Professional Documents
Culture Documents
L. Rolon and J. Toro Dept. of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506; U.S.A.
MIDDLE
The MMVB (Figure 1) constitutes what Kingston (1983) called a poly-historic basin, developed through different stages closely related with the tectonic events of the northwest corner of South America.
Figure 1. Location of the MMVB During the late Triassic Early Jurassic the opening of the proto-Atlantic ocean and the breakup of Pangea were initiated, causing the initial separation of South America, North America and Africa. The extensional stresses within the Precambrian continental block resulted in the formation of a rift structure in central Colombia, which evolved to the stage of aulacogen (Etayo, Barrero and Renzoni, 1969, Etayo et al., 1983, Fabre, 1983). According to Fabre (1983), the rifting process was due to east-west extension that caused crustal and lithospheric thinning. Jurassic Cretaceous basic intrusions are consistent with the model of passive rifting (Turcotte and Oxburgh,
1978, McKenzie, 1978 and, Segnor and Burke, 1978) which consider this igneous activity due to the elevated position of the asthenosphere / lithosphere boundary under thinned areas, the partial mantle fusion, and the high heat flow. The syn-rift infill is represented by a tectonosequence that consists of fluvial and lacustrine sedimentary rocks (Jordan, Giron and Santos formations), overlain by limestones and shales (Rosablanca and Paja formations) (Figure 2). Seismically this sequence comprises irregular, discontinuous reflectors, rotated by normal-fault blocks, which get thicker to the south-east. Changes in thickness suggest that their accumulation took place while normal faults were still active. By Early Aptian the extension decreased, the heat flow declined (Fabre, 1983), and a post-rift phase controlled by thermal subsidence started. During this phase the Tablazo, Simit, La Luna and Umir formations were deposited. The dominant deformation style was still normal faulting but less pervasive than during the syn-rift phase. This caused the thickness of units to become more uniform along the basin. The seismic character of the post-rift sequence consists of continuous reflectors and slow changes in thickness. Three main transpessive deformation phases have been observed in the MMVB during late Cretaceous and Paleogene (e.g. Taboada et al., 2000, Rolon et al., 2001), which took place during Late Cretaceous Paleocene, early to middle Eocene, and Oligocene. The Late Cretaceous (Campanian Maastrichtian) Paleocene phase has been linked to the oblique collision of the Colombian Western Cordillera with the South American plate (Barrero, 1979), which caused thrusting and uplift of the Central Cordillera. This event also triggered deformation in the foothills of the present-day Eastern Cordillera (east edge of the MMVB) with formation of west-verging thrusts. In addition, inside the MMVB the highs of Cachira and La CiraInfantas were formed, by reactivation of the ancient normal faults. This tectonic phase developed major right-lateral structures in the MMVB, like the Palestina and Cimitarra faults, and also modified
the previous existing extensional style. Even thought there is no direct evidence that relates the occurrence of these faults with the stresses generated by the collision of the Western Cordillera, Feininger (1970) believes that the age of these faults range from Late Cretaceous to prePliocene (which agrees with the age of the collision). During the late Eocene-early Oligocene tectonic phases, transpressive right lateral deformation probably occurred along the Romeral and Salinas fault Systems as a result of the oblique convergence between the paleo-Caribean plate and the Northwestern South American plate (Taboada et al., 2000). Lately by Early Miocene, a second major compressional event began as a consequence of the collision of the Panama-Choco island arc with the northwestern edge of South America. This event had repercussions in the final configuration of the MMVB and allowed the deposition of the thick sedimentary sequence at the east of the basin (Dengo and Covey, 1993, Rolon et al., 2001). Finally the MMVB became an intermontane basin. The most dramatic deformation is evidenced in the Eastern Cordillera foothills, by the presence of imbricated fans, and triangle zones.
PERIOD
STRUCTURE OF THE RIFT Reconstruction of the rift structure is not an easy task since many of the structures of the extensional phase have been affected by later compression in most of the MMVB. However, some tectonic features remain well preserved in the northern part of the MMVB, which allows inferences to be made regarding the geometry of the rift. From the morphologic point of view, the northern portion of the MMVB is a monocline dipping southeastward representing a half graben inside the whole structure. There are normal and reverse faults, mainly oriented in northeastsouthwest trends with variable vergence. Nevertheless there are some structures whose orientation is northwest-southeast.The dip direction of the monocline structure as well as the tendency of the syn-rift sequence to get thicker southeastward (Figure 3), let conclude that the rift was deepening in south-eastern direction. The fact that the syn-rift section is pinching out northwestward, is just an indicator of an emerged area in that sector. The structural features aforementioned are in agreement with the typical geometry of a half graben described by Rosendahl (1987), for the Tanganika Lake in Africa. In this model half grabens switch their polarities and a transfer zone is created in the area where the main faults are overlapping (Figure 4). Reverse faults are a result of inversion tectonics on ancient normal faults and in some cases they were affected by the Palestina strikeslip fault system, during t e Late Cretaceous and h Paleocene (Ecopetrol, 2001). Following the model of kinematics evolution for the Coffee Soil fault, proposed by Cartwright (1992) the normal faults seemed to be rotational during the syn-rift accumulation and non-rotational during post-rift sedimentation. This can be inferred from the divergent pattern of the strata in reflectors that conform the syn-rift section and the parallel pattern at the post-rift section. INVERSION OF EXTENSIONAL STRUCTURES Experimental work of inversion structures shows that thrust and reverse faults commonly form and use existing extensional structures (McClay and Buchanan, 1991), especially where the original structures had a high-angle dip. Many smaller scale compressional structures in the MMVB are cored by high-angle reverse faults (Figure 5) are clearly inverted normal faults formed by this mechanism. In addition, there are basin
EPOCH / AGE
AGE Ma 0.01
FORMATION
LITHOLOGY
DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENT
54.8
SB
PALEOCENE
L LISAMA
61.0
PARALIC
E
65.0 + 0.1
Maastrichtian
71.3 + 0.5
MARINE
UMIR
LA LUNA
Cenomanian
98.9 + 0.5
SIMITI
Albian TABLAZO
SB
121.0 + 1.4
112.2 + 1.1
MARINE Middle shelf, storm dominated towards the top MARINE Calcareous platform. Sabka tidal flats CONTINENTAL
Hauterivian
132.0 + 1.9
SB
ROSABLANCA
CUMBRE
Valanginian
Ryazanian
J RA SSIC U
Berriasian Titonian
Volgian
150.7 + 3.0
N
6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500
11905
42823
36976
95435
102826
130690
49850
94764
Norean-1
Crisol-2
Trigos1
15 60 10 70 10 80 15 80 10 90
Totumal-6
45 50 40 60 45 60
Torcoroma1
650 700 800 850 900
Gironda-1
50 70 55 70 50 80
Bosques3
45 50 40 60 45 60 45 70 40 80
Llanito-1
5450 5500
Infantas-1613
2450 2500 2550
5600
55 80
2650
5650
45 70
2700 40 80
5700
55 90
45 80 15 90
45 80
2750
60 00
40 90
C re t n or l i ao GR AI P S P -100 MV 10 5
D ph et
5800
1000
65 00
2850
5850
1050
2900 50 00
50 00
0 5
0.2
20 00
20 10
5900
1100
65 10
2950
55 00
0.2
20 00
25 10
55 00
5950
1150
60 20
50 10
50 10
3000
0 5
1200
65 20
55 10
6050
25 20 50 20
1250
60 30
3100
50 20
6100
0 5 1
20 30 55 20
1300
3150
55 20
6150
0 2
25 30 50 30
1350
60 40
50 30
3200
0 5 2
20 40
65 40
55 30
6250 C re t n or l i ao G ( /) RA N Dp et h R s tt es i iv iy ResS(SN)
1450
50 40 20 50
60 50
3300
6300
0 5 3
0 P S 150 02 . OHMM ResM(N/A) 2000
1500
3350 55 40
55 40
6350
0 4
-0 10 M V 5 0 02 . ResD(N/A) 02 . 2000 2000
25 50 50 50
1550
60 60
50 50
3400
6400
0 5 4
20 60 55 50
1600
65 60
55 50
3450
0 5
1650
5 0
60 70
50 60
6500
20 70
100
1700
55 60
65 70
3550
6550
0 6
25 70 50 70
1750
3600
50 70
Section Line
6600
0 5 6
200
20 80 55 70 25 80
1800
65 80
55 70
3650
0 7
250
60 90
50 80
6700
1900
300
65 90
3750
6750
55 80
0 8
25 90 50 90
1950
3800
50 90
6800
0 5 8
400
30 00 55 90 35 00
2000
75 00
55 90
3850
6850
0 9
450
70 10
60 00
60 00
3900
0 5 9
2100
500
75 10
65 00
6950
1000
550
35 10 60 10
2150
70 20
4000
7000
1050
30 20 65 10
2200
4050
65 10
7050
1100
650
35 20 60 20 30 30
2250
70 30
60 20
4100
1150
700
75 30
65 20
65 20
4150
7150
2350
750
70 40
4200
7200
60 30
1250
30 40 65 30
2400
4250
65 30
7250
1300
850
35 40 60 40 30 50
2450
70 50
60 40
4300
7300
1350
900
75 50
65 40
65 40
4350
2550
950
70 60
60 50
7400
1450
10 00
30 60 65 50
2600
75 60
4450
7450
1500
35 60 60 60
2650
4500
60 60
7500
1550
10 10
30 70 65 60 35 70
2700
75 70
65 60
4550
7550
1600
15 10
70 80
60 70
60 70
4600
7600
1700
1750
1800
Tertiary Unconformity
10 20
2800
75 80
4650
7650
35 80
2850
4700 60 80
60 80
7700
30 90
2900
75 90
65 80
65 80
4750
7750
10 30
35 90
80 00
15 30
4800
60 90
60 90 40 00
3000
10 40
85 00
65 90
7850
1900
15 40
45 00 70 00
3050
80 10
4900
7900
1950
40 10 75 00
3100
4950
75 00
7950
2000
15 50
45 10 70 10 40 20
3150
80 20
70 10
5000
8000
2050
10 60
3200
75 10
85 20
75 10
5050
8050
2100
15 60
3250
80 30
70 20
8100
2150
40 30 75 20
3300
5150
75 20
8150
2200
15 70
45 30 70 30 40 40
3350
80 40
70 30
5200
8200
2250
10 80
85 40
75 30 45 40
5250
75 30
3450
15 80
2350
10 90
40 50 75 40
3500
2400
45 50 70 50
3550
Tertiary
80 50 85 50 85 60 80 70 85 70 85 80 80 90 85 90 90 00
70 40
8300
5350
8350
5400
70 50
8400
2450
20 00
40 60 5450
75 50
75 50 45 60
8450
3650
25 00
5500
70 60
70 60
2550
20 10
2600
25 10
2650
20 20
2700
25 20
Upper Cretaceous
45 70 70 70 40 80 75 70 45 80 70 80 40 90 70 90 50 00 75 90 55 00 80 00 50 10 85 00 50 20 85 10 55 20 80 20 50 30
3700
75 60
8550
3750
5600
8600
3800
5650
75 70
8650
5700
70 80
3900
20 30
75 80
8750
2800
25 30
3950
5800
8800
2850
4000
5850
75 90
8850
2900
25 40
90 10
80 00
5900
8900
4100
20 50
95 10
85 00
5950
3000
25 50
4150
90 20
80 10
9000
3050
20 60
4200
6050
9050
3100
4250
90 30
80 20
6100
9100
3150
20 70
95 30
85 20 55 30
85 20
6150
4350
25 70
90 40
80 30
9200
3250
20 80
4400
85 30
95 40
6250
9250
3300
55 40 80 40
4450
6300
80 40
9300
3350
20 90
50 50
95 50
85 40 55 50
85 40
6350
9350
4550
25 90
90 60
80 50
6400
80 50
3450
30 00
4600
95 60
85 50
9450
3500
35 00
55 60 80 60
4650
6500
9500
3550
50 70 85 60 55 70
4700
95 70
85 60
6550
9550
90 80
35 10
6600
80 70
80 70 50 80
3650
30 20
4800
95 80
85 70
9650
3700
35 20
4850
80 80
90 90
6700
9700
3750
50 90 85 80
4900
6750
85 80
9750
3800
35 30
55 90
10 00 0
80 90 60 00
80 90
6800
9800
5000
30 40
15 00 0
85 90
6850
85 90
3900
35 40
5050
10 00 1
90 00
9900
3950
30 50
60 10 95 00
5100
6950
9950
4000
65 10 90 10 60 20
5150
10 00 2
90 10
7000
10000
5200
30 60
15 00 2
95 10
7050
95 10 65 20
4100
35 60
5250
10 00 3
90 20
10100
4150
30 70
5300
95 20
15 00 3
95 20
7150
10150
4200
65 30 90 30
5350
7200
90 30
10200
4250
30 80
60 40
15 00 4
95 30 65 40
95 30
7250
10250
5450
35 80
10 00 5
90 40
7300
90 40
4350
30 90
5500
15 00 5
95 40
10350
4400
35 90
65 50 90 50
5550
7400
10400
4450
60 60
15 00 6
95 50 65 60
95 50
7450
10450
5650
45 00
10 00 7
90 60
7500
10500
90 60 60 70
4550
40 10
5700
95 60
15 00 7
95 60
10550
4600
45 10
5750
90 70
10 00 8
90 70
7600
10600
4650
60 80 95 70
5800
7650
10650
4700
45 20
65 80
10 00 9
90 80 60 90
90 80
7700
10700
4750
40 30
5900
95 80
15 00 9
95 80
7750
4800
45 30
5950
10 10 0
90 90
10800
4850
40 40
70 00 95 90
6000
7850
10850
4900
75 00
10 10 1
10000 70 10
10000
7900
10900
6100
40 50
15 10 1
10050
7950
10950
5000
45 50
5050
40 60
5100
45 60
Simiti
75 10 75 20 70 30 75 30 75 40 70 50 75 50 70 60 70 70
10050
6150
10100
10 10 2
10100
11000
6200
10150
15 10 2
10150
8050
11050
6250
8100 10200
11100
15 10 3
40 70
8150
10250
10250
11150
5200
45 70
6350
10300
10 10 4
10300
8200
5250
40 80
6400
15 10 4
10350
11250
5300
45 80
6450
10400
10 10 5
8300
11300
5350
15 10 5
10450
10450
8350
11350
6550
45 90
10 10 6
10500
8400
11400
10500
5450
50 00
6600
10550
15 10 6
10550
8450
5500
55 00
6650
10 10 7
10600
8500
11500
5550
50 10
6700
8550 10650
11550
75 70
6750
55 10
10 10 8
10700
8600
11600
10700 70 80
5650
50 20
6800
10750 75 80
15 10 8
10750
8650
5700
55 20
6850
10 10 9
10800
11700
5750
50 30
70 90 10850
6900
15 10 9
8750
11750
5800
75 90
10 20 0
10900 80 00
10900
8800
11800
5850
7000
50 40
15 20 0
10950
8850
11850
-500
TD=5900
10950 85 00
7050
55 40
10 20 1
11000
8900
11000
7100
50 50
15 20 1
11050
8950
11950
85 10
55 50
7150
11100
80 20
7200
11150 85 20
55 60
TD=11184
80 30
7250
7300
50 70
9000
12000
9050
11150
12050
9100
11200
TD=5724
TD=8329
7350
11250
12150
11300
9200
12200
9250
11350
12250
7450
9300
11400
12300
7500
9350
11450
-1000
7550
11500
9400
12400
9450
12450
7650
T D = 1 2 7 0 1
11600
9500
12500
7700
11650
9550
7750
11700
12600
7800
11750
9650
12650
TD=7859
9700
12700
9750
11850
12750
9800
11900
11950
-1500
12850
T D = 1 2 0 0 2
9900
12900
9950
12950
10000
13050
10100
13100
10150
Upper Jurassic
-2000
13150
10200
13200
10250
13300
10350
13350
10400
13400
10450
13500
10550
13550
TD=13561
10600 10650
10700
10800
10850
-2500
Figure 3. Cross section showing thickness changes in the basal lime group.
10900
11000
11050
11100
TD=11100
Figure 4. Structural map of the MMVB showing the hypothetical boundaries of the half graben.
inversion geometries (Holdsworth et al., 1997), represented by thicker rift strata on the hanging wall and by variation of fault throw with depth. The inversion process of the Jurassic rift in the northern MMVB was mild, since in most of the reversed faults, the syn-rift sequence has been extruded as a major fold, what is in accordance with the models of geometries of inversion proposed by Hayward and Graham (1989). The basement or pre-rift section acted in this case as a buttress against thrusting. Inversion came about from compressiontranspression deformation along the western and eastern edges of the basin. The compressional event started during Campanian time and continues until the Recent. Major pulses of thrust formation occured during the Paleogene and Middle Miocene. During this time, a great number of former extensional features are inverted (Rolon et al., 2001). Transpresion caused by the oblique collision of the Western Cordillera, mainly developed during Paleocene, added a strike-slip component to the reactivation process through the clockwise rotation of the blocks. The north-eastern trend, what is the orientation of the Palestina fault is especially evident in the western sector of the area, where Casabe and Cantagallo fields are located. Clockwise rotation is also observed at the scale of individual structures in the eastern side of the basin. Individual thrusts translate displacement between each other either through a transfer zone or a swarm of right-lateral tear faults (Rolon et al., 2001). CONCLUSIONS The MMVB was developed through different tectonic stages related with the interaction of the tectonic plates at the Northwestern corner of South America. During Jurassic and early Cretaceous the MMVB went through rift stage that evolved to an aulacogen. Many of the structures related with the extensional phase of the MMVB were modified after the Tertiary tectonics, however the rift structures in the northern portion of the basin are still well preserved. The northern part of the MMVB is a monocline dipping toward the southeast that represents a half graben inside the rift. The monocline structure is dipping south-eastern, as is the direction, where isopach contours thicken. Most of the structures present at the area are normal and reverse faults of variable vergence, oriented in northeast-southwest direction. Kinematics of the rift seemed to be rotational
during the syn-rift accumulation and non-rotational during post-rift sedimentation. Most of the faults remaining the rift structure were inverted after compressional tectonics that started at Late Cretaceous. According the model proposed by Hayward and Graham (1989), inversion seemed to be mild in the northern MMVB area. Transpresion caused by the oblique collision of the Western Cordillera, added a strike-slip component to the reactivation process, through the clockwise rotation of the blocks. Acknowledgments: We want to express our deepest gratitude to Ecopetrol and La Luna Oil Company for providing valuable information used for this work. In the same way we want to send special thanks to Dr. Dario Barrero for his contributions and comments. REFERENCES Barrero, D., 1979, Geology of the Central Western Cordillera, west of Buga and Roldanillo, Colombia: Publicaciones Geolgicas Especiales INGEOMINAS no.4, pp.1-75. Cartwright, J., 1992, The kinematic evolution of the Coffee Soil Fault: Roberts, A., Yielding, G., & Freeman, B. (eds) The Geometry of Normal Faults. Special Publication of the Geological Society of London, pp. 29-40. Dengo, C., and Covey, M., 1993, Structure of the Eastern Cordillera of Colombia; Implications for trap styles and regional tectonics, AAPG, Bull., V.77, pp 1315-1337. Ecopetrol, 2001. Proyecto Evaluacin Regional Cuenca Valle Medio Del Magdalena - Cordillera Oriental, Colombia. Internal report. Etayo, F. et al., 1983. Mapa de Terrenos Geolgicos de Colombia; INGEOMINAS Publicaciones Especiales no. 14, 1-235. Etayo, F., Renzoni, G., and Barrero, D., 1969, Contornos sucesivos del mar Cretcico en Colombia, Memoria Primer Congreso Colombiano de Geologa, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogot, pp. 217-252. Fabre, A., 1983, La subsidencia de la cuenca del Cocuy (Cordillera Oriental de Colombia) durante el Cretceo y el Terciario, segunda parte: esquema de evolucin tectnica, Geologa Norandina, No. 8, pp 21-21. Feininger, T., 1970, The Palestina fault: Geol. Soc America, Bull., V.81, pp. 1201-1216.
NW
1 Km
SE
Tertiary Unconformity
Tertiary Unconformity
Basal-Lime-Group Top
Jurassic Top
Figure 5. Line NC-81-2, located in the northern area of the MMVB. The line shows examples of the inverted faults found in the area.
Hayward, A., & Graham, R., 1989, Some geometrical characteristics of inversion: Cooper, M., & Williams, G. (eds) Inversion Tectonics. Special Publication of the Geological Society of London, pp. 17-39. Holdsworth, R., Butler, C., and Roberts, A., 1997, The recognition of reactivation during continental: Journal of the Geological Society of London, V.154, pp. 73-78. Kingston, D., Dishroon, C., Williams, P., Global basin classification system: AAPG Bull., V.67, pp. 2175-213. McClay, K., & Buchanan, P., 1992, Thrust faults in inverted extensional basins: McClay, K. (ed) Thrust tectonics. Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom (GBR), pp. 93-104 McClay, K., 1989, Analogue models of inversion tectonics: Cooper, M., & Williams, G. (eds) Inversion Tectonics. Special Publication of the Geological Society of London, pp. 41-59. McKenzie, D., 1978, Some remarks on the development of sedimentary basins. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 40, pp. 25-32. Rolon, L., Lorenzo, J., Lowrie, A., and Barrero, D., 2001. Thrust, kinematics and Hydrocarbon migration in the Middle Magdalena Basin, st Colombia (S.A.). 21 Annual GCS-SEPM Conference. Houston, December 2001. Rosendahl, B., 1987, Tectonic model of the Malawi Rift, Africa. Tectonophysics, vol.141, no.13, pp.215-235. Segnor, A. and Burke, K., 1978, Relative timing of rifting and volcanism on Earth and its tectonic implications. Geophysics Research Letters, 5, pp. 419-421. Taboada, A. et. al, 2000, Geodynamics of the northern Andes: Subductions and intracontinental deformation (Colombia): Tectonics, V.19, No. 5, pp. 787-813. Turcotte, D., and Oxburgh, E., 1978, Intra-plate volcanism. Phil. trans. Roy. Soc Lon. 288A, pp. 561-79.