Order this document
MOTOROLA
SEMICONDUCTOR
APPLICATION NOTE
BROADBAND TRANSFORMERS AND POWER
COMBINING TECHNIQUES FOR RF
Prepared by: H. Granberg
RF Circuits Engineering
INTRODUCTION
The following discussion focuses on broadband trans-
formers for RF power applications with practical examples
of various types given with performance data. Detailed
design formula are available in the Reference section. Power
combining techniques useful in designing high power
amplifiers are discussed in detail.
BROADBAND TRANSFORMERS
The input and output transformers are among the most
critical components in the design of a multi-octave amplifier.
The total performance of the amplifier (linearity, efficiency,
VSWR, gain flatness) will depend on their quality.
Transformers with high impedance ratios and for low
impedances are more difficult to design in general. In the
transmission line transformers very low line impedances are
required, which makes them impractical for higher than 16:1
impedance ratios in a 50-Ohm system. Other type
transformers require tight coupling coefficients between the
primary and secondary, or excessive leakage inductances
will reduce the effective bandwidth. Twisted line transformers
(Figure 1C, D, F, G) are described in References 1, 2, and
Figure 1. HF Broadband Transformers
RF Application Reports
 Motorola, Inc. 1993
by AN749/D
AN749
4. Experiments have shown that the dielectric losses in
certain types of magnet wire, employed for the twisted lines,
can limit the power handling capability of such transformers.
This appears as heat generated within the transformer at
higher frequencies, although part of this may be caused by
the losses in the magnetic core employed to improve the
low frequency response. At low frequencies, magnetic
coupling between the primary and secondary is predominant.
At higher frequencies the leakage inductance increases and
the permeability of the magnetic material decreases, limiting
the bandwidth unless tight capacitive coupling is provided.
In a transmission line transformer this coupling can be clearly
defined in the form of a line impedance.
The required minimum inductance on the low impedance
side is:
4R
L=
2πf
where
L = Inductance in µH
R = Impedance in Ohms
f = Frequency in MHz
This applies to all transformers described here.
1
 AN749
Some transformers, which exhibit good broad band
performance and are easy to duplicate are shown in
Figure 1.
Transformers E and F are intended for input applications,
although A in a smaller physical form is also suitable. In E,
Solder Area 68
the windings are photo etched on double sided copper-Kap-
ton* (or copper-fiberglass) laminate. The dielectric thickness
is 3 mils, and the winding area is 0.25 in2. Ferrite plates Copper
(µr = 2000 to 3000) are cemented on each side to improve Strip 38
the low frequency response. This type transformer in the size
shown, can handle power levels to 10 W. Figure 2 shows Plastic
curves for laminate thickness versus winding area for various Insulation
impedance ratios. Material 40

10
9 25 Ω : 50 Ω Solder Area 62
LAMINATE THICKNESS (MILS)

8 10 Ω : 50 Ω
7 5 Ω : 50 Ω
Fiberglass
6 Material
Solder
5 Area 70

4
3
2 Plastic
Insulation
1 Strip 58
0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9
TRANSFORMER SIZE (AREA IN.2)

Figure 2. Laminate Thickness versus Winding Area

Impedance ratios of this transformer are not limited to

Copper
integers as 1:1, 4:1 — N:L, and the dc isolated primary and Strip 56
secondary have an advantage in certain circuit configura-
tions. This design will find its applications in high volume
Ferrite Material 82
production or where the small physical size is of main Patent Applied for.
concern. Table 1 shows the winding configuration and
measured data of the transformer shown in Figure 3. Figure 3. Detailed Structure of Transformer
Shown in Figure 1E
Table 1. Impedance at Terminals BB′
Transformer Terminated as Shown In the transformer shown in Figure 1F and Table 2, a
regular antenna balun core is employed (Indiana General
A B F684-1 or equivalent). Lines A and B each consist of two
twisted pairs of AWG #30 enameled wire. The line
impedances are measured as 32 Ohms, which is sufficiently
5.1 Ω 680 pF 180 pF close to the optimum 25 Ohms calculated for 4:1 impedance
ratio. (Zo = √Rin RL).
A′ B′ Windings a and b are wound one on top of the other,
around the center section of the balun core. Line c should
3 TURN 10 TURNS
have an optimum Zo of 50 Ohms. It consists of one pair of
f (MHz) Rp (Ohms) Xp (Ohms) AWG #32 twisted enameled wire with the Zo measured as
62 Ohms. The balun core has two magnetically isolated
1.0 50.7 + j 81
toroids on which c is wound, divided equally between each.
2.0 53.0 + j 185
The inductance of c should approach the combined
4.0 53.1 + j 1518
inductance of Lines a and b (Reference 4, 6).
8.0 53.5 – j 214
16.0 50.5 – j 79
32.0 52.9 – j 30 *Trademark of E. I. DuPont, De Nemours and Co., Inc.

2 RF Application Reports
 AN749
Table 2. Impedance at Terminals BB′ of toroids which may be more readily available, can be
Transformer Terminated as Shown stacked.

Table 3. Impedance at Terminals BB′

a, 4 TURNS Transformer Terminated as Shown
A 1 TURN 4 TURNS
c, 14.5 TURNS A B
47 pF
5.6 Ω B
20 pF
3.3 Ω
68 pF
A′ BALUN B′ 820 pF

b, 4 TURNS
A′ B′
f (MHz) Rp (Ohms) Xp (Ohms) f (MHz) Rp (Ohms) Xp (Ohms)
1.0 53.0 + j 185 1.0 54.0 + j 1030
2.0 52.6 + j 330 2.0 54.0 + j 3090
4.0 52.9 + j 430 4.0 54.0 + j 5800
8.0 53.1 + j 600 8.0 53.9 – j 300
16.0 53.2 + j 750 16.0 53.1 – j 760
32.0 53.5 + j 3060 32.0 53.2 – j 600

The reactance in the 50 Ohm port (BB′) should measure
a minimum of + j 200. To achieve this for a 4:1 transformer,
a and b should each have three turns, and for a 9:1
transformer, four turns. When the windings are connected
as a 9:1 configuration, the optimum Zo is 16.6 Ohms, and
a larger amount of high frequency compensation will be
necessary. Lower impedance lines can be realized with
heavier wires or by twisting more than two pairs together.
(e.g., four pairs of AWG #36 enameled wire would result in
the Zo of approximately 18 Ohms.) Detailed information on
the manufacture of twisted wire transmission lines can be
found in References 2, 4, and 8.
Figure 1A shows one of the most practical designs for
higher impedance ratios (16 and up). The low impedance
winding always consists of one turn, which limits the
available ratios to integers 1, 4, 9 — N. Data taken of this
type of a 16:1 transformer is shown in Table 3, while Figure 4
illustrates the physical construction. Two tubes, 1.4″ long and
1/4″ in diameter — copper or brass — form the primary
winding. The tubes are electrically shorted on one end by
a piece of copper-clad laminate with holes for the tubes and
the tube ends are soldered to the copper foil. The hole
spacing should be larger than the outside diameter of the
ferrite sleeves.
A similar piece of laminate is soldered to the opposite
ends of the tubes, and the copper foil is divided into two
sections, thus isolating the ends where the primary
connections are made. The secondary winding is formed by
threading wire with good RF insulating properties through
the tubes for the required number of turns.
Although the measurements indicate negligible differ-
ences in performance for various wire sizes and types
(stranded or solid), the largest possible diameter should be
chosen for lower resistive losses. The initial permeability of
the ferrite sleeves is determined by the minimum inductance
required for the lowest frequency of operation according to
the previous formula. Typical µr ’s can vary from 800 to 3000
depending upon the cross sectional area and lowest
operating frequency. Instead of the ferrite sleeves, a number
Multi-Turn Winding
Threaded
Through Tubings
Connections
to Tubings
Shorted Tube Ends
Ferrite Sleeves,
Stackpole 57-0472-24A,
or Equivalent.
Figure 4. Physical Construction of a 16:1 Transformer
(Actual Number of Turns Not Shown)
The coupling coefficient between the primary and
secondary is almost a logarithmic function of the tube
diameter and length. This factor becomes more important
with very high impedance ratios such as 36:1 and up, where
higher coupling coefficients are required. The losses in the
ferrite are determined by the frequency, permeability and flux
density. The approximate power handling capability can be
calculated as in Reference 4 and 6, but the ferrite loss factor
should be taken into consideration. The µr in all magnetic
materials is inversely proportional to the frequency, although
very few manufacturers give this data.
Two other variations of this transformer are shown in
Figure 5 . The smaller version is suitable for input matching,
and can handle power levels to 20 W. It employs a stackpole
dual balun ferrite core 57-1845-24B. The low impedance
winding is made of 1/8″ copper braid. The portions of braid
going through the ferrite are rounded, and openings are
made in the ends with a pointed tool. The high impedance
winding is threaded through the rounded portions of the
braid, which was uncovered in each end of the ferrite core.
(See Figures 4 and 5.)

RF Application Reports 3
 AN749
Increasing the minimum required line length by a factor
of 4 will provide the isolation, and the total length is still within
the calculated limits. The power loss in this PTFE insulated
co-axial cable is 0.03 dB/ft at 30 MHz in contrast to 0.12 dB/ft
for a twisted wire line. The total line loss in the transformer
will be about 0.1 dB.
The number of turns on the toroids has been increased
beyond the point where the flux density of the magnetic core
is the power limiting factor. The combined line and core
losses limit the power handling capability to approximately
300 W, which can be slightly increased by employing lower
loss magnetic material.
Note the connection arrangement (Figure 6), where the
braid of the cable forms the high current path of the primary.
Toroids-Indiana
General F627-19 Q1,
or Equivalent.
Figure 5. Variations of Transformers in Figure 1A

The construction technique of the larger version

transformer is similar, except two separate ferrite sleeves
are employed. They can be cemented together for easier
handling. This transformer is intended for output applications, R 4R
with a power handling capability of 200 – 250 W employing
Stackpole 57-0472-27A ferrites. For more detail, see
Reference 7.
The transformer shown in Figure 1B is superior in
bandwidth and power handling capability. Table 4 shows data
taken on a 4:1 transformer of this type. The transmission Cable — 25 Ω,
Microdot 260-4118-000,
lines (a and b) are made of 25-Ohm miniature co-axial cable, or Equivalent. (16 Turns
Microdot 260-4118-000 or equivalent. Two 50 Ohm cables on Each Toroid.)
can also be connected in parallel.
Figure 6. Transformer Construction (Figure 1B)
Table 4. Impedance at Terminals BB′
Transformer Terminated as Shown HIGH-FREQUENCY POWER COMBINING
A B
TECHNIQUES EMPLOYING HYBRID COUPLERS
a The zero degree hybrids described here are intended for
adding the powers of a multiple of solid-state amplifiers, or
12 Ω 12 pF
82 pF to combine the outputs of groups of amplifiers, usually
b referred to as modules. With this technique, powers to the
A′ B′ kW level at the high-frequency bands can be realized.
When reversed, the hybrids can be used for splitting
f (MHz) Rp (Ohms) Xp (Ohms)
signals into two or more equal phase and amplitude ports.
1.0 48.3 + j 460 In addition, they provide the necessary isolation between the
2.0 48.1 + j 680 sources. The purpose of the isolation is to keep the system
4.0 48.0 + j 920 operative, even at a reduced power level during a possible
8.0 48.0 + j 1300 failure in one amplifier or module. The isolation is especially
16.0 48.1 + j 900 important in output combining of linear amplifiers, where a
32.0 48.1 + j 690 constant load impedance must be maintained. Sometimes
the inputs can be simply paralleled, and a partial system
The balun, normally required to provide the balanced to failure would not have catastrophic effects, but will merely
unbalanced function is not necessary when the two result in increased input VSWR.
transmission lines are wound on separate magnetic cores, For very high frequencies and narrow bandwidths, the
and the physical length of the lines is sufficient to provide hybrid couplers may consist of only lengths of transmission
the necessary isolation between AA′ and BB′. The minimum line, such as co-axial cable. The physical lengths of the lines
line length required at 2.0 MHz employing Indiana General should be negligible compared to the highest operating
F627-19-Q1 or equivalent ferrite toroids is 4.2 inches, and frequency to minimize the resistive losses, and to avoid
the maximum permissible length at 30 MHz would be possible resonances. To increase the bandwidth and improve
approximately 20 inches, according to formulas 9 and 10 the isolation characteristics of the line, it is necessary to
presented in Reference 2. The 4.2 inches would amount to increase the impedance for non-transmission line currents
four turns on the toroid, and measures 1.0 µH. This complies (parallel currents) without effecting its physical length. This
with the results obtained with the formula given earlier for can be done by loading the line with magnetic material.
minimum inductance calculations. Ideally, this material should have a linear BH curve, high

4 RF Application Reports
 AN749
permeability and low losses over a wide frequency range.
For high-frequency applications, some ferrites offer satisfac-
tory characteristics, making bandwidths of four or more
octaves possible.
Depending upon the balance and phase differences
between the sources, the currents should be mostly
cancelled in the balun lines. In a balanced condition, very
little power is dissipated in the ferrite cores, and most
occurring losses will be resistive. Thus, a straight piece of
transmission line loaded with a high permeability ferrite
sleeve, will give better results than a multiturn toroid
arrangement with its inherent higher distributed winding
capacitance.
It is customary to design the individual amplifiers for
50 Ohm input and output impedances for testing purposes
and standardization. 50- and 25-Ohm co-axial cable can then
be employed for the transmission lines. Twisted wire lines
should not be used at power levels higher than 100 Watts
average, due to their higher dielectric losses.
Variations of the basic hybrid are shown in Figure 7A and
B where both are suitable for power dividing or combining.
RL
RL
2 The power output with various numbers of inoperative
RL
RL
2 P = Total power of operative sources
Figure 7A
RL
RL
2 is shown in Figure 9. It has the advantage of being capable
2 X RL
RL
Figure 7B
Figure 7. Variations of Basic Hybrid
The balancing resistors are necessary to maintain a low
VSWR in case one of the 50-Ohm points reaches a high
RF Application Reports
impedance as a result of a transistor failure. As an input
power splitter, neither 50-Ohm port will ever be subjected
to a short due to the base compensation networks, should
a base-emitter junction short occur. An open junction will
result in half of the input power being dissipated by the
balancing resistor, the other half still being delivered to the
amplifier in operation. The operation is reversed when the
hybrid is used as an output combiner. A transistor failure will
practically always cause an increase in the amplifier output
impedance. Compared to the 50-Ohm load impedance it can
be regarded as an open circuit. When only one amplifier is
operative, half of its output power will be dissipated by R,
the other half being delivered to the load. The remaining
active source will still see the correct load impedance, which
is a basic requirement in combining linear amplifiers. The
resistors (R) should be of noninductive type, and rated for
25% of the total power, unless some type of automatic shutoff
system is incorporated. The degree of isolation obtainable
depends upon the frequency, and the overall design of the
hybrid. Typical figures for 2 to 30 MHz operation are
30 – 40 dB. Figures 8A and B show 4 port “totem pole”
structures derived from Figures 7A and 7B. Both can be used
with even number of sources only, e.g. 4, 8, 16, etc. For type
8B, it is more practical to employ toroidal multi-turn lines,
rather than the straight line alternatives, discussed earlier.
sources can be calculated as follows, if the phase differences
are negligible: (Reference 2)
P
Pout = ǒ Ǔ N1
N
where:
N = Total number of sources
N1 = Number of operative sources
Assuming the most common situation where one out of
four amplifiers will fail, 75% of the total power of the
remaining active sources will be delivered to the load.
Another type of multiport hybrid derived from Figure 7A
of interfacing with an odd number of sources or loads.
In fact, this hybrid can be designed for any number of
ports. The optimum values of the balancing resistors will vary
according to this and also with the number of ports assumed
to be disabled at one time. Two other power combining
arrangements are shown in Figures 10 and 11. The isolation
characteristics of the four-port output combiner were
measured, the data being shown in Table 5. The ferrite
sleeves are Stackpole 57-0572-27A, and the transmission
lines are made of RG-142/U co-axial cable. The input power
dividers described here, employ Stackpole 57-1511-24B
ferrites, and the co-axial cable is Microdot 250-4012-0000.
5
 AN749

25 Ω
a
50 Ω
R1
b e
12.5 Ω
50 Ω C1
R3
c f
C2
50 Ω
R2 12.5 Ω
d
50 Ω
50 Ω C3
25 Ω T1 = 4:1

Zo (a, b, c, d) = 50 Ω g
Zo (e, f, g) = 25 Ω

Figure 8A
100 Ω

50 Ω R1
50 Ω
50 Ω
25 Ω R3
50 Ω a
1:4

50 Ω c 12.5 Ω d

25 Ω
b
50 Ω C1
R2 Line impedances:
a, b = 50 Ω
100 Ω c, d = 25 Ω

Figure 8B

Figure 8. Four Port “Totem Pole” Structure

+
R 50 Ω 50 Ω R
a a
+
R 50 Ω 50 Ω R

b b
R + R
50 Ω 50 Ω
c c

50 Ω Input 50 Ω Output
T1 = 3:1
C1 T2 = 1:3 C2
d e
R = 22.2, 16.6 Ohms

Zo (a, b, c) = 50 Ω
Zo (d, e) = 25 Ω (optimum 28.9Ω)

Figure 9. Three-Port Hybrid Arrangement

6 RF Application Reports
 AN749
+
50 Ω 50 Ω

R a a R
25 Ω + 25 Ω
50 Ω 50 Ω

50 Ω Input 50 Ω Output

C1 c d C2
T1 = 2:1 T2 = 1:2

Zo (a, b) = 50 Ω
Zo (c, d) = 25 Ω (optimum 35.4Ω)

Figure 10. Two-Port Hybrid System

R 50 Ω 50 Ω R

a a
R R
50 Ω 50 Ω

b b
R R
50 Ω 50 Ω

c c
R R
50 Ω 50 Ω

d d
V
50 Ω Input 50 Ω Output
C1 C2

T1 = 4:1 R T2 = 1:4
e f
RL= 12.5 Ohms

1 PORT INOPERATIVE. 2 PORTS INOPERATIVE. 3 PORTS INOPERATIVE.

Optimum R = 28.3 Ohms Optimum R = 25 Ohms Optimum R = 18.75 Ohms
Pout = Pout = Pout =
R R R
(P1+P2+P3) – (PR + P ) (P1+P2) – (PR + P ) P1 – (PR + P )
3 2 1
P1, P2, P3 = Power at any operative port, PR = Power dissipated in R, excluding RL.
V = RMS voltage at any 50 Ohm point.
(The phase differences are assumed negligible.)
Zo (a,b,c,d) = 50 Ω
Zo (e,f) = 25 Ω (optimum)

Figure 11. Four-Port Hybrid System

RF Application Reports 7
 AN749
Table 5. Isolation Characteristics of
Four Port Output Combiner

Isolation,
Port-to-Port
f (MHz) (dB)
2.0 27.0 – 29.4
4.0 34.8 – 38.2
7.5 39.0 – 41.2
15 32.1 – 33.5
20 31.2 – 33.0
30 31.0 – 33.4

The input and output matching transformers (T1 – T2)

will be somewhat difficult to implement for such impedance
ratios as 2:1 and 3:1. One solution is a multi-turn toroid
wound with co-axial cable, such as Microdot 260-4118-000.
A tap can be made to the braid at any point, but since this
is 25-Ohm cable, the Zo is optimum for a 4:1 impedance ratio
only. Lower impedance ratios will normally require increased
values for the leakage inductance compensation capaci-
tances (C1 – C2). For power levels above 500 – 600 W, larger
diameter co-axial cable is desirable, and it may be necessary
to parallel two higher impedance cables. The required cross
sectional area of the toroid can be calculated according to
the Bmax formulas presented in References 4 and 6.
The 2 to 30 MHz linear amplifier (shown in Figure 13)
consists of two 300 W modules (8). This combined amplifier
can deliver 600 W peak envelope power. The CW power
output is limited to approximately 400 W by the heatsink and
the output transformer design.
Figure 12. Two-Four Port Hybrids
The one at the lower left is intended for power divider applications
with levels to 20–30 W. The larger one was designed for amplifier
output power combining, and can handle levels to 1 – 1.5 kW. The
balancing resistors are not shown with this unit.)
The power combiner (Figure 13A) and the 2:1 step-up
transformer (Figure 13B) can be seen in the upper right
corner. The input splitter is located behind the bracket
(Figure 13C). The electrical configuration of the hybrids is
shown in Figures 7A and 10. Note the loops equalizing the
lengths of the co-axial cables in the input and output to
assure a minimum phase difference between the two
modules.

Figure 13. 2 to 30 MHz Linear Amplifier Layout

8 RF Application Reports
 AN749
REFERENCES
1. Ruthroff: Some Broad Band Transformers, IRE, Volume
47, August 1957.
2. Pizalis-Couse: Broadband Transformer Design for RF
Transistor Amplifiers, ECOM-2989, U.S. Army Elec-
tronics Command, Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, July
1968.
3. Lewis: Notes on Low Impedance H.F. Broad Band
Transformer Techniques, Collins Radio Company, No-
vember 1964.
4. Hilbers: Design of H. F. Wideband Power Transformers,
Philips Application Information #530.
5. Philips Telecommunication Review, Volume 30, No. 4,
pp. 137–146, November 1972.
RF Application Reports
6. Granberg, H.: Broadband Linear Power Amplifiers Us-
ing Push-Pull Transistors, AN-593, Motorola Semicon-
ductor Products Inc.
7. Granberg, H.: Get 300 Watts PEP Linear Across 2 to
30 MHz From This Push-Pull Amplifier, EB-27, Motoro-
la Semiconductor Products Inc.
8. Lefferson: Twisted Wire Transmission Line, IEEE
Transactions on Parts, Hybrids and Packaging, Vol.
PHP-7, No. 4, December 1971.
9. Krauss-Allen: Designing Toroidal Transformers to Opti-
mize Wideband Performance, Electronics, August
1973.
9
 AN749

Motorola reserves the right to make changes without further notice to any products herein. Motorola makes no warranty, representation or guarantee regarding
the suitability of its products for any particular purpose, nor does Motorola assume any liability arising out of the application or use of any product or circuit,
and specifically disclaims any and all liability, including without limitation consequential or incidental damages. “Typical” parameters can and do vary in different
applications. All operating parameters, including “Typicals” must be validated for each customer application by customer’s technical experts. Motorola does
not convey any license under its patent rights nor the rights of others. Motorola products are not designed, intended, or authorized for use as components in
systems intended for surgical implant into the body, or other applications intended to support or sustain life, or for any other application in which the failure of
the Motorola product could create a situation where personal injury or death may occur. Should Buyer purchase or use Motorola products for any such
unintended or unauthorized application, Buyer shall indemnify and hold Motorola and its officers, employees, subsidiaries, affiliates, and distributors harmless
against all claims, costs, damages, and expenses, and reasonable attorney fees arising out of, directly or indirectly, any claim of personal injury or death
associated with such unintended or unauthorized use, even if such claim alleges that Motorola was negligent regarding the design or manufacture of the part.
Motorola and are registered trademarks of Motorola, Inc. Motorola, Inc. is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer.

Literature Distribution Centers:

USA: Motorola Literature Distribution; P.O. Box 20912; Phoenix, Arizona 85036.
EUROPE: Motorola Ltd.; European Literature Centre; 88 Tanners Drive, Blakelands, Milton Keynes, MK14 5BP, England.
JAPAN: Nippon Motorola Ltd.; 4-32-1, Nishi-Gotanda, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 141, Japan.
ASIA PACIFIC: Motorola Semiconductors H.K. Ltd.; Silicon Harbour Center, No. 2 Dai King Street, Tai Po Industrial Estate, Tai Po, N.T., Hong Kong.

10 AN749/D
RF Application Reports
◊