Professional Documents
Culture Documents
)
)
Objection Deadline: June 24, 2009 at 4:00 p.m. (prevailng Eastern time) Hearing: July 1,2009 at 10:00 a.m. (prevailng Eastern time)
DEBTORS' MOTION FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.c. 1121(D) EXTENDING THE TIME PERIODS DURING WHICH THE DEBTORS HAVE THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO FILE A PLAN AND SOLICIT ACCEPTANCES THERETO
The above-captioned debtors and debtors in possession (the "Debtors") hereby
move (the "Motion") the Court for the entry of an order, pursuant to section 1121 (d) of title 11 of
the United States Code (the "Bankptcy Code"), (a) extending by one-hundred twenty (120)
days the period under section 1121(b) of
the exclusive right to file a Chapter 11 plan (the "Exclusive Filing Period") and (b) extending by
one-hundred twenty-one (121) days2 the period under section 1121(c)(3) of
during which the Debtors have the exclusive right to solicit acceptances of a chapter 11 plan
(the "Exclusive Solicitation Period," together with the Exclusive Filng Period, the "Exclusive
Periods"). This is the first request by the Debtors for an extension of
support of
1 The Debtors in these cases, along with the last four digits of each of
number, are: Pacific Energy Resources Ltd. (3442); Petrocal Acquisition Corp. (6249); Pacific Energy Alaska
Holdings, LLC (tax J.D. # not available); Cameros Acquisition Corp. (5866); Pacific Energy Alaska Operating LLC (7021); San Pedro Bay Pipeline Company (1234); Cameros Energy, Inc. (9487); and Gotland Oil, Inc. (5463). The mailng address for all of the Debtors is III W. Ocean Boulevard, Suite 1240, Long Beach, CA 90802. 2 An extension of the Exclusive Solicitation Period, which now expires on September 5, 2009, of 120 days concludes on Januar 3, 2010, which is a Sunday, therefore, the Debtors request a 121 day extension of the Exclusive Solicitation Period.
DOCS_LA:203447.1
matter is a core proceeding within the meaning of28 U.S.C. 157(b)(2)(A), (L), and (0).
2. Venue of
requested herein.
General Backe:round
the
Bankptcy Code. The Debtors have continued in the possession of their property and have
continued to operate and manage their businesses as debtors and debtors in possession pursuant
to sections 1107(a) and 1108 of
acquisition, development and exploitation of oil and gas properties in the western United States. They currently own oil and gas properties in Alaska and off the shore of southern California.
to the Debtors' commencement ofthese chapter 11 cases is set forth in the Declaration of
Gerald
A. Tywoniuk, Chief Financial Offcer of Pacifc Energy Resources Ltd, in Support of First Day
DOCS_LA:203447. l
in the Chapter 11 Cases. The Office of the United States Trustee appointed an Official
Committee of
numerous business and legal challenges. Significant and numerous matters required substantial
attention from the Debtors' employees, management, and professionals in the opening months of
these Chapter 11 Cases and continue to do so, however, the Debtors have made material progress
in moving these Chapter 11 Cases closer to the point of filing a plan of reorganization or
liquidation.
9. Prior to and after the Petition Date, the Debtors' employees, management
and professionals, in addition to ruing the Debtors' businesses, have spent a substantial
amount of
their time negotiating DIP financing with the postpetition lenders, preparing in depth
offering memoranda with descriptions of the business and financial projections for the business,
preparing an online data room for potential purchasers to visit, contacting potential purchasers
and responding to inquiries from same and exploring other alternative possibilties for
reorganization.
10. The final order approving the DIP financing (the "Final DIP Order") was
entered on June 4,2009. The Debtors have received bids on certain of
continue to solicit additional bids. In addition to the possible sales of its assets, the Debtors are
continuing to explore other alternatives for reorganization.
DOCS_LA:203447. l
iI. In addition to making progress with the DIP financing, possible sales of
assets or other alternative reorganization possibilities, the Debtors, during the first three and onehalf months of
these Chapter 11 Cases, among other things, (i) responded as quickly and
the Committee, (ii) negotiated the terms
of
the employment of
various if
Trustee, (iii) fied their Schedules of Assets and Liabilities (the "Schedules") and a Statement of
Financial Affairs on April 28, 2009, (iv) fied amendments to certain of
2009, (v) obtained approval of a general bar date of June 23, 2009 for prepetition creditors in these Chapter 11 Cases and served notice of same on potential creditors, (vi) dealt with issues
regarding payment of royalties, overriding royalties and alleged production payments and
various requests for the segregation of funds, (vii) responded to issues raised by Union Oil of
California, (viii) began the review of executory contracts and unexpired leases to determine
which ones wil need to be rejected (ix) obtained approval of a key employee incentive plan and
(x) determined which ofthe Debtors' properties are burdensome to the estates and must be
abandoned, if not sold.
12. Although the Debtors have made substantial progress toward the
resolution of these Chapter 11 case, the next three months wil be very demanding on the time
and energy of
the Debtors and their professionals. The Final DIP Order and the amendment to
the DIP credit agreement mandate an expedited sale process. The Debtors and their
professionals, therefore, wil be devoting substantial time and effort over the next three months
to preparing and filing various bid procedure and sale motions regarding the sale of their Alaska
and California assets, obtaining approval of
DOCS_LA:203447. l
required by the amendment to the DIP credit agreement, the Debtors wil fie alternative motions
regarding the abandonment of their Alaska assets if there are no viable stalking horse bids for
those assets and those abandonment motions could lead to substantial litigation that wil further
consume the time and efforts of the Debtors and their professionals.
13. As stated, this is the Debtors' first motion to extend the Exclusivity
Periods in these cases. The current deadline wil expire on July 7,2009, which, unsurprisingly in
light of the complexity of the matters the Debtors have faced and continue to face, is not a
sufficient amount time for the Debtors to negotiate and fie a plan in these Chapter 11 Cases.
Relief Requested
14. By this Motion, the Debtors seek to extend the Exclusive Filing Period for
one-hundred twenty (120) days, from July 7, 2009, through and including November 4,2009,
and to extend the Exclusive Solicitation Period for one-hundred twenty-one (121) days from
September 5,2009, through and including January 4,2010. The Debtors further request that
such order be without prejudice to the Debtors' rights to seek additional extensions of
the
extend the Exclusive Periods "for cause" after notice and a hearing. 11 U.S.C. 1121(d).
Although the term "cause" is not defined by the Banptcy Code, the legislative history
indicates that it is to be viewed flexibly "in order to allow the debtor to reach an agreement."
H.R. Rep. No. 95, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. 232 (1997). See also In re McLean Indus., Inc., 87 B.R.
830,833 (Bank. S.D. N.Y. 1987) (quoting H.R. Rep. No. 595, 95th Cong., 2d Sess. 231 (1978),
DOCS_LA:203447. l
reprinted in 1978, U.S.C.C.A.N. 5963,6190); In re Public Servo Co. ofN H, 88 B.R. 521, 534
(Ban. D. N.H. 1988) ("(T)he legislative intent. . . (is) to promote maximum flexibility").
327 (Ban. S.D. N.Y. 1987). The decision to extend a debtor's exclusive periods to fie a plan and solicit acceptances thereto is committed to the sound discretion of the banptcy court,
based upon the facts and circumstances of each particular case. See, e.g., First Am. Bank of NY.
V. Southwest Gloves and Safety Equip., Inc., 64 B.R. 963, 965 (D. DeL. 1986).
17. Courts have relied on a variety of factors when determining whether cause
exists for an extension of a debtor's exclusive periods to file a plan and solicit acceptances
thereto, each of which may provide sufficient grounds for extending those periods. These factors
include (a) the size and complexity of the cases, (b) the necessity of
and prepare adequate information, (c) the existence of good faith progress toward reorganization,
(d) whether the debtor is paying its debts as they come due, (e) whether the debtor has
demonstrated reasonable prospects for filing a viable plan, (f) whether the debtor has made progress in negotiating with creditors, (g) the length of time the case has been pending,
(h) whether the debtor is seeking the extension to pressure creditors, and (i) whether unesolved
contingencies exist. See, e.g., In re Dow Corning Corp., 208 B.R. 661,664-65 (Ban. E.D.
Mich. 1997); In re Express One Intl, Inc., 194 B.R. 98, 100 (Ban. E.D. Tex 1996); In re
Grand Traverse Dev. Co. Ltd. P'ship, 147 B.R. 418, 420 (Ban. W.D. Mich. 1992); In re
DOCS_LA:203447. l
Texaco, Inc., 76 B.R. at 327. However, the identified criteria are only factors, not all of
which
are necessarily relevant in every case. See In the Matter of Federated Department Stores and
Alled Stores Corporation, 1990 Bank. Lexis 711, *6 (Ban. S.D. Ohio 1990). Moreover, no
one factor is dispositive, and the Court is not restricted to counting factors. Dow Corning, 208
B.R. at 669.
18. Cause exists in the Chapter 11 Cases for extending the Exclusive Periods
as requested in this Motion, as several of the above-noted factors are present. First, as is
demonstrated by the ever expanding docket and the Schedules file herein, these Chapter 11
Cases are large and complex. A few examples that demonstrate the large and complex nature of
the case are as follows: (a) the Debtors have hundreds of creditors and are paries to numerous
executory contracts and unexpired leases; (b) the amount of the prepetition loans secured by
substantially all of
negotiations were lengthy and complex; (c) numerous paries claim royalty interests, overriding
royalty interests and production payment interests in the oil and gas properties and certain of
those parties have requested segregation of funds; and (d) the sale of oil and gas properties is
notoriously complex.
19. Despite the large and complex nature of
Debtors have made good faith progress toward reorganization. As delineated above, since the
commencement of
these Chapter 11 Cases, the Debtors have, among other things, (a) negotiated
the terms of the postpetition financing and obtained a final order approving same; (b) negotiated
the terms of the employment of various of their professionals who are instruental in the
marketing and sale of the assets; ( c) prepared and fied their Schedules and Statements of
DOCS_LA:203447.l
Financial Affairs; (d) set a general bar date of June 23, 2009 for prepetition claims and served the
notice of such bar date; (e) marketed substantially all of their operating assets, obtained bids on
certain assets and continue the marketing effort with sales expected to be completed by August
of 2009; (f) continued to explore other alternatives for reorganization; (g) responded to numerous
requests from the Committee for information; (h) determined which of
are burdensome to the estates and must be abandoned, if not sold; (i) began the review of
executory contracts and unexpired leases to determine which ones wil need to be rejected; and
G) actively pursued and satisfied the other pressing obligations of Chapter 11 debtors. The
Debtors have acted in good faith to maximize the value of
creditors and, although the cases have been pending less than four months, the Debtors and their professionals have made substantial progress in resolving major issues and moving the cases
substantial time and effort on the par of the Debtors and their professionals. Once the Bar Date
passes, the Debtors wil need to review and analyze the claims received to identify those that wil
need to be addressed by the terms of any plan of reorganization. The rights of the paries
asserting overriding royalty interests and production payments must be determined. In addition,
attention needs to be given to the review and analysis of avoidance actions and other possible
recoveries in order to determine with greater certainty the possible components of a plan.
21. The Debtors have cultivated a relationship of cooperation with the
Committee and have worked successfully with the Committee to resolve various issues that have
DOCS_LA:203447.1
arisen in these Chapter 11 Cases and the Debtors anticipate that negotiation of the terms of a plan
of reorganization, likewise, wil be fritfuL. However, in light of
cases have been pending and the myriad of other pressing matters with which the Debtors have had to deal, they have not had sufficient time to negotiate the terms of a plan or to prepare
adequate disclosures related thereto. The Debtors are not seeking an extension oftime to
pressure the creditors, but to resolve various pending matters, to continue to gather information
and to negotiate a consensual plan of reorganization with the creditors.
22. Further, DIP financing provides sufficient funds for the Debtors to pay
their undisputed postpetition obligations (including care outs for the professionals) and the
Debtors are paying their undisputed postpetition debts as they come due.
23. At this time, and especially in light of relatively early stage of these cases
and the significant contingencies that remain, it would not be prudent for the Debtors to abandon
their exclusivity rights. Accordingly, by this Motion, the Debtors seek to extend their Exclusive
Filing Periods for ninety days, without prejudice to the Debtors' right to request further
extensions of
prejudice the Debtors' creditors or other parties in interest in these Chapter 11 Cases and wil, in
the Debtors' opinion, fuher the intent of section 1121 of the Banptcy Code, which is to
afford the Debtors a meaningful and reasonable opportunity to negotiate with their creditors and
to propose and confirm a consensual plan. These Chapter 11 Cases do not bear characteristics
that would justify the denial of an extension of the exclusive periods. See, e.g., In re Gagel &
Gagel, 24 B.R. 674 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1982) (denying extension of exclusivity period because
DOCS _ LA:20344 7. l
extension would be fruitless); Dow Corning, 208 B.R. at 670 (stating that an extension of
the
exclusive period should be denied if debtor appeared to be attempting to delay the administration
of
the banptcy case). The Debtors are not seeking the extensions to delay administration of
their cases or to pressure creditors to accept unsatisfactory plans. On the contrary, this request is
intended to facilitate an orderly, efficient, and cost-effective plan process for the benefit of all
creditors.
25. Moreover, the Debtors submit that the requested extensions are reasonable
and relatively modest. The fact that the Debtors anticipate, and are undertaking, a liquidation of
their assets does not preclude their ability to request an extension of exclusivity. Courts in this
District have, on numerous occasions, granted extensions of exclusivity in liquidating chapter 11
cases. See, e.g. In re Western Nonwovens, Inc. et aI., Case No. 08-11435(PJW) (Ban. D. DeL.
Fe. 26,2009) (granting second 90 day extension of exclusivity); In re S-Tran Holdings, Inc., et
al., Case No. 05-11391(KJC) (Ban. D. DeL. Mar. 24, 2009) (granting further 90 day extension
nearly four years after commencement); In re Tiro Acquisition, LLC, Case No. 04-12938 (PJW)
(Bank. D. DeL. Nov. 3,2005) (granting fourth motion to extend exclusivity period and extending
exclusivity period for an additional 90 days); In re SFNB Acquisition Corp., Case No. 03-11524
(PJW) (Ban. D. DeL. Aug. 25, 2004) (granting fifth motion to extend exclusivity period and
extending exclusivity period for an additional 124 days); In re Orion Refining Corp., Case No.
03-11483 (MFW) (Bank. D. DeL. Sept. 12,2004) (granting third motion to extend exclusivity
and extending exclusivity period for an additional 60 days).
DOCS_LA:203447.l
10
the Exclusive
Periods requested herein is reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances and should be
granted as being in the best interests of
Notice
27. Notice of this Motion has been given to (a) the Office of
Trustee; (b) the Debtors' postpetition lenders; (c) counsel for the Committee; and (d) those
persons who have requested notice pursuant to Rule 2002 of the Federal Rules of
Bankptcy
Procedure. The Debtors submit that, in light of the nature of the relief requested, no other or
further notice need be given.
No Prior Request
28. No prior request for the relief sought in this Motion has been made to this
or any other court.
WHEREFORE, the Debtors respectfully request that the Cour enter an order
(i) granting an extension of
Exclusive Solicitation Period for one-hundred twenty-one (121) days through and including
Januar 4,2010, (iii) providing such relief
additional extensions of their Exclusive Periods, and (iv) granting such other relief as may be fair
and equitable.
DOCS_LA:203447. l
11
. 1 9084)
Sco aE.Mc arland(DE ar . 4184, CABarNo.
165391)
Facsimile: 310/652-4400
Email: ikharasch(1oszilaw.com
smcfarland(1oszilaw.com
rsaunders(oszilaw. com
kmakowski(pszjlaw.com
Counsel for Debtor and Debtor in Possession Pacific Energy Resources Ltd.
DOCS_LA:203447.l
12
)
)
)
)
Objection Deadline: June 24, 2009 at 4:00 p.m. (prevailng Eastern time) Hearing: July 1,2009 at 10:00 a.m. (prevailng Eastern time)
NOTICE OF DEBTORS' MOTION FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. 1121(D) EXTENDING THE TIME PERIODS DURING WHICH THE DEBTORS HAVE THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO FILE A PLAN AND SOLICIT ACCEPTANCES THERETO
the United States Trustee; (b) counsel to the Debtors' postpetition Unsecured Creditors; and (d) those persons who have requested notice pursuant to Rule 2002 of the Federal Rules of
lenders; (c) counsel to the Official Committee of
Banptcy Procedure.
On June 12,2009, the debtors and debtors in possession in the above-captioned
cases (collectively, the "Debtors") fied the attached Debtors' Motion for an Order Pursuant to
11 U.S.C. 1121(d) Extending the Time Periods During Whch the Debtors Have the Exclusive
Right to File a Plan and Solicit Acceptances Thereto (the "Motion"). By this Motion, the Debtors seek a 120 day extension of the exclusive period within which only the Debtors may file a plan of reorganization and a 121 day extension of the exclusive period in which only the Debtors may
solicit votes for that plan.
i The Debtors in these cases, along with the last four digits of each of the Debtors' federal tax identification
number, are: Pacific Energy Resources Ltd. (3442); Petrocal Acquisition Corp. (6249); Pacific Energy Alaska
Holdings, LLC (tax J.D. # not available); Cameros Acquisition Corp. (5866); Pacific Energy Alaska Operating LLC (7021); San Pedro Bay Pipeline Company (1234); Cameros Energy, Inc. (9487); and Gotland Oil, Inc. (5463). The mailng address for all of the Debtors is i i i w. Ocean Boulevard, Suite 1240, Long Beach, CA 90802.
DOS_LA:203447. l
WRTING AND BE FILED WITH THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR
that they are received not later than June 24, 2009 at 4:00 p.m. prevailng Eastern time, by: (1)
Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, 919 North Market Street, 1 ih Floor, Wilmington, DE
19899-8705, Attn: James O'Neil, Esq.; Fax: 302-652-4400, e-mail: ioneill(1oszilaw.com and (2)
Pachulski Stag Ziehl & Jones LLP, 10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 11th Floor, Los Angeles, CA
90067-4100; Attn: Ira D. Kharasch, Esq; Fax: 310-201-0760, e-mail: ikharash(1oszjlaw.com (b)
counsel to the Lenders: Goldman Sachs (1) Bingham McCutchen, 399 Park Avenue, New York,
NY 10022, Attn: Jeffrey Sabin, Esq.; Fax: 212-752-5378, e-mail: ieffrev.sabin(binqham.com and
(2) Bingham McCutchen, One Federal Street, Boston, MA 01221-1726, Attn: Amy Kyle, Fax:
617-345-5001, e-mail: amv.kyle(binqham.com and Silver Point Finance: Skadden, Ars, Slate,
Meagher & Flom, LLP, 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL 60606-1285, Attn: Seth
Jacobson, Esq.; Fax: 312-407-8511, e-mail: seth.iacobson(1skadden.com and (c) the Office of
the
United States Trustee, J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, 844 N. King Street, Suite 2207, Lock
Box 35, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, Attn: Joseph McMahon, Esq. and (d) counsel for the
Official Committee of
2121 Avenue of
Fax: (310) 734-3173, e-mail: koioer(steotoe.com and (2) Pepper Hamilton LLP, Hercules Plaza,
DOCS_LA:203447. l
Ste 5100, 1313 N. Market Street, Wilmington, DE 19801; Attn: James C. Carignan, Esq., Fax:
(302) 421-8390, e-mail: icarqnan(oeoperlaw.com.
1 sl Kathleen P. Makowski Ira D. Kharasch (CA Bar No. 109084) Scotta E. McFarland (DE Bar No. 4184, CA Bar No. 165391) Robert M. Saunders (CA Bar No. 226172) Kathleen P. Makowski (DE Bar No. 3648) 919 North Market Street, 1 ih Floor P.O. Box 8705 Wilmington, DE 19899-8705
Telephone: 302/652-4100
Facsimile: 310/652-4400
Email: ikharasch(oszilaw.com
smcfarland(pszjlaw.com
rsaunders(oszilaw. com
kmakowski(1oszjlaw.com
Counsel for Debtor and Debtor in Possession Pacific Energy Resources Ltd.
DOCS _LA:203447. l
ORDER GRANTING DEBTORS' MOTION FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.c. 1121(D) EXTENDING THE TIME PERIODS DURING WHICH THE DEBTORS HAVE THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO FILE A PLAN AND SOLICIT ACCEPTANCES THERETO
Upon the motion (the "Motion"i of
the
Bankptcy Code extending the Exclusive Periods in which to fie a chapter 11 plan and to solicit
acceptances thereof; and it appearing that this Cour has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to
28 U.S.C. 157 and 1334; and it appearing that this proceeding is a core proceeding pursuant to
28 U.S.C. 157(b)(2); and it appearing that venue of
this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1408 and 1409; and due and proper notice of
having been given; and after due deliberation and it appearing that sufficient cause exists for
granting the requested relief; and that the relief requested under the Motion is in the best interests
of
Holdings, LLC (tax I.D. # not available); Cameros Acquisition Corp. (5866); Pacific Energy Alaska Operating LLC (7021); San Pedro Bay Pipeline Company (1234); Cameros Energy, Inc. (9487); and Gotland Oil, Inc. (5463). The
2Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Motion.
the Debtors is 111 W. Ocean Boulevard, Suite 1240, Long Beach, CA 90802.
DOCS_LA:203447. i
ORDERED that the Debtors' Exclusive Filing Period is extended through and
additional extensions of the Exclusive Filng Period and the Exclusive Solicitation Period and is
without prejudice to the right of any pary to object to any such further extensions; and it is
, fuher
ORDERED that the Cour shall retain
,2009
DOCS_LA:203447. l
In re: )
STATE OF DELAWARE )
) ss:
Debtors. ))
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, attorneys for the Debtors in
the above-captioned action, and that on the 1 ith day of June, 2009 she caused a copy of the
following document(s) to be served upon the parties on the attached service lists in the maner
indicated:
MARY E. CORCORA
NOTARY PUBLIC
ii tPlrt
DOCS_DE:J49366.l
STATE OF DELAWAR
tA commission expires Nov. 4, 20
1 The Debtors in these cases, along with the last four digits of each of the Debtors' federal tax
identification number, are: Pacific Energy Resources Ltd. (3442); Petrocal Acquisition Corp. (6249); Pacific Energy Alaska Holdings, LLC (tax J.D. # not available); Cameros Acquisition Corp. (5866); Pacific Energy Alaska Operating LLC (7021); San Pedro Bay Pipeline Company (1234); Cameros
Energy, Inc. (9487); and Gotland Oil, Inc. (5463). The mailing address for all of
12 - Hand Delivery
39 - First Class Mail 02 - FOREIGN First Class Mail
Hand Delivery (United States Attorney) Ellen W. Slights, Esq. United States Attorney's Office District of Delaware
i 007 N. Orange Street, Suite 700
Wilmington, DE 19801
Hand Delivery (Counsel for Silver Point Finance) Ian S. Fredericks, Esquire
Skadden Ars, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Counsel for Debtors) Laura Davis Jones, Esquire James E. O'Neil, Esquire Kathleen P. Makowski, Esquire Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP 919 North Market Street, 17th Floor P.O. Box 8705 Wilmington, DE 19899-8705
Wilmington, DE 19899
Hand Delivery (Counsel for Union Oil Company of California, a California Corporation) Norman M. Monhait, Esquire Rosenthal, Monhait & Goddess, P A
Citizens Ban Center, Suite 1401
Wilmington, DE 19801
Hand Delivery (Copy Service)
Parcels, Inc.
Hand Delivery (Counsel for Westchester Fire Insurance Company and Noble Energy Inc.) Tobey M. Daluz, Esquire Joshua E. Zugerman, Esquire Ballard Spah Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP 919 N. Market Street, 1 ih Floor Wilmington, DE 19801
Hand Delivery (Counsel for Oxy Long Beach Inc.) David L. Finger, Esquire
Finder, Slanina Liebesman, LLC
Wilmington, DE 19801
Hand Delivery
(Official Committee of
Creditors) David B. Stratton, Esquire James C. Carignan, Esquire Pepper Hamilton LLP
Hercules Plaza, Suite 1500
Hand Delivery (Counsel for Marathon Oil Company) Kevin 1. Mangan, Esquire Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1501 Wilmington, DE 19801 Hand Delivery (Counsel for Cook Inlet Region, Inc.) Eric Lopez Schnabel, Esquire Dorsey & Whitney (Delaware) LLP
1105 North Market Street, Suite 16th Floor
Wilmington, DE 19801
Hand Delivery (Counsel for Area Energy LLC) Norman L. Pernick, Esquire Karen M. McKinley, Esquire Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, P.A. 500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1410 Wilmington, DE 19801
District Director Internal Revenue Service 31 Hopkins Plaza, Room 1150 Baltimore, MD 21201
Houston, TX 77067
General Counsel-Banptcy
Washington, DC 20554
(Counsel for Union Oil Company of California, a California Corporation) Cabot Christianson, Esquire Christianson & Spraker 911 West 8th Avenue, Suite 201 Anchorage, AK 99501
Banptcy Coordinator
MMS / Denver Federal Center POBox 25165 Mail Stop 370B2 Denver, CO 80225
Philadelphia, P A 19103
John J. Haris, Esquire Rachel M. Feiertag, Esquire Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson 333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 1670 Los Angeles, CA 90071
(Counsel for Oxy Long Beach Inc.) Richard M. Kremen, Esquire Jodie E. Buchman, Esquire DLA Piper LLP (US)
6225 Smith Avenue
Baltimore, MD 21209
Greenwich, CT 06830
E. Kathleen Shahan, Esquire U.S. Deparment of Justice 1100 L Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20005
Creditors) Robbin Itkin, Esquire Katherine Piper, Esquire Kelly Frazier, Esquire Steptoe & Johnson LLP 2121 Avenue of the Stars, 28th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067
Anchorage, AK 99501
the Americas
Marin A. Mooney, Esquire Deily, Mooney & Glastetter, LLP 8 Thurlow Terrace Albany, NY 12203