Complex Families Community Budgets EssexFamily Deep Dive Analysis by Tonic Consultants Matthew Scott

LSSLkIAMIL
uLL ulvL AnAL?SlS

hase 1: roblem-lramlng
verslon 6
urpose: 1o sumulaLe furLher quesuons and lnform debaLe
SLC1ICN 1
ro[ecL Cvervlew
2
hase 1
SPA8Lu
8C8LLM
l8AMlnC
hase 2
SCLu1lCn
lMAClnlnC
hase 3
8C1C1?lnC
8ulLu, 1LS1, 8LllnL
MA?
SL1
CnWA8uS
SN1nLSIS
WCkkSnCS
- core team
- Loca||ty |eads
LCCAL
DLCISICNS 1C
GC LIVL
Stakeho|der
engagement
"Commun|ty 8udget"
conversanon
Strateg|c
Comms
Shared
keecnon &
Learn|ng
Shared
keecnon &
Learn|ng
Shared
keecnon &
Learn|ng
Lva|uanon
Des|gn
Lva|uanon
Starts
Cpportun|nes to sca|e
rep||cate & de-
comm|ss|on
App||canon to
w|der system
Lssex-Wlde
new servlces for
lCn
Local & Lssex
Wlde
LLhnography
1he ubllc Cmce
Workshops
uemocrauc
LngagemenL
uemocrauc
LngagemenL
Lngage
wlLh
famllles
Lxplorauon wlLh
pracuuoners &
managers
rogramme
undersLandlng Lhe
daLa
lramework for
meanlngful
engagemenL
wlLh famllles &
communlues
racuuoner
engagemenL
Lvldence base
harnessed
Servlce
deslgn for
lCn
ueslgn of fundlng
mechanlsms
Lngage
wlLh
famllles
uaLa analysls /
urlll uown
Larly
lnLervenuon
servlce deslgn
erformance
frameworks
explorauon /
deslgn
uemocrauc engagemenL
new servlces
for lCn
new
servlces
for lCn
new servlces
for lCn
new
servlces
for lCn
LngagemenL wlLh famllles,
communlues, pracuuoner &
managers
Local
CommunlLy
8udgeLs Co
Llve ??
Lmerglng new
Ll approaches
key:
1nL DLSIGN kCCLSS
Learnlng from
lls Workshop
Department for Lducanon Dehn|non
2 of famllles ln 8rlLaln experlence ve or more of Lhe baskeL of
dlsadvanLages llsLed below:
lamlly llves ln poor quallLy or overcrowded houslng,
no parenL has any quallcauons,
MoLher has menLal healLh problems,
AL leasL one parenL has a longsLandlng llmlung lllness, dlsablllLy or
lnrmlLy,
lamlly has low lncome (below 60 of Lhe medlan), or
lamlly cannoL aord a number of food and cloLhlng lLems.
Lssex n|dden narm keport Dehn|non
lamllles llvlng ln Lhe same household as chlldren aged under 18 years
(Lhls could be adapLed Lo 0-19, up Lo 23 lf Lhe young person has a learnlng
dlmculLy or dlsablllLy - Lo reecL prevlous Chlldren 1rusL denluon)
1bls pots o cleotet boooJoty otoooJ tbe fomlly oolt
Where one or more of Lhe resldenL famlly members e.g. parenLs, carers or
slbllngs have slgnlcanL vulnerablllues
1bls tecoqolses tbot ooy membet(s) of tbe fomlly coolJ be tbe slqolfcoot
loJlvlJool(s) ooJ tbetefote locotpototes botb oJolt ooJ cbllJteo setvlces
ptlotlues
vulnerablllues are drug mlsuse, alcohol mlsuse, oendlng behavlour,
menLal healLh problems, domesuc abuse, anu soclal behavlour, houslng
problems l.e. renL arrears or LhreaL of evlcuon
1bese oppeot to be tbe key Jomolos ftom tbe teseotcb bose
And Lhe vulnerablllLy ls lmpacung negauvely on a chlld, lncludlng where a
chlld has been Laken lnLo care Lemporarlly as a resulL of Lhese
vulnerablllues
1bls tefoloq ockoowleJqes oJolt ooJ cbllJteo setvlces ptlotlues, e.q.
commoolty petcepuoo of A58 ls o key ptlotlty lJeoufeJ - cc sotvey ooJ
5ofet ssex
A famlly can be consldered Lo
have complex needs when
members of Lhe lmmedlaLe
famlly have muluple
dlsadvanLages and/or
vulnerablllues LhaL lmpacL
negauvely on Lhemselves and
Lhelr chlldren, and poLenually
oLher famlly members and
Lhe communlLy
1erms
lor Lhe LssexIam||y rogramme, Lhe followlng
Lerms have been used:
- ulsadvanLages" - CovernmenL denluon from
Lhe 1hlnk lamlly reporL
- vulnerablllues" - Lssex Pldden Parm reporL
- Chlld" - dened as someone under Lhe age of
19 (or under 23 wlLh Speclal Lducauon needs)
Work|ng Dehn|non of
Iam|||es w|th Comp|ex Needs
Working Hypotheses
- lL ls posslble Lo reduce Lhe dependency of lndlvldual
famllles & lmprove Lhelr long Lerm ouLcomes, Lhrough
whole famlly sLrengLhenlng lnLervenuons
IAMIL
- lL ls posslble Lo harness communlLy capaclLy Lo lmprove
long-Lerm capablllLy & reslllence of famllles wlLh complex
needs
CCMMUNI1
- lL ls posslble Lo develop scaleable approaches LhaL wlll
boLh lmprove ouLcomes, reduce lmmedlaLe cosLs, and
dellver slgnlcanL long-Lerm savlngs
LSSLk
CCkL kINCILLS
lamllles wlll achleve beuer long-Lerm ouLcomes lf
Lhey are able Lo ldenufy and bulld on Lhelr sLrengLhs,
capablllues and condence so Lhey can Lhrlve as a
famlly, lndependenL from Lhe lnLervenuons of publlc
servlce provlders. Iam|||es w||| be |nvo|ved as acnve
partners |n determ|n|ng what w||| work for them.
Acnve |nvo|vement of commun|nes |s key to success.
We wlll engage communlues, as cluzens, resources
and nelghbour, ln shaplng and conLrlbuung Lo local
responses. lamllles wlLh complex needs wlll become
valued paruclpanLs ln Lhelr own communlues.
We w||| take an |ntennona| and systemanc |earn|ng
approach. We wlll LesL dlerenL soluuons ln dlerenL
areas, respondlng, adapung and renlng as we go,
learnlng from mlsLakes as well as successes. ln dolng
so we wlll grow a culLure and processes LhaL enable
us Lo conunuously adapL and learn, wlLhln a sysLem
LhaL has fewer of Lhe sLrucLures and hlerarchles LhaL
lmpede lnnovauon.
Approaches we deve|op !"#$"% the pro[ect w|||
be usefu| &'()%* the pro[ect, conLalnlng lessons
and Lechnlques LhaL can be applled, wlLh
approprlaLe local amendmenLs, for famllles
across Lhe CounLy. new approaches wlll be
susLalnable, faclllLaung a shl ln malnsLream
sysLems Lo dellver more eecuve early
lnLervenuon for chlldren and famllles.
We w||| take a bo|d, non-trad|nona| approach
to resources. We wlll recongure budgeLs and
fundlng Lo lncenuvlse [olned-up, co-owned
responses. We wlll ldenufy and moblllse all
resources LhaL can be deployed ln achlevlng
beuer ouLcomes for famllles, lncludlng
resources wlLhln famllles and communlues
Lhemselves, and ln Lhe prlvaLe, soclal lnnovauon
and volunLary and communlLy secLors.
We w||| support a|| th|s w|th a comm|tment to
honesty and cha||enge, be|ng brave enough to
have the 'conversanons that mauer' even
when |t's d|mcu|t.
- lncreased condenL
auLhorlLauve parenung
- 8educuon ln subsLance
mlsuse
- lmproved menLal healLh
- 8eady and able Lo work /
ln susLalnable employmenL
- SLablllLy of sulLable
houslng
- 8educed rellance on
beneLs
- Able Lo play a posluve parL
ln communlLy
- 8euer healLh and
wellbelng
- 8educed crlmlnal
lnvolvemenL
AdulLs (arenLs)
- 8euer auendance
and aualnmenL aL
school
- 8euer physlcal and
emouonal healLh
and wellbelng
- Able Lo play a
posluve parL ln
Lhelr communlLy
- Safeguarded and
proLecLed
- 8eady for school
and Lhe world of
work
Chlldren &
?oung eople
- ConLrlbuLe Lhelr
energles, ambluons
and ldeas
- lully engaged ln
shared problem
framlng
- Co-deslgnlng beuer
servlce responses
wlLh pracuuoners
- 1anglble
lmprovemenLs ln
local quallLy of llfe
Communlues
- lncrease ln shared
accounLablllLy: allgnlng
eorL & money
- 8emoval of bureaucracy
LhaL does noL lmprove
ouLcomes
- lnLenuonal deslgnlng
ouL need for some
servlces
- Lmergence of new
models of fundlng &
reward for long-Lerm
lnvesLmenL
- 8educuon ln crlsls
spendlng and need for
fuLure fallure servlces
Lhrough lnvesLmenL ln
early lnLervenuon
- Savlngs reallsed
ubllc Servlces
- Meanlngful
democrauc
engagemenL wlLh
cluzens balanced
wlLh approprlaLe
pollucal leadershlp
- 8ulldlng lnnovauon
capaclLy across Lhe
counLy
- uevelopmenL of a
more porous,
exlble markeL for
dellverlng
lmproved publlc
ouLcomes
Lssex SysLem
1kILL 1kACk AkCACn
1. Securlng beuer ouLcomes for famllles wlLh Lhe mosL complex needs ln 3 places across Lhe counLy
2. Shllng Lhe malnsLream sysLem Lo dellver more eecuve early lnLervenuon Lo famllles everywhere
3. Crowlng & embeddlng a robusL lnfrasLrucLure for lnnovauve, responslve and cosL-eecuve democrauc publlc servlces
AM8I1ICN
lamllles Lhrlvlng ln lndependence from governmenL lnLervenuon, ln good healLh and wellbelng, wlLh a safe and nurLurlng
envlronmenL for Lhelr chlldren, and where posslble economlcally acuve and engaged posluvely ln Lhe communlLy
CU1CCMLS IkAMLWCkk
LSSLx CCMMunl1?
8uuCL1
S1LLkING GkCU
LSSLx A81nL8SPl (LS)
Cr
LSSLx PLAL1P & WLLL8LlnC 8CA8u
CLn18AL
CCvL8nMLn1
8ICnAkD GkCU &
WnI1LnALL
CnAMICN
LSSLx CCMMunl1?
8uuCL1
CCkL kCILC1 1LAM
LSSLx CCMMunl1?
8uuCL1
1ASk & IINISn
GkCUS
LCCALl1lLS
1o estab||sh the|r own
governance
arrangements
GCVLkNANCL
SUMMAk
SLC1ICN 2
roblem lramlng Analysls: Case SLudles, uaLa Analysls & Cosungs
9
Summary of Deep D|ve I|nd|ngs
System highly complex to navigate (e.g. numerous
assessments, recording systems, structures)
High immediate costs are met by local agencies
Average cost 139k per family per year (NB: many costs
not included here)
Long-term impact on family members intergenerational
transmission & poor outcomes
Up to 90% of spend is reactive/failure costs; only 6%
invested in strengthening the family
Data Analysis: Local Headlines
Basildon
422 families @ 59m
Castle Point & Rochford
235 families @ 33m
Colchester
286 families @ 40m
Harlow
215 families @ 30m
Tendring
320 families @ 45m
NEXT STEPS
Data book for each locality & hotspot
identification
Methodology & support for developing
case studies in localities
1. A CCMLLk SS1LM
1he Lssex Pldden Parm reporL and Lhe
Collaborauon ro[ecL ln CasLle olnL &
8ochford show LhaL Lhe sysLem of publlc
servlces ln Lssex ls complex for famllles wlLh
muluple problems. 1hese ndlngs have been
echoed ln our analysls of case sLudles
1he followlng dlagrams show Lhe number of
assessmenLs, recordlng sysLems and agencles
LhaL a Lyplcal famlly wlLh complex needs mlghL
encounLer
12
MoJ MoI
Lxamp|e of Mu|np|e Assessments & kepornng Structures 1: Ch||dren
Connexions YOS Locality Team School
Childrens Services
DfE
FIP worker/
parenting
practitioner
Child
Protection
Social Worker
Youth
Offending -
Prevention
Youth
Offending -
Reactive
Education
Welfare Officer
Personal
Careers
Advisor
A
S
S
E
T

C
o
r
e

P
l
u
s

Connex|ons CS Loca||ty 1eam Schoo|
D
a
t
a

R
e
t
u
r
n
s

Lssex Ch||dren's Serv|ces
DfL
ll worker/
parenung
pracuuoner
Chlld roLecuon
Soclal Worker
?ouLh Cendlng
- revenuon
?ouLh Cendlng
- SLaLuLory
Lducauon
Welfare Cmcer
ersonal
Careers Advlsor
A
S
S
E
T

C
o
r
e

P
l
u
s

Funding
Database
Assessment
13
MoI ] NCMS
Lxamp|e Mu|np|e Assessments & kepornng Structures 2: Adu|ts
Connexions YOS Locality Team School
Childrens Services
FIP worker/
parenting
practitioner
Child
Protection
Social Worker
Youth
Offending -
Prevention
Education
Welfare Officer
Personal
Careers
Advisor
LDAA1
Adu|t Soc|a|
Care
Menta| nea|th
Lssex robanon
8oard
D
a
t
a
b
a
s
e

Lssex Adu|t nea|th & Commun|ty We||be|ng 8oard
nC
ollce
AdulL MenLal
PealLh Servlce
Soclal Work
1eam
robauon
CommunlLy
SubsLance
Mlsuse Servlce
D
a
t
a
b
a
s
e

Dn CLG DW
N
D
T
M
S

P
N
C

Funding
Database
Assessment
N
A
T
M
S

o||ce 8oard
14
D|str|ct Counc||
& nous|ng Assoc|anons
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t

2. CASL S1UDILS
ML1nCDCLCG
1he followlng 3 case sLudles show a recenL 12 monLh perlod ln Lhe llves of a famlly wlLh complex
needs. 1hey were Laken from an lnlual ouLllne of 20 cases, and a broadly represenLauve sample
was Laken from Lhese
Lach horlzonLal llne represenLs a member of Lhe lmmedlaLe famlly
Lach box represenLs an lnLeracuon wlLh a publlc servlce, colour-coded by organlsauon
uslng local and nauonal unlL cosL daLa, where avallable, we have lllusLraLed:
Pow much each famlly has cosL Lhe publlc purse over LhaL year
Whlch agency pays
WheLher Lhe money could be consldered Lo be lnvesLmenL" ln sLrengLhenlng Lhe famlly Lo
prevenL fuLure problems or reacuve" or fallure" cosLs where servlces have Lo reacL Lo a
problem
Lhe esumaLes presenLed here should be consldered very conservauve, because:
each case sLudy was bullL from a slngle agency perspecuve. 1here may well be oLher servlces
lnvolved wlLh a famlly whlch were unknown Lo LhaL agency
cosLs of every day publlc servlces such as schoollng and vlslLs Lo Cs were noL lncluded
we do noL have slghL of or cosLs for some lnLeracuons such as mulu agency meeungs
we have noL consldered Lhe cosL of beneLs recelved by famllles
noL all nouonal cosLs (e.g. Lruancy, school excluslon) have been lncluded, due Lo dlmculLy of
aurlbuung cosLs Lo local agencles
1he current pub||c serv|ce response to the
needs of comp|ex fam|||es means that costs
are |ncurred across a range of pub||c serv|ces
13
CPlLu 1 (0)
MuM
uAu 2
LSSLkIAMIL CASL S1UD 1
Chaonc Iam||y
MonLh 1 MonLh 2 MonLh 3 MonLh 4
MonLh 3 MonLh 6 MonLh 7 MonLh 8 MonLh 9 MonLh 10 MonLh 11 MonLh 12
MonLh 1 MonLh 2 MonLh 3 MonLh 4 MonLh 3 MonLh 6 MonLh 7 MonLh 8 MonLh 9 MonLh 10 MonLh 11 MonLh 12
kL:
Ch||dren's Serv|ces
Adu|t Serv|ces
Ma[or Inc|dent
o||ce
NnS
robanon
Court
nous|ng
CPlLu 2 (3)
CPlLu 3 (12)
uAu 1
CPlLu 4 (13)
lamlly
Croup
Conference
lamlly
Croup
Conference
lamlly
Croup
Conference
Supervlsed ConLacL 3 umes a week
Supervlsed ConLacL weekly
rlson - 3 monLhs
Women's
8efuge
Pouse llre
Pouse llre
losLer care
losLe rcare
losLer care
ollce
Call ouL
ollce
Call ouL
ollce
Call ouL
ollce
Call ouL
ollce
Call ouL
ollce
Call ouL
CCu81
ArresL
ArresL
1 year drug
LreaLmenL
1 year drug
LreaLmenL
1 year drug
LreaLmenL
lamlly care worker weekly
lnLenslve lamlly SupporL
sychlaLrlc
assessmenL
Lvlcuon
nouce &
Lvlcuon
lloaung supporL
1 years robauon
1 years robauon
1 years robauon
Case Study 1: WnC AS?
1oLal CosL: 301,640
17
CPlLu 2 (14)
MuM
uAu 1
LSSLkIAMIL CASL S1UD 2 Large & n|gh|y Comp|ex Iam||y
kL:
Ch||dren's
Serv|ces
Adu|t Serv|ces
Ma[or Inc|dent
o||ce
NnS
robanon
Court
nous|ng
ln prlson
CPlLu 4 (11)
CPlLu 6 (2)
uAu 2
CPlLu 1 (17)
CPlLu 3 (12)
CPlLu 3 (3)
CPlLu 7 (0)
Chlld ln need - 1 vlslL per monLh
Chlld roLecuon lan - 30 vlslLs ln LoLal
Councll
clean up
house
CSC buy
beds,
furnlLure &
beddlng
ln courL
for Lhe
ArresLed
for Lhe
Lruanung
?CS
vlslL
?CS
vlslL
?CS
vlslL
?CS
vlslL
?CS
vlslL
?CS
vlslL
?CS
vlslL
?CS
vlslL
?CS
vlslL
A&L
for
ln[ury
PealLh
vlslLor
PealLh
vlslLor
PealLh
vlslLor
PealLh
vlslLor
PealLh
vlslLor
PealLh
vlslLor
Pouslng
problems -
nelghbour
complalnLs ollce
call ouL
AS8
ln hosplLal for
LreaLmenL of lllness - 8
weeks
1axl Lo
hosplLal
CuLpauenL
appL
CuLpauenL
appL
CuLpauenL
appL
CuLpauenL
appL
CuLpauenL
appL
1axl Lo
hosplLal
1axl Lo
hosplLal
1ruanung 1ruanung
Applled
for
evlcuon
ollce
call ouL
AS8
ln CourL for
evlcuon nouce
lamlly SupporL
lnLervenuon
Councll
clean up
house
CSC buy
beds,
furnlLure &
beddlng
LWC
arenung
assessmenL
aedlaLrlc
assessmenLs
lamlly CenLre lnLervenuon
MAA meeung
robauon meeungs forLnlghLly
A&L
33 hours per week care package
uv
lncldenL
uv
lncldenL
uv
lncldenL
uv
lncldenL
Counselllng
Counselllng
CverwelghL
3 monLhs
renL
arrears
School
excluslon
Lvlcuon
8aby born
1oLal CosL: 161,418
19
CPlLu 6 (0)
MuM
uAu
When Do We 8reak the Cyc|e?
kL:
Ch||dren's Serv|ces
Adu|t Serv|ces
Ma[or Inc|dent
o||ce
NnS
robanon
Court
nous|ng
Mum & Dads 5 previous children have all been taken into care whilst babies due to neglect, poor
parenting, homelessness, DV, lack of parenting capacity & unsafe social networks
Soclal
Worker
vlslL x
2
Soclal
Worker
vlslL x
2
Soclal
Worker
vlslL x
2
Soclal
Worker
vlslL x
4
Soclal
Worker
vlslL x
4
Soclal
Worker
vlslL x
4
Soclal
Worker
vlslL x
2
Soclal
Worker
vlslL x
2
Soclal
Worker
vlslL x
2
8aby
born
1aken
lnLo
fosLer
care
Care proceedlngs
Adopuon proceedlngs
Low level drug
problem - noL
engaged wlLh
servlces
On Child Protection plan as a child
Pregnant when 15 with first child, then
every year since
ArresLed
for Lhe
ln CourL
for Lhe
arenLal
assessmenL
SpeclallsL mldwlfe - lnLenslve
uv
lncldenL
uv
lncldenL
uv
lncldenL
uv
lncldenL
LvlcLed
LvlcLed
ueclared lnLenuonally Pomeless - SLaylng ln Lmergency 8&8
Assessed for
Lu buL below
Lhreshold for
supporL
MenLal PealLh
assessmenL, buL
below Lhreshold
for supporL
ollce call
ouL AS8
1oLal CosL: 113,964
21
CPlLu 1 (0,)
MuM
uAu
Lar|y Intervennon - arents w|th
vu|nerab|||nes
kL:
Ch||dren's
Serv|ces
Adu|t Serv|ces
Ma[or Inc|dent
o||ce
NnS
robanon
Court
nous|ng
Incapacity
benefits
Mum &
uad spllL
up
Low level LD
but no
services
received
uv
lncldenL -
assaulL
(whllsL
drunk)
re-blrLh &
core
assessmenL
8aby
born
SC8u &
mldwlfe
Leam for
10 days
PealLh vlslLor - announced & unannounced
Soclal
worker
vlslL x
2
Soclal
worker
vlslL x
2
Soclal
worker
vlslL x
2
Soclal
worker
vlslL x
2
Soclal
worker
vlslL x
2
Soclal
worker
vlslL x
2
Soclal
worker
vlslL x
4
Soclal
worker
vlslL x
4
Soclal
worker
vlslL x
4
Chlld roLecuon lan
arenung course
Chlld
roLecuon
Case
Conference
Alcohol
assessmenL
- buL dld
noL Lake up
servlce
uv
lncldenL
- assaulL
(whllsL
drunk)
MenLal PealLh Servlce - monLhly sesslons
lnpauenL
MP sLay
for 1
monLh
ln CourL
for
AssaulL
1 week
hosplLal
sLay
followlng
uv
lamlly
Croup
Conferen
ce
Chlld
roLecuon
Case 8evlew
robauon - weekly appolnLmenLs
ln CourL
for
AssaulL
ollce
break
door
down for
welfare
check
Supervlsed conLacL wlLh chlld - weekly aL conLacL cenLre
sychlaLrlc
assessmenL
lnLegraLed uomesuc Abuse rogramme
1oLal CosL: 161,418
23
CPlLu 2 (9)
MuM
SLep-uAu
LSSLkIAMIL CASL S1UD S
Cne ch||d |n care & one ch||d
at an ear|y stage
kL:
Ch||dren's
Serv|ces
Adu|t Serv|ces
Ma[or Inc|dent
o||ce
NnS
robanon
Court
nous|ng
CPlLu 1 (13)
Possible LD undiagnosed
arenung Classes
Not willing to engage with services or offers of support
Mulu
agency
meeung
called by
school
regnanL -
Lermlnauon
8eferral,
Lo lnlual
assessme
nL Leam
CAMPS
AssessmenL
CAMPS 1eenage Croup - weekly sesslon
ollce
call
ouL uv
ollce
call
ouL uv
ollce
call
ouL uv
ollce
call ouL
uv
ollce
call ouL
uv
klcked
ouL of
home by
parenLs
S20 Laken lnLo care - chlldren's home
SupporL group for
chlldren ln care
Soclal
worker
vlslL x
2
Soclal
worker
vlslL x
2
Soclal
worker
vlslL x
4
Lxcluded
from school
Soclal
worker
vlslL x
1
Soclal
worker
vlslL x
1
Soclal
worker
vlslL x
2
Soclal
worker
vlslL x
1
Soclal
worker
vlslL x
4
Medlauon & 8elnLegrauon servlce, weekly
Soclal
worker
vlslL x
4
Currently doing well at school risk factors present but no services used or concerns raised currently
Moved ouL of
home for 2
monLhs
Has two grow-up daughters from first marriage who
had both been in local authority care
ollce
call
ouL uv
Case Study S: WnC AS?
1oLal CosL: 67,201
23
Average Cost from Case Stud|es
1he followlng conservauve esumaLes have been made from Lhese
case sLudles:
8ange of cosLs per famlly = 31k - 302k per year
Average esumaLed cosL = 139k per year
lf a locallLy conslders Lhe lmpacL of lLs Lop 30 complex famllles,
Lhey could be cosung = 7m per year
Cur analysls shows LhaL 90 was spent on reacnve or fa||ure
costs and only 6 of spend was consldered Lo be lnvesLmenL ln
sLrengLhenlng Lhe famlly
26
Long-1erm Impact
INDIVIDUAL CCS1S
Some lncldenLs LhaL occur for famllles do noL
have an lmmedlaLe cosL value Lo publlc
servlces, however research demonsLraLes LhaL
some can have slgnlcanL long Lerm cosLs:
1ruancy from school: 44,468 (llfeume)
Lxcluslon from school: 63,831 (llfeume)
uomesuc vlolence: 19,707 (cosL Lo
socleLy)
8esearch shows LhaL a famlly wlLh severe
problems could cosL local servlces 230,000 -
330,000 ln a slngle year (5be[elJ nolom uolvetslty, 2006)
NA1ICNAL CCS1S
PealLh lnequallues resulL ln losL producuon of
31 bllllon
1he cosL Lo Lhe governmenL of hlgher beneL
paymenLs and losL Laxes resulung from healLh
lnequallues ls beLween 28 and 32 bllllon
Lhe dlrecL cosL Lo Lhe nPS of Lreaung lllness
and lll-healLh arlslng from healLh lnequallues
are esumaLed aL 3.3bn annually
IN1LkGLNLkA1ICNAL kC8LLMS
Chlldren of heroln-uslng parenLs are more
llkely Lo have problems wlLh anxleLy,
hyperacuvlLy, lnauenuon, lmpulslvlLy and
aggresslon, depresslon and worry
up Lo 70 of chlldren Laken lnLo care have
aL leasL one parenL wlLh a subsLance
mlsuse problem
63 of boys wlLh convlcLed faLhers go on
Lo be convlcLed Lhemselves
Chlldren of prlsoners have 3 umes Lhe rlsk
for menLal healLh problems
8esearch lndlcaLes LhaL chlldren who have
wlLnessed domesuc abuse are 2.3 umes
more llkely Lo develop serlous soclal and
behavloural problems Lhan oLher chlldren,
and Lhey are also more llkely Lo be
perpeLraLors or vlcums of domesuc abuse
as adulLs
5ootce. ssex nlJJeo notm kepott (2010)
27
Lconom|c case for change
Cur conservauve esumaLes show, Lhe 30 mosL
expenslve famllles ln each locallLy cosL a LoLal of 7m
per year ln dlrecL cosLs
Pow mlghL we lnvesL LhaL money more eecuvely, Lo
bulld capablllLy and reslllence raLher Lhan reacuve
lnLervenuons aer crlses?
1he dlagram on Lhe followlng page lllusLraLes a
poLenual commlsslonlng Lable aL locallLy level for
famllles wlLh complex needs, based on our case
sLudy analysls
28
1he Comm|ss|on|ng 1ab|e:
An Investment artnersh|p for the 1op S0 Iam|||es |n each Loca||ty
ECC
Childrens
Services
Essex
Probatio
n
Essex
Police
Health
CVS
District
Council
ECC Adult
Health &
Community
Wellbeing
MoJ:
Courts &
Prison
3.7m
(53%)
221k
(3%)
606k
(9%)
1.4m
(20%)
596k
(9%)
265k
(4%)
125k
(2%)
?
Others: DWP, Job
Centre Plus, Social
Landlords, Businesses,
Big Society etc.
?
lnvesLmenL
lund:
7m
Essex
Fire &
Rescue
170k
(2%)
29
3. NLLDS ANALSIS:
uaLa & LsumaLes
1he followlng slldes show known numbers and
esumaLes of famllles wlLh complex needs, and
vulnerable adulLs and chlldren ln order Lo
demonsLraLe Lhe poLenual scale of Lhe
challenge for Lhe 3 locallues
ln addluon, esumaLes have been made of Lhe
poLenual cosL of Lhese famllles ln each dlsLrlcL
30
Data nead||nes
Measure
Actual or
Estimate
TOTAL
across 6
districts Basildon
Castle
Point Colchester Harlow Rochford Tendring
Mothers in drug
treatment with dependent
children living with them
Actual
(NDTMS,
20010-11)
90 21 6 30 3 5 25
Lone Parents with 2 or
more dependent children
and no parent working
Actual
(ONS) 475 136 41 99 81 25 93
Families with multiple
problems and a child
experiencing problems
Estimate
(DfE) 582 153 54 120 74 36 145
Families with multiple
problems
Estimate
(SETF &
DfE)
1,479 422 140 286 215 95 320
Children living with
parents with drug misuse,
alcohol misuse and
mental health problems
Estimate
(Manning
et al,
2009) 1,760 438 204 414 205 195 304
Chaotic Families (10%)
Estimate
(Knowsley,
2010)
8,457 2,127 1,027 1,874 1,036 952 1,441
Estimated cost of families
with multiple problems
From case
study
estimates
(2011) 207m 59m 20m 40m 30m 13m 45m
31
LssexIam||y Complex lamllles: 1o be
deLermlned locally
MoLhers ln drug LreaLmenL wlLh dependenL
chlldren llvlng wlLh Lhem: nu1MS daLa
Lone arenL lamllles wlLh 2 or more
dependenL chlldren and no parenL worklng:
CnS daLa
lamllles wlLh muluple problems and chlld
experlenclng problems: sumote ftom uf
lamllles wlLh Muluple roblems: sumote of
2X (cobloet O[ce)
Chaouc lamllles: sumote of 10X (koowsley
cooocll)
lamllles where no adulL ls worklng: CnS daLa
All lamllles: CnS daLa
ML1PCuCLCC? lC8 CPA81S
1he number of famllles
engaged ln a lamlly
lnLervenuon rogramme
(ll) where Lhls ls ln
place 11
LCCAL ISSULS:
leel unsafe by day &
by nlghL CnS
voung 1urnouL CnS
Crlme Avg. Score CnS
Pouslng SLock:
Councll Pouslng CnS
8eglsLered Soclal
Landlords CnS
An annual cosL esumaLe
based on Lhe average
gure from Lhe case
sLudles of 92k muluplled
by Lhe esumaLed number
of complex famllles ln Lhe
area
VULNLkA8LL ADUL1S:
Cenders & 8eoenders Lssex
robauon (2009-10)
urug Mlsuslng arenLs nu1MS
Alcohol Mlsusers sumote ftom
MenLal PealLh CnS
Long-Lerm unemployed CnS
Pomeless Pouseholds CnS
Cvercrowded Pouseholds CnS
uomesuc vlolence Analysls of all
uv lncldenLs reporL across LCC
(2009)
Learnlng ulsablllLy !SnA
no Cuallcauons CnS
Long-Lerm Llmlung lllness CnS
VULNLkA8LL CnILDkLN &
CUNG LCLL:
nLL1s !SnA
CWl Avg. Score CnS
Chlldren ln workless households
CnS
Chlldren Looked Aer LCC
?oung Cenders LCC
Low 8lrLh WelghL CnS
MAAC 8eferrals LCC
MenLal PealLh CAMPS needs
AssessmenL esumaLe
Chlld overLy CnS
u18 Concepuons LCC
School Lxcluslons LCC
Chlld roLecuon lans LCC
Chlldren on Lhe Ldge of Care LCC
Chlldren ln need LCC
Ch||dren ||v|ng w|th
A|coho| M|sus|ng
arents
Ch||dren ||v|ng
W|th Drug M|sus|ng
arents
arents w|th Menta|
nea|th rob|ems
1X
17.8X
2.6X
4.2X
22.1X
8X J.6X
A llsL of poLenual hoLspoL
Lower Super CuLpuL
Areas (LSCAs) LhaL are ln
Lhe hlghesL 20 ln Lhe
dlsLrlcL for 4 or more of
Lhe followlng households:
Lone parenL famlly wlLh
dependenL chlldren
Cn beneLs or lowesL
grade of work
Long Lerm llmlung lllness
Long Lerm unemployed
no quallcauons
no adulL ln employmenL
wlLh dependenL
chlldren
* Estimates in italics
Estimates (Manning et al, 2010)
LssexIam||y Complex lamllles: ?
MoLhers ln drug LreaLmenL wlLh
dependenL chlldren llvlng wlLh Lhem: 21
dependenL chlldren and no parenL
worklng: 136
experlenclng problems: 15J
lamllles wlLh Muluple roblems: 422
Chaouc lamllles: 2,127
lamllles where no adulL ls worklng: 3,787
All lamllles: 21,266
8ASILDCN: Sca|e of the Cha||enge
Iam||y
Intervennon
ro[ect:
lamllles engaged
by ll 13
CCS1:
I59m per year
VULNLkA8LL ADUL1S:
Cenders 1,833
8eoenders 189
urug Mlsuslng arenLs 146
Alcohol Mlsusers 5,J66
MenLal PealLh 3,712
Long-Lerm unemployed 1,033
Pomeless Pouseholds 238
Cvercrowded Pouseholds 4,036
uomesuc vlolence 18 of LCC LoLal
Learnlng ulsablllLy 443
no Cuallcauons 38,323
Long-Lerm Llmlung lllness
22,318
VULNLkA8LL CnILDkLN
& CUNG LCLL:
nLL1s 13
CWl Avg. Score 133
Chlldren ln workless
households 7,882
Chlldren Looked Aer 37
?oung Cenders 331
Low 8lrLh WelghL 6
MAAC 8eferrals 332
MenLal PealLh J,290
Chlld overLy 33
u18 Concepuons 434
Chlldren on Lhe Ldge of
Care JJ4
A|coho| M|sus|ng
arents
Ch||dren ||v|ng
W|th Drug M|sus|ng
arents
arents w|th Menta|
nea|th rob|ems
4J8
7,794
1,1J9
1,8J9
9,677
J,50J 1,567
LCCAL ISSULS:
1raveler lamllles
leel unsafe by day
6 & by nlghL 41
voung 1urnouL 62
Crlme Avg. Score 0.4
Pouslng SLock:
Councll Pouslng 16
8eglsLered Soclal
Landlords 7
Basildon needs analysis by electoral ward
Number of 16-18's who are NEET (02 03 2010) Average IMD score (2007)
Pupils achieving 5+ GCSE inc Eng & Maths (2009) Teenage Pregnancy Rate (2005-07)
Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey mapping with the
permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery
Office Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction
infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or
civil proceedings.
Essex County Council Licence No. 100019602. 2007
The colour schemes used in the maps are all using a five
coloured quantile range - dark green denotes that the
ward is amongst the top 20% performing wards within
Essex (then light green, yellow, orange) down to red being
amongst the worst performing wards in Essex.
NEET by postcode 02 03 2010
1
2
3 - 4
5 - 7
8 - 23
Ward
Y
o
u
n
g

P
e
o
p
l
e

a
g
e
d

1
6
-
1
8

w
h
o

a
r
e

N
E
E
T
%

a
c
h
i
e
v
i
n
g

5
+

A
*
-
C

G
C
S
E

i
n
c

E
n
g

&

M
a
t
h
s
A
v
e
r
a
g
e

I
M
D
Billericay East 16 74.5% 5.97
Billericay West 10 74.8% 7.54
Burstead 16 58.1% 8.42
Crouch 23 60.5% 16.30
Fryerns 45 32.4% 32.77
Laindon Park 59 34.1% 26.61
Langdon Hills 15 57.4% 10.59
Lee Chapel North 75 39.0% 31.76
Nethermayne 40 49.4% 18.27
Pitsea North West 50 29.3% 33.01
Pitsea South East 39 33.3% 27.62
St. Martin's 52 35.3% 34.41
Vange 57 23.1% 36.10
Wickford Castledon 10 51.1% 10.57
Wickford North 24 58.0% 13.14
Wickford Park 16 49.0% 12.21
worklng: 41
experlenclng problems: 54
Chaouc lamllles: 1027
CAS1LL CIN1: Sca|e of the Cha||enge
Iam||y
Intervennon
ro[ect:
lamllles engaged
by ll 0
LCCAL ISSULS:
leel unsafe by day 4
& by nlghL 34
voung 1urnouL 67
Crlme Avg. Score -0.2
Pouslng SLock:
Councll Pouslng 4
8eglsLered Soclal
Landlords 1
CCS1:
I20m per year
VULNLkA8LL ADUL1S:
Cenders 637
8eoenders 47
Alcohol Mlsusers 2,085
MenLal PealLh 3,712
11,731
VULNLkA8LL CnILDkLN & CUNG
LCLL:
nLL1s 6
CWl Avg. Score 107
Chlldren ln workless households 3,881
?oung Cenders 189
Low 8lrLh WelghL 4
MAAC 8eferrals 83
MenLal PealLh 475
Chlld overLy 7
u18 Concepuons 163
Chlldren on Lhe Ldge of Care 94
A|coho| M|sus|ng
arents
Ch||dren ||v|ng
W|th Drug M|sus|ng
arents
arents w|th Menta|
nea|th rob|ems
204
J,J6J
5J1
858
4,514
16J4 7J5
worklng: 99
CCLCnLS1Lk: Sca|e of the Cha||enge
Iam||y
Intervennon
ro[ect:
lamllles engaged
by ll 14
LCCAL ISSULS:
& by nlghL 30
voung 1urnouL 62
Pouslng SLock:
Councll Pouslng 9
8eglsLered Soclal
Landlords 3
CCS1:
I40m per year
VULNLkA8LL ADUL1S:
Cenders 1,488
8eoenders 142
MenLal PealLh 3,177
Long-Lerm unemployed 667
19,463
LCLL:
nLL1s 6
CWl Avg. Score 120
?oung Cenders 373
Low 8lrLh WelghL 6
MAAC 8eferrals 308
MenLal PealLh 2,7J0
Chlld overLy 20
u18 Concepuons 297
A|coho| M|sus|ng
arents
Ch||dren ||v|ng
W|th Drug M|sus|ng
arents
arents w|th Menta|
nea|th rob|ems
414
7,J62
1,075
1,7J7
9,140
J,J09 1,489
Colchester needs analysis by electoral ward
civil proceedings.
1
2
3 - 4
5 - 7
8 - 23
Ward Y
o
u
n
g

P
e
o
p
le

a
g
e
d

1
6
-
1
8

w
h
o

a
r
e

N
E
E
T
%

a
c
h
ie
v
in
g

5
+

A
*
-
C

G
C
S
E

in
c

E
n
g

&

M
a
t
h
s
A
v
e
r
a
g
e

I
M
D
Berechurch 42 38.1% 21.48
Birch and Winstree 7 61.1% 10.94
Castle 22 54.9% 15.98
Christ Church 4 88.0% 8.77
Copford and West Stanway 0 57.1% 10.50
Dedham and Langham 4 47.8% 9.55
East Donyland 5 60.7% 14.67
Fordham and Stour 8 70.3% 10.81
Great Tey 3 72.7% 11.86
Harbour 30 37.5% 25.63
Highwoods 24 51.9% 13.59
Lexden 17 58.1% 11.84
Marks Tey 5 46.2% 14.79
Mile End 11 69.5% 10.53
New Town 40 42.5% 20.32
Prettygate 8 67.8% 8.20
Pyefleet 3 81.8% 13.39
St. Andrew's 45 26.8% 30.99
St. Anne's 25 41.9% 22.06
St. John's 6 72.4% 6.88
Shrub End 34 39.7% 15.10
Stanway 10 50.6% 10.85
Tiptree 9 50.0% 12.27
West Bergholt and Eight Ash Green 10 64.3% 9.38
West Mersea 15 46.6% 10.60
Wivenhoe Cross 2 61.1% 7.50
Wivenhoe Quay 11 52.9% 7.21
worklng: 81
Chaouc lamllles: 1,0J6
nAkLCW: Sca|e of the Cha||enge
Iam||y
Intervennon
ro[ect:
lamllles engaged
by ll 27
LCCAL ISSULS:
leel unsafe by day
7 & by nlghL 39
voung 1urnouL 63
Crlme Avg. Score 0.4
Pouslng SLock:
Councll Pouslng 28
8eglsLered Soclal
Landlords 3
CCS1:
IJ0m per year
VULNLkA8LL ADUL1S:
Cenders 1,234
8eoenders 107
MenLal PealLh 2,380
10,340
LCLL:
nLL1s 3
CWl Avg. Score 162
Chlldren ln workless households
4,300
?oung Cenders 230
Low 8lrLh WelghL 3
MAAC 8eferrals 138
MenLal PealLh 1,410
Chlld overLy 37
u18 Concepuons 182
A|coho| M|sus|ng
arents
Ch||dren ||v|ng
W|th Drug M|sus|ng
arents
arents w|th Menta|
nea|th rob|ems
205
J,641
5J2
859
4,521
1,6J6 7J6
Harlow needs analysis by electoral ward
civil proceedings.
1
2
3 - 4
5 - 7
8 - 23
Ward
Y
o
u
n
g

P
e
o
p
l
e

a
g
e
d

1
6
-
1
8

w
h
o

a
r
e

N
E
E
T
%

a
c
h
i
e
v
i
n
g

5
+

A
*
-
C

G
C
S
E

i
n
c

E
n
g

&

M
a
t
h
s
A
v
e
r
a
g
e

I
M
D
Bush Fair 10 36.4% 23.18
Church Langley 1 39.7% 8.44
Great Parndon 8 56.4% 17.75
Harlow Common 12 37.5% 22.43
Little Parndon and Hare Street 6 31.4% 23.75
Mark Hall 10 43.0% 24.02
Netteswell 18 31.8% 26.05
Old Harlow 6 53.7% 14.36
Staple Tye 8 34.2% 29.66
Sumners and Kingsmoor 9 35.6% 23.35
Toddbrook 22 46.2% 23.96
worklng: 23
experlenclng problems: J6
Chaouc lamllles: 952
lamllles where no adulL ls worklng: 813
All lamllles: 9,320
kCCnICkD: Sca|e of the Cha||enge
Iam||y
Intervennon
ro[ect:
lamllles engaged
by ll 0
LCCAL ISSULS:
& by nlghL 23
voung 1urnouL 38
Pouslng SLock:
Councll Pouslng 0
8eglsLered Soclal
Landlords 8
CCS1:
I1Jm per year
VULNLkA8LL ADUL1S:
Cenders 393
8eoenders 33
MenLal PealLh 1,139
Long-Lerm Llmlung lllness 9,967
LCLL:
nLL1s 9
CWl Avg. Score 78
?oung Cenders 118
Low 8lrLh WelghL 4
MAAC 8eferrals 33
MenLal PealLh 475
Chlld overLy 6
u18 Concepuons 133
Chlldren on Lhe Ldge of Care 2J
A|coho| M|sus|ng
arents
Ch||dren ||v|ng
W|th Drug M|sus|ng
arents
arents w|th Menta|
nea|th rob|ems
195
J,466
506
818
4,J04
1,158 701
Rochford needs analysis by electoral ward
civil proceedings.
1
2
3 - 4
5 - 7
8 - 23
Ward Y
o
u
n
g

P
e
o
p
l
e

a
g
e
d

1
6
-
1
8

w
h
o

a
r
e

N
E
E
T
%

a
c
h
i
e
v
i
n
g

5
+

A
*
-
C

G
C
S
E

i
n
c

E
n
g

&

M
a
t
h
s
A
v
e
r
a
g
e

I
M
D
Ashingdon and Canewdon 7 46.7% 11.67
Barling and Sutton 3 60.0% 13.13
Downhall and Rawreth 9 59.2% 5.84
Foulness and Great Wakering 16 41.2% 12.16
Grange 3 66.7% 7.96
Hawkwell North 5 53.8% 5.61
Hawkwell South 9 45.9% 11.82
Hawkwell West 0 20.0% 7.10
Hockley Central 7 40.0% 5.28
Hockley North 7 0.0% 5.63
Hockley West 2 75.0% 4.66
Hullbridge 5 56.0% 9.97
Lodge 9 60.0% 5.62
Rayleigh Central 2 67.5% 7.40
Rochford 20 39.7% 19.36
Sweyne Park 6 48.6% 12.21
Trinity 7 65.6%
Wheatley 6 71.2% 7.37
Whitehouse 3 69.4% 8.55
worklng: 93
lamllles wlLh Muluple roblems: J20
1LNDkING: Sca|e of the Cha||enge
Iam||y
Intervennon
ro[ect:
lamllles engaged
by ll 24
LCCAL ISSULS:
& by nlghL 31
voung 1urnouL 64
Pouslng SLock:
Councll Pouslng 3
8eglsLered Soclal
Landlords 3
CCS1:
I45m per year
VULNLkA8LL ADUL1S:
Cenders 1,237
8eoenders 113
Alcohol Mlsusers J,446
MenLal PealLh 3,341
Cvercrowded Pouseholds 3.038
24,962
LCLL:
nLL1s 14
CWl Avg. Score 174
?oung Cenders 426
Low 8lrLh WelghL 6
MAAC 8eferrals 227
MenLal PealLh 2,323
Chlld overLy 41
u18 Concepuons 328
A|coho| M|sus|ng
arents
Ch||dren ||v|ng
W|th Drug M|sus|ng
arents
arents w|th Menta|
nea|th rob|ems
J04
5,406
790
1275
6,712
2,4J0 1,09J
Tendring needs analysis by electoral ward
civil proceedings.
1
2
3 - 4
5 - 7
8 - 23
Ward Y
o
u
n
g
P
e
o
p
le
a
g
e
d
1
6
-
1
8

w
h
o
a
r
e
N
E
E
T
%
a
c
h
ie
v
in
g
5
+
A
*
-
C
G
C
S
E

in
c
E
n
g
&
M
a
th
s
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
IM
D
Alresford 1 43.5% 11.87
Alton Park 33 20.9% 36.85
Ardleigh and Little Bromley 3 52.6% 14.71
Beaumont and Thorpe 4 38.1% 18.01
Bockings Elm 13 39.2% 23.85
Bradfield, Wrabness and Wix 6 58.8% 12.06
Brightlingsea 11 48.0% 13.42
Burrsville 4 0.0% 24.46
Frinton 4 65.2% 10.31
Golf Green 22 21.7% 51.91
Great and Little Oakley 3 50.0% 17.39
Great Bentley 3 52.2% 11.29
Hamford 9 53.8% 12.92
Harwich East 21 35.9% 33.51
Harwich East Central 22 42.9% 21.48
Harwich West 9 26.5% 17.48
Harwich West Central 21 36.8% 19.55
Haven 7 57.1% 20.44
Holland and Kirby 10 46.4% 16.56
Homelands 3 53.8% 18.35
Lawford 6 55.9% 12.73
Little Clacton and Weeley 15 41.9% 21.10
Manningtree, Mistley, Little Bentley and Tendring 8 56.1% 18.36
Peter Bruff 14 28.6% 24.48
Pier 53 32.3% 47.72
Ramsey and Parkeston 12 47.6% 25.79
Rush Green 35 16.2% 48.22
St. Bartholomews 6 47.5% 18.36
St. James 12 42.6% 20.77
St. Johns 20 30.8% 26.23
St. Marys 28 28.8% 30.12
St. Osyth and Point Clear 16 25.5% 27.99
St. Pauls 19 56.4% 19.35
Thorrington, Frating, Elmstead and Great Bromley 8 64.3% 17.42
Walton 14 41.0% 27.60
SLC1ICN 3
nLx1 S1LS
39
1nL CnALLLNGL
Pow do we ldenufy famllles wlLh complex
needs? uene Lhls locally?
Pow do we engage Lhem eecuvely?
Pow wlll share daLa and lnformauon?
Pow do famllles ask for help or wanL Lo engage
wlLh publlc servlces?
Pow do famllles ldenufy Lhemselves?
WhaL do famllles wlLh complex needs wanL
servlces Lo be llke?
Pow do we nd hldden famllles?
uellver lnLervenuons aL a large enough scale Lo
make a real dlerence
Work prevenLauvely Lo reduce dependency and
lmprove ouLcomes for lndlvlduals
SusLaln Lhe dellvery of lnLervenuons over ume
Lhrough provlng Lhe beneLs of lnvesLmenL
parLnershlps
WhaL ls ln our CommunlLy 'budgeL'? 1hls could
be resource, people and money
WhaL abouL Lhose below Lhe radar"? L.g.
arenLs who do noL meeL adulL servlce
Lhresholds for alcohol or menLal healLh
WhaL do we do nexL year for Lhese famllles?
Who ls responslble for Lhem?
Can we undersLand, supporL and be ambluous
for Lhese famllles?
WhaL wlll work?
Pow can we fund lL?
Pow can we lnvolve Lhe communlLy ln bulldlng
Lhe soluuon?
Pow can we shl a greaLer percenLage of spend
from reacuve/fallure cosLs Lo lnvesLmenL ln
sLrengLhenlng famllles?
Pow can we reallse cashable savlngs?
40
otenna| Dec|s|on Mak|ng Groups
8ASILDCN
8aslldon 8enalssance arLnershlp
8aslldon Cu8
Local Chlldren's Commlsslonlng & uellvery 8oard -
SouLh WesL
8aslldon Local SLraLeglc arLnershlp
CAS1LL CIN1
CasLle olnL Crlme and ulsorder 8educuon
arLnershlp
SouLh LasL
CasLle olnL Local SLraLeglc arLnershlp
CCLCnLS1Lk
ColchesLer 8enalssance arLnershlp
ColchesLer CommunlLy SafeLy arLnershlp
Local Chlldren's Commlsslonlng & uellvery 8oard
8oard - norLh LasL
ColchesLer2020 Local SLraLeglc arLnershlp
nAkLCW
Parlow 8enalssance
WesL
Parlow 2020 Local SLraLeglc arLnershlp
kCCnICkD
1he PealLh + Wellbelng arLnershlp (8ochford)
8ochford Skllls and LmploymenL
8oard - SouLh LasL
8ochford CommunlLy lnvolvemenL Croup
8ochford CommunlLy SafeLy arLnershlp
8ochford Local SLraLeglc arLnershlp
1LNDkING
1endrlng CommunlLy SafeLy arLnershlp
Paven CaLeway arLnershlp (PC)
8oard - norLh LasL
1endrlng Local SLraLeglc arLnershlp
LSSLk-WIDL
Learnlng ulsablllLy arLnershlp
Lssex 1ransluons arLnershlp
Lssex Soclal Care Workforce SLraLegy Croup
8elauves & 8esldenLs Assoclauon (Lssex)
rocuremenL Agency for Lssex (AL)
Lssex SLraLeglc P8 arLnershlp
Lssex 8eslllence lorum
Lssex CasualLy 8educuon and Congesuon
8oard
SLudenL 8ehavlour arLnershlp
Lssex Lconomlc 8oard
urug and Alcohol arLnershlp
ollcy & erformance neLwork
SLronger Communlues arLnershlp
SusLalnable Lssex
Chlldren's 1rusL Lxecuuve (under Lhe
SLraLeglc !CC)
Larly ?ears uevelopmenL and Chlldcare
arLnershlp
LPA and arLners Collaborauve (LC)
Lssex School Covernor Assoclauon & Lssex
Local AuLhorlLy worklng ln parLnershlp
Lssex and SouLhend PealLhy Schools
arLnershlp
1eenage regnancy arLnershlp 8oard
?ouLh Cendlng Servlce ManagemenL
8oard
Lssex Safeguardlng Chlldren 8oard
Safer Lssex arLnershlp
CommunlLy Wellbelng and Clder eople's
8oard
Lssex arLnershlp
Lssex ManagemenL 8oard
Lssex CompacL

Complex Families Community Budgets EssexFamily Deep Dive Analysis by Tonic Consultants Matthew Scott

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Complex Families Community Budgets EssexFamily Deep Dive Analysis by Tonic Consultants Matthew Scott

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

LSSLkIAMIL

uLL ulvL AnAL?SlS

You might also like