Professional Documents
Culture Documents
محاضرات هندسة الاساسات د. طارق نجيب P2
محاضرات هندسة الاساسات د. طارق نجيب P2
PART 2
27 April 2012
Wall
b/4
b
ECCENTRICALLY LOADED
FOOTINGS
27 April 2012
M
Eccentricity, e
P
P
6* e
s1
1
B* L
L
2
M
P
s2
Soil Pressure
27 April 2012
s1
+
=
OR
OR
27 April 2012
Soil Stress
s1 qall soil ) 1(
3 Cases may be encountered )2(
Case (1): s2 compression ) 2(
Case (2): s2 = zero ) = 2(
Case (3): s2 tension ) 2(
Cases (1) and (2) are acceptable, ) 2( )1(
Case (3) needs special treatment
) 3(
Option (1): Offsetting the column distance (e)
Option (2): Calculate the actual soil pressure, and
design the footing for such case.
(e) :)1(
:)2(
27 April 2012
e < L/6
e = L/6
e > L/6
27 April 2012
+
=
P/A
M/Z
OR
OR
B/6
L/6
L
27 April 2012
(
)
27 April 2012
:)2(
eL
eB
B'
L'
L
27 April 2012
10
Example (2):
Eccentrically Loaded Isolated Footing
Design a reinforced concrete isolated footing to
support the followings column loads at the ground
surface:
D.L. = 800 kN,
L.L. = 600 kN
MD.L. = 250 kN.m,
ML.L. = 150 kN.m
HD.L = 50 kN,
HL.L=25 kN.
Column dimensions, 80 x 40 cm
qall soil = 1.50 kg/cm2, fcu = 30 N/mm2, fy = 360 N/mm2.
F.L. = - 2.00 m from the ground level (G.L.).
Design a footing such that the soil pressure will be
approximately uniform.
27 April 2012
11
P
G.L.
2.0 m
F.L.
L
0.40
0.80
27 April 2012
12
Solution
-Column Service Loads Pc = PD.L. + PL.L.
- Pc = 800 + 600 = 1400 kN = 140.0 ton
-P at F.L. = 1.10 x Pc = 140.0 x 1.08 = 151.2 ton
Dimensions of P.C. footing
AR.C. = P / qall = 151.20 / 15.0 = 10.08 m2
Lp .c .
B p .c .
a-b
0.8 - 0.40
Ap.c.
10.08
3.37 3.40 m
2
2
a-b
0.8 - 0.40
Ap.c. 10.08 2.97 3.00 m
2
2
27 April 2012
13
0.364 0.36 m
P 151.20
P
6* e
s1
1
B* L
L
2
151.20
6 * 0.36
s1
1
14.82 * (1 0.64)
3.0 * 3.4
3.40
2
14
0.36
3.40 m
3.00 m
P
fn
AR.C.
0.36
151.20
14.82 t/m 2
3.4 * 3.0
27 April 2012
0.40
0.80
15
0.36
224.64
2
22.02 t/m
3.4 * 3.0
27 April 2012
3.00 m
f un
Pu
AR.C.
0.40
0.94 m
0.80
1.66 m
16
Flexural Design
Critical Section for Moment
Long Direction
x1
x1
LR .C . - a
e
2
3.40 - 0.80
0.36 1.66 m
LR.C.
1.0
2
1
x * 1.0
M u / m' f un *
2
x1 I
1.66 2 * 1.0
M u / m' 22.02 *
30.34 m.t/m'
2
27 April 2012
17
Flexural Design
Mu
R
From
Chart,
for
R
2
f cu * bs * d
= 0.033, = 0.04
5
30.34 * 10
R
0.033
2
300 * 100 * 55
2
A
=
18.33
cm
f cu
s
As *
* bs * d
A
=
10
f
/m'
s
16
f
y
30
2
As 0.040 *
* 1000 * 550 1833.33 mm
360
0.6
0.6
2
As min
bs d
* 1000 * 550 917 mm
fy
360
27 April 2012
18
Flexural Design
Critical Section for Moment in Short Direction
2
2
1
BR.C.
18.61* 10
R
300 * 100 * 55 2
0.021
1.30 * 1.0
M u / m' 22.02 *
2
18.61 m.t/m'
y1
y * 1.0
M u / m' f un
2
5
1.0
y1
3.00 - 0.40
1.30 m
a
LR.C.
19
Flexural Design
Critical Section for Moment in Short Direction
30
2
As 0.021 *
* 1000 * 550 962.50 mm
360
As = 9.63 cm2
As = 5f16 /m'
27 April 2012
20
Check of Shear
x2
x2
LR .C . - a - d
e
2
LR.C.
fun
Check of Shear:
Qsh
qu
qcu
BR.C. * d
BR.C.
91.82 * 1000
qu
5.56 kg/cm 2
300 * 55
27 April 2012
d/2
x2
21
Check of Shear
Allowable Shear
qcu 0.16
qcu 0.16
f cu
gc = 1.50
gc
30
2
0.72 N/mm
1.50
7.20 kg/cm
27 April 2012
22
Check of Punching
ap = (a+d) = 0.80 + 0.55 = 1.35 m
bp = (b+d) = 0.40 + 0.55 = 0.95 m
LR.C.
Qp= 22.02*[3.40*3.00
ap
d/2
BR.C.
1.35*0.95] = 196.36 t
27 April 2012
bp
d/2
23
Check of Punching
qcup 0.316
qcup
qcup
f cu
gc
0.316
30
1.41 1.6 N/mm 2
1.5
ap
0.316 0.50
b
p
0.40
0.316 0.50
0.80
qcup
f cu
gc
30
1.41 N/mm 2
1.5
0.80 0.20
b
p
f cu
gc
4 * 0.55 30.0
2
qcup 0.80 0.20
2.43
N/mm
4.60 1.50
27 April 2012
Shallow Foundations, P1, Tarek Nageeb
24
Check of Punching
Qup
196.36 * 1000
2
qup
7.76 kg/cm
b punch * d
460 * 55
qup (7.76 kg/cm2) < qcup 14.10 kg/cm2 ) O.K.
For footing subjected to large lateral loads, check of
sliding should be performed. Sliding resistance will
be: Footing base resistance with underlying soils.
Passive earth pressure due to wall embedment
27 April 2012
25
27 April 2012
26
P
G.L.
2.0 m
F.L.
L
0.40
0.80
27 April 2012
27
Solution
Dimensions of P.C. footing to avoid tension in the
soil:
L 6e
to avoid tension on the soil
L = 6*e + a
Or to be calculated by the usual method,
whichever is larger
6
M
55.0
e
0.36 m
P 151.20
28
a -b
0.8 - 0.40
10.08
3.37 3.40 m
2
2
a-b
0.8 - 0.40
10.08 2.97 3.00 m
2
2
Shallow Foundations, P1, Tarek Nageeb
29
s1
P
6 * e 151.20
6 * 0.36
s1
1
B* L
L 3.0 * 3.4
3.4
2
s2
= 14.82*(1 + 0.635)
= 24.23 t/m2 > 15.0 t/m2, unsafe
= 14.82*(1 - 0.635)
= 5.41 t/m2 > 0.0 (no tension), safe
30
0.34 m
P 161.0
P
6* e
161.0
6 * 0.34
s1
1
B* L
L 3.0 * 5.0
5.0
2
s1
s2
= 10.73*(1 + 0.408)
= 15.11 t/m2 15.0 t/m2, considered safe
= 10.73*(1 0.408)
= 6.35 t/m2 > 0.0 (no tension), safe
27 April 2012
31
161
Column
R.C.
55.0
P.C.
6.35 t/m2
15.11 t/m2
Soil Pressure under the P.C. footing
27 April 2012
32
- Assume tp.c. = 40 cm
- Reinforced Concrete Dimensions:
LR.C. = Lp.c. 2 x = 5.00 2 * 0.40 = 4.20 m
BR.C. = Bp.c. 2 x = 3.00 2 * 0.40 = 2.20 m
AR.C. = LR.C. * BR.C. = 4.20 * 2.20 = 9.24 m2
R.C. Footing Design
Forces and Moments at the interface between
reinforced and plain concrete footings:
-Ultimate Column Load
33
R.C.
2.20 m
3.00 m
4.20 m
0.40
0.80
P.C.
5.00 m
27 April 2012
34
0.368 0.37 m
Pu 208.0
208.0
6 * 0.37
f u1
1
22.51* (1 0.53)
2
4.2 * 2.20
4.20
27 April 2012
35
208 t
x1
76.6
10.58 t/m2
34.4 t/m2
1.70
2
f u 3 34.40 - 34.40 - 10.58 *
24.76 t/m
4.20
27 April 2012
36
Flexural Design
Critical Section for Moment
Long Direction
x1
LR .C . - a
x1
4.20 - 0.80
1.70 m
2
f u1 f u 2 34.40 24.76
f un avg
29.58 t/m 2
2
2
x1
1.7
M u / m' f un avg * x1 * 29.58 * 1.7 *
42.75 m.t/m'
2
2
Mu
R
2
f cu * bs * d
27 April 2012
42.75 * 10
R
0.047
2
300 * 100 * 55
37
Flexural Design
From Chart, for R = 0.047, = 0.058
f cu
As *
* bs * d
fy
30
2
As 0.058 *
* 1000 * 550 2658.33 mm
360
0.6
0.6
2
bs d
* 1000 * 550 917 mm
fy
360
Shallow Foundations, P1, Tarek Nageeb
38
Flexural Design
Critical Section for Moment in Short Direction
1.00
f u4 34.40 - 34.40 - 10.58 *
28.73 t/m 2
4.20
f u1 f u 2 34.40 28.73
f uns avg
31.57 t/m 2
2
2
0.90 2 * 1.0
M u / m' 31.57 *
2
12.79 m.t/m'
BR.C.
y12 * 1.0
2
y1
M u / m' f un
27 April 2012
1.0
y1
2.20 - 0.40
0.90 m
LR.C.
39
Flexural Design
Critical Section for Moment in Short Direction
12.79 * 10 5
R
0.014
2
300 * 100 * 55
f cu
As *
* bs * d
fy
30
As 0.020 *
* 1000 * 550 916.67 mm 2
360
40
Check of Shear
x2
LR .C . - a - d
f u shear
x2
1.43 m
2
1.43
34.40 - 34.40 - 10.58 *
26.29 t/m 2
4.20
30.35 t/m 2
2
2
Check of Shear:
Qsh
qu
qcu
BR.C. * d
27 April 2012
d/2
BR.C.
x2
41
Check of Shear
95.48 * 1000
qu
7.89 kg/cm 2
220 * 55
Allowable Shear : qcu 0.16
qcu 0.16
f cu
gc
gc = 1.50
30
0.72 N/mm 2 7.20 kg/cm 2
1.50
42
208
d/2
1.40 m
1.40 m
76.6
10.58 t/m2
34.4 t/m2
fu6 =18.52 t/m2
43
Check of Punching
fu-punch-avg = (26.46 + 18.52)/2 = 22.49 t/m2
ap = (a+d) = 0.80 + 0.60 = 1.40 m
bp = (b+d) = 0.40 + 0.60 = 1.00 m
LR.C.
ap
Qp= 22.49*[4.20*2.20
27 April 2012
BR.C.
1.40*1.00] = 176.32 t
d/2
bp
d/2
44
Check of Punching
qcup 0.316
qcup
qcup
f cu
gc
0.316
30
1.41 1.6 N/mm 2
1.5
ap
0.316 0.50
b
p
0.40
0.316 0.50
0.80
qcup
f cu
gc
30
1.41 N/mm 2
1.5
0.80 0.20
b
p
f cu
gc
4 * 0.60 30.0
2
qcup 0.80 0.20
2.50
N/mm
4.80 1.50
27 April 2012
Shallow Foundations, P1, Tarek Nageeb
45
Check of Punching
Qup
176.32 * 1000
2
qup
6.12 kg/cm
b punch * d
480 * 60
qup (6.12 kg/cm2) < qcup 14.10 kg/cm2 ) O.K.
Check of footing sliding, F.S. = FResisting/FSliding:
FSliding
FResisting
FResisting
= Horizontal forces
= P tan d for sand, d = up to f
= Ca * L for clay, Ca 0.80 C,
L = footing length
Ignore passive resistance for shallow depths, and
take it for relatively large depths.
F.S. > 1.50
27 April 2012
46
5 f16 /m'
7 f22 /m'
(short direction)
Ld2 = 60*1.60 = 96 cm (short direction)
y1 = 90 cm < Ld2, bend bars upward
27 April 2012
47
DESIGN OF COMBINED
FOOTINGS
27 April 2012
48
FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
1- Site Investigation
2- Design of Shallow Foundations:
a- Design of Isolated Footings.
b- Design of Isolated Footings under
Eccentric Loads.
c- Design of Combined Footings.
d- Design of Strap Beam.
e- Design of Raft Foundations
27 April 2012
49
Combined Footing
Pc2
Pc1
Reinforced Concrete
Plain Concrete
27 April 2012
50
27 April 2012
51
Property
Line
Neighbor
Column
27 April 2012
52
Pc1
Pc2
xr
S
L
Pc 2 * S
Resultant: R = Pc1 + Pc2 xr
Pc1 Pc2
For the plain concrete footing:
LP.C. = 2 * xr + C1/2 + C2/2 + (1 ~ up to 2 m)
27 April 2012
53
AP .C .
BP .C .
LP.C.
Dimensions of Reinforced Concrete:
LR.C. = LP.C. 2 * x BR.C. = BP.C. 2 * x
Assume the thickness of R.C.
27 April 2012
54
f un1
27 April 2012
Puc 1 Puc2
t/m'
LR.C.
55
27 April 2012
56
Puc1
Puc2
xr
S
Mmax. 1
fun1 (t/m')
LR.C.
Mmax. 3
27 April 2012
Mmax. 2
57
Puc1
Puc2
xr
S
fun1 (t/m')
LR.C.
d/2
27 April 2012
Qsh2
d/2
Qsh1
58
Reinforced concrete depth and main upper
Reinforcements are determined using Mmax1
Mmax1
59
Pc2
Pc1
Longitudinal Reinforcements
27 April 2012
60
Assume that all the column load is distributed
under the column as a hidden beam on width
only with extension of d/2 from each side
d/2
27 April 2012
61
Puc1
d/2
Puc2
d/2
d/2
d/2
Hidden Beams
27 April 2012
62
Puc2
Puc1
d/2
d/2
d/2
d/2
27 April 2012
63
Check of Punching
ap2
ap1
d/2
d/2
bp1
bp2
d/2
d/2
64
0.70
S = 3.60 m
Shallow Foundations, P1, Tarek Nageeb
0.30
C2
65
Solution
Pc1=132t
Pc2=196t
xr =2.15
S = 3.60 m
L
Resultant: R = Pc1 + Pc2 = 132.0 + 196.0 = 328.0 ton
Pc 2 * S 196 * 3.60
xr
2.15 m
Pc1 Pc2 132 196
For the plain concrete footing:
LP.C. = 2 * xr + C1/2 + C2/2 + (1 ~ up to 2 m)
27 April 2012
66
20.62 m 2
qall - soil
17.50
AP .C . 20.62
BP .C .
3.44 3.45 m
LP.C.
6.00
Plain concrete footing dimensions:
Lp.c. = 6.00 m, Bp.c. = 3.45 m, tp.c. Taken 40 cm
R
2.15 m
0.40
0.30
3.0 m
27 April 2012
S = 3.60 m
0.70
0.30
3.45
3.0 m
Shallow Foundations, P1, Tarek Nageeb
67
f un 1
94.62 t/m'
27 April 2012
LR.C.
5.20
68
198
294
1.15
0.45
P2
x=2.09
3.60
P1
94.62 t/m'
5.20 m
69
1.15 2
M max 2 94.62 *
62.57 m.t
22
0.45
M max 3 94.62 *
9.58 m.t
2
Moments at different points
Point
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
27 April 2012
M (m.t)
30.27
3.55
-19.61
2.96
70
198
0.45
4
294
1.15
2.15
3
3.60
118.07
94.62 t/m'
5.20 m
Bending Moment Diagram
19.61
19.61
2.96 9.58
27 April 2012
3.55
62.57
30.27
71
0.45
198
d/2
P2 4
R
2.15
d/2
294
1.15
1 P1
3.60 2
94.62 t/m'
5.20 m
117.54
42.58
27 April 2012
155.42
185.19
101.96
Shallow Foundations, P1, Tarek Nageeb
41.16
108.81
72
M max 1 118.07
M max / m'
44.55 m.t/m'
BR.C.
2.65
5
Mu
44.55 * 10
R
2
R
0.033
2
f cu * bs * d
250 * 100 * 73
f cu
For R = 0.033, = 0.04 As *
* bs * d
f
y
25
As 0.040 *
400
As = 6f20/m'
27 April 2012
73
0.6
0.6
bs d
* 1000 * 730 1095 mm 2
fy
400
M 1 30.27
M 1 / m'
11.43 m.t/m'
BR.C.
2.65
R = 0.009, take = 0.02, As = 9.13 cm2
Therefore, for moments at points (2), (3), (4)
take the minimum area steel of As = 12.00 cm2
= 6f16/m'
27 April 2012
74
0.25
294
d1/2
bc2=1.41
bc1=1.01
)1( = bc1
)2( = bc2
In the short direction, d1 = d 2 = 73 2 = 71 cm
bc1 = ac1 + 0.25 + d1/2
= 0.40 + 0.25 + 0.71/2 = 1.005 m 1.01 m
bc2 = ac2 + 2*(d1/2) = 0.70 + 2*(0.71/2) = 1.41 m
27 April 2012
75
294 t
198 t
1.18
2.65
2.65
Puc1 198.0
f
74.72 t/m'
BR.C.
2.65
Puc2 294.0
'
fu2
110.94 t/m'
BR.C.
2.65
'
u1
27 April 2012
76
M f
'
u1
'
uc1
'
M 'u 2 f uc2
2
1
y
1.18
74.72 *
52.02 m.t
2
2
2
2
y1
1.18
110.94 *
77.24 m.t
2
2
77.24 * 10
Mu
R
0.043
R
2
2
250 * 141* 71
f cu * bs * d
f cu
* bs * d
For R = 0.043, = 0.0522 As *
fy
25
2
As 0.052 *
* 1410 * 710 3267.0 mm
400Shallow Foundations, P1, Tarek Nageeb
27 April 2012
77
25
As 0.0492 *
* 1005 * 710 2194.0 mm 2
400
As = 21.94 cm2 = 6f22
)1(
1.01
27 April 2012
78
0.45
198
d/2
P2 4
R
2.15
d/2
294
1.15
1 P1
3.60 2
94.62 t/m'
5.20 m
117.54
42.58
27 April 2012
155.42
185.19
101.96
Shallow Foundations, P1, Tarek Nageeb
41.16
108.81
79
Check of Shear:
Qsh
qu
qcu
BR.C. * d
117.54 * 1000
qu
6.08 kg/cm 2
265 * 73
f cu
gc = 1.50
Allowable Shear : qcu 0.16
gc
25
qcu 0.16
0.65 N/mm 2 6.50 kg/cm 2
1.50
80
Check of Punching
f un
Pc1 Pc 2
AR.C.
27 April 2012
bp2
ap1
81
Check of Punching
qcup 0.316
qcup
qcup
f cu
gc
0.316
25
1.29 1.6 N/mm 2
1.5
ap
0.316 0.50
b
p
0.30
0.316 0.50
0.70
qcup
qcup
27 April 2012
f cu
gc
25
2
1.20 N/mm
1.5
0.80 0.20
b
p
4 * 0.73
0.80 0.20
4.92
f cu
gc
25.0
2.59 N/mm 2
1.50
82
Check of Punching
Qup
241.42 * 1000
2
qup
6.72 kg/cm
b punch * d
492 * 73
qup (6.72 kg/cm2) < qcup 12.00 kg/cm2 ) O.K.
27 April 2012
83
Longitudinal Reinforcements,
27 April 2012
84
Under
Column C2
Under
Column C1
27 April 2012
85