Overview of Artificial Lift Systems
Kermit E, Brown, SPE, U.of Tuts.
Summary
This paper gives guidelines to assist in the selection of
antficial lift methods. The most important guideline is
determination of the flow rates possible by each method.
This requires preparation of pressure/flow rate diagrams
combining well-inflow performance relationships with
tubing intake curves. The tubing intake curve includes
pressure loss in the complete piping system and/or
pressure gains by the pumping method. Many other fac-
{ors other than rate, such as location, retriovability by
wireline, corrosion, paraffin, scale deposition, cost,
‘operating life, and others, influence the final selection of
Tift equipment.
Introduction
‘This paper provides an overview of artificial lift systems,
and gives guidelines indicating when one system is better
to use than another. Advantages and disadvantages are
‘given with examples in the selection of lift methods.
This list represents the relative standing of lift systems,
based on the number of installations throughout the
world: (1) sucker rod pumping (beam pumping), (2) gas
lift, (@) electric submersible pumping, (4) hydraulic
piston pumping, (5) hydraulic jet pumping, (6) plunger
(free-piston) lift, and (7) other methods. This differs ac-
cording to field, state, and country.
New lift systems are being developed and tested con-
‘inually. The lifting of heavy viscous crude oils requires
special attention, and methods designed specifically for
this purpose are being tested. Wells located offshore and
in deep water present specific problems, and surface-
space limitations become important. The artificial lift
method should be considered before the well is drilled
Obviously this cannot be done on wildcat wells, but it
‘must be done on all subsequent development wells. The
drilling program must be set out to ensure hole sizes that
permit adequate casing and tubing sizes.
ap 062 Sato Pau Eien ot ME
2388
One serious limitation to artificial lift installations has
been the installation of small casing sizes, which limits
the installation to specific tubing sizes to obtain the ob-
jective flow rate and, in particular, limits the size of
retrievable gas lift equipment and/or pumping equip-
‘ment. The installation of gas-lift mandrels that accept
only I-in. (2.5-em) OD gas-lift valves is common in the
U.S., and serious limitations on gas passage volumes are
imposed on the system with this small valve, Also, the
better performance characteristics of the 1'-in
3.81-cm) OD valve are lost. For the pumping systems,
the smaller capacity pumps must be used in the smaller
casing sizes, and sometimes the advantage of retrievable
pumps is lost.
Surface-space limitations become an important factor.
For example, if large compressors for gas lift or large
generators for electrical pumping are anticipated for off-
shore platforms, provisions must be made in the original
design to allow for both weight and space on the plat-
forms. Some engineers are invariably optimistic about
natural flow in the planning stage, and in many instances
they still maintain that artificial lift will not be required
during the life of a field. This leads to very poor plan-
ning, especially on offshore facilities.
In the design of antificial lift systems for a well, itis
recommended that it initially be treated as if it were a
flowing well—i.e., a production systems graph should
be prepared to sec if the well is capable of flowing and, if
itis, at what rate. The artificial lift analysis can be placed
fn the same plot. Numerous flowing wells will show in-
creased flow rates when placed on artificial lif
‘The purpose of any artificial lift system is to create a
predetermined tubing intake pressure such that the reser-
voir may respond and produce the objective flow rate
The design and analysis of any lifting system can be
divided into two main components. The first is the reser-
voir component (inflow performance relationship),
which represents the well’s ability to produce fluids. The
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGYTABLE 1—RELATIVE ADVANTAGES OF ARTIFICIAL LIFT SYSTEMS”
Hydrauic —_—Elctne Submersio
Fos Pumping ___Pision Pumping __ Pumping
Fclatwely simple Not so dapth ited Can i exromoly
System design an ft large walumes igh volumes,
from great dept, 20,000 8
LUnts easy changed S00.610 (9.40 mie), (19078 m2 in
{tervals wih fom 15,000 Sratow wos wih
misimum cos (G72 m) Have been large casing. Cuenty
Instated io 18.000 8 Wing + 12,000 810
meson, ange
‘ae ea fr Hols
eopte 1 operate,
(Gaeee m,
for sappy wal in
Crookes notes present Nile East wi
rinimal problems. 600-Np (44-4) units
‘Appcabio to sim 720-9 (59780)
hols and mutiple —_Unobtrusive in urban avaiable, 1000
completions. lecatons (eam uncer
evelopment
‘Can pump a wot own Power source can be
tovery ow pressure remotety locales Uncbtswe in ban
(opt and fate locations
Sependent) ‘Analyzabe
‘Simple to operate
System usualy is
analy
(te separ
foi Tevelsounaage,
lexble—can vauaty
‘match displacement
‘ees capnay
Easy 1 install
‘Sensor fc tlematenng
pressure to surtece va
abe.
Floxble-can match
{splacoment rate to
‘wo capanity as well
Can use gas or
‘Sct a
power source Ceeoked noes prosant
‘Secles, ro problem,
Downhole pumps can
‘Analyze. be cea out in” Applicable ofshore
free systems.
Cant igh Corrosion and sete
Temperature and Can pump awoll___ treatment easy Io
vozous ol, flown to fait ow perform
preesu.
Can use gos oF ‘vali in
flecicty 2s power Apaiicable ‘erent se
soure ‘utile completions
Liting cost for tgh
CCotsion and scale Applicable ashore, alums gaeraly
Watmont 035710 veryow
pedo oso system wit
‘combat soresion.
‘Agpicabe to pune
otteonat | Easy to pu in
‘lst, tye bye cock,
‘Avaaity of Adjustable guar box
Giterent 208, for Trgiex ars
‘mote fx
Hoow sucker ods
se ava for
in mole completions
Sand oat of mneior
Ming power uid
ith wany 0 Wseous
‘radon can ee
Have pumps with
outle valing at
‘bump on both
pate and
Hydraute
cas uit devPump Plunger uit
Gan and largo Ravievablewihout eviovable witout
‘lume of ss wih puling tubing. puting tubing
‘nor probes.
Has no moving parts, Very inexpensive
Hands largo volume neato,
‘night was No probioms in
(Gonteuous tt (levied or crooked Automatica keeps
Soe 80, hate. tubing elena of
(8 37 mH, i param, sete
Fir Hoxie reeatons Aoplcable fo igh
converte am (988 of rato walls
‘continuous 6 Aepleable oishoce.
inverter can be weed in
chambor or plunger Can use water as a conjunction with
teas wet power source Irtermmen gas
secines
Power Wud does net
have tbe #0 lean
‘aor hyractc
ston pumping.
(Can be used to union
Unotrusive in ua ‘i rom ga wot
Power source can be
remotely lected. Corosion scale
sy t obtain ‘289 10 perform.
downhole pressures
find gtadiens Powor source can be
remotely located and
‘can handle nigh
‘elumes 1 30.000 6
(area 2's,
iting ons wells
is no problem
‘win wteline unt
‘Crooked holes present
no problem
Contosion i not
Usual as adverse,
‘Aplcabe ofthe,
“tare ot een a 8, Kit Cop, Ms wh ment by Sonn?
second component represents the entire piping and ar-
tificial lit system, This includes separator, flowline,
flowline restrictions such as chokes, tubing string, tub
ing string restrictions such as safety valves, and the ar-
tificial lift mechanism itself. Tubing intake pressures
then can be determined for varying flow rates, and when
this intake curve is placed on the same plot as the IPR
curve, the rate for a particular lift method can be deter-
mined.
‘These factors should be considered in the selection of |
artificial lift equipment: producing characteristics, fluid
properties, hole characteristics, long-range recovery
OCTOBER 1982
plan, surface facilities, location, available power
sources, operating problems, completion type, automa-
tion, operating personnel, service availability, and
economics. Tables ! and 2' summarize the advantages
and the disadvantages of the principal methods that are
commonly used.
Factors To Consider in Design
Liquid Productive Capacity of the Well
‘The desired rate from a particular well is the most
significant factor in selecting the lift method, Its impor-
oats‘TABLE 2—RELATIVE DISADVANTAGES OF ARTIFICIAL LIFT SYSTEMS"
Etecric Submersibie Hydraulic dot
fod Pumping __ Hydraulic Pumping ‘Pumping Gas uit Pumping Plunger Lit
‘rocked hates prosort” Power ol systoms aro. Not applicable 12 Lit gas & not Folatvely ineficiont May not take well to
a fition problem. a fe hazard ‘mutupio completions. alwaye avaiable, It method. eplation; hence,
eventually requiring
High solids Large oliventory Only applicable with Not efficent in FRoquires atleast 20% anether If method
production is requted in power oll electie power ting small lds submergence to
{rovblesome, system whieh detracts ‘rene well leases. approach best in Good for low-rate
‘rom proftabity. High voltages efficiency. wells only normaly
Gassy wols usually (1.000 V) ae Ditto less than 200 B/D
Tower volumetic High sods, ‘ecossary, ‘emulsions and Design of stem is (1.8 mie).
otficency production Is viscous crudes. more complex.
{roublesome, Imprectioa in Fequires more
's depth tied, hallon,low-velume Not ecient for Pump may caviate engineering
primarily due te rod Operating costs are wells. smal folds oF Under conan ‘upenision 1o adjust
eapabily ‘somatimes higher. onewelllesses condone. propery.
Expensive to change compression
CObtrsive in urban Usually suscoptible equipment io maten equipment is Very sonstive Danger exists in
teeatons to gas interference—dectring wal required. toany change in plunger aching too
Uovaly no vented. eapabity backpressure high a veloaty an
Heavy and bulky In Gas freezing anc ‘casing suriace,
foffshore operations, Vented installations Cable causes hydrate probloms. The producing of ree damage.
are more expensive problems in handling ‘928 through the pump
Suseptbie to Because of extra tubulare. Problems wih dity Sausee reduction In Communication
parafin problems. tubing required. ‘urtace ines, ‘billy mando —_botwaon tubing
Cables deteriorate Tiquis. and casing required
‘Tubing cannot bo Treating for scale in high ‘Some aitcuty {or good operation
Intematy coated’ below packer is temperatures. ‘analyzing propery Power oll systems unas used in
{or cortion