Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chap 16
Chap 16
N. Gregory Mankiw
PowerPoint Slides by Ron Cronovich
CHAPTER
16
SEVENTH EDITION
problems measuring the budget deficit the traditional and Ricardian views of the
government debt
Country U.K. Netherlands Norway Sweden Spain Finland Ireland Korea Denmark Australia
Gov Debt
(% of GDP)
59 55 46 45 44 40 33 33 28 14
CHAPTER 16
CHAPTER 16
CHAPTER 16
CHAPTER 16
CHAPTER 16
10
11
17 14 11 8 5 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2030 2040 1950 1960 2020 2050
12
CHAPTER 16
6 4 2 0 1995 2000 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 2005
13
CHAPTER 16
Percent of GDP
pessimistic scenario
optimistic scenario
0 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
CHAPTER 16
14
CHAPTER 16
15
CHAPTER 16
16
CHAPTER 16
17
CHAPTER 16
18
MEASUREMENT PROBLEM 1:
Inflation
Suppose the real debt is constant, which implies a
zero real deficit.
19
MEASUREMENT PROBLEM 1:
Inflation
Correcting the deficit for inflation can make a huge
difference, especially when inflation is high.
Example: In 1979,
nominal deficit = $28 billion inflation = 8.6% debt = $495 billion D = 0.086 $495b = $43b real deficit = $28b
CHAPTER 16
20
CHAPTER 16
21
MEASUREMENT PROBLEM 2:
Capital Assets
Currently, deficit = change in debt Capital budgeting:
deficit = (change in debt) (change in assets)
MEASUREMENT PROBLEM 3:
CHAPTER 16
23
CASE STUDY:
Accounting for TARP Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP): The U.S. Treasury gave funds to help
struggling banks.
CHAPTER 16
24
CASE STUDY:
Accounting for TARP Should the TARP outlays count toward the
deficit? The U.S. Treasury considered TARP outlays to be expenditures that increased the deficit, and will consider bank repayments as revenues that will reduce the deficit. Congressional Budget Office (CBO) counted the net present value of the program outlays minus eventual repayments adjusted for the risk of non-repayment. This works out to 25 cents for each dollar spent on TARP.
CHAPTER 16
25
MEASUREMENT PROBLEM 4:
CHAPTER 16
26
MEASUREMENT PROBLEM 4:
CHAPTER 16
27
cyclicallyadjusted
The bottom line We must exercise care when interpreting the reported deficit figures.
CHAPTER 16
30
CHAPTER 16
31
32
CHAPTER 16
33
34
CHAPTER 16
35
36
Private saving may have fallen for reasons Because the data is subject to different
other than the tax cut, such as optimism about the economy.
interpretations, both views of government debt survive. CHAPTER 16 Government Debt and Budget Deficits
37
vs. optimal fiscal policy Some politicians have proposed amending the
U.S. Constitution to require balanced federal government budget every year.
38
OTHER PERSPECTIVES:
CHAPTER 16
Fortunately: little evidence that the link between fiscal and monetary policy is important most governments know the folly of creating inflation most central banks have (at least some) political independence from fiscal policymakers
Government Debt and Budget Deficits
39
OTHER PERSPECTIVES:
40
OTHER PERSPECTIVES:
International dimensions
Government budget deficits can lead to trade
deficits, which must be financed by borrowing from abroad.
CHAPTER 16
41
CASE STUDY:
Inflation-indexed Treasury bonds Starting in 1997, the U.S. Treasury issued bonds
with returns indexed to the CPI.
Benefits:
Removes inflation risk, the risk that inflation
and hence real interest rate will turn out different than expected.
CASE STUDY:
5 4 3 2 1 0
2003- 2003- 2004- 2004- 2004- 2005- 2005- 2006- 2006- 200701-03 07-04 01-02 07-02 12-31 07-01 12-30 06-30 12-29 06-29
CASE STUDY:
Chapter Summary
1. Relative to GDP, the U.S. governments debt is
measures of fiscal policy because they: are not corrected for inflation
do not account for changes in govt assets omit some liabilities (e.g., future pension
Chapter Summary
3. In the traditional view, a debt-financed tax cut
increases consumption and reduces national saving. In a closed economy, this leads to higher interest rates, lower investment, and a lower longrun standard of living. In an open economy, it causes an exchange rate appreciation, a fall in net exports (or increase in the trade deficit).
4. The Ricardian view holds that debt-financed tax
cuts do not affect consumption or national saving, and therefore do not affect interest rates, investment, or net exports.
Chapter Summary
5. Most economists oppose a strict balanced budget
rule, as it would hinder the use of fiscal policy to stabilize output, smooth taxes, or redistribute the tax burden across generations.
6. Government debt can have other effects: may lead to inflation politicians can shift burden of taxes from current to future generations may reduce countrys political clout in international affairs or scare foreign investors into pulling their capital out of the country