Federal Lawsuit Appeal in case no.

12-CV-3098(RRM) (LB)

CHILD STEALING
by LESBIAN JUDGE from HETEROSEXUAL MOTHER

GAY LESBIAN JUDGE DISCRIMINATES on SEXUAL ORIENTATION and RELIGION Court orders mother not to discuss religion with her son Court criticizes mother for making a statement to Petitioner father you will believe in God when this case is over Court orders mother not to speak disparagingly, regarding anybodys sexual orientation during parental access time. Kings County First Openly Gay Lesbian Judge Debra Silber and former LGBT Board Member. HYPOCRISY Honorable Judge Debra Silber went beyond her Legal Jurisdiction as the Lesbian activist Judge illegally allied with another Gay Lesbian, the Paternal Grandmother in an effort to segregate a FIT mother from her minor child. This action arises out of a contested child custody dispute. See Pena v. Chadee, and Chadee v. Pena, Docket Nos. V-00084/06; slip op. at 1-6 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Richmond County, July 6, 2010) (Doc. No. 1-2, Ex. AA). Rita Kaufman, a law guardian assigned to represent my 6 year old child and Justice Debra Silber, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, engaged in a conspiracy to deprive me of custody of my child. Judge Silber and Rita Kaufman violated my constitutional rights in the course of that conspiracy. Consequently, my child was taken away from me without due process and as a result of an irrational decision NOT based on fact or law, but a bias favoritism, of a homosexual way of life.

The Court Concludes: [Decision 7.6.2010: 10]

The Court finds Petitioner Fathers testimony completely Credible, whereas the Respondent Mothers testimony NOT Credible on the subjects most pertinent to this custody determination. The Court has carefully considered Forensic Expert Dr. Kaplans report and the recommendations contained therein, and found them only occasionally useful. The Court also found Ms. Pena, the paternal grandmother to be a Credible Witness.

July 2012 For Immediate Release: CONTACT- Sandy Chadee via asking.cue.bono@Gmail.com

Page 1

Federal Lawsuit Appeal in case no. 12-CV-3098(RRM) (LB)

The Conspiracy
Judge Silber acted in ultra-vires manner when she illogically justified and maliciously credited undue emphasis on the testimony of a layperson, unethically choosing to REJECT the Court-Appointed Forensic Experts, opinion, recommendations and testimony. Judge Silber allowed corrupt thinking, impure selfish interest to motivate her in plotting to divert custody of a minor child from its FIT mother to an impoverished violent father. [Kalb v. Luce, 291 N.W. 841, 234 WISC 509] Court appointed Forensic Psychiatrist- Doctor Robert Kaplan, Recommendation: Sole Custody remains with the mother, Ms. Chadee. [Jan. 7, 2007 Forensic Report] Sole Custody remains with the Childs natural mother. [Oct. 31, 2007 Forensic Report]
The Court Concludes: [Decision 7.6.2010: 44]

The Court recognizes that it is NOT bound by the opinion of the neutral expert. [Zelnik v. Zelnik 1st dept. 1993]. The opinion of a mental health professional is not binding upon the Court. [Bayer v. Bayer the 2nd Dept. 1984] [The court has the right to discount the recommendation of the psychiatrist], and that in rendering a decision in a custody dispute, the Court must not cede its decision-making authority to the expert. (Bates v. Bates, [3rd Dept. 2002] [Recommendations of such witnesses ...are not determinative of the ultimate issue in controversy but are factors to be considered unless unsupported by the record].

The Record
The Court Concludes: [Decision 7.6.2010: 45]

Doctor Kaplans conclusions about Mr. Pena seem to especially lack perspective. He notes Mr. Penas ability to push Ms. Chadees buttons, but seems largely unaware of Ms. Chadee efforts to do the same, especially concerning Mr. Penas lack of a father (a Sperm donor) and Mr. Penas mothers sexuality. Ms. Chadee told Forensic Dr. Kaplan that Mr. Penas mother would not let him have a normal relationship, as she was too possessive of him and that she thought her childs sexuality would be negatively affected by his having contact with Ms. Pena. Dr. Kaplan did not think these opinions were unusual or incorrect.
Court appointed Forensic Doctor Kaplan Concludes: [Forensic Report 10.31.2007: 17]

(For reasons that arent fully clear) Maria Pena is anathema to Sandy Chadee, the examiner doubts that Ms. Pena is less than appropriate with her grandson; and there is absolutely no reason known to the examiner why she shouldnt be allowed to be present during visitations.

July 2012 For Immediate Release: CONTACT- Sandy Chadee via asking.cue.bono@Gmail.com

Page 2

Federal Lawsuit Appeal in case no. 12-CV-3098(RRM) (LB)

The Record (continues)

The Court notes: [Decision 7.6.2010: 20] Mr. Pena describes himself as a Unitarian and Ms. Chadee was for a time a devout Jehovah Witness" and Mr. Pena objects to some aspects of that RELIGION including what he terms Its bigotry against the LGBT Community. Basic First Amendment principles and the New Yorks Sexual Orientation Non-Discrimination Act (SONDA) render discrimination based on religion and sexual orientation Illegal. Judge Silber and the Paternal grandmother are both lesbian activists, with Judge Silber once holding a position as board member of the Lambda Independent Democrats of Brooklyn, Brooklyns Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Political Voice. http://lidbrooklyn.org/?page_id=2 Court appointed Dr. Robert Kaplan [Forensic Report: 10.7.2007] Maria Pena proudly disclosed to the Court appointed Forensic psychiatrist, her transgender Lesbian lifestyle and reveals her liberal activist involvement most of her adulthood. Ms. Pena biological son Carlos Pena born from artificial insemination and reared in a way of life with two mothers from birth. The Court notes: [Decision 7.6.2010: 18] Ms. Chadees apparent obsession with Mr. Penas mother, not only about his mothers sexuality (though presently married to a man, she was in a lesbian relationship at the time of Mr. Penas birth and during much of his childhood).
The Court notes other evidence: [Decision 7.6.2010: 19]

Ms. Chadee told Forensic, Doctor Kaplan she had reason to believe that Mr. Pena was sexually molested by his mother, and that she was afraid she would sexually molest Daniel, and that Ms. Pena told her on a few occasions that she didnt have any underwear on, and was getting ready to go to bed. The Record implicitly bears out that the Paternal Grandmother a (Lesbian Activist), was the most pertinent subject to this custody determination, rather than the propertied subject, which is the best interest of the child. In sum, Dr. Kaplan observed the following in his forensic report, which should have, and would have carried the day were it not for unlawful and unconstitutional interference and Judicial bias that went so far as to vitiate Ms. Chadees Right to discuss religion with her son:

July 2012 For Immediate Release: CONTACT- Sandy Chadee via asking.cue.bono@Gmail.com

Page 3

Federal Lawsuit Appeal in case no. 12-CV-3098(RRM) (LB)

Respectfully submitted, /s/ Sandy Chadee ___________________________ Sandy Chadee Fit mother.

July 2012 For Immediate Release: CONTACT- Sandy Chadee via asking.cue.bono@Gmail.com

Page 4