Cancer Resolve Holy Ghost Height of Logistics Yoke Grandeur Hypocratic Oath Sustainable Tyranny If not already checked

out 1 or 666 too late a floater on new assignment, yet relative and pertinent to the reality that is and was as the world inevitably turns one humungous old leaf to a new page called HUMANITY www.1or666.com A world of Simplistic Sanity absent of the dedicated complicity of the SATANIC GODIC that chose to write their epitaph while such remarks from they once in higher place were recorded to say http://www.scribd.com/doc/71333371/Who-Would-Be-Foolish-Enough-to-Leave-a-Paper-Trail New investment opportunities in the new fangled undergarments Wet your pants and #2 laughter headed to your locality For what you have missed will be guided in spoon feed as we assess their Prolefeed Have ample diaper change handy eh? In his essay Politics and the English Language (1946), Orwell wrote about the importance of honest and clear language and said that vague

writing can be used as a powerful tool

of political manipulation. In Nineteen Eighty-Four he described how the state controlled

thought by controlling language, making certain ideas literally unthinkable. The adjective Orwellian refers to the frightening world of Nineteen Eighty-Four, in which the state controls thought and misinformation is widespread. Several words and phrases from Nineteen Eighty-Four have entered popular language.

Newspeak is a simplified and obfuscatory language designed to make independent thought impossible. Doublethink means holding two contradictory beliefs simultaneously.
The Thought Police are those who suppress all dissenting opinion. Prolefeed is homogenised, manufactured superficial literature, film and music, used to control and indoctrinate the populace through docility. Big Brother is a supreme dictator who watches everyone. We will get to watch them dump on themselves http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humpty_dumpty Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall, Humpty Dumpty had a great fall. All the king's horses and all the king's men Couldn't put Humpty together again.[1]

Humpty appears in Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking-Glass (1872), where he discusses semantics and pragmatics with Alice. I dont know what you mean by glory, Alice said. Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. Of course you donttill I tell you. I meant theres a nice knock-down argument for you! But glory doesnt mean a nice knock-down argument, Alice objected. When I use a word, Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, it means just what I choose it to meanneither more nor less. The question is, said Alice, whether you can make words mean so many different things. The question is, said Humpty Dumpty, which is to be master thats all. Alice was too much puzzled to say anything, so after a minute Humpty Dumpty began again. Theyve a temper, some of themparticularly verbs, theyre the proudestadjectives you can do anything with, but not verbshowever, I can manage the whole lot! Impenetrability! Thats what I say![15] This passage was used in Britain by Lord Atkin and in his dissenting judgement in the seminal case Liversidge v. Anderson (1942), where he protested about the distortion of a statute by the majority of the House of Lords.[16] It also became a popular citation in United States legal opinions, appearing in 250 judicial decisions in the Westlaw database as of April 19, 2008, including two Supreme Court cases (TVA v. Hill and Zschernig v. Miller).[17]

On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Frank Gallagher <kccm13@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Bob No mention of Hawaii in the Adverse Possession crap and then there is Iraq and Afghanistan corporate world stuff Of course the entire history of Capitalist Imperialist ... Aristocrat ... evolves the finer honed PRICK inciting FIBIB Political Religious Intellectual Charlatan Kleptocracy ... Fickle Inherent Bias Ignorant Bliss www.orcabp.com Democratic no Humanic Voice just as well in coherency absentia in STP - Satanic Truth Prohibition JENCIT.WS could assuredly use you and your gang to exec the NWO sector of our ICE SMELTER ---------- Forwarded message ---------From: "Bob Hurt" <bob@bobhurt.com> To: <siplin.gary.web@flsenate.gov> Cc: Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 22:29:00 -0500 Subject: [Lawmen: 4612] Our Judicial Oligarchy Dear Senator Gary Siplin: I write for two reasons: 1. To extend my support for SB 1524 2

2. To encourage you to sponsor related constitutional amendments.

SB 1524
I consider this a generally admirable bill in spite of its ambiguity and cleverness. I dont like the hiding of a racial issue into the bill. THAT generally violates the Constitutions requirement that a bill adhere to its purpose and not contain extraneous issues. The hiring of more minority (I presume you mean African-American) women will not improve the judiciary. If you think it will, please show me proof. If anything it will make the judiciary more racially prejudiced. I applaud your use of the English law of Florida the linchpin for eliminating judicial an prosecutorial immunity that causes widespread suffering and simultaneous loathing of government in Florida. Unfortunately, one must look high and low for the English law of Florida because the Legislature has never published it. I believe a famous judge began the project of reducing the essence of that law to writing back in the 1850s. I have googled for it and seen handwritten copy on the internet. I believe the Legislature last published it in the 1941 third volume of the Florida Statutes. The public has not seen it since. My point here: People cannot obtain protection for their rights under English law of Florida if they cannot find that law to read. The Legislature must stipulate and publish that law, with the provision that the publication, like the statutes, provide only prima facie evidence of the existence of a corresponding law, and if one can find actual law that differs from the statute, the court must take judicial notice of the law and its preeminence over statutes. Today in Florida thousands of people suffer police abuse for adverse possession of homes abandoned in foreclosure. Even though only an idiot would think any opportunity exists for taking that adverse possession to statutory term (7 years), it still constitutes a right under the English law of Florida of which the sheriffs, police, and prosecutors have ZERO cognizance. So, adverse possessors get arrested for trespassing, theft, burglary, B&E, fraud, and conspiracy then they cop a plea and take a conviction they dont deserve because they only get incompetent, lackluster public defenders. In late May, last year, African-American entrepreneur Joel McNair (cousin of the famous astronaut and MIT scientist Ron McNair) committed suicide rather than facing life in prison for adverse possession. Google him. Thats the evil of our prosecutors and sheriffs at work. In reality, your bill should have supplemented the ANTI-SLAPP Act by extending the protection against strategic lawsuits from the exercise of the first amendment rights to the exercise of any and all rights. Police have made the exercise of the right of adverse possession into a crime. You could consider that a counterpart for getting arrested for driving while black but ticketed for an illegal uturn that you did not do. And its public policy all over Florida to go after adverse possessors. Last year the legislature stiffened the requirements for adverse possessors, adding possible perjury to their list of crimes by requiring an affidavit never before needed for averse possession, and requiring the property appraiser to notify the owner of the adverse possession. Consider the impact: THAT requirement essentially strips away the rights of adverse possessors by giving notice not only to owners but also to sheriffs/police who then conduct an investigatory pogrom intended to frighten the adverse possessor out of the home, often culminating in one or more arrests. I have written extensively on this subject. Google Bob Hurt adverse possession. 3

I refer you to The Florida Supreme Court ruling Kluger v White (1973). In that case, the Florida Supremes opined that the Legislature cannot remove a common law right without providing a suitable statutory substitute. In 2010 the Legislature encumbered the adverse possessor by requiring notice to the owner who abandoned the house and should have paid attention to it anyway. That effectively took away a common law right of privacy and freedom from unwarranted intrusion into peoples private lives (see FL. Const Art I SECTION 23.Right of privacy.Every natural person has the right to be let
alone and free from governmental intrusion into the persons private life except as otherwise provided herein. This section shall not be construed to limit the publics right of access to public records and meetings as provided by law.). Now, where did the Legislature provide a statutory substitute? Nowhere.

This speaks directly to your SB 1524s language regarding F.S. 2.01, doesnt it? Unfortunately, your bill does not require the Legislature to PUBLISH the English Law of Florida so that the people in and out of government may know it. Everyone should know adverse possession constitutes a right, not merely a remedy, that flies straight into the face of private ownership of real estate. The right to own comes at the expense of the responsibility and obligation to exercise due watchcare and put the realty to its highest, best use. Eminent domain and the requirement to pay property taxes and HomeOwner Association dues also destroy the presumed sacrosanctity of private ownership of realty, so why shouldnt adverse possession, within the statutory limits? Now, Senator, you have also ignored another important fact in your bill. The crooks of Florida commit innumerable crimes against other people theft, fraud, racketeering, judicial abuse, prosecutorial abuse, and exercise of other privileges of the good old boys network. In many of those instances, the State Attorney WILL NOT PROSECUTE. When it comes to rights violations, you can write to the Attorney General under 760.51 and ask the AG to sue the offender, but the AG seldom or never does. We need a Private AG statute added to 760.51 to make the offender pay the court costs and legal fees plus treble damages to the victim, and to protect the victim from such fees in an unsuccessful PAG prosecution of the offender, or at least give the PAG the use of an out of state judge who is not part of the good old boys network. THIS is possibly more important than the other text of your bill. Hand in hand with that comes the common law right of all citizens personally to prosecute in criminal court any criminal who has injured the citizen, and to do it on behalf of another citizen. Hand in hand with that comes the right of any citizen to prosecute any case in court on behalf of any other citizen without a license or any other authorization to practice law, and to do so under the caveat emptor principle, without falling subject to government abuse for messing up the litigation and causing a client to lose. As a basis for this, consider normal lawyered litigation one side nearly always loses, often due to lawyer incompetence. My buddy Storm Bradford has counseled criminal defense lawyers for 35 years, teaching them how to beat prosecutors. He has a 90%+ win rate, in spite of 99% guilty clients. Nothing can explain that but prosecutorial abuse and incompetence. Thus, ANY CITIZEN should have the right to prosecute a civil or criminal case. This would break the legal services monopoly and lower lawyer fees to something far more affordable. And your bill should have done something about the outrageous fees courts charge for filing cases and counterclaims, and for buying transcripts. The average citizen simply cannot afford to litigate anything, leaving the courts available only to the wealthy for resolving disputes, when the courts should remain available to all for redressing injury (FL Const Art I - SECTION 21.Access to courts.
The courts shall be open to every person for redress of any injury, and justice shall be administered without sale, denial or delay.) Those high fees are just as abusive as bad judges.

AND, your bill ignored the most important aspect of judicial abuse the fact that the Supreme Court has the exclusive right to admit people to the practice of law and discipline those admitted. This 4

responsibility should go to the Executive branch, as do all other licensing issues. That and the 1949 merging of the bar into the Supreme Court creates a judicial oligarchy. Even YOU, a Senator, fall subject to the discipline of the Supreme Court and Florida Bar, and whether you like it or not, that makes you their lackey, destroying our Republic as a form of government. That violates Fl. Const Article II SECTION 3.Branches of government.The powers of the state

government shall be divided into legislative, executive and judicial branches. No person belonging to one branch shall exercise any powers appertaining to either of the other branches unless expressly provided herein.
Even other parts of the Constitution violate that section without rhyme or reason the AG and State Attorneys all must be bar members. So, your bill should have ousted the bar from the Supreme Court and its members from government altogether. Ooops, that would take a constituonal amendment wouldnt it? Well, I guess you have your work cut out for you. I expect your bill, for that reason, to crash and burn. The Florida Supremes have repeatedly slapped the hands of the Legislature for getting into their cookie jar. In the 2008 Bar v Sibley ruling, Peggy Quince, for the per curiam court, opined that we deem that by swearing the public officer oath in the Constitution we have complied with statutes. Sibley had claimed that they didnt hold office because they had not sworn the oaths required by FS 876.05-10. They said it doesnt matter what the legislature says. They must obey ONLY the constitution. Now look at that Article II Sec 5(b) oath: I

do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support, protect, and defend the Constitution and Government of the United States and of the State of Florida; that I am duly qualified to hold office under the Constitution of the state; and that I will well and faithfully perform the duties of (title of office) on which I am now about to enter. So help me God.
Do you see that language, Senator? You and judges swore to support protect and defend the GOVERNMENT, not merely the Constitutions. The GOVERNMENT means the GOOD OLD BOYS NETWORK, not the Constitutions and Laws pursuant thereto. YOU SWORE AN OATH TO THE ENEMY of the Constitution and laws. Those stay as written till properly amended, but Government changes its mind at whim and establishes public policies that flat violate the constitution and laws, and government employees break the laws and rules EVERY DAY. Your SB 1524 tries to address this by removing immunity from judges, by claiming they never had it under the English law of Florida. Now you see the source of such immunity the very oath public officers swear guarantees they will remain loyal to the government over the constitution. THAT explains the abusive, reprobate nature of government. It is staffed by hooligans who do what they damned well please. Let me clarify my assertion above. You get a choice every minute of every day whether to obey the Constitutions mandates, or to obey the mandates or wishes of some government employee which differs from or even opposes the mandates of the Constitution. No one can hold you accountable for doing what the Supreme Court wants you to do even though it violates the law, rules, and constituions. Why? Because you swore an oath to obey both, even when they differ or oppose. How do you deal with that ethics issue? Wel, you ought not to swear such Every time a government employee violates a rule or law or fails to use his power to enforce both the government structure and the guarantee of rights enumerated in the Constitutions, and those not enumerated as well, you become an OLIGARCHY, not a republic, and you become no better than any common street thug, and the people have the moral and ethical duty to oust you from the government forthwith by whatever means they deem expedient.

Here is your obligation from the very beginning of Article I of the present Florida Constitution:
SECTION 1.Political power.All political power is inherent in the people. The enunciation herein of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or impair others retained by the people. SECTION 2.Basic rights.All natural persons, female and male alike, are equal before the law and have inalienable rights, among which are the right to enjoy and defend life and liberty, to pursue happiness, to be rewarded for industry, and to acquire, possess and protect property; except that the ownership, inheritance, disposition and possession of real property by aliens ineligible for citizenship may be regulated or prohibited by law. No person shall be deprived of any right because of race, religion, national origin, or physical disability.

And here it is with crystal clarity from the Florida Constitution of 1838:

Section 1. That all freemen, when they form a social compact, are equal; and have certain inherent and indefeasible rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty; of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property and reputation; and of pursuing their own happiness. Section 2. That all political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and established for their benefit; and, therefore, they have, at all times, an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter or abolish their form of government, in such manner as they may deem expedient.
So long as you have sworn the Public Officers oath and do not repudiate it, you server two, disparate, often diametrically opposed MASTERS the Constitution, which cannot defend itself and requires YOU to defend it, and GOVERNMENT, the judicial oligarchy, the good old boys network which defends itself very well because it can rely upon you for support. I didnt intend this monologue as an indictment of you, Senator. But I did intend it to show you the dichotomy, the paradox, the conundrum, the irony that you as a bar member, attorney, and servant of the judiciary hold office in the Legislative branch in violation of Article II Section 3 separation of powers doctrine which you swore to support, protect, and defend. Can you offer up any excuse under the sun for that? All of which leads me to encourage you to

SUPPORT CERTAIN CHANGES to the CONSTITUTION

I hope you can see the good sense in promoting changes to the Florida Constitution so as to restore the republic and respect for constitution and law and defeat the good old boys network and judicial oligarchy that lies at the root of judicial and other forms of unjustified sovereign immunity. 6

1. Excise the bar from government 2. Excise bar members from government 3. Require that neither judges, Attorneys General, nor State Attorneys, nor any other public officer, nor staff attorneys nor general counsel may have active bar membership during office nor within 5 years after termination of public office. 4. Give the power to admit persons to the practice of law and the regulation of those admitted to the Executive Branch 5. Define practice of law as any professional acts of an attorney, only when a licensed attorney does them, and limit prosecution for unauthorized practice of law exclusively to disbarred attorneys and non-attorneys who claim attorney status. For all who seek legal services, caveat emptor applies, but only an attorney may be sued for legal malpractice. 6. Forbid the bar from engaging in any and all political activities, and bar dues from being spent on any and all political activities. 7. Require the Legislature to publish the English Law of Florida, updating it every year. 8. Require the Supreme Court and rules of court to comply with statutes related to preservation of the rights guaranteed in the Constitution, and forbidding any court rules that contradict state laws. For example, Article I Section 24 needs changing as follows striking paragraph (d) and replacing it with a new paragraph (d) and (e):

SECTION 24.Access to public records and meetings. Every person has the right to inspect or copy any public record made or received in connection with the official business of any public body, officer, or employee of the state, or persons acting on their behalf, except with respect to records exempted pursuant to this section or specifically made confidential by this Constitution. This section specifically includes the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government and each agency or department created thereunder; counties, municipalities, and districts; and each constitutional officer, board, and commission, or entity created pursuant to law or this Constitution.(a) All meetings of any collegial public body of the executive branch of state government or of any collegial public body of a county, municipality, school district, or special district, at which official acts are to be taken or at which public business of such body is to be transacted or discussed, shall be open and noticed to the public and meetings of the legisl(b)ature shall be open and noticed as provided in Article III, Section 4(e), except with respect to meetings exempted pursuant to this section or specifically closed by this Constitution. This section shall be self-executing. The legislature, however, may provide by general law passed by a twothirds vote of each house for the exemption of records from the requirements of subsection (a) and the exemption of meetings from the requirements of subsection (b), provided that such law shall state with specificity the public necessity justifying the exemption and shall be no broader than necessary to accomplish the stated purpose of the law. The legislature shall enact laws governing the enforcement of this section, including the maintenance, control, destruction, disposal, and disposition of records made public by this section, except that each house of the legislature may adopt rules governing the enforcement of this section

in relation to records of the legislative branch. Laws enacted pursuant to this subsection shall contain only exemptions from the requirements of subsections (a) or (b) and provisions governing the enforcement of this section, and shall relate to one subject.(c) All laws that are in effect on July 1, 1993 that limit public access to records or meetings shall remain in force, and such laws apply to records of the legislative and judicial branches, until they are repealed. Rules of court that are in effect on the date of adoption of this section that limit access to records shall remain in effect until they are repealed.(d)

(d) The Courts and Clerks of Court shall publish all dockets, and all documents identified in the dockets, including pleadings, notices, opinions, transcripts, photographs of all physical evidence on the internet for unfettered public access free of charge; all triers of fact shall take mandatory judicial notice of all such items upon request by any litigant. (e) All courts and tribunals of any and all kinds within Florida shall grant access by the public with no more than 10% of the seating reserved for press and dignitaries, and shall accommodate the video and audio recording of proceedings by the public, without exception. All courts shall make official audio and video recordings of proceedings, and shall make them available to the public on standard digital recording media such as CD or DVD for the retail cost of the media rounded up to the nearest five dollars.

9. Add this language to Section 21: No per party court filing fee shall exceed $100 for individual people, or $1000 for corporations with annual revenue less than $5,000,000, or $10,000 for other corporations including governments and their instrumentalities. Attorneys involved in litigation shall pay 15% of their compensation for services and litigants shall pay 25% of all punitive damage awards as a tax to the Clerk of Courts in order to help support the cost of maintaining courts and records. Courts shall not charge any fee for reopening cases, or for access to its records or electronic transcripts. Courts shall charge no transcript fee from lower courts for appeals.

Article I Section 21.Access to courts.The courts shall be open to every person for redress of any
injury, and justice shall be administered without sale, denial or delay.
History.Added, C.S. for C.S. for H.J.R.s 1727, 863, 2035, 1992; adopted 1992; Am. S.J.R. 1284, 2002; adopted 2002.

Remove And Government from the Article II Section 5(b) oath, and add language: All public employees shall swear or affirm all oaths required by statutes. All requirements other for election candidates apply equally apply to nomination candidates. All public officer candidates, including appointment nominees, shall recite the Florida Constitution Declaration of Rights and US Constitution Bill of rights from rote memory or pass a corresponding competency exam in order to qualify for nomination or appointment. All public officers shall possess their credential documents in miniature for public scrutiny upon demand. Credentials shall include bar oath, elector oath, candidate oath, candidate loyalty oath, public officer oath, and public employee oath, acceptance of office, and competency certification. I have more, but I know I have worn you out if you have read this far. 8

I sincerely appreciate your sponsoring 1524. Thank you.

Bob Hurt
Contact: Email bh f t Blogs: 1 2 3 Law: E-letter Subscribe Donate Learn

2460 Persian Drive #70, Clearwater, Florida 33763 727 669 5511 *** This Microsoft colortag contains my contact info for your smart phone:

-You received this because you subscribe to the "Lawmen" messages. Comment to Lawmen owner - reply to the message (only the owner posts messages). See the archives, change options - visit http://groups.google.com/group/Lawmen Join / Subscribe - send email to Lawmen+subscribe@googlegroups.com Resign / Unsubscribe- send email to Lawmen+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

-2012 Forgiveness Ultimatum www.2012fu.com