Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Office Hours: Important! Please schedule appointments ONLY with Professor Kritsonis
williamkritsonis@yahoo.com - 281-550-5700 (Available 24/7)
I. COURSE DESCRIPTION:
It is suggested that doctoral students purchase a current APA Style Guide if they do
not have one. APA information also available at: www.nationalforum.com
NOTE: Links to journals, research reports, and other sources will be posted on the
class WebCT site, and additional materials may be presented in class. All posted and
distributed materials form part of the knowledge base for the course.
Outline of Topics
Guidelines for the Research Paper: Due: November 18, 2006 - Saturday
The research paper should be 25 pages including an abstract and bibliography. The
specific tasks for this assignment include the following:
A (90-100 pts) - This research paper has a clear beginning, middle, and an end
delineating the line of argument/analysis developed by the candidate. This is clearly
original, superior work product with no spelling or grammatical errors. The
arguments are compelling and supported. The paper has a conclusion that is
supported by the evidence. This paper conforms to the articles published in the
DOCTORAL FORUM – www.nationalforum.com.
B (80-89 pts) - This research paper has most of the requirements to receive an “A”,
but falls short in one or more areas. Spelling and grammatical errors, no matter how
minor, usually result in the grade of a “B” even if all other indices have been met.
C (70-79 pts) - This research paper fails to meet one or more of the above
requirements and contains many spelling, grammatical or syntactical errors. The line
of argument is not clear or not supportable. The paper is a superficial treatment and
not very original.
D (60 – 69) - This research paper is unacceptable. It fails to develop a coherent line
of argument or analysis. What points are made are not supported logically and show
no real understanding of the premises. The connections are not clear.
F (59 and below) - This research paper is unacceptable. In addition to the
above errors, there are many spelling, grammatical or syntactical errors in this
paper.
The perspective of this course is that doctoral students are adults and they learn best
when they can …
1. Direct their own learning.
2. Influence and participate in meaningful decision making.
3. Focus on problems relevant to practice.
4. Use their own, rich experiential backgrounds.
5. Build strong relationships with peers.
6. Exercise some control over both the content and the process of learning.
7. Influence activities and topic format of discussions.
8. Develop goals, design and implement activities, and evaluate outcomes.
9. Feel a sense of ownership.
100 Points – Group Power Point Presentation on Human Resource Management (40
minutes) (Two members per group)
Submit CD and two hard copies of presentation to Dr.
Kritsonis.
Send cohort members copies of your presentation.
150 Points – Class Participation - (Grade shall be lowered for lack of participation)
650 Total Points
584 – 650 = A
477 – 453 = B
410 – 476 = C
343 – 409 = D
Below 342 = F
Out-of-class independent writing assignment - September 23, 2006 – Saturday.
You are expected to practice academic honesty in every aspect of this course and all
other courses. Make sure you are familiar with your Student Handbook, especially
the second on academic misconduct,. Students who engage in academic misconduct
are subject to university disciplinary procedures.
X. NONACADEMIC MISCONDUCT
The university respects the rights of instructors to teach and students to learn.
Maintenance of these rights requires conditions that do not impede their exercise.
Campus behavior that interferes with either (1) the instructor’s ability to conduct the
class, (2) the inability of other students to profit from the instructional program, or
(3) campus behavior that interferes with the rights of others will not be tolerated. An
individual engaging in such disruptive behavior may be subject to disciplinary action.
Such incidents will be adjudicated by the Dean of Students under nonacademic
procedures.
In 2005, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis lectured at the Oxford Round Table at
Oriel College in the University of Oxford, Oxford, England. His lecture was
entitled Ways of Knowing Through the Realms of Meaning.
Educational Background
Professional Experience
Dr. Kritsonis began his career as a teacher. He has served education as a
principal, superintendent of schools, director of field experiences and student
teaching, consultant, invited guest professor, author, editor, and publisher. He
has earned tenure at the highest academic rank as a professor at two major
universities.
International Travel