You are on page 1of 5

Tfthyujjghjfjhfgds Fhfgjhgkjhkjghjflskdjlkjdfkdflkjdkl

1. Plaintiff is Luz Diaz, sixty five (65) years old, widow and a resident of Mountain View Subdivision, Antipolo, Rizal while defendant is Emma Crisostomo, forty two (42) years old, housewife married and also a resident of Mountain View Subdivision, Antipolo, Rizal; 2. Plaintiff and defendant have been neighbors for at least three (3) years. Plaintiff alleges that in the afternoon of October 25, 2010, a truck owned by the defendant's carpenter, Gregorio Timbol, was parked in front of the defendant's on a street that was sloping. Mr. Timbol has been working on the renovation of defendant's house. He has been a carpenter for at least thirty five (35) years; 3. Just before the incident, plaintiff was taking a nap in her house when she noticed that her dog, Trix was missing. She then looked around the house until she heard a crashing bang and a dog crying out; 4. When the plaintiff went outside her gate, she saw Trix pinned under the wheel of the truck. The truck was backed up against a tree by the sidewalk and Trix was thrashing and squealing underneath the truck with blood coming out his mouth; 5. Plaintiff cried and screamed to Nilda, her helper, and shouted for the guards who roamed the subdivision, but no one came. She could not save him even if she wanted to because there was no one in the truck's driver seat and she does not know how to drive. She could only cry and scream while Trix kept on howling until it stopped moving and making any sound. He died soon after; 6. According to the plaintiff, Trix had been with her since her husband passed away eight years ago. 7. Plaintiff observed that the truck had always been parked in front of the defendants house since the time defendant's house was being renovated; 8. When the incident happened, defendant did not do anything except to call Mr. Timbol. Defendant insisted that the truck was properly parked and what happened to Trix was an accident and Mr. Timbol could not be faulted. On the other hand, Mr. Timbol admitted that his truck was of an old model. He bought it second hand and had it overhauled and repainted. He also admitted that, when he parked it on the day the incident happened, he put two (2) large rocks against the back wheels to make sure the truck does not roll back down the street; 9. Mr. Timbol finally admitted that when he looked at the scene after the incident happened, the rocks were no longer there. He concluded that someone must have removed them; 10. Plaintiff demanded that the defendant should give her another dog, but the latter refused and insisted that what happened to Trix was plaintiff's fault because Trix should have not been loose on te streets. 11. Defendant testified that Trix was a pesky dog and had complained about it many times. In fact, it was because of Trix that the defendant met plaintiff for the first time three (3) years ago. Defendant went to plaintiff's house to complain that Trix pulled out the plants in the yard; 1. Plaintiff is Luz Diaz, sixty five (65) years old, widow and a resident of Mountain View Subdivision, Antipolo, Rizal while defendant is Emma Crisostomo, forty two (42) years old, housewife married and also a resident of Mountain View Subdivision, Antipolo, Rizal; 2. Plaintiff and defendant have been neighbors for at least three (3) years. Plaintiff alleges that in the afternoon of October 25, 2010, a truck owned by the defendant's carpenter, Gregorio Timbol, was parked in front of the defendant's on a street that was sloping. Mr. Timbol has been working on the renovation of defendant's house. He has been a carpenter for at least thirty five (35) years;

3. Just before the incident, plaintiff was taking a nap in her house when she noticed that her dog, Trix was missing. She then looked around the house until she heard a crashing bang and a dog crying out; 4. When the plaintiff went outside her gate, she saw Trix pinned under the wheel of the truck. The truck was backed up against a tree by the sidewalk and Trix was thrashing and squealing underneath the truck with blood coming out his mouth; 5. Plaintiff cried and screamed to Nilda, her helper, and shouted for the guards who roamed the subdivision, but no one came. She could not save him even if she wanted to because there was no one in the truck's driver seat and she does not know how to drive. She could only cry and scream while Trix kept on howling until it stopped moving and making any sound. He died soon after; 6. According to the plaintiff, Trix had been with her since her husband passed away eight years ago. 7. Plaintiff observed that the truck had always been parked in front of the defendants house since the time defendant's house was being renovated; 8. When the incident happened, defendant did not do anything except to call Mr. Timbol. Defendant insisted that the truck was properly parked and what happened to Trix was an accident and Mr. Timbol could not be faulted. On the other hand, Mr. Timbol admitted that his truck was of an old model. He bought it second hand and had it overhauled and repainted. He also admitted that, when he parked it on the day the incident happened, he put two (2) large rocks against the back wheels to make sure the truck does not roll back down the street; 9. Mr. Timbol finally admitted that when he looked at the scene after the incident happened, the rocks were no longer there. He concluded that someone must have removed them; 10. Plaintiff demanded that the defendant should give her another dog, but the latter refused and insisted that what happened to Trix was plaintiff's fault because Trix should have not been loose on te streets. 11. Defendant testified that Trix was a pesky dog and had complained about it many times. In fact, it was because of Trix that the defendant met plaintiff for the first time three (3) years ago. Defendant went to plaintiff's house to complain that Trix pulled out the plants in the yard; 1. Plaintiff is Luz Diaz, sixty five (65) years old, widow and a resident of Mountain View Subdivision, Antipolo, Rizal while defendant is Emma Crisostomo, forty two (42) years old, housewife married and also a resident of Mountain View Subdivision, Antipolo, Rizal; 2. Plaintiff and defendant have been neighbors for at least three (3) years. Plaintiff alleges that in the afternoon of October 25, 2010, a truck owned by the defendant's carpenter, Gregorio Timbol, was parked in front of the defendant's on a street that was sloping. Mr. Timbol has been working on the renovation of defendant's house. He has been a carpenter for at least thirty five (35) years; 3. Just before the incident, plaintiff was taking a nap in her house when she noticed that her dog, Trix was missing. She then looked around the house until she heard a crashing bang and a dog crying out; 4. When the plaintiff went outside her gate, she saw Trix pinned under the wheel of the truck. The truck was backed up against a tree by the sidewalk and Trix was thrashing and squealing underneath the truck with blood coming out his mouth; 5. Plaintiff cried and screamed to Nilda, her helper, and shouted for the guards who roamed the subdivision, but no one came. She could not save him even if she wanted to because there was no one in the truck's driver seat and she does not know how to drive. She could only cry and scream while Trix kept on howling until it stopped moving and making any sound. He died soon after; 6. According to the plaintiff, Trix had been with her since her husband passed away eight years ago. 7. Plaintiff observed that the truck had always been parked in front of the defendants house since the time defendant's house was being renovated; 8. When the incident happened, defendant did not do anything except to call Mr. Timbol. Defendant insisted that the truck was properly parked and what happened to Trix was an accident and Mr. Timbol could not be faulted. On the other hand, Mr. Timbol admitted that his truck was of an old model. He bought it second hand and had it overhauled and repainted. He also admitted that, when he parked it on

the day the incident happened, he put two (2) large rocks against the back wheels to make sure the truck does not roll back down the street; 9. Mr. Timbol finally admitted that when he looked at the scene after the incident happened, the rocks were no longer there. He concluded that someone must have removed them; 10. Plaintiff demanded that the defendant should give her another dog, but the latter refused and insisted that what happened to Trix was plaintiff's fault because Trix should have not been loose on te streets. 11. Defendant testified that Trix was a pesky dog and had complained about it many times. In fact, it was because of Trix that the defendant met plaintiff for the first time three (3) years ago. Defendant went to plaintiff's house to complain that Trix pulled out the plants in the yard; 1. Plaintiff is Luz Diaz, sixty five (65) years old, widow and a resident of Mountain View Subdivision, Antipolo, Rizal while defendant is Emma Crisostomo, forty two (42) years old, housewife married and also a resident of Mountain View Subdivision, Antipolo, Rizal; 2. Plaintiff and defendant have been neighbors for at least three (3) years. Plaintiff alleges that in the afternoon of October 25, 2010, a truck owned by the defendant's carpenter, Gregorio Timbol, was parked in front of the defendant's on a street that was sloping. Mr. Timbol has been working on the renovation of defendant's house. He has been a carpenter for at least thirty five (35) years; 3. Just before the incident, plaintiff was taking a nap in her house when she noticed that her dog, Trix was missing. She then looked around the house until she heard a crashing bang and a dog crying out; 4. When the plaintiff went outside her gate, she saw Trix pinned under the wheel of the truck. The truck was backed up against a tree by the sidewalk and Trix was thrashing and squealing underneath the truck with blood coming out his mouth; 5. Plaintiff cried and screamed to Nilda, her helper, and shouted for the guards who roamed the subdivision, but no one came. She could not save him even if she wanted to because there was no one in the truck's driver seat and she does not know how to drive. She could only cry and scream while Trix kept on howling until it stopped moving and making any sound. He died soon after; 6. According to the plaintiff, Trix had been with her since her husband passed away eight years ago. 7. Plaintiff observed that the truck had always been parked in front of the defendants house since the time defendant's house was being renovated; 8. When the incident happened, defendant did not do anything except to call Mr. Timbol. Defendant insisted that the truck was properly parked and what happened to Trix was an accident and Mr. Timbol could not be faulted. On the other hand, Mr. Timbol admitted that his truck was of an old model. He bought it second hand and had it overhauled and repainted. He also admitted that, when he parked it on the day the incident happened, he put two (2) large rocks against the back wheels to make sure the truck does not roll back down the street; 9. Mr. Timbol finally admitted that when he looked at the scene after the incident happened, the rocks were no longer there. He concluded that someone must have removed them; 10. Plaintiff demanded that the defendant should give her another dog, but the latter refused and insisted that what happened to Trix was plaintiff's fault because Trix should have not been loose on te streets. 11. Defendant testified that Trix was a pesky dog and had complained about it many times. In fact, it was because of Trix that the defendant met plaintiff for the first time three (3) years ago. Defendant went to plaintiff's house to complain that Trix pulled out the plants in the yard; 1. Plaintiff is Luz Diaz, sixty five (65) years old, widow and a resident of Mountain View Subdivision, Antipolo, Rizal while defendant is Emma Crisostomo, forty two (42) years old, housewife married and also a resident of Mountain View Subdivision, Antipolo, Rizal; 2. Plaintiff and defendant have been neighbors for at least three (3) years. Plaintiff alleges that in the afternoon of October 25, 2010, a truck owned by the defendant's carpenter, Gregorio Timbol, was parked in front of the defendant's on a street that was sloping. Mr. Timbol has been working on the renovation of defendant's house. He has been a carpenter for at least thirty five (35) years;

3. Just before the incident, plaintiff was taking a nap in her house when she noticed that her dog, Trix was missing. She then looked around the house until she heard a crashing bang and a dog crying out; 4. When the plaintiff went outside her gate, she saw Trix pinned under the wheel of the truck. The truck was backed up against a tree by the sidewalk and Trix was thrashing and squealing underneath the truck with blood coming out his mouth; 5. Plaintiff cried and screamed to Nilda, her helper, and shouted for the guards who roamed the subdivision, but no one came. She could not save him even if she wanted to because there was no one in the truck's driver seat and she does not know how to drive. She could only cry and scream while Trix kept on howling until it stopped moving and making any sound. He died soon after; 6. According to the plaintiff, Trix had been with her since her husband passed away eight years ago. 7. Plaintiff observed that the truck had always been parked in front of the defendants house since the time defendant's house was being renovated; 8. When the incident happened, defendant did not do anything except to call Mr. Timbol. Defendant insisted that the truck was properly parked and what happened to Trix was an accident and Mr. Timbol could not be faulted. On the other hand, Mr. Timbol admitted that his truck was of an old model. He bought it second hand and had it overhauled and repainted. He also admitted that, when he parked it on the day the incident happened, he put two (2) large rocks against the back wheels to make sure the truck does not roll back down the street; 9. Mr. Timbol finally admitted that when he looked at the scene after the incident happened, the rocks were no longer there. He concluded that someone must have removed them; 10. Plaintiff demanded that the defendant should give her another dog, but the latter refused and insisted that what happened to Trix was plaintiff's fault because Trix should have not been loose on te streets. 11. Defendant testified that Trix was a pesky dog and had complained about it many times. In fact, it was because of Trix that the defendant met plaintiff for the first time three (3) years ago. Defendant went to plaintiff's house to complain that Trix pulled out the plants in the yard; 1. Plaintiff is Luz Diaz, sixty five (65) years old, widow and a resident of Mountain View Subdivision, Antipolo, Rizal while defendant is Emma Crisostomo, forty two (42) years old, housewife married and also a resident of Mountain View Subdivision, Antipolo, Rizal; 2. Plaintiff and defendant have been neighbors for at least three (3) years. Plaintiff alleges that in the afternoon of October 25, 2010, a truck owned by the defendant's carpenter, Gregorio Timbol, was parked in front of the defendant's on a street that was sloping. Mr. Timbol has been working on the renovation of defendant's house. He has been a carpenter for at least thirty five (35) years; 3. Just before the incident, plaintiff was taking a nap in her house when she noticed that her dog, Trix was missing. She then looked around the house until she heard a crashing bang and a dog crying out; 4. When the plaintiff went outside her gate, she saw Trix pinned under the wheel of the truck. The truck was backed up against a tree by the sidewalk and Trix was thrashing and squealing underneath the truck with blood coming out his mouth; 5. Plaintiff cried and screamed to Nilda, her helper, and shouted for the guards who roamed the subdivision, but no one came. She could not save him even if she wanted to because there was no one in the truck's driver seat and she does not know how to drive. She could only cry and scream while Trix kept on howling until it stopped moving and making any sound. He died soon after; 6. According to the plaintiff, Trix had been with her since her husband passed away eight years ago. 7. Plaintiff observed that the truck had always been parked in front of the defendants house since the time defendant's house was being renovated; 8. When the incident happened, defendant did not do anything except to call Mr. Timbol. Defendant insisted that the truck was properly parked and what happened to Trix was an accident and Mr. Timbol could not be faulted. On the other hand, Mr. Timbol admitted that his truck was of an old model. He bought it second hand and had it overhauled and repainted. He also admitted that, when he parked it on

the day the incident happened, he put two (2) large rocks against the back wheels to make sure the truck does not roll back down the street; 9. Mr. Timbol finally admitted that when he looked at the scene after the incident happened, the rocks were no longer there. He concluded that someone must have removed them; 10. Plaintiff demanded that the defendant should give her another dog, but the latter refused and insisted that what happened to Trix was plaintiff's fault because Trix should have not been loose on te streets. 11. Defendant testified that Trix was a pesky dog and had complained about it many times. In fact, it was because of Trix that the defendant met plaintiff for the first time three (3) years ago. Defendant went to plaintiff's house to complain that Trix pulled out the plants in the yard; 1. Plaintiff is Luz Diaz, sixty five (65) years old, widow and a resident of Mountain View Subdivision, Antipolo, Rizal while defendant is Emma Crisostomo, forty two (42) years old, housewife married and also a resident of Mountain View Subdivision, Antipolo, Rizal; 2. Plaintiff and defendant have been neighbors for at least three (3) years. Plaintiff alleges that in the afternoon of October 25, 2010, a truck owned by the defendant's carpenter, Gregorio Timbol, was parked in front of the defendant's on a street that was sloping. Mr. Timbol has been working on the renovation of defendant's house. He has been a carpenter for at least thirty five (35) years; 3. Just before the incident, plaintiff was taking a nap in her house when she noticed that her dog, Trix was missing. She then looked around the house until she heard a crashing bang and a dog crying out; 4. When the plaintiff went outside her gate, she saw Trix pinned under the wheel of the truck. The truck was backed up against a tree by the sidewalk and Trix was thrashing and squealing underneath the truck with blood coming out his mouth; 5. Plaintiff cried and screamed to Nilda, her helper, and shouted for the guards who roamed the subdivision, but no one came. She could not save him even if she wanted to because there was no one in the truck's driver seat and she does not know how to drive. She could only cry and scream while Trix kept on howling until it stopped moving and making any sound. He died soon after; 6. According to the plaintiff, Trix had been with her since her husband passed away eight years ago. 7. Plaintiff observed that the truck had always been parked in front of the defendants house since the time defendant's house was being renovated; 8. When the incident happened, defendant did not do anything except to call Mr. Timbol. Defendant insisted that the truck was properly parked and what happened to Trix was an accident and Mr. Timbol could not be faulted. On the other hand, Mr. Timbol admitted that his truck was of an old model. He bought it second hand and had it overhauled and repainted. He also admitted that, when he parked it on the day the incident happened, he put two (2) large rocks against the back wheels to make sure the truck does not roll back down the street; 9. Mr. Timbol finally admitted that when he looked at the scene after the incident happened, the rocks were no longer there. He concluded that someone must have removed them; 10. Plaintiff demanded that the defendant should give her another dog, but the latter refused and insisted that what happened to Trix was plaintiff's fault because Trix should have not been loose on te streets. 11. Defendant testified that Trix was a pesky dog and had complained about it many times. In fact, it was because of Trix that the defendant met plaintiff for the first time three (3) years ago. Defendant went to plaintiff's house to complain that Trix pulled out the plants in the yard;

vvvfdgfjuhikfjdyg

You might also like