Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stress Fast Food
Stress Fast Food
Psychology Together
teacher understands your difficulty and helps you to plan a more realistic deadline for example, you are more likely to recover from this stage. Stage Three - Exhaustion. ACTH and corticosteroids in the blood stream prevent further release of ACTH (negative feedback). If the stressor was removed during the resistance phase blood sugar will gradually return to normal. If the stressor was not dealt with this prolonged exposure means that higher brain centres will override the negative feedback and maintain the pituitary-adrenal excitation. This leads to wear and tear on the tissues, fatigued muscles and damage to the endocrine glands and kidneys. Selye referred to these as diseases of adaptation or stress related illness. (See stress and physical illness for evidence). There is no point trying to avoid your teacher! Admit defeat and explore ways of discussing an extension if possible! Summary evaluation of GAS *It is a good and thorough explanation of the physiology of stress. You need to use the findings of Selyes' work to back this point up. *The non-specific nature of the responses has been questioned - in other words, do we all respond in exactly the same way as the three stages suggest? Some of you will be un-phased by a teacher requesting work, others will be really worried. You can use the evidence of stress modifiers to back up this claim. (See individual differences and stress modification) *The psychological effects and response to the stressor have not been accounted for in the GAS model. Psychological effects are poor cognitive skills, negative emotional states and poor coping mechanisms, based of maladaptive experiential learning for example. You can use the individual differences evidence for the effects of stressors and the stress management evidence to support the claim that some people can respond differently through employing techniques. (See stress management).
-*-
Anything can cause the stress response if it is perceived and evaluated as a stressor
-*Psychology Together
use indirect methods such as questionnaires (to ask about illness and stress), or direct methods such as taking blood samples to measure the reduction in T cells, evidence of coronary heart disease or cancer Thinking about the methods used, gives you an automatic line of thinking for evaluation (see research methods, advantages and disadvantages of methods used). Most examination questions will require you to know ONE study in detail to show the relationship between stress and a named illness, either cardiovascular disorders (CHD or coronary heart disease) or effects on the immune system (vulnerability to colds etc.). The examiners can ask you to: *Give any 2 of the following: aims, procedure, findings, conclusion and implications of one study researching the effects of stress on the cardiovascular system. Use Friedman and Rosenman (see key studies) *Give any 2 of the following: aims, procedure, findings, conclusion and implications of one study researching the effects of stress on the immune system. Use Kiecolt and Glaser (see key studies). Examiners may vary the request between any combination, e.g. give aims and findings, give procedure and conclusion, give aims and implication. Remember that there will be 3 marks fro each so you will to be accurate, identify the answer clearly and elaborate. For a part C question DO NOT simply regurgitate the aims etc. - read the question and write in essay style to answer the question, e.g. One study that researched the relationship between stress and cardiovascular disorders was Friedman and Rosenmans study on........., at the end of the detail refer back to the question....'they found that they was a definite relationship between Type A people and cardiovascular disorders'. This answering of the question set, as opposed to just jotting down the correct content is the discriminator between E, D, C, B and A grade candidates. Read the question carefully and respond appropriately. In addition to the two key studies related to this area, it is useful to have at least two more findings, to use in a longer essay section or for evaluation.
Examples of other findings: Sweeney (1995) found that stressed groups with injuries did not heal as quickly, therefore remaining 'ill' longer. Kiecolt-Glaser (1995) found that highly stressed Alzheimer carers took 9 days longer to heal after injury, again, remaining 'ill' longer than less stressed people.
Psychology Together
Brady's monkeys could be used for any stress and illness question which does not specify the illness as cardiovascular or immune. Increased stress hormones caused ulcers and death. Remember that Weiner's study on army recruits validates Brady's findings on animals
Psychology Together