8,840
6,090
7,560
4,816
5,688
6,000
7,014
6,767
5,039
10,217
7,040
4,999
123,562
100%
95%
80%
80%
60%
65%
60%
65%
80%
80%
70%
80%
80%
80%
80%
17,709
14,763
8,196
7,072
3,654
4,914
2,890
3,697
4,800
5,611
4,737
4,032
8,173
5,632
3,999
99,877
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
56.21%
52
Organic
(kg/day)
9,955
8,298
4,607
3,975
2,054
2,762
1,624
2,078
2,698
3,154
2,663
2,266
4,594
3,166
2,248
56,144
53
SUB-ANNEX 9
Local
Type
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Tam Quan
Bong Son
Hoai Son
Hoai Chau Bac
Hoai Chau
Hoai Phu
Tam Quan Bac
Tam Quan Nam
Hoai Hao
Hoai Thanh Tay
Hoai Thanh
Hoai Huong
Hoai Tan
Hoai Hai
Hoai Xuan
Hoai My
Hoai Duc
Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Population
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
11,092 11,221 11,351 11,482 11,616 11,750 11,887 12,025 12,164 12,305
17,652 17,857 18,064 18,273 18,485 18,700 18,917 19,136 19,358 19,583
9,501
9,611
9,723
9,835
9,950
10,065 10,182 10,300 10,419 10,540
9,492
9,602
9,713
9,826
9,940
10,055 10,172 10,290 10,409 10,530
8,740
8,841
8,944
9,048
9,153
9,259
9,366
9,475
9,585
9,696
8,841
8,944
9,047
9,152
9,258
9,366
9,474
9,584
9,696
9,808
17,281 17,481 17,684 17,889 18,097 18,307 18,519 18,734 18,951 19,171
11,718 11,854 11,991 12,131 12,271 12,414 12,558 12,703 12,851 13,000
12,585 12,731 12,879 13,028 13,179 13,332 13,487 13,643 13,801 13,962
10,912 11,039 11,167 11,296 11,427 11,560 11,694 11,829 11,967 12,106
12,196 12,337 12,481 12,625 12,772 12,920 13,070 13,221 13,375 13,530
16,196 16,384 16,574 16,766 16,961 17,157 17,356 17,558 17,761 17,967
17,798 18,004 18,213 18,425 18,638 18,855 19,073 19,294 19,518 19,745
7,087
7,169
7,252
7,336
7,422
7,508
7,595
7,683
7,772
7,862
8,228
8,323
8,420
8,518
8,616
8,716
8,818
8,920
9,023
9,128
13,281 13,435 13,591 13,749 13,908 14,069 14,233 14,398 14,565 14,734
14,091 14,254 14,420 14,587 14,756 14,927 15,101 15,276 15,453 15,632
206,691 209,089 211,514 213,968 216,450 218,960 221,500 224,070 226,669 229,298
54
2019
12,448
19,810
10,662
10,652
9,808
9,922
19,394
13,150
14,123
12,246
13,687
18,176
19,974
7,953
9,234
14,905
15,814
231,958
2020
12,592
20,040
10,786
10,776
9,922
10,037
19,619
13,303
14,287
12,388
13,846
18,387
20,205
8,046
9,341
15,077
15,997
234,649
SUB-ANNEX 10 (a)
TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR HOAI NHON DISTRICT IN 2010
Hoai Nhon district includes 2 subtown and 15 communes
Population: 209,089; Population rate: 1.16%; Rate of garbage collection: 33.6%
No.
Local
Type
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Tam Quan
Bong Son
Hoai Son
Hoai Chau Bac
Hoai Chau
Hoai Phu
Tam Quan Bac
Tam Quan Nam
Hoai Hao
Hoai Thanh Tay
Hoai Thanh
Hoai Huong
Hoai Tan
Hoai Hai
Hoai Xuan
Hoai My
Hoai Duc
Total
Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Population
(people)
11,221
17,857
9,611
9,602
8,841
8,944
17,481
11,854
12,731
11,039
12,337
16,384
18,004
7,169
8,323
13,435
14,254
209,089
Garbage per
person
(kg/person.day)
Total
garbage
(kg/day)
Rate of
collection
(%)
Garbage from
collection
(kg/day)
Rate of
organic
(%)
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
8,977
14,285
4,806
4,801
4,421
4,472
8,741
5,927
6,365
5,519
6,169
8,192
9,002
3,585
4,162
6,718
7,127
113,268
85%
90%
0%
50%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
50%
7,630
12,857
2,401
4,370
2,760
4,501
3,564
38,082
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
Organic
(kg/day)
4,348
7,327
1,368
2,490
1,573
2,565
2,031
21,701
SUB-ANNEX 10 (b)
TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR HOAI NHON DISTRICT IN 2015
Hoai Nhon district includes 2 subtown and 15 communes
Population: 221,500; Population rate: 1.16%; Rate of garbage collection: 56.8%
11,887
18,917
10,182
10,172
9,366
9,474
18,519
12,558
13,487
Garbage per
person
(kg/person.day)
0.8
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Total
garbage
(kg/day)
9,509
17,025
5,091
5,086
4,683
4,737
9,260
6,279
6,743
Rate of
collection
(%)
90%
95%
30%
70%
35%
35%
70%
35%
30%
Garbage from
collection
(kg/day)
8,558
16,174
1,527
3,560
1,639
1,658
6,482
2,198
2,023
Rate of
organic
(%)
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
Commune
11,694
0.5
5,847
70%
4,093
56.99%
2,332
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
13,070
17,356
19,073
7,595
8,818
14,233
15,101
221,500
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
6,535
8,678
9,537
3,797
4,409
7,116
7,550
121,883
30%
30%
70%
30%
35%
30%
70%
1,960
2,603
6,676
1,139
1,543
2,135
5,285
69,254
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
1,117
1,484
3,804
649
879
1,217
3,012
39,465
No.
Local
Type
Population
(people)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Tam Quan
Bong Son
Hoai Son
Hoai Chau Bac
Hoai Chau
Hoai Phu
Tam Quan Bac
Tam Quan Nam
Hoai Hao
Hoai Thanh
Tay
Hoai Thanh
Hoai Huong
Hoai Tan
Hoai Hai
Hoai Xuan
Hoai My
Hoai Duc
TOTAL
Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
56
Organic
(kg/day)
4,877
9,217
870
2,029
934
945
3,694
1,252
1,153
SUB-ANNEX 10 (c)
TABLE OF GENERAL INFORMATION OF GARBAGE FOR HOAI NHON DISTRICT IN 2020
Hoai Nhon district includes 2 subtown and 15 communes
Population: 234,649; Population rate: 1.16%; Rate of garbage collection: 74.4%
No.
Local
Type
Populatio
n
(people)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Tam Quan
Bong Son
Hoai Son
Hoai Chau Bac
Hoai Chau
Hoai Phu
Tam Quan Bac
Tam Quan Nam
Hoai Hao
Hoai Thanh
Tay
Hoai Thanh
Hoai Huong
Hoai Tan
Hoai Hai
Hoai Xuan
Hoai My
Hoai Duc
TOTAL
Subtown
Subtown
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
12,592
20,040
10,786
10,776
9,922
10,037
19,619
13,303
14,287
0.8
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10,074
18,036
5,393
5,388
4,961
5,018
9,809
6,652
7,144
95%
100%
60%
80%
60%
60%
80%
60%
60%
9,570
18,036
3,236
4,310
2,977
3,011
7,847
3,991
4,286
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
5,454
10,278
1,844
2,456
1,696
1,716
4,472
2,274
2,443
Commune
12,388
0.5
6,194
80%
4,955
56.99%
2,824
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
Commune
13,846
18,387
20,205
8,046
9,341
15,077
15,997
234,649
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
6,923
9,193
10,103
4,023
4,670
7,539
7,999
129,118
60%
60%
80%
60%
60%
60%
80%
4,154
5,516
8,082
2,414
2,802
4,523
6,399
96,109
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
56.99%
2,367
3,143
4,606
1,375
1,597
2,578
3,646
54,769
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Garbage per
person
(kg/person)
Total
garbage
(kg)
57
Rate of
collection
(%)
Garbage from
collection
(kg)
Rate of
organic
(%)
Organic
(kg)
SUB-ANNEX 11
No
DISTRICT
Kg/day
1
2
3
4
No
1
2
3
4
An Nhon
district
Tay Son
district
Phu My
district
Hoai Nhon
district
Total
DISTRICT
An Nhon
district
Tay Son
district
Phu My
district
Hoai Nhon
district
Total
Up to 2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year
2010
28,342
10,345
34,260
12,505
40,312
14,714
46,499
16,972
52,825
19,281
64,659
23,601
22,047
8,047
26,057
9,511
30,156
11,007
34,347
12,536
38,630
14,100
46,723
17,054
13,199
4,818
19,721
7,198
26,393
9,633
33,217
12,124
40,196
14,671
53,606
19,566
38,082
13,900
43,702
15,951
49,448
18,048
55,320
20,192
61,323
22,383
69,254
25,278
101,671
37,110 123,740
45,165 146,308
53,403 169,383
61,825 192,974
70,436 234,242
85,498
2016
2017
Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year
Up to 2020
2018
2019
Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year
2020
Kg/day Ton/year
Total
2010-2020
Tons
71,402
26,062
78,293
28,577
85,334
31,147
92,528
33,773
99,877
36,455
253,431.5
50,442
18,411
54,241
19,798
58,122
21,215
62,085
22,661
66,133
24,138
178,478.7
59,572
21,744
65,668
23,969
71,898
26,243
78,264
28,566
84,767
30,940
199,472.9
74,401
27,156
78,745
28,742
85,028
31,035
90,511
33,036
96,109
35,080
270,801.9
255,817
93,373
276,948
101,086
300,382
109,639
323,388
118,036
346,887
126,614
902,185.1
58
SUB-ANNEX 12
No
1
2
3
4
No
1
2
3
4
DISTRICT
An Nhon
district
Tay Son
district
Phu My
district
Hoai Nhon
district
Total
DISTRICT
An Nhon
district
Tay Son
district
Phu My
district
Hoai Nhon
district
Total
Up to 2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year
2010
100,851
36,811
102,021
37,238
103,204
37,670
104,402
38,107
105,613
38,549
116,638
42,573
71,816
26,213
72,649
26,517
73,492
26,824
74,344
27,136
75,207
27,450
81,048
29,583
90,896
33,177
91,951
33,562
93,017
33,951
94,096
34,345
95,188
34,744
106,750
38,964
113,268
41,343
114,581
41,822
115,911
42,307
117,255
42,798
118,615
43,295
121,883
44,487
142,386
155,607
Up to 2020
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year
Total
2010-2020
Tons
117,991
43,067
119,360
43,566
120,745
44,072
122,145
44,583
123,562
45,100
451,334.6
81,989
29,926
82,940
30,273
83,902
30,624
84,875
30,979
85,860
31,339
316,864.0
107,988
39,416
109,241
39,873
110,508
40,335
111,790
40,803
113,087
41,277
410,446.7
123,297
45,003
123,297
45,003
126,174
46,053
127,637
46,588
129,118
47,128
485,828.1
431,265
157,412
434,837
158,716
441,328
161,085
446,448
162,953
451,626
164,844
1,664,473.4
59
SUB-ANNEX 13
Year
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Local
Binh Duong
Phu My
My Duc
My Chau
My Thang
My Loc
My Loi
My An
My Phong
My Trinh
My Tho
My Hoa
My Thanh
My Chanh
My Quang
My Hiep
My Tai
My Cat
My Chanh
Tay
TOTAL
2010
2011
2012
Garbag
Garbage
Rate of Garbage
Rate of e from
Rate of Garbage
per
Populati Total
Organic Populati Total
Populatio Total
collecti from
collecti collecti Organic
collectio from
Organic
person
on garbage
(kg/day
on
garbage
n
garbage
on collection
on
on
(kg/day)
n
collection (kg/day)
(kg/perso (people) (kg/day)
)
(people) (kg/day)
(people) (kg/day)
(%) (kg/day)
(%)
(kg/day
(%)
(kg/day)
n.day)
)
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
(1)
(2)
(3)
5,510
11,456
7,240
8,427
10,689
7,313
7,370
8,440
8,712
6,348
14,859
8,911
10,528
13,899
6,783
13,650
10,422
6,636
4,408
9,165
3,620
4,213
5,344
3,656
3,685
4,220
4,356
3,174
7,430
4,456
5,264
6,950
3,391
6,825
5,211
3,318
60%
60%
20%
20%
5%
20%
5%
20%
-
4,422 2,211
171,61
90,896
3
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
4,473
13,199 8,552
2,236
91,951
60
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
64%
64%
6%
7%
26%
7%
7%
26%
14%
6%
12%
7%
6%
28%
14%
28%
6%
6%
2,854
5,934
220
298
1,406
259
261
1,110
617
193
902
316
319
1,968
480
1,933
316
201
1,849
3,845
142
193
911
168
169
719
400
125
584
204
207
1,275
311
1,252
205
130
5,639
11,724
7,409
8,623
10,938
7,483
7,541
8,637
8,915
6,496
15,206
9,119
10,773
14,224
6,941
13,968
10,665
6,791
4,511
9,379
3,704
4,312
5,469
3,742
3,771
4,318
4,458
3,248
7,603
4,560
5,387
7,112
3,471
6,984
5,332
3,395
68%
68%
12%
14%
32%
14%
14%
32%
23%
12%
24%
14%
12%
36%
23%
36%
12%
12%
3,067
6,378
445
604
1,750
524
528
1,382
1,025
390
1,825
638
646
2,560
798
2,514
640
407
1,987
4,132
288
391
1,134
339
342
895
664
253
1,182
414
419
1,659
517
1,629
415
264
6%
134
87
4,525
2,262
12%
271
176
19,721 12,778
93,017
26,393 17,100
2013
2014
2015
2016
No.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
5,704
4,563
72%
3,286
2,129
5,770
4,616
76%
3,508
2,273
5,837
4,670
80%
3,736
2,421
5,905
2,540
11,860
9,488
72%
6,831
76%
7,294
80%
7,767
5,282
7,495
3,747
18%
675
437
7,582
3,791
24%
910
589
7,670
3,835
30%
1,150
745
7,759
905
8,723
4,362
21%
916
593
8,824
4,412
28%
1,235
800
8,927
4,463
35%
1,562
1,012
9,030
1,229
11,065
5,532
38%
2,102
44%
2,463
50%
2,831
2,004
7,570
3,785
21%
795
515
7,658
3,829
28%
1,072
695
7,747
3,873
35%
1,356
878
7,837
1,066
7,629
3,814
21%
801
519
7,717
3,859
28%
1,080
700
7,807
3,903
35%
1,366
885
7,898
1,075
8,737
4,368
38%
1,660
1,076
8,838
4,419
44%
1,944
1,260
8,941
4,470
50%
2,235
1,448
9,044
1,582
9,019
4,509
32%
1,443
935
9,123
4,562
41%
1,870
1,212
9,229
4,615
50%
2,307
1,495
9,336
1,694
10
6,571
3,286
18%
591
383
6,647
3,324
24%
798
517
6,725
3,362
30%
1,009
654
6,803
793
11
15,383
7,691
36%
2,769
48%
3,735
6,611
4,622
12
9,225
4,612
21%
969
628
9,332
4,666
28%
1,306
846
9,440
4,720
35%
1,652
1,070
1,299
13
10,898
5,449
18%
981
636
11,025 5,512
24%
1,323
857
11,153 5,576
30%
1,673
1,316
14
14,389
7,194
44%
3,166
52%
3,784
7,068
4,941
15
7,022
3,511
32%
1,123
3,552
41%
1,456
50%
1,796
1,164
1,319
16
14,130
7,065
44%
3,109
52%
3,716
6,073
4,246
17
10,788
5,394
18%
971
629
10,914 5,457
24%
1,310
849
11,040 5,520
30%
1,656
1,302
18
6,870
3,435
18%
618
401
6,949
3,475
24%
834
540
7,030
3,515
30%
1,055
683
7,112
829
19
4,577
2,289
18%
412
267
4,630
2,315
24%
556
360
4,684
2,342
30%
703
455
4,739
2,369 36%
553
Total
94,096
728
33,217 21,522
7,103
95,188
943
40,196 26,043
61
7,185
3,593
106,750
53,606 34,732
9,550
7,269
107,988
(3)
(4)
853
(5)
59,572 38,597
2017
No.
(1)
2018
2019
2020
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
5,973
4,779
86%
4,110
2,663
6,043
4,834
89%
4,302
2,788
6,113
4,890
92%
4,499
2,915
3,045
12,420
9,936
86%
8,545
8,945
9,354
6,331
7,849
3,924
42%
1,648
1,068
7,940
3,970
48%
1,906
1,235
8,032
4,016
54%
2,169
1,405
1,579
9,135
4,568
49%
2,238
1,450
9,241
4,621
56%
2,588
1,676
9,348
4,674
63%
2,945
1,908
2,145
11,587
5,794
58%
3,360
62%
3,634
66%
3,913
2,720
7,928
3,964
49%
1,942
1,258
8,020
4,010
56%
2,246
1,455
8,113
4,056
63%
2,556
1,656
1,861
7,989
3,995
49%
1,957
1,268
8,082
4,041
56%
2,263
1,466
8,176
4,088
63%
2,575
1,669
1,875
9,149
4,575
58%
2,653
1,719
9,256
4,628
62%
2,869
1,859
9,363
4,681
66%
3,090
2,002
2,148
9,444
4,722
62%
2,928
1,897
9,554
4,777
68%
3,248
2,105
9,665
4,832
74%
3,576
2,317
2,534
10
6,882
3,441
42%
1,445
936
6,961
3,481
48%
1,671
1,082
7,042
3,521
54%
1,901
1,232
1,385
11
16,109 11,276
68%
7,668
8,213
8,770
6,051
12
9,660
4,830
49%
2,367
1,533
4,886
56%
2,736
1,773
4,943
63%
3,114
2,268
13
11,413
5,706
42%
2,397
48%
2,771
54%
3,153
2,296
14
15,068 12,054
68%
8,197
8,780
9,375
6,468
15
7,353
3,677
62%
2,279
1,477
68%
2,529
1,639
74%
2,784
1,804
1,973
16
14,797 10,358
68%
7,043
7,544
8,056
5,558
17
11,298
5,649
42%
2,373
48%
2,743
54%
3,122
2,273
18
7,194
3,597
42%
1,511
979
7,278
3,639
48%
1,747
1,132
7,362
3,681
54%
1,988
1,288
1,448
19
4,793
2,397
42%
1,007
652
4,849
2,425
48%
1,164
754
4,905
2,453
54%
1,324
858
965
Total
109,241
65,668 42,547
9,773
7,438
3,719
110,508
71,898 46,584
62
9,886
7,525
3,762
111,790
78,264 50,708
(1)
(2)
113,087
(3)
(4)
(5)
84,767 54,922
SUB-ANNEX 14
Year
No.
Local
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Phu Phong
Binh Tan
Tay Thuan
Binh Thuan
Tay Giang
Binh Thanh
Tay An
Binh Hoa
Tay Binh
Binh Tuong
Tay Vinh
Vinh An
Tay Xuan
Binh Nghi
Tay Phu
TOTAL
2010
2011
2012
Garb
age
Rate Garbag
Rate
Rate
per
Total
Garbage
Garbage
Populati
of
e from
Populati Total
of
Populati Total
of
perso
garbag
Organic
from Organic
from Organic
on
collect collectio
on
garbage collect
on garbage collec
n
e
(kg/day)
collection (kg/day)
collection (kg/day)
(people)
ion
n
(people) (kg/day) ion
(people) (kg/day) tion
(kg/pe
(kg/d)
(kg/day)
(kg/day)
(%)
(kg/d)
(%)
(%)
rson.d
ay)
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
(1)
20,249
6,217
7,142
7,296
11,326
9,332
4,940
8,303
5,456
9,133
6,546
1,171
5,609
13,603
8,447
124,770
(2)
16,199
3,109
3,571
3,648
7,928
4,666
2,470
4,152
3,819
4,566
3,273
586
2,805
6,801
4,223
71,816
(3)
80%
50%
0%
20%
40%
20%
20%
20%
(4)
(5)
12,959
7,826
3,964.06 2,394
830
501
1,527.56
922
560.93
339
1,360.30
821
844.69
510
22,047 13,313
(1)
20,484
6,289
7,225
7,380
11,457
9,440
4,997
8,400
5,519
9,239
6,622
1,185
5,674
13,761
8,545
63
(2)
16,387
3,145
3,612
3,690
8,020
4,720
2,498
4,200
3,863
4,619
3,311
593
2,837
6,880
4,272
72,649
(3)
82%
6%
6%
6%
56%
6%
8%
26%
46%
6%
6%
6%
26%
26%
26%
(4)
13,438
189
217
221
4,491
283
200
1,092
1,777
277
199
36
738
1,789
1,111
26,057
(5)
8,114
114
131
134
2,712
171
121
659
1,073
167
120
21
445
1,080
671
15,734
(1)
(2)
20,722 16,577
6,362 3,181
7,309 3,654
7,466 3,733
11,590 8,113
9,550 4,775
5,055 2,527
8,497 4,248
5,583 3,908
9,346 4,673
6,699 3,349
1,199
599
5,740 2,870
13,920 6,960
8,644 4,322
73,492
(3)
84%
12%
12%
12%
62%
12%
16%
32%
52%
12%
12%
12%
32%
32%
32%
(4)
13,925
382
439
448
5,030
573
404
1,360
2,032
561
402
72
918
2,227
1,383
30,156
(5)
8,409
231
265
270
3,037
346
244
821
1,227
339
243
43
555
1,345
835
18,209
2013
No.
(1)
(2)
(3)
2014
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
2015
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
2016
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(4)
(5)
20,962 16,770 86% 14,422 8,709 21,205 16,964 88% 14,928 9,015 21,451 19,306 90%
6,436
3,218 18%
579
350
6,511
3,255 24%
781
472
6,586
3,293
30%
988
597
6,663
3,331
36% 1,199
724
7,393
3,697 18%
665
402
7,479
3,740 24%
897
542
7,566
3,783
30%
1,135
685
7,654
3,827
36% 1,378
832
7,553
3,776 18%
680
410
7,640
3,820 24%
917
554
7,729
3,864
30%
1,159
700
7,818
3,909
36% 1,407
850
80%
7,679
4,637 12,137
9,710
9,661
4,830 18%
869
525
9,773
708
9,886
4,943
30%
1,483
895 10,001
5,000
5,114
2,557 24%
614
371
5,173
2,586 32%
500
5,233
3,663
40%
1,465
885
5,294
3,705
8,596
986
8,695
8,796
4,398
50%
2,199
1,328 8,898
4,449
5,648
1,385
5,713
5,779
4,624
70%
3,236
1,954 5,846
4,677
10
9,454
4,727 18%
851
514
9,564
693
9,675
4,837
30%
1,451
876
9,787
4,894
11
6,777
3,388 18%
610
368
6,855
3,428 24%
823
497
6,935
3,467
30%
1,040
628
7,015
3,508
36% 1,263
762
12
1,213
109
66
1,227
147
89
1,241
620
30%
186
112
1,255
628
36%
136
13
5,807
666
5,874
780
5,942
2,971
50%
1,486
897
6,011
3,006
54% 1,623
14
50%
3,603
2,175 14,578
7,289
15
8,744
1,003
50%
2,237
1,351 9,052
4,526
81,989
50,442 30,459
Tot
al
606
18%
34,347 20,740
8,846
613
24%
828
8,948
38,630 23,327
64
4,474
81,048
(3)
46,723 28,213
226
980
2017
No.
(1)
(2)
(3)
2018
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
2019
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
2020
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
21,952 19,757 94% 18,571 11,214 22,206 19,986 96% 19,186 11,586 22,464 20,218 98% 19,813 11,964 22,725 20,452 100% 20,452 12,350
855
6,818
988
6,897
3,449
54%
1,862
1,125
6,977
3,489
60%
2,093
1,264
982
7,832
1,135
7,923
3,962
54%
2,139
1,292
8,015
4,007
60%
2,404
1,452
1,003
8,001
1,160
8,094
4,047
54%
2,185
1,320
8,188
4,094
60%
2,456
1,483
5,160
8,846
5,341
9,152
5,526
1,483
10,353
5,176
54%
2,795
1,688
10,473
5,236
60%
3,142
1,897
1,177
5,417
1,328
5,480
3,836
64%
2,455
1,482
5,543
3,880
70%
2,716
1,640
1,576
9,106
1,705
9,211
4,606
66%
3,040
1,836
9,318
4,659
70%
3,261
1,969
2,114
5,983
2,197
6,052
4,842
78%
3,777
2,280
6,122
4,898
80%
3,918
2,366
10
1,451
10,132
5,066
54%
2,736
1,652
10,249
5,125
60%
3,075
1,857
11
900
7,179
1,040
7,262
3,631
54%
1,961
1,184
7,346
3,673
60%
2,204
1,331
12
1,270
161
1,285
186
1,300
650
54%
351
212
1,315
657
60%
394
238
13
1,065
6,151
1,152
6,223
3,111
66%
2,054
1,240
6,295
3,148
70%
2,203
1,330
2,793
15,091
7,545
66%
4,980
3,007
15,266
7,633
70%
5,343
3,226
15
1,604
1,734
9,371
4,685
66%
3,092
1,867
9,479
4,740
70%
3,318
2,003
635
42%
267
54,241 32,753
9,263
48%
308
58,122 35,097
65
84,875
62,085 37,490
85,860
66,133 39,934
SUB-ANNEX 15
Year
No.
Local
2010
2011
2012
Garbag
Garbag
Rate of
Garbage
Rate of Garbage
e per Populatio Total
e from
Populati Total Rate of
Organi Populatio Total
collecti
Organic
from
collecti
from
Organic
person
n
garbage
collecti
on garbage collection
c
n
garbage
on
(kg/d)
collection
on
collection (kg/day)
(kg/per (people) (kg/d)
on
(people) (kg/day) (%)
(kg/d) (people) (kg/day)
(%)
(kg/day)
(%) (kg/day)
son.d)
(kg/d)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Binh Dinh
0.8
10,520
5,913
17,736 14,189
77%
10,926
6,142
17,942
14,354
79%
11,339
6,374
Dap Da
0.8
9,693
5,449
17,509 14,007
72%
10,085
5,669
17,712
14,170
74%
10,486
5,894
Nhon My
0.5
11,411
5,705
11,543
5,772
10%
577
324
11,677
5,839
20%
1,168
656
Nhon Thanh
0.5
15,755
7,877
20%
1,575
886
15,937
7,969
26%
2,072
1,165
16,122
8,061
32%
2,580
1,450
Nhon Hanh
0.5
10,853
5,427
10,979
5,490
6%
329
185
11,107
5,553
12%
666
375
Nhon Hau
0.5
13,472
6,736
13,629
6,814
7%
477
268
13,787
6,893
14%
965
542
Nhon Phong
0.5
8,583
4,292
8,683
4,341
6%
260
146
8,784
4,392
12%
527
296
Nhon An
0.5
10,136
5,068
0%
10,254
5,127
7%
359
202
10,373
5,186
14%
726
408
Nhon Phuc
0.5
10,693
5,346
20%
1,069
601
10,817
5,408
26%
1,406
790
10,942
5,471
32%
1,751
984
10
Nhon Hung
0.5
12,500
6,250
30%
1,875
1,054
12,645
6,323
36%
2,276
1,279
12,792
6,396
42%
2,686
1,510
11 Nhon Khanh
0.5
8,614
4,307
8,714
4,357
8%
349
196
8,815
4,407
16%
705
396
12
Nhon Loc
0.5
8,981
4,490
0.20
898
505
9,085
4,543
26%
1,181
664
9,191
4,595
32%
1,470
827
13
Nhon Hoa
0.5
18,208
9,104
20%
1,821
1,024
18,419
9,209
26%
2,394
1,346
18,633
9,316
32%
2,981
1,676
14
Nhon Tan
0.5
7,841
3,920
7,932
3,966
10%
397
223
8,024
4,012
20%
802
451
15
Nhon Tho
0.5
8,908
20%
891
501
9,011
26%
1,171
659
9,116
4,558
32%
1,459
820
28,342
15,932
4,506
102,02
1
34,260
19,259
TOTAL
4,454
100,85
180,797
1
66
103,204
40,312 22,660
2013
No.
(1)
(2)
(3)
2014
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
2015
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
2016
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
18,150 14,520 81% 11,761 6,611 18,361 14,689 83% 12,192 6,853 18,574 16,716
17,918 14,334 76% 10,894 6,124 18,126 14,501 78% 11,310 6,358 18,336 14,669
568
823
450
8,989
606
619
835
10
11
601
9,020
811
12
993
9,405
1,163
13
14
684
8,211
923
15
985
9,329
1,154
104,402
800
996
1,343 12,088
9,671
50%
4,835
2,718
12,228
3,080
2,040 16,690
8,345
50%
4,172
2,345
16,883
2,657
11,498
5,749
30%
1,725
969
11,631
1,177
1,110 14,272
7,136
35%
2,498
1,404
14,438
1,664
9,093
4,546
30%
1,364
767
9,198
931
10,738
5,369
35%
1,879
1,056
10,862
1,252
1,385 11,327
5,664
50%
2,832
1,592
11,459
1,804
1,987 13,242
6,621
60%
3,973
2,233
13,396
2,410
9,125
6,388
40%
2,555
1,436
9,231
1,671
9,514
4,757
50%
2,379
1,337
9,624
1,515
2,358 19,289
9,644
50%
4,822
2,711
19,512
3,071
8,306
6,645
50%
3,323
1,868
8,403
2,116
9,437
4,718
50%
2,359
1,326
9,546
1,503
46,499 26,138
105,613
767
52,825 29,694
67
116,638
71,402 40,137
2017
No.
(1)
(2)
(3)
2018
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
2019
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
2020
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
19,007 17,107 91% 15,567 8,751 19,228 17,305 94% 16,267 9,144 19,451 17,506
18,764 15,011 86% 12,909 7,257 18,981 15,185 89% 13,515 7,597 19,202 15,361
74%
7,494
4,213
4,607
3,302 17,478
8,739
74%
6,467
3,635
17,681
3,975
1,606 12,041
6,020
54%
3,251
1,827
12,180
2,054
2,201 14,946
7,473
59%
4,409
2,478
15,119
2,762
1,098
1,270
9,522
4,761
54%
2,571
1,445
9,633
1,624
1,656 11,245
5,622
59%
3,317
1,865
11,375
2,078
2,241 11,862
5,931
74%
4,389
2,467
12,000
2,698
10
2,774 13,868
6,934
76%
5,270
2,962
14,028
3,154
11
1,911
9,446
2,156
9,556
6,689
64%
4,281
2,406
9,667
2,663
12
1,697
9,849
1,882
9,963
4,982
74%
3,686
2,072
10,079
2,266
13
74%
7,474
4,201
4,594
14
2,370
8,599
2,629
8,699
6,959
74%
5,150
2,895
8,799
3,166
15
1,683
9,769
1,867
9,883
4,941
74%
3,657
2,055
9,997
2,248
119,360
9,413
85,334 47,968
68
122,145
92,528 52,012
123,562
99,877 56,144
SUB-ANNEX 16
Year
No.
Local
2010
2011
Garbag
Garbag
Total
Rate of e from
Rate of
e per Populat garba
Organic Populati Total
collecti collecti
collecti
person
ion
ge
(kg/day
on garbage
on
on
on
(kg/per (people) (kg/d
)
(people) (kg/day)
(%) (kg/day
(%)
son.d)
)
)
(1)
(2)
2012
Garbage
Rate of Garbage
from
Populati Total
Organic
collecti from Organic
collectio
on
garbage
(kg/d)
on collection (kg/d)
n
(people) (kg/day)
(%) (kg/day)
(kg/day)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
4,554
Tam Quan
0.8
11,221 8,977
85%
7,630
4,348
11,351
9,081
86%
7,809
4,450
11,482
9,186
87%
7,992
Bong Son
0.8
12,857
7,327
18,064 14,451
91%
13,151
7,494
18,273 14,619
92%
13,449 7,664
Hoai Son
0.5
9,611
4,806
9,723
4,861
6%
292
166
9,835
4,918
12%
590
336
0.5
9,602
4,801
50%
2,401
1,368
9,713
4,857
54%
2,623
1,495
9,826
4,913
58%
2,850
1,624
Hoai Chau
0.5
8,841
4,421
8,944
4,472
7%
313
178
9,048
4,524
14%
633
361
Hoai Phu
0.5
8,944
4,472
9,047
4,524
7%
317
180
9,152
4,576
14%
641
365
0.5
17,481 8,741
50%
4,370
2,490
17,684
8,842
54%
4,775
2,721
17,889
8,945
58%
5,188
2,956
0.5
11,854 5,927
11,991
5,996
7%
420
239
12,131
6,065
14%
849
484
Hoai Hao
0.5
12,731 6,365
12,879
6,439
6%
386
220
13,028
6,514
12%
782
445
10
0.5
11,039 5,519
50%
2,760
1,573
11,167
5,583
54%
3,015
1,718
11,296
5,648
58%
3,276
1,867
11
Hoai Thanh
0.5
12,337 6,169
12,481
6,240
6%
374
213
12,625
6,313
12%
758
432
12
Hoai Huong
0.5
16,384 8,192
16,574
8,287
6%
497
283
16,766
8,383
12%
1,006
573
13
Hoai Tan
0.5
18,004 9,002
50%
4,501
2,565
18,213
9,107
54%
4,918
2,802
18,425
9,212
58%
5,343
3,045
14
Hoai Hai
0.5
7,169
3,585
7,252
3,626
6%
218
124
7,336
3,668
12%
440
251
15
Hoai Xuan
0.5
8,323
4,162
8,420
4,210
7%
295
168
8,518
4,259
14%
596
340
16
Hoai My
0.5
13,435 6,718
13,591
6,795
6%
408
232
13,749
6,874
12%
825
470
17
Hoai Duc
0.5
14,254 7,127
50%
3,564
2,031
14,420
7,210
54%
3,893
2,219
14,587
7,294
58%
4,230
2,411
TOTAL
209,089113,268
38,082 21,701
114,581
69
43,702 24,904
115,911
49,448 28,178
2013
No.
(1)
(2)
(3)
2014
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
2015
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
2016
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
90%
8,558
4,877
12,025
9,620
18,485 14,788 93% 13,753 7,837 18,700 14,960 94% 14,062 8,014 18,917 17,025
95%
16,174
9,217
19,136
10,182 5,091
30%
1,527
870
10,300
5,150
36% 1,854
1,057
70%
3,560
2,029
10,290
5,145
72% 3,704
2,111
961
548
9,259
739
9,366
4,683
35%
1,639
934
9,475
4,737
40% 1,895
1,080
972
554
9,366
747
9,474
4,737
35%
1,658
945
9,584
4,792
40% 1,917
1,092
70%
6,482
3,694
18,734
9,367
72% 6,744
3,843
734
990
12,558 6,279
35%
2,198
1,252
12,703
6,352
40% 2,541
1,448
676
912
13,487 6,743
30%
2,023
1,153
13,643
6,822
36% 2,456
1,399
70%
4,093
2,332
11,829
5,915
72% 4,259
2,427
13,070 6,535
30%
1,960
1,117
13,221
6,611
36% 2,380
1,356
895
510
688
4,988
655
870
30%
2,603
1,484
17,558
8,779
36% 3,160
1,801
70%
6,676
3,804
19,294
9,647
72% 6,946
3,958
14
668
381
7,508
3,754 24%
15
905
516
8,716
713
901
513
7,595
3,797
30%
1,139
649
7,683
3,841
36% 1,383
788
695
8,818
4,409
35%
1,543
879
8,920
4,460
40% 1,784
1,017
962
14,233 7,116
30%
2,135
1,217
14,398
7,199
36% 2,592
1,477
70%
5,285
3,012
15,276
7,638
72% 5,499
3,134
55,320 31,525
884
91% 8,754
(5)
118,615
61,323 34,945
70
121,883
69,254 39,465
123,297
74,401 42,398
2017
No.
(1)
(2)
(3)
2018
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
2019
(4)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
94%
9,361
5,334
12,592
19,136 17,223 97% 16,706 9,520 19,583 17,624 98% 17,272 9,843 19,810 17,829
99%
17,651 10,058
20,040
54%
2,879
1,641
10,786
5,393
60% 3,236
1,844
78%
4,154
2,367
10,776
5,388
80% 4,310
2,456
1,215
9,696
1,381
9,808 4,904
55%
2,697
1,537
9,922
4,961
60% 2,977
1,696
1,229
9,808
1,397
9,922 4,961
55%
2,728
1,555
10,037
5,018
60% 3,011
1,716
78%
7,563
4,310
19,619
9,809
80% 7,847
4,472
55%
3,616
2,061
13,303
6,652
60% 3,991
2,274
54%
3,813
2,173
14,287
7,144
60% 4,286
2,443
10
78%
4,776
2,722
12,388
6,194
80% 4,955
2,824
11
54%
3,695
2,106
13,846
6,923
60% 4,154
2,367
12
54%
4,907
2,797
18,387
9,193
60% 5,516
3,143
13
78%
7,790
4,439
20,205
4,606
14
919
7,862
1,075
7,953 3,977
54%
2,147
1,224
8,046
4,023
60% 2,414
1,375
15
1,144
9,128
1,300
9,234 4,617
55%
2,539
1,447
9,341
4,670
60% 2,802
1,597
16
54%
4,024
2,293
15,077
7,539
60% 4,523
2,578
17
78%
6,167
3,514
15,997
7,999
80% 6,399
3,646
123,297
(5)
2020
78,745 44,873
126,174
85,028 48,454
71
127,637
90,511 51,578
129,118
5,454
96,109 54,769
SUB-ANNEX 17
No.
Component
Total garbage
3
5
5
1
(ton/day)
1 Organic (yard
waste, food,
68.91% 70.16% 74.79% 89.67%
bone)
2 Paper, cardboard
0.79% 4.25% 4.20% 0.94%
3 Nylon
12.03% 12.25%
9.08%
4 Textiles
0.14% 0.79%
5 Plastic
21.01% 0.31%
6 Rubber
7 Leather
1.98%
8 Glass bottles
1.48%
9 Can
10 Heavy metals
11 Ceramic
0.20%
12 Demolition waste
13 Styroform
14 Battery
15 Others
18.12% 8.89%
Total
100%
100% 100%
100%
Note: Based on form 1, form 1.1, form 3.1 and form 4.1
%
21
10
23
33
TOTAL
Ton/d Ton/day
ay
87
101
59.01
58.42%
2.80%
6.73%
0.18%
7.61%
0.42%
0.32%
0.04%
3.20%
100%
2.89
12.15
3.82
2.50
0.76
0.06
0.76
0.15
0.11
0.30
1.54
0.04
16.92
101
2.86%
12.03%
3.79%
2.47%
0.75%
0.06%
0.76%
0.14%
0.11%
0.30%
1.52%
0.04%
16.75%
100%
0.39
0.94
0.03
1.07
0.06
0.04
0.01
0.45
14
72
1.16%
10.90%
2.97%
3.03%
2.69%
1.01%
0.36%
0.07
0.00
11.00%
100%
SUB-ANNEX 18
No.
Component
Market
waste
Phu My District
An Nhon district
TOTAL
Averag
Averag
Average
Average
domestic
Market domestic
e
Market domestic
Market domestic
e
percent
percent
Ton/day
waste
waste
waste percent waste
waste
waste
waste percent
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
Total garbage
1
21
22
3
10
13
5
23
28
5
33
38
101
(ton/day)
Organic (yard
1
waste, food,
68.91% 59.85% 60.26% 70.16% 62.49% 64.26% 74.79% 52.17% 56.21% 89.67% 52.03% 56.99% 59.01
bone)
Paper,
2
0.79% 1.16% 1.14% 4.25% 1.63% 2.23% 4.20% 4.97% 4.83% 0.94% 2.87% 2.62%
2.89
cardboard
3
Nylon
12.03% 10.90% 10.96% 12.25% 17.81% 16.52%
14.29% 11.73% 9.08% 11.66% 11.32% 12.15
4
Textiles
0.14% 2.97% 2.84% 0.79% 3.77% 3.08%
1.86% 1.53% 0.00% 7.18% 6.23%
3.82
5
Plastic
3.03% 2.89%
1.93% 1.49% 21.01% 1.24% 4.77% 0.31% 0.96% 0.87%
2.50
6
Rubber
2.69% 2.57%
0.01
0.01
0.47% 0.38%
0.76
7
Leather
1.98%
0.46%
0.06
8
Glass bottles
1.01% 0.96% 1.48% 2.22% 2.05%
1.24% 1.02%
0.76
9
Can
0.03%
0.00
0.62% 0.51%
0.15
10 Heavy metals
0.36% 0.34%
0.32% 0.24%
0.11
11 Ceramic
0.20%
0.05%
0.90% 0.78%
0.30
Demolition
12
6.95% 6.64%
0.01
0.01
1.54
waste
13 Styroform
0.00%
14 Battery
0.08% 0.07%
0.00
0.00
0.04
15 Others
18.12%
0.11 11.32% 8.89% 7.87% 8.11%
23.14% 19.01% 0.00% 24.40% 21.19% 16.92
Total
100%
100% 100%
100%
100% 100% 100%
100%
100%
100%
100% 100%
101
Note: Based on form 1, form 1.1, form 3.1 and form 4.1
73
100
58.42%
2.86%
12.03%
3.79%
2.47%
0.75%
0.06%
0.76%
0.14%
0.11%
0.30%
1.52%
0.00%
0.04%
16.75%
100%
SUB-ANNEX 19
No
1
2
3
4
No
1
2
3
4
DISTRICT
An Nhon
district
Tay Son
district
Phu My
district
Hoai Nhon
district
Total
DISTRICT
An Nhon
district
Tay Son
district
Phu My
district
Hoai Nhon
district
Total
2011
Kg/day Ton/year Kg/day Ton/year
2012
Kg/day Ton/year
Up to 2015
2013
Kg/day Ton/year
15,932
5,815
19,259
7,029
22,660
8,271
26,138
9,541
29,694
10,838
36,347
13,266
13,313
4,859
15,734
5,743
18,209
6,646
20,740
7,570
23,327
8,514
28,213
10,298
8,552
3,121
12,778
4,664
17,100
6,242
21,522
7,855
26,043
9,506
34,732
12,677
21,701
7,921
24,904
9,090
28,178
10,285
31,525
11,507
34,945
12,755
39,465
14,405
59,498
21,717
72,674
26,526
86,148
31,444
99,925
36,473
114,010
41,614
138,757
50,646
2010
2016
Kg/day
Ton/year
2017
Kg/day
Ton/year
Up to 2020
2018
Kg/day Ton/year
2014
Kg/day Ton/year
2015
Kg/day Ton/year
Total
2019
Kg/day
Ton/year
2020
Kg/day
Ton/year
2010-2020
Tons
40,137
14,650
44,010
16,064
47,968
17,508
52,012
18,985
56,144
20,492
142,460.2
30,459
11,118
32,753
11,955
35,097
12,810
37,490
13,684
39,934
14,576
107,773.8
38,597
14,088
42,547
15,530
46,584
17,003
50,708
18,508
54,922
20,046
129,241.3
42,398
15,475
44,873
16,379
48,454
17,686
51,578
18,826
54,769
19,991
154,318.8
151,592
55,331
164,185
59,927
178,103
65,007
191,789
70,003
205,768
75,105
533,794
74
SUB-ANNEX
20
Animal
Coefficient of
waste
Kg/day
Min
Max
An Nhon
Hoai Nhon
Phu My
TOTAL
Head
Number of
manure per day
Kg/day
Min
Buffalo
18
25
1,065
19,170
Cattle
15
20
30,050
450,750
Pig
1.2
73,632
88,358
Poultry
0.02
0.05
751,898
15,037
TOTAL
Tay Son
Head
Max
26,625
920
Number of
manure per
day
Kg/day
Min
Max
Head
Min
16,560 23,000
2,840
25,229
573,316 959,747
21,110
Number of manure
per day
Kg/day
533,233
1,160,47
773,219 0
Max
51,120
71,000
378,435
504,580
197,458
658,196
10,664
26,661
637,678
Head
1,260,437
Number of
manure per day
Kg/day
Min
4,647
83,646
Head
Min
Max
116,175 9,472
283,62
Kg/day
358,563
170,496
430,275
1,434,252
121,304
2,971,773 4,888,996
Note: Applying livestock waste coefficient by manual use of biogas program for the livestock sector in Vietnam 2007-2011, Department of
Livestock, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development and the Dutch development organization
75
236,800
2,322,480 3,096,640
987,559 1,508,340
Max
SUBANNEX 21
Composition
Paper
Plastic
Organic waste
Iron
Other metal
Glass
Fibber
Rubber
Wood
Harardous waste
Brick
Ofice
waste
46.4
14.5
32.9
0.9
0.7
2.7
0.9
1.2
0.0
0.6
0.0
Household waste
9.0
8.9
69.0
0.0
0.2
0.1
3.6
0.2
0.0
3.6
5.4
76
Trade center
waste
28.5
20.7
27.8
0.0
1.8
1.7
1.0
1.9
0.0
0.0
16.7
Market
waste
2.8
4.0
86.6
0.0
0.4
0.6
2.3
2.1
0.6
0.0
0.8