A RESPONCE TO AL BUUT:II. It is reported that Al But:ii.

declaired that he disbe lieves in im ka:n al kidhb and hence consiquently believes in imtina: al kidhb.Bu t he is not an authority on UPON AHLUSSUNNAH ASHAIRAH AND MATURIDIAH.iF HE CLAIM S TO BE AN ASHARITE OR A MATURIDITE THEN HIS CLAIM MAY BE QUESTIONED.ANY HOW WE DO NOT DECLAIR ANY ONE AS KAFIR WHOS BELIEVES IN IMTINA: AL KIDHB EVEN IF THE DEC LAIR ALL OF THOSE AS KA:FIR WHO DO BELIEVE IN IMKA:N AL KIDHB. SOME OF THE RESPONCES ARE AS FOLLOW: It was a glimmer of light in a world filled with the darkness of blasphemy when someone sent me a link with the following statement by Dr. Muammad, Saiid Ramaaan A l-Buuiyy: ANSWER: THE LEARNED DOCTOR RAMAD:A:N IS NOT AN AUTHORITY OF AHLUSSUNNAH WAL JAMA AH SO HIS WORS CAN NOT BE A HUJJAH ON AHLUSSUNNAH WAL JAMAAH. Question: It has been related to your distinguished self, in one site on the int ernet, the opinion that it is not intrinsically impossible that Allaah could lie , but that Allaah made it an obligation for Himself not to lie. This statement h as been translated to English, and we would like to check with you the truthfuln ess of the attribution of this statement to you. : Answer by Dr. Muammad, Saiid Rama aan Al-Buuiyy: No one has ever asked me about this, and I believe that no one has ever faced me , nor will anyone ever face me with such a despicable question. ANSWER: THIS DOES SHEW THAT THE LEARNED AUTHER WAS UNAWAIR OF THE DISPUTE WHICH IS CONTI NNUING AFTER THE CLAIM OF SEL ABSURDITY OF FALSEHOOD IN DIVINE STATEMENT BY FAD: L AL HAQQ KHAIRABADI IN SUBCONTINENT OR MORE SRICTLY SUBCONTINENT SOUTH ASIA. THI S ALSO DOES PROVE THAT THE LEARNED AUTHOR DID NOT STUDIED THOSE WORKS WHICH DEAL WITH THE FAMOUS DISPUTE . There is no one among the people that does not know that lying belongs to the ca tegory of lowly attributes. A RESPONCE TO AL BUUT:II. It is reported that Al But:ii. declaired that he disbe lieves in im ka:n al kidhb and hence consiquently believes in imtina: al kidhb.Bu t he is not an authority on UPON AHLUSSUNNAH ASHAIRAH AND MATURIDIAH.iF HE CLAIM S TO BE AN ASHARITE OR A MATURIDITE THEN HIS CLAIM MAY BE QUESTIONED.ANY HOW WE DO NOT DECLAIR ANY ONE AS KAFIR WHOS BELIEVES IN IMTINA: AL KIDHB EVEN IF THE DEC LAIR ALL OF THOSE AS KA:FIR WHO DO BELIEVE IN IMKA:N AL KIDHB. SOME OF THE RESPONCES ARE AS FOLLOW: It was a glimmer of light in a world filled with the darkness of blasphemy when someone sent me a link with the following statement by Dr. Muammad, Saiid Ramaaan A l-Buuiyy: ANSWER: THE LEARNED DOCTOR RAMAD:A:N IS NOT AN AUTHORITY OF AHLUSSUNNAH WAL JAMA AH SO HIS WORS CAN NOT BE A HUJJAH ON AHLUSSUNNAH WAL JAMAAH. Question: It has been related to your distinguished self, in one site on the int ernet, the opinion that it is not intrinsically impossible that Allaah could lie , but that Allaah made it an obligation for Himself not to lie. This statement h as been translated to English, and we would like to check with you the truthfuln ess of the attribution of this statement to you. : Answer by Dr. Muammad, Saiid Rama aan Al-Buuiyy: No one has ever asked me about this, and I believe that no one has ever faced me , nor will anyone ever face me with such a despicable question. ANSWER: THIS DOES SHEW THAT THE LEARNED AUTHOR WAS UNAWAIR OF THE DISPUTE WHICH IS CONTI NNUING AFTER THE CLAIM OF SEL ABSURDITY OF FALSEHOOD IN DIVINE STATEMENT BY FAD: L AL HAQQ KHAIRABADI IN SUBCONTINENT OR MORE SRICTLY SUBCONTINENT SOUTH ASIA. THI S ALSO DOES PROVE THAT THE LEARNED AUTHOR DID NOT STUDIED THOSE WORKS WHICH DEAL WITH THE FAMOUS DISPUTE .[MORE COMMENTS MAY BE SEEN IN FOOT NOTE 2]. QUOTATION OF AL BUUT:I:. There is no one among the people that does not know that lying belongs to the ca tegory of lowly attributes. Moreover, there is no one among the believers in All aah that does not know that Allaah is only attributed with complete perfection,

and that He is clear of all attributes of flaw. Furthermore, something pertainin g to the Power of Allaah does not mean it is possible that Allaah could be attri buted with it. Finally, His Power pertains only to what is possible, and does no t pertain to what is impossible. ANSWER: ALL THE ATTRIBUTES OF G-D ARE ATTRIBUTES OF PERFECTIONS. BUT THERE ARE DIFFERENT DEGREES OF PERFECTIONS AND DIFFERENT LEVELS OF PERFECTIONS. FISRT KIND IS THE SELF PERFECTION OR ESSENTIAL PERFECTION. TO THIS KIND THE ESSE NTIAL ATTRIBUTES DO BELONG TO. THEY ARE EITHER IDENTICAL TO THE DIVINE ESSENCE A S PHILOSOPHICAL MINDED SUNNIS BELIEVE OR DO SUSTAIN WITH DIVINE ESSENCE AS DIALE CTICAL MINDED SUNNIS BELIEVE. IN EITHER CASE THEIR ANNIHILIATION AND THEIR FLAWS ARE SELF ABSURD, AND THE ARE NOT IN DIVINE OMNIPOTENCE. FLAWS AND DEFECT IN EAC H ONE OF THEM IS SELF ABSURD MUH:A:L BIDH DHA:T.THEIR INNES IN DIVINE OMNIPOTENCE IS SELF ABSURD. AN OTHER KIND OF PERFECTION MAY BE TERMED AS ACTIVE PERFECTION. TO THIS KIND QISM ALL ACTIVE ATTRIBUTES OF G-D DO BELONG TO. THEY ARE NEITHER IDENTICAL TO THE DI VINE ESSENCE NOR THEY DO SUSTAIN WITH DIVINE ESSENCE. THEY ARE SEPERATE FROM ESS ENCE OF G-D [ESSENCE OF G-D IS G-D HIMSELF].THEY ARE IN POWER OF G-D. THEIR ANNH ILIATION, THEIR FLAWS, AND THEIR OPPOSITES ARE ALSO IN POWER OF G-D. DIVINE LIFE IS THE EXAMPLE OF FIRST KIND, AND K-R-M, H:-L-M, ADL,AFW BELONG TO THE NEXT KIND/ TYPE. SIDQ IS NO DOUBT AN ACTIVE ATTRIBUTE OF G-D. EVEN IF IT IS AN ESSENTIAL ATTRIBUT E OF G-D LIKE SOME SALAFIES SUGGEST [SINCE THEY ASSOCIAL EACH AND EVERY ATTRIBUT E OF G-D WITH DIVINE ESSENCE NEGLECTING THE ESSENTIAL AND FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE S BETWEEN THEM AND AUTHOR OF SUBH:A:N ASSUBBU:H: DID BORROW THIS THING FROM HIS S ALAFI RIVALS] (1) THE SIDQ [TRUTH] OF AL KALAM AL LAFZ:I: IS AN ACTIVE ATTRIBUTE AL ITS BEST.IF IT IS SUPPOSED THAT TRUTH IS AN ESSEMTIAL ATTRIBUTE OF THE DIVINE ESSENCE [ ONLY FO R AN AURGUMENT] EVEN THEN THE TRUTH OF KALA:M 'AL LAFZ:I: IS JUST AN ATTRIBUTE O F AN ATTRIBUTE OF DIVINE ESSENCE ID EST KALA:M ''AL LAFZ:I:. WHICH IS AN ATTRIBU TE OF G-D ,AND NOT AN ATTRIBUTE OF G-D WHICH IS DIRECTLY ASCRIBED TO G-D INDEPEN DENT OF ANY OTHER ATTRIBUTE OF G-D LIKE DIVINE LIFE,DIVINE SIGHT [AND DIVINE KAL A:M 'AL LAFZ:I:. IF IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE ETERNAL AND ESSENTIAL]. SO THE SELF POSSIBILITY OF FALSEHOOD / FALSITY DOES NOT SELF IMPLY ANY FLAW IN D IVINE ESSENCE AND DOES NOT SELF IMPLY ANY FLAW IN ANY ONE OF THE ESSENTIAL ATTRI BUTE [OF PERFECTION] OF G-D.(2) Muammad Saiid Rama aan Al-Buuiyy : . . . . . (1) IN FACT FATHER OF MAULANA 'ABUL KALA:M AZAD [AN STUNCH OPPONENT OF WAHABISM] DECLAIRED THAT TRACES OF WAHABISM IS FOUND IN MAULVI RAD:A BARAILWI . THE REASO N DOES APPEAR TO BE THAT HE DID BORRW MANY THINGS FROM SALAFIS IN ORDER TO REFUT E THE TRUTH OF SELF POSSIBILITY OF FALSEHOOD IN DIVINE STATEMENTS.IT MAY BE NOTE D THAT SALAFITES [ONE OF THE MINOR CULT OF 'AHLUSUNNAH WAL JAMAA-''AH DO NOT DIS TINGUISH BETWEEN THE NATURES OF ATTRIBUTATION OF ESSENTIAL ATTRIBUTES,ACTIVE ATT RIBUTES AND RELATIVE ATTRIBUTES. EITHER THEY DO BELIEVE EACH ONE OF THEM AS IDE NTICAL TO THE DIVINE ESSENCE [AS FEW MAY DO] OR DO BELIEVE THAT THEY ARE ASSOCIA TED WITH THE DIVINE ESSENCE [IT EST G-D] ALIKE.SOME HOW EVER DO NOT USE THE TERM LA: ''AIN WALA: GHAIR YET IN SENSE AND MEANING THEY DO BELIEVE THE FUNDAMENTAL SENCE OF THE TERM. SINCE IF DIVINE ATTRIBUTES ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE DIVINE ES SENCE AND ARE NOT IDENTICAL TO THE ESSENCE THEN THEY ARE LA ''AIN WA LA: GHAIR W HETHER A PERSON DOES USE THIS TERM OR THE PERSON DOES NOT USE THIS TERM.THE MAJO RITY SUNNI SECTS ASHA:'IRAH AND MATURIDITES DO DIFFENTIATE B/T THE NATURES OF AT TRIBUTATIONS OF ESSENTIAL ATTRIBUTES AND ACTIVE ATTRIBUTES. THE DISPUTE B/T 'ASH :''IRAH AND MATURIDIAH OVER THE NATURE OF ATTRIBUTATION OF ACTIVE ATTRIBUTES IS PROVED TO BE VERBAL AND NOT ESSENTIAL. HOW EVER A VERY SMALL MINORITTY OF MATURI DITES DOES NOT DIFFERENTIATE B/W THE NATURES OF ATTRIBUTATION OF ESSENTIAL ATTRI

BUTE OF G-D AND ACTIVE ATTRIBUTES OF G-D LIKE SALAFITES. BUT MAJORITY OF MATURID ITES DO REJECT THEIR VIEW. (2) A)IT IS EVIDENT THAT THE LEARNED SCHOLOR DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE CONTENTS OF TEX TS CITED BY BY DENOUNCERS OF SELF ABSURDITY OF FALSEHOOD / FALSITY IN STATEMENTS OF DIVINE KALA:M 'AL LAFZ:I:. AND DENOUNCERS OF SELF POSSIBILITY OF FALSEHOOD / FALSITY IN THE STATEMENTS OF DIVINE KALA:M 'ALLAFZ:I:. FROM THE WORKS OF SUNNI THEOLOGIANS IN TRHE FAVOUR OF THEIR RESPECTIVE ARTICLES OF FAITH. B)IT IS OBVIOUS AND EVIDENT THAT THE INTERNAL DISPUTES OF MUTTZILAH OVER THE DIV INE POWER OVER THE FALSITY WAS KNOWN TO THE ABOVE STATED SCHOLOR AT LEAST AT THE TIME HE WAS WRITING THIS RESONCE. EPITOME: IF THE LEARNED SCHOLOR HAD EITHER STUDIED THE WORKS OF EITHER SIDE OR STUDIED TH E WORKS ABOUT THE INTERNAL DISPUTES OF MU''TAZILAH HE WOULD HAVE NEVER SAID WHAT HE HAVE SAID. SEE ABOVE. THIS DOES ENERCOATE HIS OPENIONS,REMARKS,COMMENTS ETCETERA ABOUT THE ISSUE. WITH RESPECT AND REGARDS ANY FATVA: AF THIS SCHOLOR IS NEITHER AUTHORATIVE NOT R ELIABLE AND ADDITIONALLY NOT AUTHENTIC. IT MAY BE NOTED THAT THE BELIEVERS OF SELF POSSIBILITY OF FALSEHOOD / FALSITY IN THE STATEMENTS OF DIVINE KALA:M 'AL LAFZ:I:. DO NOT DECLAIR THE BELIEVERS OF SE LF ABSURDITY OF FALSEHOOD / FALSITY IN THE STATEMENTS OF DIVINE KALA:M 'AL LAFZ: I:. AS KAFIR. YET NO DOUBT THEY ARE HERITIC AT THIS ISSUE. THE QUESTION THAT WHE THER THEIR THIS HETERODOX BELIEF IS SUFFICIENT TO EXCLUDE THEM FROM 'AHL 'ASSUNN AH OR NOT IS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF PRESENT ARTICLE.