Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Characters Metrics for the Already Motivated? Health Outcomes as Motivators Regulations Holding Back Feedback Loops?
3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11
Copyright October 2012 Chester Street Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
odays health and fitness devices are connected. Whether they are Bluetooth-enabled, WiFi-ready, full-on cellular, or easily plugged into a mobile, these devices are collecting data that is much more meaningful and impactful because it is not locked within the device itself. This mobility of health and fitness data is a key enabling factor for the many health behavior change experiments currently being led by consumer health startups. At the heart of these experiments these new devices and companion apps the search is for effective, positive health feedback loops. At its most basic level, the kind of feedback loop often leveraged in these experiments follows these three steps: 1. Device collects data. 2. Data moves to application. 3. Application provides device user with personalized feedback. Granted the three steps outlined above often occur right from the same device. Smartphones equipped with motionsensing accelerometers, location-aware GPS chips, and increasingly better cameras, have helped make the smartphone a standalone health and fitness data collection hub. With their current suite of sensors, however, smartphones are not able to collect data related to all of the major biometrics. In recent years blood pressure monitor makers, weight scale manufacturers, blood glucose meter developers, pulse oximetry device makers and more have added connectivity. As a result these device makers have had the opportunity to transform themselves or at least augment their current status from hardware companies to software companies with companion applications or even service plans attached to their device offerings.
Of course, not everyone has fully embraced that opportunity. In early 2011 iHealth Lab, a Mountain View, California-based subsidiary of China-based medical device company Andon Health, became the first company to have an FDA-cleared medical device sold at Apple Stores. As the name implies iHealths Blood Pressure Dock connects directly to an iOS device just like a charging dock or speaker dock accessory. The blood pressure device is actually controlled by its companion app, which the user downloads to the iOS device from iTunes AppStore. The iHealth BPM apps feedback is sparse and streamlined by design. Apart from the big, centered button that the user pushes on their iOS device to make the cuff inflate and take the blood pressure measurement, the app offers a simple graph that shows where the BP reading falls on a scale of dark green, green, yellow, orange, dark orange and red. It also offers a historical table of past readings and a comparative color-coded chart for past BP readings. Like almost every other company that offers connected health devices, iHealth keeps feedback to qualitative colors to avoid moving into the more regulated territory of diagnosis. Are we looking to be everything to everyone? iHealths Senior Vice President and General Manager Adam Lin asked. No. Forget whether or not we could do it, no one has ever done both hardware and software incredibly well. Apple may be the exception. Our focus is still on the hardware, first and foremost. We are focused on enabling connectivity and
ensuring the data is truly mobile, secure, and not restricted. There are a number of [third party] apps out there that do [software] really well. Considering iHealths success with its Apple partnership, Lins comments are understandable. While many others working in connected health agree that opening APIs and enabling third party apps to use data collected by dedicated devices is an important trend, most companies building hardware also see companion apps and services as a big opportunity. Some even believe the service and software side of the digital health opportunity is the bigger one. This report aims to highlight and illustrate some of the ways digital health companies are using feedback loops in an attempt to encourage healthy behaviors. While this is not a comprehensive document, it will provide a broad overview of the most common types of feedback loops and mechanisms used by consumer health applications today. It is also worth noting that many of the digital health services mentioned here offer a number of different kinds of behavior change mechanisms beyond the ones highlighted in this report.
Copyright October 2012 Chester Street Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
// Crowdsourcing Feedback
When Silicon Valley-based consumer health startup Massive Health launched in 2011, its founder Aza Raskin, who formerly served as the creative lead at Mozilla Firefox, wrote that health care needs to have its design Renaissance, where products and services are redesigned to be responsive to human needs and considerate of human frailties. Apart from evangelizing the need for a design Renaissance in healthcare, Massive Health became the leading proponents for better healthrelated feedback loops. The feedback loop became core to the startups original pitch. The human brain famously doesnt deal well with delayed gratification, Raskin wrote. The reason why weight is hard is because the feedback loop is too loose: The cake I eat today doesnt materially change my body for the rest of today or tomorrow. Its the incremental amount of cake I eat or dont [eat] over weeks and months that makes me fit or fat. Our brains pleasure circuits lead us to optimize short-term happiness (cake!) over longterm healthiness (obesity, coronary heart disease, diabetes). Massive Health used the dashboard that Toyota included on its hybrid Prius cars as an example of how feedback loops can change longstanding behavior. Think about it like driving a car, Raskin wrote. While you know it is bad for the environment to drive, that knowledge doesnt really change your behavior. When the Prius introduced a large screen with instant and average MPG with a pretty graph, Toyota created a small breed of hyper-milers and a much larger populace that changed routes and driving behavior to optimize that number. Toyota had tightened the feedback loop and pushed people to drive more green on a daily basis.
The Eatery iPhone App by Massive Health
Copyright October 2012 Chester Street Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
In November 2011, nearly a year after the companys founding, Massive Health launched its first experiment, a free iPhone app called The Eatery that helped people get feedback on how healthy their food choices were. The apps core feature enabled users to snap photos of the food they were about to eat, label it if they wanted to, rank it on a spectrum of fit to fat and then share it with other users of The Eatery app. Within a few minutes the community of users would give the snapshot of food their own numerical ranking on the fit to fat scale, and the users food submission had a crowdsourced health review. While the company admitted crowdsourcing the reviews is not as precise as using a team of dieticians, the startup said research shows that collectively people are good at rating the healthfulness of food. Good was good enough for the purposes of the experimental app. Seven months later Massive Health amassed nearly 8 million crowdsourced food ratings from people in more than 50 countries. The person about to eat the food photographed rated the food as healthier than the rest of the community about 72 percent of the time. The company also found that people eat about 1.7 times less healthy with each passing hour of the day. In an early interview shortly after The Eatery app launched, Massive Healths head of business development Andrew Rosenthal noted that part of what makes an app engaging is speed. When The Eatery first launched, it only took about 2.8 seconds to snap a photo of food and have it appear in The Eatery, which is the same amount of time it takes to take a photo and have it appear in the iPhones native camera app, according to Rosenthal. When Apple saw that we could match their native camera time, they were impressed, he said.
While Massive Health stands out as the biggest evangelist of feedback loops in digital health, many other companies have leveraged crowdsourcing and social media channels in an effort to create meaningful feedback loops. Soon after it first launched its WiFi-enabled weight scale in the United States, Francebased Withings integrated its web app with Twitter so that users could share their current weight, weight goal, and how many pounds they have to go, in real-time, daily, weekly, or monthly via their Twitter account. While the integration was something of an open-ended feedback loop, the intent was clearly to enable friends or Twitter acquaintances to encourage or at least comment on the users latest numbers. The new feature was met with considerable skepticism from tech blogs. Engadget
called the integration a way to ensure that your followers will start dropping faster than even you could imagine and that Withings had given Twitters iconic fail whale a new meaning. Despite Engadgets negative review for Withings Twitter feedback loop attempt, in mid-2011 a newspaper in the United Kingdom called The Daily Mirror published an article about a 40-year-old man who claimed posting his weight on Twitter for all his friends, family, and work colleagues to see was the motivating factor that got him to make better decisions about his diet. He ended up shedding about a quarter of his body weight, according to the newspaper, without attempting any special diet: The prospect of going into work and having to face people knowing you had put weight on wasnt a great one, he explained. \\
Copyright October 2012 Chester Street Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright October 2012 Chester Street Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Sleep coaching company Zeo does not offer an explicit competition feature as a part of its sleep monitoring platform, but because the company has found ways to quantify how well its users are sleeping, it has enabled competitive sleeping. Zeo Sleep Manager Mobile is a sleep phase monitoring headband that connects to a users iOS or Android device and continuously transmits data about the wearers sleep health as he or she sleeps. The Zeo app on the users phone tracks how much time the sleeper spends in each of the four sleep phases, how long it takes them to fall asleep, how many times they wake during the night, and other metrics to determine a composite sleep score, called the Z Score. Upon waking the user can review how much time they spent in the REM phase of sleep, for example, along with the other metrics, but the Z Score is the easiest one to use as a reference point. Its also an easy way to compare how much better of a sleeper the user is compared to their spouse, sibling, parent, or friend. \\
Copyright October 2012 Chester Street Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
sponsored content
Mobile devices are making a huge impact on the health care industry. As consumers are snapping up connected devices, the medical device industry is following suit; creating systems to provide clinicians with real-time access to their patients data around specific therapies. The key to any therapy is compliance, and mobile health is no exception. Unless mobile health applications are responsive and reliable, patients and physicians will lose patience, and the promise of mobile health will go unfulfilled.
The Striiv device is a $99 standalone pedometer (no mobile phone required) that can hang on a keychain or attach to a belt. Its sensors are able to differentiate between walking, running, climbing stairs, and hiking, according to the company. Using points earned from activity, users can donate clean water to children in South America or polio vaccines to children in India thanks to Striivs partnership with GlobalGiving. \\
One of the most frustrating experiences for Internet users is slow response time from unreliable connections. And when web applications dont perform consistently, users may wind up avoiding the applications altogether. Its a common problem: as the physical distance between users and applications increases, performance typically deteriorates rapidly. In fact, Web application wait times for users located on the opposite coast of North America can be five times longer than those based locally. Performance issues like these create unique problems for healthcare. If an Internet-based solution is behaving poorly, a physician could have difficulty accessing the information needed to make the right treatment decisions. For example, a physician who only sees part of an X-ray series over the Internet may be unable to make a correct diagnosis, or worse, make an incorrect one.
In short, physical distance, inefficient protocols, Internet congestion, and poor routing conspire to add critical seconds to each transaction. And in the medical profession, this can quickly become a life and death matter.
Akamai addresses shortcomings in the fundamental design of core Internet protocols - creating a delivery system designed to improve the performance and availability of healthcare applications. Its globally distributed computing platform (The Akamai Intelligent Platform) eliminates web performance bottlenecks. And within this massive footprint, 90% of the worlds Internet users are within one network hop of an Akamai server. This effectively translates to localized response times delivered to global users. With its intelligent and dynamic mapping technology, Akamai tackles Internet traffic jams - dynamically determining the best available, highest-performing route between an application and the end user.
Copyright October 2012 Chester Street Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
flower growing, Fogg told the Times. When you push that button and see the change, its instant feedback, a reward. Even though the device seems simple, its tapping into a complex psychology that changes peoples behavior, he said. It hits the right button. Most humans are naturally wired to nurture things and be rewarded for doing so, he said. \\
Copyright October 2012 Chester Street Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
full-fledged company in its own right. Still, it may be providing alternative feedback loops in the form of infographics that users of existing health apps benefit from. Another much more quantitative tool that can help self trackers better visualize their numbers is Daytum, which describes itself as an elegant and intuitive tool for counting and communicating personal statistics. Ryan Case and Nicholas Felton developed Daytum based on Feltons experience of producing yearly annual reports based on his self-tracking, which he has done since 2005. Felton is something of a celebrity in the world of self-tracking, and Daytum helps his fans and others to create similar visual representations of their own tracking metrics. \\
Copyright October 2012 Chester Street Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Screen shot from 100Pluss marketing video (above) Screen shots from two different 100Plus iPhone apps (right)
Copyright October 2012 Chester Street Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.