51060 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No.

185 / Thursday, September 24, 1998 / Notices

Estimated
Estimated Annual re- average
Respondents Regulation (17 CFR) number of sponses hours, per
respondents response

Traders .................................................................. 1.47, 1.40 and Part 150 ........................................ 12 12 36

Issued in Washington, DC on September applicable Federal, State and local
21, 1998. statutes and regulations, and all
Jean A. Webb, reasonable and practical efforts have
Secretary of the Commission. been incorporated to minimize harm to
[FR Doc. 98–25621 Filed 9–23–98; 8:45 am] the local public and the environment.
BILLING CODE 6351–01–M Any questions regarding this matter
should be directed to Mr. John P. Carr,
Program Manager at (703) 696–5546.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Correspondence should be sent to:
AFBCA/DB, 1700 North Moore Street,
Department of the Air Force Suite 2300, Arlington, VA 22209–2802.
Barbara A. Carmichael,
Record of Decision (ROD) for the Alternate Air Force Federal Register Liaison
Disposal and Reuse of Chanute Air Officer.
Force Base (AFB), Illinois [FR Doc. 98–25596 Filed 9–23–98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910–01–P
On April 28, 1998, the Air Force
issued the Fourth Revised Supplemental
Record of Decision (FRSROD) for the
Disposal and Reuse of Chanute AFB, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Illinois. The decisions included in this
FRSROD have been made in Notice of Proposed Information
Collection Requests
consideration of, but not limited to, the
information contained in the Final AGENCY: Department of Education.
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) SUMMARY: The Acting Deputy Chief
for the Disposal and Reuse of Chanute Information Officer, Office of the Chief
AFB, filed with the Environmental Information Officer, invites comments
Protection Agency and made available on the proposed information collection
to the public on July 19, 1991. requests as required by the Paperwork
Chanute AFB closed on September 30, Reduction Act of 1995.
1993, pursuant to the Defense Base
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
Closure and Realignment Act of 1990,
submit comments on or before
Pub. Law. 100–526 (10 U.S.C. 2687
November 23, 1998.
note) and the recommendations of the
Defense Base Closure and Realignment ADDRESSES: Written comments and
requests for copies of the proposed
Commission. The FEIS analyzed
potential environmental impacts of the information collection requests should
be addressed to Patrick J. Sherrill,
Air Force’s disposal options by
portraying a variety of potential land Department of Education, 600
Independence Avenue, SW, Room 5624,
uses to cover a range of reasonably
foreseeable future uses of the property Regional Office Building 3, Washington,
DC 20202–4651, or should be
and facilities by others.
The Air Force issued a ROD on July electronically mailed to the internet
21, 1992 which documented a series of address Pat Sherrill@ed.gov, or should
decisions regarding the intended be faxed to 202–708–9346.
disposal of Government-owned FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
property. Since that time the Air Force Patrick J. Sherrill (202) 708–8196.
has modified the decisions in the ROD Individuals who use a
four times. This FRSROD modifies telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
certain decisions made in the ROD and
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
its supplements, thus completing the
disposal decisions for Chanute AFB. between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern time,
The Air Force has decided to modify the Monday through Friday.
method of disposal for Parcel O, and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
clarify the disposal of the phone system, 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
roads, and rights of way. 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
The implementation of these that the Office of Management and
conversion activities and associated Budget (OMB) provide interested
mitigation measures will proceed with Federal agencies and the public an early
minimal adverse impact to the opportunity to comment on information
environment. This action conforms with collection requests. OMB may amend or
waive the requirement for public
consultation to the extent that public
participation in the approval process
would defeat the purpose of the
information collection, violate State or
Federal law, or substantially interfere
with any agency’s ability to perform its
statutory obligations. The Acting Deputy
Chief Information Officer, Office of the
Chief Information Officer, publishes that
notice containing proposed information
collection requests prior to submission
of these requests to OMB. Each
proposed information collection,
grouped by office, contains the
following: (1) Type of review requested,
e.g. new, revision, extension, existing or
reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of
the collection; (4) Description of the
need for, and proposed use of, the
information; (5) Respondents and
frequency of collection; and (6)
Reporting and/or Recordkeeping
burden. OMB invites public comment at
the address specified above. Copies of
the requests are available from Patrick J.
Sherrill at the address specified above.
The Department of Education is
especially interested in public comment
addressing the following issues: (1) is
this collection necessary to the proper
functions of the Department; (2) will
this information be processed and used
in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate
of burden accurate; (4) how might the
Department enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (5) how might the
Department minimize the burden of this
collection on the respondents, including
through the use of information
technology.
Dated: September 21, 1998.
Hazel Fiers,
Acting Deputy Chief Information
Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer.
Office of Educational Research and
Improvement
Type of Review: New.
Title: Evaluation of the National Star
Schools Program.
Frequency: One time.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour
Burden:
Responses: 364.
Burden Hours: 159.
 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 185 / Thursday, September 24, 1998 / Notices
Abstract: The Star Schools program
has the purpose of encouraging
improved instruction in mathematics,
science, and foreign languages as well as
other subjects through modern
telecommunications technology. The
purpose of this evaluation is to
independently examine the
implementation and administration of
the program as a whole and of
individual projects, as well as the
program’s outcomes and impact on
schools, teachers, and students.
Clearance is requested for two data
collection efforts (1) a site teacher
survey of 400 respondents and (2) a
production teacher survey of 25
respondents. The Department uses the
information to make grant awards.
[FR Doc. 98–25572 Filed 9–23–98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP98–781–000]
ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of
Request Under Blanket Authorization
September 18, 1998.
Take notice that on September 14,
1998, ANR Pipeline Company, (ANR),
500 Renaissance Center, Detroit,
Michigan 48243, filed under Sections
157.205 and 157.216(b) of the
Commission’s Regulations to abandon
its North Sparta Meter Station, located
in Kent County, Michigan all as more
fully described in the request which is
on file with the Commission and open
to public inspection. The North Sparta
Meter Station was previously used to
deliver gas to Michigan Consolidated
Gas Company (Mich Con). ANR states
that Mich Con no longer needs service
through the North Sparta Meter Station.
ANR states further, that in place of
receiving gas at the North Sparta Meter
Station, Mich Con has been receiving
deliveries at ANR’s Sparta-Muskegon
Meter Station.
ANR asserts that it will not terminate
any service to Mich Con as a result of
this proposed abandonment and that
Mich Con has already disconnected its
facilities from ANR’s at the North Sparta
Meter.
Any person or the Commission’s staff
may, within 45 days after issuance of
the instant notice by the Commission,
file pursuant to Rule 214 of the
Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR
385.214) a motion to intervene or notice
of intervention and pursuant to Section
157.205 of the Regulations under the
Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a
protest to the request. If no protest is
filed within the time allowed therefore,
the proposed activity shall be deemed to
be authorized effective the day after the
time allowed for filing a protest. If a
protest is filed and not withdrawn
within 30 days after the time allowed
for filing a protest, the instant request
shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of
the Natural Gas Act.
David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98–25484 Filed 9–23–98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–M
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP98–772–000]
Black Marlin Pipeline Company; Notice
of Request Under Blanket
Authorization
September 18, 1998.
Take notice that on September 10,
1998, Black Marlin Pipeline Company
(Black Marlin), 1400 Smith Street,
Houston, Texas 77002, filed in Docket
No. CP98–772–000 a request pursuant to
Sections 157.205 and 157.216 of the
Commission’s Regulations (18 CFR
157.205, 157.216) under the Natural Gas
Act (NGA) for authorization to abandon
by sale to Houston Pipe Line Company
(HPL) certain measuring and regulating
facilities in Galveston County, Texas,
under Black Marlin’s blanket certificate
issued in Docket No. CP89–2115–000,
pursuant to Section 7 of the NGA, all as
more fully set forth in the request that
is on file with the Commission and open
to public inspection.
Black Marlin proposes to abandon the
measuring and regulating facilities at
two interconnections between Black
Marlin and HPL (HPL Texas City and
HPL Grant Avenue Stations). It is stated
that both interconnections were
constructed under Commission
authorization in Docket No. CP84–354–
000 as part of a 13-mile extension of its
pipeline system. It is asserted that Black
Marlin proposes to sell the facilities to
HPL in response to a request from HPL.
It is further asserted that HPL will
continue to use the facilities as part of
its distribution system to serve its gas
system and that there will be no loss of
service to any customer. Black Marlin
states that the proposal is not prohibited
by its FERC gas tariff and that it has
sufficient capacity without detriment or
disadvantage to its other customers.
51061
Any person or the Commission’s staff
may, within 14 days after issuance of
the instant notice by the Commission,
file pursuant to Rule 214 of the
Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR
385.214) a motion to intervene or notice
of intervention and pursuant to section
157.205 of the Regulations under the
Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a
protest to the request. If no protest is
filed within the time allowed therefor,
the proposed activity shall be deemed to
be authorized effective the day after the
time allowed for filing a protest. If a
protest is filed and not withdrawn
within 30 days after the time allowed
for filing a protest, the instant request
shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of
the Natural Gas Act.
David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98–25482 Filed 9–23–98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–M
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. RP98–402–000]
Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company;
Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC
Gas Tariff
September 18, 1998.
Take notice that on September 15,
1998, Eastern Shore Natural Gas
Company (Eastern Shore) tendered for
filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff,
Second Revised Volume No. 1, the
following revised tariff sheets with a
proposed effective date of October 15,
1998:
First Revised Sheet No. 264
Original Sheet No. 264A
First Revised Sheet No. 278
Original Sheet No. 278A
First Revised Sheet No. 304
Original Sheet No. 304A
Eastern Shore states that the purpose
of this filing is to modify certain of
Eastern Shore’s pro forma service
agreements to provide for specific types
of volume-related discounts that may be
granted by Eastern Shore. By making
these modifications to Eastern Shore’s
form of service agreements, Eastern
Shore seeks to reduce the need for filing
individual discount agreements as
‘‘material deviations’’ when such
discounts are volume-related.
Eastern Shore further states its
proposed tariff revisions are consistent
with the Commission’s clarifications
regarding discount agreements set forth
in ‘‘Order on Rehearing and