Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Arina MAFTEI PROMOVAREA COMERULUI EXTERIOR AL REPUBLICII MOLDOVA PRIN PRISMA INVESTIIILOR STRINE DIRECTE
IER Project
World Economy and IER specialty Author: student gr. EMREI 106, full time education Arina MAFTEI
--------------------------
Chiinu - 2012
CONTENT
Introduction3 I CONCEPT, OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS OF ORGANIC AGRICULURE................................................................5
1.1 Concept of Organic Agriculture Opportunities and Constraints ....5 1.2 Activities and Functions of FAO in Organic Agriculture11
INTRODUCTION
According to the Food and Agriculture Organization FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), and WHO World Health Organization 'Alimentarius Code "organic farming is an integrated management system of the production process, which helps to support and strengthen resilience agro ecosystems, including biodiversity, biological cycles and soil biological activity. Organic farming emphasizes the use of management practices appropriate instead of introducing new products that are made out the farm and taking into consideration the fact that particularities of each region requires systems well adapted to this region. This can be accomplished by using the agronomic, biological and mechanical methods instead of using synthetic materials for certain operations in the system. Therefore organic farming must respect the strict rules established by the laws. The trademark guarantees the highest quality and origin of products and that is why farming is closely linked to respect strict rules of production established by certain legislative rules and it must be checked and certified . The goal is to ensure customer compliance with established production rules. Organic farming is a production method that takes into account traditional knowledge of farmers and scientific integrates of all agricultural disciplines, addressing social concerns as the environment, quality products are provided to consumers even in poorer countries. The main objective of organic farming is to protect the biosphere and Earth's natural resources, excluding the use of chemical fertilizers, synthetic pesticides and herbicides, prevention methods play a key role in the fight against pests, diseases and weeds. It should also be taken into account biological techniques used and local conditions, adapted to the socioeconomic realities and traditional methods, optimum utilization of resources in agro ecosystems, is an essential factor for achieving optimum results for long term. Principles underpinning organic farming are universal, but the techniques used are adapted to the climatic conditions, resources and local traditions.Organic farming is a method that requires observation and reflection capacity. It uses a high potential of workforce, requiring new jobs and keep the peasants in the fields, important in a period unemployment, on the one hand and the rural exodus to urban areas, on the other hand. Minimum requirements for achieving sustainable development: First, fair-balanced distribution of resources and increased quality production side as attributes of a new conception of resizing growth. Second, improvement, refocusing or changing technologies, putting them under the control and monitoring risks. Third, forms of governance, decentralization, increased participation in decisions concerning ecology and the environment. Forth, providing a potential developed in terms of financial, economic, human, technological. Environment and natural resources must be recognized as
the foundation of all human activities and protecting them should be a prerequisite for its development. The concept of sustainable development is based on rights, obligations and justice, assuming: the need to maintain environmental integrity. This means to be promoted economic
3
efficiency and the maintaining of fairness. Sustainable development of agricultural ecosystems and the ability to produce food of the highest quality can be considered the most important contribution of agriculture to ensure the future of mankind. Such causes and diversify agricultural economic activities as raw materials and processed primarily occur in rural areas, developing infrastructure and increasing economic potential of villages. So, sustainable agriculture must be productive, profitable, ecological, to conserve resources and balanced social and human.
synthetic and natural prohibited investments, this list is constantly negotiated with Codex. Many certification programs Additional measures required to protect the environment. Despite the fact that many farmers in developing countries do not use synthetic inputs, they are not classified as organic.
The main objectives of organic farming: -To achieve high-quality agricultural products nutritious and effective conditions;
- Develop and strengthen the living systems during production cycles; - Maintain and improve long-term soil fertility; - Avoid all forms of pollution that may result from agricultural practices; - Allow farmers a fair remuneration for their job satisfaction and a safe and healthy working environment -To promote and diversify the biological cycles in agricultural systems, following micro-organisms, soil flora and fauna, cultures and growth of animals: -To maintain and improve long-term soil fertility; -Use as much as possible the natural resources and recycled locally; -To develop agricultural systems as self-sufficient, regarding organic materials and nutrients; -To ensure all animals living conditions as little contrary to fundamental aspects of the behavior river; -To maintain the genetic diversity of agricultural systems, their environment, plants and wildlife including protection; -To consider the impact on the environment and cultural techniques of social relations. The main opportunities and constraints are:
a)Markets
Demand for organic products has created new export opportunities for developing world. While some consumers express a preference for organic products local demand for a wide range of products during the whole year makes it impossible for any country to source only organic food inside it. As a result, many developing countries have begun to export organic products successfully (eg. Tropical fruits in Europe, herbs from Zimbabwe to South Africa, six African nations export cotton in the European Community). Usually organic exports is achieved impressive premiums at a price 20% higher than identical products produced inorganic. Ultimate profitability of organic production vary, but studies in this area indicate a high potential of this method of long production.
Returns from organic agriculture can potentially contribute to local food security by increasing family incomes. However, a lucrative market penetration is not so easy. Farmers are denied market penetration organic products in developed countries over a period of two to three years after the introduction and use of organic management, this time is necessary for filtering chemical residues. According Project Codex guidelines, the products produced on land under organic management for a period exceeding one year but less than 2-3 years may be sold as "transitional organic" but for such products there is still little markets. In most cases farmers and vendors who wish to sell their products in developed countries must hire an organic certification organization to annually inspect and confirm that these businesses adhere to organic standards set by the partners. The cost for this service can be expensive, varying depending on farm size, production volume and efficiency certification organization (eg. IFOAM certification costs from 2 to 5% of sales volume). Few developing countries have domestic certification organizations, and even when sufficient resources to pay for certification farmers have enough information to find inspectors accredited. While most traders in developing countries focuses on export markets in developed countries, domestic market opportunities for organic products and eco-products can be explored. For example, in China, there is a growing demand for "green food" which, according to local standards, are produced without pesticides and fertilizers with biological methods. Chinese farmers produce organic food for export (eg: tea in Holland, soybeans in Japan). Because of the difficulty of obtaining adequate information, farmers do not know where to focus their attention: towards the local market or export. There is no systematic research markets organic products. In particular, they have been conducted market projects in developing countries, no systematic assessment of export markets. At the same time was not taken into account people's willingness to pay Additional margins, the impact of regional attitudes and tastes and incidence of fraud on the market. b) Farm productivity Farmers harvest losses are likely to perceive the transition to organic production. There is a period between removal of synthetic chemicals and normalizing sufficient biological activity (eg increased number insects, nitrogen fixation by legumes) that is typical fertility problem. Degree of yield loss varies and depends on factors such as the biological attributes of the farm, farmer expertise, and the use of synthetic inputs to transition to organic production. In areas where soil fertility is low and
7
biological processes have been severely damaged, it may take years to restore the ecosystem where organic production is possible. In these cases other methods can be implemented judicious use of synthetic chemicals. Another strategy for crossing the transition period is the partial conversion of farms to organic production so that the entire operation is not at risk. Most studies point out that organic farming requires more labor input than conventional farms. This shows the truth especially in regions with low ecological potential. However, when labor is not a constraint organic agriculture can benefit the unemployed in rural communities. More than that, used in organic farming crop diversification may distribute labor demand more evenly and stabilize employment as a result of people. Land rent also shows a critical point in the adoption of organic agriculture. It is unlikely that farmers required lessees to invest labor and suffer difficult transition period without having strong guarantees on access land in later years, when the results of organic farming will be his maximum. Crop rotations should be planned in terms of both economic as well as technical - their use should be determined for all types of crops and animals. As in any system of farming, diversification of production and income generating opportunities may increase as in the case of fruit, provide a substantial amount of minerals and vitamins to the diet familiar. It also reduces the risk of failure to wide range of cultures. It is possible that organic farms where the crop volume is smaller than farms with a high degree of synthetic inputs, final economic income to be due to a higher degree of market margins high and low production costs. Methods generated by organic farmers after their research specific production strategies can be of great benefit to farmers inorganic interested in diversifying its management options. However, organic producers face a number of uncertainties. Lack of information is an obstacle to organic conversion (eg. Research in the field shows that 63% of farmers in the Sahara and 73% of North America's organic farmers, consider lack of information as the greatest barrier for adoption of organic management). Extension personnel rarely receive adequate training in the field of organic methods, and this often discourages farmers from organic management. The more so, institutional support in developing countries is rare. In most developing countries there are professional institutions that would assist farmers during the process of production, post-production and marketing. While there are many research outcome in the field, that can be immediately applied by farmers, many other things are necessary. In 1990, FAO sponsored a conference where the need for
research in organic agriculture have been identified (eg. Economy farm nitrogen cycle etc.). Grudgingly many of them were discussed. c) Environmental impact and sustainability Explicit goal of organic agriculture is deeply sustainability. Yet negative impacts may occur, organic agriculture is not an exclusive method for sustainable agriculture. Methods of protection and conservation of soil and water used in sustainable agriculture, the combat erosion, salinization and other forms of degradation are evident existing organic agriculture. Use crop rotation and other methods improves soil microstructure and encourages the growth of microorganisms. Mixed cropping ensure continuous soil cover, so the earth is exposed to the erosive rain, wind and sun. Terracing to conserve soil moisture and is used in appropriate, particular attention is paid to the actual irrigated areas on farm water management specified. Properly managed organic farming reduces or eliminates water pollution and helps conserve water and soil on the farm (although improper use of manure can seriously pollute water). A small number of countries compel farmers to use organic techniques as a solution to water pollution (eg Germany, France). Farmers rely on natural pest control (eg biological control, plant pest control character) rather than synthetic pesticides that are misused, kill beneficial organisms (such as: pest, bees, rhymes), pollute water and soils. Reduce the use of toxic synthetic pesticides, after researching the World Health Organization (WHO) poisoning 3 million. people annually, will help improve the health of farm. Farmers organic products tend to use the maximum grain residues (straw, beans and other edible parts) or directly as compost or indirectly as animal Dung. Elimination of synthetic nitrogen fertilizers, greatly reduces the risk of nitrogen contamination of water. Crop rotation is a widely used method to maintain fertility and control pests and diseases, which is used on farms of all sizes, both in developed as well as in developing ones. Forage legumes are well known to raise soil fertility and crops that are grown on vast territories in Asia sub-tropical and semi-arid regions with a dual purpose animal feeding and enrichment of soil nitrogen. Cereals can also provide a reasonable crop without nitrogenous fertilizer. Leguminous crops in rotations through biological fixation of atmospheric nitrogen, can be used and other nitrogen fixing plants like Azolla. Biological nitrogen fixation is a powerful technique, but it requires some addition of minerals to the soil, especially phosphorus. Most certification programs prohibit the use of mineral fertilizers necessary to supplement the manure produced on the farm. Can be used and organic manure off the
9
farm such as: limestone phosphorus, calcium dioxide, natural manure, lime etc. While most certification programs prohibit the use of wastewater and sludge residues, they are still used in some places. It was found that the sludge may contain many elements contaminants including heavy metals that have a cumulative effect and damage to the soil, while residues contain human pathogens and should be carefully composted before use. Crop rotation helps to use crop diversification, increase their productivity and conservation of plant genetic resources. Integrating livestock adds income through organic meat, eggs and dairy products, as well as using draft animal power. Fruit integrated into the system provide food, income and wood fuel. In various organic agricultural systems may also be found integrated agro-aquatic. Economic objectives are not the only motivation of organic farmers, their intent is often to optimize land, animals, and plant interactions, preserve natural nutrient and energy, enhance biodiversity, all of which contribute to the overall objective of sustainable agriculture to preserve natural resources and ecosystems for future generations. If we analyze from the political point of view we have to take in consideration the following aspects: a) Public and private partnership The environmental and economic benefits that organic agriculture has attracted the attention of a large number of countries, and yet very few of them have enacted policies to assist the organic sector. Most assistance has been applied in the private sector, especially by NGOs. The private sector infrastructure has been recognized not only countries, but also encouraged. Farmers and consumers in almost all countries rely on a system of self-organizing production units and independent certifiers who, over the years have provided a certification effective economic mechanism. The importance of independent certifiers that can be revealed by IFOAM coordinates 650 individual and institutional members in over 100 countries, 75% of the developing countries. Yet certificate on the network require an extension, as has already been mentioned, many developing countries suffer from lack of certification organizations. Organic programs and projects Codex directory, specify "list permitted investments" for organic produce and ingredients allowed. Countries, following consultation with civil social organizations may propose individual lists Codex, which negotiations will determine the final list of international acceptability. Framing in international trade requires much higher production volume of a particular organic farms. NGOs assist farmers in establishing organizations for collecting, processing and
10
marketing organic products. Governments can facilitate the formation NGO organizations that coordinates and controls compliance techniques used in production and post-production. b) Technical Support Northern developed countries invest enormous sums in organic agriculture research, but contribution in this area is minimal compared to the total agricultural research (less than 0.01% in the U.S.). Practices initiated by FAO IPM and Farmers Schools showed that farmers, owners or lessees, on small or large, can perform scientific research, whether they are technical assistance and are provided with the correct orientation. Countries can also initiate market research. For example U.S., examines market organic products in over 20 countries, specifying export opportunities. Codex Project Scoping and most national and private organic standards prohibit the use in organic production organisms built using genetic engineering (GE) and especially transgenic crops. While biotechnology applications are prohibited in organic production, scientific research and possible future negotiations that could result in technologies accepted by consumers. c) Direct assistance Interest in environmental protection and preservation of family farms, small size led to huge subsidies from European developed countries. Serve as an incentive subsidies (eg in the UK during the conversion period is 450 pounds subsidies for hectare subsidies in the European Community helped 15% of Irish farmers, organic food to exercise to increase dairy operations ). Interested communities should be informed about organizational characteristics, aspects of purchasing and selling finished products. Consumer confidence is essential if sensing products are made with high margins. Because organic products can not be differentiated from conventional products, consumers depend entirely on sincerity certifiers. To maintain organic standards is necessary rough punishment of all fraudulent activities, as well as measuring the impact of fraud on the market for organic products.
. Asia and Pacific Regional Office coordinated the Asian Network of Bio-fertilizers and organic fertilizers, which publishes more than 10 years in the annual ballot organic recycling in the region. Division of Earth and Water Development has developed software that facilitates collecting information about using organic fertilizers. Codex Committee on Food Labelling now develop draft Guidelines for the Production, Processing, Marketing and Labelling of organic products. Perspectives and guidelines for treating fruits, vegetables, organic species in developing countries are developed by agro-industrial and Post Production Services Management. In 1997 was established a network of internal e-mail to facilitate information exchange and evaluation in the field of organic agriculture, as well as developing understanding between FAO staff. Organic farming has been placed as one of the focal points of the Service of Natural Resources and the Environment. After obtaining formal status as part of the FAO in 1997, FAO and IFOAM meeting conducted in all technical departments in March 1998.
Additional efforts will be required to provide the information requirements in organic agriculture and technofinancial assistance. FAO can effectively collaborate and build partnerships with existing institutions (associations / national programs, IFOAM and other NGOs, national and international research centers in agriculture) in certain regions, assuming the existence of adequate resources. Proposed main functions
are: a)Providing a forum As part of FAO Regular Programme could provide a forum for member countries to establish standards for organic production, labeling and other market problems. Some of these would continue to happen in the Codex Committee on Food Labelling , but FAO could gather groups of experts to investigate problems in the crop rotation, etc. pathogenic problems. Advice of these groups can help Codex Committee in developing international mechanisms of development of organic farming activities. FAO Codex Regional Committees are the following local estimate of the organic standards and list of investments that would take into account domestic production needs, as well as international market demand.[4.1] b) Policy Analysis and Information Support Basic knowledge is required for a full understanding of the magnitude and potential organic sector. FAO could get information about organic production and manufacturing in different countries using annual questionnaires. FAO could also develop standards and classification of information collected appropriated. FAO could serve as a clearing office market research by gathering information and
12
issue reports on research in the field. Could be maintained a list of centers and hired experts in marketing rebuke could be promoted an information network in developing countries. Data collection would require specialized financing. For good functioning information network should be developed together with the extra-budgetary funding control. For example, resources can be used technical cooperation programs. Once the data is collected and analyzed, FAO could provide guidance on the development of local production priorities in line with market demand organic. c) Facilitating research and extension information exchange Organic farming includes some interesting questions for research to improve management and sustainable production systems. FAO could facilitate communication international research centers such questions, so Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) and the National Agricultural Research (NARS). Level of collaboration in research could be raised by establishing networks of information exchange. FAO could develop relevant questionnaires extension programs and communication component. While some of these programs are included in TAC and CGIAR Secretariat functions NARS, others will require extra resources.[4.2] d) Technical Assistance Collaborated pilot activities with national programs, FAO could assist organic integration, IPNS, and EPI with necessary information. Among the most effective methods of assistance we can call "Farmers Field School" method used in towns where organic production activity could be profitable. FAO could promote the development of local certification organizations in developing countries, which would eliminate the costly practice of hiring foreign experts to certify organic operations. All these pilot activities will require identifying and mobilizing extrabudgetary resources.
13
14
Much of organic farming areas worldwide is in Oceania (33%), followed by Europe (25%) and Latin America (23%). The highest percentage of organic farming in the Falkland Islands is the U.S. (35.7%), followed by Lichtenstein (26.9%) and Austria (18.5%). There are currently 1.8 million organic producers in the world, the majority being in developing countries. Global market for organic products was estimated in 2009 to 40 billion euros (55 billion dollars) by market research company Organic Monitor, 5% more than last year. Most organic products are sold in Europe and North America. Europe has spent more than $ 18 billion for green products, Germany fully recorded sales of 5.8 billion, followed by France ( 3 billion) and the UK (2.1 billion euros). Danish and Swiss Consumers spend the most on organic products: more than 130 per year per capita.[4.4] Studies show that organic farming is a sector development in Africa, especially in countries in the southern part of the continent. An important factor in the development of organic agriculture in Africa is the demand for organic products in industrialized countries. More than 200,000 hectares are currently cultivated in this system. Based on the estimates presented global sales in 23 European countries, USA, Canada, Japan and Oceania were approximately 23-25 billion dollars in 2003 and 29-31 billion in 2005.
agricultural products and indications referring thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs entered into force in January 2007.[1.1] The other regulation, namely the new Council Regulation (EC no. 834/2007) in June 2007 on organic production and labeling of organic products defines organic production logo and labeling system was adopted by the Council of the European Union on 28 June 2007 and expected to enter into force on 1 January 2009 [1.2] Logo and Labeling: Current EU regulations on organic production set the administration of crops and livestock and how the processing of food and feed, because they can be labeled as organic. Compliance with EU regulations on organic products is also mandatory for EU products will carry logo farming. It is also mandatory to mention on the label and the code of the inspection body that inspects and certifies operators agriculture and organic products. This labeling scheme aims to make sure you and other consumers in the Member States of the European Union, the organic nature of the products they buy. EU logo is designed to enhance the recognition of organic products among consumers and act like national logos that you can see the products in your country. Currently, it is imperative that products comply with EU Regulation on organic production logo of the European bear, but this will become mandatory when the new Regulation will enter into force. Facts and Figures: Statistics show that many EU consumers, like you, looking for products bearing such labels and organic logo when buying vegetables or they choose a dish at a restaurant or cafeteria. Studies estimate that the market for organic products grows by 10-15% a year. The European market for organic products is approx. 20 billion per year 18.5% of the agricultural area of Austria is grown organically, which makes it EU countries with the highest percentage of agricultural land for organic production in the country. The following places ranks Sweden, a country where 12.6% of the total agricultural area is cultivated organically, Estonia - 10.5% and the Czech Republic - 9.4%. Agricultural area devoted to organic farming across Europe has increased tenfold since 1994, when totaled 1% of arable land by 2009, it totaled 9.3% Year by year Total organic area is still increasing in the EU and Norway.
16
The total organic area in EU-27 (i.e. the fully converted area and area under conversion) continues to show an upward trend. The increase in area between 2007 and 2008 was 7.4 %, as compared with 5.9 % between 2006 and 2007.
Table 1 Total organic area 2008(ha) and % changes 2007-2008
From 2007 to 2008, Belgium, Bulgaria, Greece, Spain, Hungary, Slovakia and the United Kingdom recorded growth of over 10 %. Although Italy led the European Union in the organic farming sector in recent years, the area under organic crops in Italy actually fell by 12.9 %. During the same period, the organic area in Spain increased by 33.3 % [4.8]
17
The size of the organic area differs considerably from one Member State to another. In terms of the total organic area of each Member State as a share out of the total organic area in EU-27, 4 countries together accounted for around 50 % in 2008: the United Kingdom (9.4 %), Germany (11.7 %), Italy (12.9 %) and Spain (17.0 %).[3.1]
18
In 2009 the market for organic products in Germany was 5.8 billion. Number of organic producers Rise by 9.5 % between 2007 and 2008. In 2008, there were a total of 196 200 organic producers in the EU-27. Germany, Greece, Spain and Austria each accounted for over 10 % of the EU-27 total, with Italy out in front on 22.6 %. In 12 countries the share was less than 1 % .[4.7]
19
Table 4
Between 2007 and 2008 the number of organic producers in the EU-27 rose by 9.5 %. The highest rate of increase, 40.2 %, was in the Czech Republic. In 6 countries (Denmark, Italy, Lithuania, Romania, Finland and the United Kingdom) falls were registered, ranging from -0.9% in Lithuania to as much as -13.4 % in Romania.[4.6] The data, published by the Austrian newspaper Wiener Zeitung, based on a special report of the Court of Auditors on the check control systems, production and distribution of organic and biological and Agerpres quoted, shows that in the year 2009, first place in the ranking of the largest collections made from the sale of food and drinks came in Germany - with 5.8 billion, followed by France - to 3.04 billion EUR, United Kingdom - 2, 07 billion EUR, Italy - 1, 5 billion, Spain - EUR 0.91 billion and Austria - to 0.87 billion EUR.
20
And in 2010 Germany is the second largest market for organic products in the world with a value of 6 billion. Studies also show that the rate of consumption of organic products increased in 2010 to two billion U.S. dollars, with $ 340 million in France and $ 300 million in Germany. Commission data shows that the market for organic products has grown rapidly in the EU, recording annual growth rates of over 10% in the last 20 years. European market for organic food amounts to a value of around 20 billion annually, representing an estimated market share of 1.5% of the food market as a whole. Romania: 300,000 ha organically grown in 2011, 10,000 organic operators and a market of 80 million EUR.Surface organic cultivation increased from 260,000 ha in 2010 to about 300,000 ha in 2011, but compared to 9 million ha of agricultural land area is still insignificant. [2.1]And the number of organic operators grew in 2011 to 2008-2010, reaching 10,000. Most of these are but small areas and a small number of animals. Romanian market of organic products totaling presently about 80 million, while exports of these products are estimated to be worth 200 million in 2011, twice more than in 2010, according to estimates Agriculture Operators Association eco - Bio Romania.[2.3] Romania export and import raw material processed organic products in Germany, Austria and Belgium: As in previous years, most exported cereals, honey, berries and very few processed products such as cheese, wine and bread products. European countries are the main export markets for organic products in Romania, Germany, Austria and Belgium are among the countries importing raw materials obtained massive local ecological system, but also the leading supplier of processed organic products on the Romanian market.[2.2] Regarding the consumption of organic products is estimated by Bio Romania about 80 million, half of this amount from Romanian products, or honey, wine and bread, and half of the imports made especially for large retailers. The Partnership between European Union and U.S.A. EU and U.S. sign a historic partnership in trade in organic products European Union and the United States announced on February 15, 2012 that as of June 1 2012, certified organic products in the EU or U.S. can be sold as organic products either of these two regions. This partnership between the two largest producers of organic world will build a solid construction that will promote organic farming contributing to the development of this sector, to create jobs and business creation globally.
21
In total, the U.S. organic products and EU together worth about 40 billion euros, a figure that increases from year to year. Formal letters establishing partnerships were signed on 15 February 2012 in Germany, Nuremberg, The Dacian Ciolos, European Commissioner for Agriculture and Rural Development, Kathleen Merrigan, deputy secretary the Ministry of Agriculture and U.S. Ambassador Isi Siddiqui, chief agricultural negotiator in the U.S. trade representative. Signing Ceremony World Fair held products BioFach organic, the largest event of its kind in the world. "... The agreement has a dual value added. On the one hand, farmers and food producers green will have access easier, with less bureaucracy and fewer costs to U.S. markets and EU, which will strengthen the competitiveness of the sector. In addition, increases transparency standards for organic products and the level of consumer confidence, and their ability to recognize organic food and products, "said European Commissioner for Agriculture and Rural Development, Dacian Ciolo.[4.9] Before concluding this agreement, growers and companies wanting to market produced by both sides of the Atlantic had to obtain certificates of conformity given two different standards, which meant doubling fees, controls and moves bureaucratic. This agreement eliminates barriers, especially for small and medium sized organic products. All products which qualify partnership can be marketed and labeled as food, meat, cereals and wine certified organic. [5.0] Although there are slight differences between the rules in the U.S. and EU in the field of organic farming both individually decided that their programs are virtually equivalent, except prohibition on the use of antibiotics. U.S. Department of Agriculture regulations (USDA) organic farming ban the use of antibiotics, unless it is trying to control invasive bacterial infections (bacterial fire) affecting orchard apples and pears. EU regulations on organic farming only allow the use of antibiotics to treat infected animals. Under this partnership, not be used antibiotics for any reason, which must be verified by the certification agency. In addition, all products are traded under the partnership be transported to an export certificate for organic products. This document must indicate the place of production, to identify the organization that certified organic product, verify that were not used prohibited substances and methods, to ascertain whether the terms of the partnership were and ensure the traceability of products traded.[4.7] Both sides are committed to ensuring that all organic products that will be subject fulfill the terms of trade partnership and that they maintain full ecological properties on the route from farm to point of sale. DG Agriculture and Rural Development Commission and the national program for organic
22
products (National Organic Program) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture - which oversees all products U.S. green - will assume important roles surveillance.
development of domestic demand for organic products, brand promotion export country. Specific factors can be deduced, mostly from the development of this sector globally. Subsidies have also a significant impact on the development of organic agriculture. Most of all, they were designed to support the introduction of agricultural land conversion process. However, farming subsidies represent only a fraction of the total volume of subsidies to agriculture (0.7% in 2010). In 2007 was stimulated ecological agricultural production by allocating EUR 2 million MDL. In the period 2007-2008, support was given to partially offset the costs incurred during the conversion of conventional agricultural production to organic production, and since 2009 it has added marketing boost organic production. [5.2] But the local market is underdeveloped because of barriers related to marketplace and promotion of national export of organic products is anemic or nonexistent. It can be seen proper marketing for organic products even internally. Producers on their own and their association with the purpose of solving the problems of the sector and promote local and foreign market production is reduced. Development of complex marketing strategies by each manufacturer is a difficult, expensive and hard to argue.[5.1] Organic farming has expanded rapidly in Moldova in recent years. Organic crops dominate this sector. During 2003-2011, certified organic cultivated areas increased from 80 ha to 22 102 ha (x270 times). As the analysis shows the annual compound growth period (102%), cultivated areas have doubled on average every year. The role of subsidies can hardly be disputed dynamics of this process, though, can not be proven sufficient stability in their promotion. In 2011, certified organic surfaces constituted 0.9% of all land area in Moldova Figure 1 Statistical surface cultivated with organic products
24
Structurally, most green areas were cultivated with cereals, vineyards and protein crops. Small area of grassland illustrates underdevelopment organic livestock farming sector, which is based on intensive grazing on green pastures.
Over 170 producers were trained in organic farming in 2011 (7% of the total number of companies in agriculture). Number of farmers increased by a compound annual rate of 41% during 2003-2011. According to forecasts, the number will exceed 260 by 2015.[5.1] Moldovan agricultural exports is mainly oriented towards traditional markets of CIS, emerging markets, unstable now. Exports to these countries requires large risks. Reduction export of agricultural products are influenced by a number of factors including the reduced competitiveness of local agricultural production on the domestic and external market due to poor quality and safety, such markets. Consumers ever-increasing demands of today, especially on EU markets and other countries around the world, not only require guarantees that the products they buy are quality, but more and more requests additional confirmation of the quality and safety of the products they consume. They prefer organic products / clean green GM and demand for such products is increasing.
25
For example SGS company in Moldova is member of SGS International Group (Societe Generale de Surveillance) registered and certified over 15 million hectares of agricultural land, which produces nuts, grapes, wine, vegetable oil and ethereal, fruits and vegetables, grains, berries, honey green etc. Certification is made in accordance with European regulation for Organic Production. (EC) 834/2007, with the aim certification of agricultural production, crop production, livestock production, aquaculture animal production, beekeeping production, wild crop. The majority ecological products are exported and they are also requested on the local market.[1.3] On 11.02.2011 was adopted the Law on ecological food production that requires mandatory labeling of organic products and organic agricultural production in line with EU rules.[1.4] The Low describes the methods and principles of organic farming in crop and animal production, describes possible methods of treatment and tillage, fertilizer and organic materials permitted maintenance conditions of the animals, etc.. By law, national brand Organic Agriculture Republic of Moldova is applied only on products that meet ecological standards. National mark will indicate where they were agricultural raw materials from which it is manufactured. If the raw material is grown abroad will be applied Organic brand non - Moldova. Organic brand / non - Moldova will be applied if the part of the raw material was raised in the country, and the other part - outside. Organic brand - the EU will be used if the raw materials are cultivated in the EU.[4.8] Right to use national brand Organic Agriculture- Republic of Moldova on products, labels and packaging of agricultural products will get companies that produce, process, import, export and / or made organic food products registered in the Ministry of Agriculture and Food Industry. Regulation of import and export of organic products will be developed by the competent authorities and approved by the government. Organic food product imported from third countries may be placed on the Moldovan market for the fulfillment of certain conditions.[5.2] The law provides for the development of organic agriculture in Moldova will be promoted to farmers subsidy fund created annually in the state budget structure. As was reported earlier, generally organic food products in Moldova produce about 100 companies that will receive the appropriate national brand. Ministry of Agriculture has already 65 companies who want to receive it. Companies that will produce organic food products will receive state aid in obtaining international certificates of compliance and security that would facilitate exports and domestic achievement priority
26
Thus Republic of Moldova is situated in a geographical area with extremely favorable climatic conditions and very fertile soils, the combination of which represents a huge opportunity for the agricultural sector of national economy and allows a rich harvest high quality without the need of intensive application of various chemicals and inorganic fertilizers or non-synthetic chemicals. It is however necessary to comply with the requirements of international standards and national production
27
Conclusion
Converting traditional agriculture to organic farming is a complex operation involving high risk and serious problems, both technical and economic. It was discussed that organic farming is more costly than the conventional one, mainly because the labor input is higher and yields are lower. Inevitably, organic farming needs more internal inputs, as well as labor. Developing and less developed countries have some advantages that they have rather low external input use and often an unused and underused labor. This movement in the those countries can make a considerable contribution to developing efforts with high export capacity, if they could successfully cope with some important obstacles related to production knowhow, organization and marketing. A gradualist approach is advised to lower the amount of offfarms inputs. On the other hand, a strict certification procedure is enforced. It reveals a dilemma in promoting organic farming. The only solution for farmers is tobe able to receive a premium price for organic products in a rather stable market structure. At the beginning, this could be realized by support policies as in the EU. It is well known that in the Union, there are some national support schemes such as conversion grants or aids as well as Union wide structural instruments and regulations. Due to the lack of the domestic market, this could be achieved only through vertical coordination between producers and export oriented marketing or processing firms through contract farming. Development of organic farming both in the developed and developing countries will be dependent on the evolution of market structure and performance. Sound adoption and dissemination efforts are needed to help existing nonorganic farmers convert at least some of their production to organic methods, or to assist those who want to begin organic farming as well as the existing organic producers. Availability of related organization and proper supporting policies are very important for the development of organic agricultural movement. Organizing under a farmer owned organization is very important for the small scaled farms. For example, a well organized farming association can offer advisory services not only for the purpose of inspection and the authorities use of the associations brand name, but also for marketing benefits. For instance, most of the German organic farming association standards are stricter than the standards, which are included in the EU Regulation (Buley et al., 1997). The entire food chain from the field through processing and trade to the market is subject to inspection where the importing of the organic products is concerned.
28
From the above figures, we can see the development of organic farming in the world. Although Organic Agriculture is not dominating the continent yet. But in European Union seems to be a real interest in this form of agriculture. For example, Germany has set an ambitious goal: to achieve a 20% share of organic farming in total cultivated areas and Austria has already a share of 10% currently. For Moldovan citizens could be a huge opportunity to establish a more ecological agriculture, little by little, to replace subsistence agriculture, prevalent at this time in the country. Strategically quality objective of the sector organic positioning in national agricultural center as a pivotal period in the development of rural areas. Moldova has great opportunities for promoting and developing the ecological agriculture due to an agricultural area of 2.25 million hectares and unpolluted soils. To develop the organic sector in Moldova are necessary following measures: 1. Increasing the role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in this sector by programs to develop trade with organic products; 2. Increasing the number of exporters actively involved in programs of ecological agricultural trade development in disadvantaged areas; 3. Supporting commercial operation in organic farming to be more often encountered in the market; 4. Association of small producers of organic farming for cooperation in marketing organic products; 5. Increasing the number of projects for direct foreign investment 6. Increasing investment in export-related activities in rural areas 7. Increasing the volume of organic production 8. Increased investment in activities related to organic products exported from less developed rural areas. 9. Increasing the number of new companies involved in exporting primary products and processed organic farming Thus Republic of Moldova is a country with a huge potential in organic production, because the grounds are not chemicalized so much, therefore organic agriculture can be practiced successfully.
29
Bibliography
II Books:
2.1. Letitia Zahiu. Agricultura Uniunii Europene sub impactul politicii agricole commune. Bucuresti: Editura Ceres 2006. P.26 2.2. Charles Walters, C.J. Fenzau. Eco-Farm.p.57 2.3. I. Toncea, Ghid practiced agricultura ecologica.Cluj-Napoca: Editura AcademicPres 2002.p.30
III Articles:
3.1. Area under organic farming increased by 7.4% between 2007 and 2008 in the EU-27 - Statistics in
focus 10/2010
IV Websites:
4.1. www.madr.ro 4.2.www.miepo.md 4.3.www.eafacere.ro 4.4.www.ecomagazin.ro 4.5.www.agro-bucuresti.ro 4.6.http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Organic_farming_statistics
30
4.7http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Organic_farming_statistics_%E2 %80%94_setting_higher_standards 4.8.www.ecologie.md 4.9.www.adevarul.ro 5.0. www.ec-europa.eu 5.1. www.statistica.md 5.2 http://data.worldbank.org
31