The Distributor, otherwise known as Edward Woodward.

If you have something I need then you are in a position to manipulate me. If I have something you need, then I am in a position to manipulate you. But the question is, why on Earth would anyone want to. Power games and manipulative wrangling have made for a very pleasant world? It doesnt matter where you get your power from, because lets be clear, we all have powers of one sort or another, chances are, you will tend to want to cling to it tenaciously, because it is what you know and it is how you get your sense of self and self worth. Thing is though, often the powers we have often arent the powers we truly want. When this is the case, then we can apply the maxim, Using what you have to get what you want. Generally it is about giving from your excess to fill your lack. If we apply that maxim, and granted, there are some people who are quite happy with the way they are, but, in life, it is not always about what you want, then a natural distribution pattern will emerge, a natural equalisation. Nowhere can we see that more clearly than in governance. The incredible pressures that the traditional governance mechanisms have been put under is causing them to creak and actually, the reality is that the power of governance of traditional bodies and institutions is slowly being eroded, but this is obvious. Who respects the government today like they were respected 2 or 3 decades ago? This is the distribution of power and it has already moved on a considerable way. The way that the government is portrayed today, it seems to me that it is often portrayed as little more than a self interested cabal. Whether that is an accurate representation is a good question, but the emphasis has shifted. So, as far as distribution goes, things can be distributed and shared out a lot more evenly than they are right now. That includes, governance, finance, free time, and so on. No one should be left chronically lacking for anything. Thats healthy for at the moment, we all have some form of extreme lack, even if it is just a working bonce. The distributor is sorting it out. Instead of giving all the onion rings to one guy and all the cider to another, there's going to be a couple of onion rings and cider for everyone. That's the new even paradigm and anything which moves towards a collective of people rather than a collection of individuals is likely to be a part of that paradigm, as far as I can see anyway. Individuals accruing and gorging themselves on one thing till they have chronic lack in other areas has what has got us in this mess. We all do it, even if it is just training for The Olympics. Jesus said it to the rich man, give away all your possessions to the poor. This is the main tenet of equalisation, giving from your excess to feed a lack and that is how peace is born. It's been known for 2000 years, so whether it is actually going to come about. Lose the greed as they say. It's a lovely tenet that because it's always some other guy who has to do the giving away. No-one lines up and says, I'll give from my excess to the poor. They don't do that and that is why the world is spiralling down. The gamble is that you actually have something to lose, or is that the illusion? The root of the problem is that often people are convinced that what they have is better than what they would get if they gave it up. This goes for religions and all sorts of things. It's a natural fear not to want to lose what you have, but if you don't give something up, there can never be the space for anything new to come in. That is why the distributor is imploring people, give a little and see what you get back. The need to cling on to what you have is a fear born of the past where people have lost and lost again. Times have changed to mean that the idea is to move beyond that fear. At one time I had basically given away or how I saw it squandered, which amounted to giving it away, all I

had and I had to then trust in the fact that correct recompense would be forth coming and it was. I don't know if that helps, but when I had given up all my stuff, that is what happened to me and all I can do is relate that story. In giving it up, I became free of it and it turned out to be an enlightening liberation of sorts, from where I had been at before.