Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ERBS April 22 Transcript
ERBS April 22 Transcript
STATE OF WISCONSIN
2 3
4
CIRCUIT COURT CHIPPEWA COUNTY Branch 1 ------------------------------------------------------JEFFREY P. ERBS, Petitioner, vs. MARY ANN ERBS, Respondent.
-------------------------------------------------------
CASE NO. 10 FA 11
5
6
SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE/
7
8
STATUS CONFERENCE
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Chippewa
HOI~ORABLE RODERICK
A. CAMERON
CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE, PRESIDING Thursday, April 22, 2010 Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin
County Courthouse,
54703, appearing
THE COURT:
2 3
Marriage of Jeffrey P. Erbs and Mary Ann Erbs, 10 FA 11. Mr. Erbs appears in person and is Miss Erbs does not appear but her
4
5
self-represented. attorney
6
7 8 9 10
11
conference
Anything
12 13 14 15
1
I just received from Mr. Liptak, it appears that the issues, potential issues are going to be a maintenance largely a
from an equal property division given the and the length of the
17 18 19
20
In terms of the maintenance most likely need to have a vocational and potentially
21
22
records if
Mr. Erbs is claiming he has -- he's unable to work due to a medical condition, complete those. THE COURT: How long was the marriage so it may take us some time to
23 24
25
(~
11
, 2 31 4
befcre he filed?
MS. V,::TE:
for
t~e pe:ition.
6, 2()03.
:1
-I
SlX
years.
81
9
F.rbs-?
11 11
17i
proper~y
No,
:10,
d1visicn
13
14j
15
~6
17'
T:JE eOCRT:
:8
19;
20;
Yes, we do.
We have anot:-.er
F,
2? 23 24 25
W~il:
iSS:lC
be?
We !ldve t~is
Acto.ney
Ve' U:
vio1atio!1 of confidences
/.-..., ,
3
-'--
n
4
l
did yo~ gQt in ~~c file
the
[~le
from THE
Mr.
Liptak? What
COUR::
rrorr.Mr.
Liptak?
MS. VEITIi:
sta~e~cn:s, i~anciaJ mostly disclosure to be Erbs, t~e
received plcadings,
disclosure
statemen~s, to daLe
other
~..
flled and
i~clllding there to
8. 9 10
T believe
:iptak
--
was,
le~=er
[rom
Mr.
():l~ clien=,
simply
i:lcical;ng and
t;haL
order
ef ~~e filed
WcJ5
o~ t~e mo~io~
13
Erbs
~,iptak removed.
That
14
csser.ti,a.:.ly
it.
THE COURT: Were :~ere notes ary rotes :n there like
16
1
[rom
or any=hi"g
17. ]8
L~at?
~s. VETTH:
~ardwrit~en envelopes no~es from, then !rom
no
~otCSf
19
There Mr.
wcre
Lwo
i= Joeks just
li%e
~:rbs to ~y "umbers
)1
cl ien~ a~d
an enve:ope
phone
22
Were
)1,
yeu
received
that
pertain
:0 his
divorce?
o
I.
------
--------l
I
That is a very valid concern, of the file records attorney, following Your Honor.
YOUy
51
61
1
I
1
,HE C8t;RT:
argument. Sr.e received relating
I'm
rlO~
81
91
correspondence
101
III
1
receive anything
121
What does sr.e have that you received? Okay. 1'hlS would be like an What about any possible or to the respondent, or
n
"
d
14
15
, 6
1 1 1
17
Mary Ann Erbs, from Mr. Lipta~ or ~rom Mar~ Mullen from anyone from the Mullen MS. VEITH: Mr. Liptak. Law Group, LLC:
181 19
My assistant,
with Mr. Lipta~'s office was she called 2nd requested the file. I haven'~ spoken wIth Mr. Liptuk about t~is
case or any other case. 24 251 THE COURT: MR. ERBS: Any other questions, Traditionally in a Mr. Erbs?
()
I
5
_I
1-
I
------- - -----
---
---------
---
--
---------
disqualification
THe:
~rderstand~ng,
6
I
COJRT:
Mr. Erbs.
record and I'm ~o~ aware of any ~ndicaLlon liptak, hearing previous Veith's
tirs: of all, r.ad a:1yth~ng frorr. the previous that he could r.ave Lransferred divorce office. But occiluse o[ Lhe potentiill, I gra:1tcd to -- [rom the to Ms.
8
9
1 :)
"'-
.'
,
I
he
, 3'I
('"
Veith's
14i
J
16 17
La Mr. Lipta~.
::: cior:'t
18 19 20
71
can be worried
about as far as
what.'s happening
MR. ERBS:
1 2
;
presu~ption
tha~
confidences
exc~anqed.
v'r. Liptak
Liptak,
as
3 4 5 6
I
so if ~r.
i::'s an irrebl"::taDle presumption from hIm and also Mr. Lip~ak. Mary Ann Eros
'I'~erefore, we I:ave fficre:han and we have more motions than property d~vision.
~a~ntenarce
8
9
have
today For
:8
~1
To strike
12
I3
yocr
:irst
I4
1~ 16 17 I8
reql"es t. ~iss
Your
request
no basis
in
so that's
denied.
19 20 21 22 23 24
25.
fraud
;n ~~is
case.
THe:
You your
cauK'!':
~t
Mr.
~rhs,
~'ve ~ade
the ruling.
going
"
thal. :1 4 have
YO\; dO:1't :a Lk
7.0
me about ~o yo~
to the court
of appeals.
any molior.s for this ~orning? MR. ERBS: Yes, 1 do, vacate
I
Sl
6' 71
8. 9
on I-'ebc;lClry cst.
mol ion
10
1
motlor.. THE COuRT: MR. ~kBS: Have those motio:1s been ficed?
1:!.
,"'--',:
~J
:!-1
.2
No, Yeur
Honor.
TilE COU:l.T: You r.eed te file your motlo:1s i:1 writi:1q so ~s. Veith the ociq.:.na1. ~R. is Lhat -- that ER3S: you And
~avcrl't
gets
a cepy,
~he court
gets
151 16 c7, 18
1
your
order
is -- your that
erd~r 1'm
seerl a mOLion
gOJr.g to file and yeu say I car.'t file what -THE COUR":": 1 didn't wen': hear it until M:l..ERBS: the motion Okay.
it, is l~~t
19 20 21
: said
n
2:i
The:1
have
motIon
to file,
24 25
,,-.,.
.
8
----
--
----
--
--
----
--
--
----
you're
going
MR.
the second
change
the temporary
order
that
81 91
10
1
motion
is an order of
discovery documents,
of financial and
-records,
production charges.
11,
12 13
1
the basis
for a contempt
(I
14
The
respondent
came
upon
the 16th
by myself
on the weekend
of the
mont;'?
there
a temporary
order
at
Yes,
there
was.
THE COURT: Dc yo~ have them with MR. E~GS: T'-lF. COleRT:
24 25
I do, Yo~r
Honor. for Ms ..
Do you have
a copy
()
---
--
--
----
--
---
--
-------
--I
J
Veith as we ll?
2
MR. ERBS:
They're
I don't
have any time, court time on them yet, Your Honor. I'll make sure they're served to her office. THE COURT: those now, Ms. Veith?
I
7
1
KS. VEITH:
81
0 J
1
10i
11 12 13
Mr. Erbs, what's the :heory behind strike all Ms. Erbs' pleadings? MR. ERBS: THE COURT: MR. ERGS: Fraud.
your motion
('I
14
1
-
Erbs knew that Lester Liptak was my attorney previously illegal and she was forewarned that it was probably
51
1
161 17
1
;Cor him
THE COURT:
You've explained
enough of your I
the day on the 24th. MS. VEITn: I'm in trial on the 24th and
()
10
~-----.-..-
------------
.-
--~
-",
2 3
4
I'm out of town on the 25th. Ti1E Co{;RT: I'm on vacation the next week.
How is the 8th Oe 9th of July? MS. VEITH: ::lorn~ng, Your I cu~ld do the e~l: ir: the
6
7 8
9' 10
11
9:3C,
ten days
and prov~de
!
copies
the motfon
hea~ing,
12 13
MS. VEITH:
You~
1:'
16
that know
bllt T have
disclosure he's
I dor't
He filed
ff~e.
20
that's
the pettioner,
Let De
21
22 23 24
25! !"
it shoJld
be in the
=t shoJld
oe.
That's
why
was
Mr. Erbs
filed
a fiilancia:
"
'
1 2
decla"ation
copy of thi:lt ~s. ~rbs or Mr. Veith -- or ~s. Veith to or Mr. Liptak? MR. ERBS: No, I haven'~ ye:-,.
3
4
THE COUR'i': Do yeu have il cepy you ca" give C1s. Ve.:.Lh?
7 ~R. ERRS: Yes,
do.
Okay.
10
YlS. V;::TE: Thunk yo,1. THE COURT: Is :.t,ere ar.y~~ir.qelse you war.~
Le b"ing up, Mr. Erbs, for this mo":,i"q? )1". ERi3S: Are we near c's:":.:.ssal here?
( '\
::'4
Wr.a~? This .:.S fle ng recorded, i We're or. t~c record. correct?
'lhe
16
17
-;'H~
COURT:
repe"ter
19 20 71: 22 23
please,
the repor::cr and arrar.ge to pay her. Yl?. ER2S: Thl:: COURT: MS. VEITH: ',hE COURT: Okay, fi"e. Yls. Veith, anythi"g
-:lme, No:: at Lh.:.s
else? hono r .
24
25
Ycur
Okay.
r
1
I
over.
Court's
in recess. :hank you, Your Monor. Thank you, Your Honor. were concluded.)
21
3' 4' 5 6 7 8 9 10
II
(The proceedinqs
121 13 (-'-, 14 15 16 i7 18 19 20 2i 22 ?3 24 25
f ~'" .
13
..
()
STATE OF WISCONSIN
)
) 55.
2 3
4
Court do hereby
in and for the State of Wisconsin, that the foregoing and complete transcript
is a true, in
transcript
of the proceedings
.3l'CLday
of ~,
2010.
()
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
.....
coCo011\ (~W 0
/lA
0"-
0
________________________________
14
00
__
._