Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Per Wirdemark
2004-09-02
PTS-ER-2004:32
1 (18)
SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to find out how the signal requirement matches the service requirement in a UMTS network, and to comment on some of the specific issues raised by the Swedish Operators in a request for changed requirements. The key findings from the report are: UMTS coverage is in the majority of the situations limited by the uplink while the coverage requirements for the UMTS License holders in Sweden is set on the downlink. This means that the licence criteria can not be evaluated / determined without making some assumptions on how base stations are configured. The aspects that have most impact on the signal requirement are: building penetration loss, and its variation in different types of buildings the use or non-use of tower mounted low noise amplifiers on the uplink the interference level in the network The link budget calculations show that current license requirement of 58 dBuV / m measured on the primary common pilot channel is a too low requirement in city centres, while it is too high in rural areas. Suggested range is from 65 dBuV / m in dense city centres to 50 dBuV / m in rural areas. Buildings in city centres are normally big constructions of concrete or brick, while habituated buildings in rural areas are primarily single family houses constructed out of wood. This difference in construction means a difference in penetration loss, which motivates a 9 dB difference in signal strength requirement to achieve the same service level in both environments. Differences in uplink interference level in high and low traffic areas can motivate an additional 2 dB difference between dense urban and rural areas. Coverage in areas with low traffic and therefore low interference will be limited by the uplink performance, and the use of tower mounted amplifiers can improve the uplink performance by 4-5 dB. If tower mounted amplifiers are used in rural areas and not in urban areas, the additional difference in signal requirement to achieve same service level should be approximately 4 dB. 50 dBuV / m should be a sufficient coverage requirement in low traffic rural areas if tower mounted low noise amplifiers are used on the base stations and no more than 10% of the total power is allocated to the primary common pilot channel channel.
HiQ Data AB Mster Samuelsgatan 17, Box 7421, 103 91 Stockholm. Tel 08-588 90 000, Fax 08-588 90 001.
Per Wirdemark
2004-09-02
PTS-ER-2004:32
2 (18)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 2 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 4 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 6 6.1 7
SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................................. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................ 2 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 3 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................... 3 PURPOSE .................................................................................................................................................... 3 RESERVATIONS .......................................................................................................................................... 3 LINK BUDGETS FOR UMTS ................................................................................................................... 4 PURPOSE OF THE LINK BUDGET .................................................................................................................. 4 FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LINK BUDGETS FOR TDMA AND CDMA NETWORKS ................... 4 BASIC UPLINK POWER BUDGET .................................................................................................................. 5 FACTORS AFFECTING THE LINK BUDGET .................................................................................................... 6 CURRENT LICENSE REQUIREMENTS AND HOW IT RELATES TO THE LINK BUDGET ABOVE ........................ 14 COMMENTS ON OPERATOR PROPOSAL ........................................................................................ 15 CHANGED SERVICE THRESHOLD .............................................................................................................. 15 CHANGED PROBABILITY .......................................................................................................................... 15 MEASUREMENTS ..................................................................................................................................... 16 IMPLICATIONS OF CHANGED REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................... 17 OPERATOR INVESTMENT ......................................................................................................................... 18 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................................... 18
HiQ Data AB Mster Samuelsgatan 17, Box 7421, 103 91 Stockholm. Tel 08-588 90 000, Fax 08-588 90 001.
Per Wirdemark
2004-09-02
PTS-ER-2004:32
3 (18)
INTRODUCTION
2.1 Background
UMTS license conditions[1] in Sweden include a requirement on the operators to provide a measured field strength on the primary common pilot channel of 58 dBuV / m with 95 % area probability. In a clarification to the signal strength requirement it is stated that it corresponds to service bit rates between 144 and 384 kbit/s in an indoor environment.
2.2 Purpose
The purpose of this report is to find out how the signal requirement matches the service requirement, and to comment on some of the specific issues raised by the operators[5].
2.3
Reservations
In order to calculate the required signal strengths for the different services and different environment, a link budget is presented. Link budgets always makes a number of assumptions, and engineers can gladly spend hours debating individual values. UMTS technology is still not very mature, and some early assumptions may still prove wrong in the real life. In this report we have tried to use values that seem average in the literature, so that any deviations in one value that an engineer will raise would hopefully equal out the claims for changes of another value by another engineer. Still, one should regard the final figures with a +/- 2dB uncertainty.
HiQ Data AB Mster Samuelsgatan 17, Box 7421, 103 91 Stockholm. Tel 08-588 90 000, Fax 08-588 90 001.
Per Wirdemark
2004-09-02
PTS-ER-2004:32
4 (18)
The purpose of the link budget is to calculate the maximum path loss allowed between the base station and the mobile for a given service. The maximum path loss is then used to choose antennas and configurations for the base stations, and for planning of output power on the different channels of the base stations. The maximum path loss determines the range of each base station and thus the base station density, and number base stations required to cover a given area. Another important purpose of the link budget is to balance the up and downlink. Very high output power of the base station is of little use if the base station can not hear the mobile station.
3.2 Fundamental difference between link budgets for TDMA and CDMA networks
In 2G TDMA networks, such as GSM, all radio resources on a given frequency are dedicated to a certain mobile at any given point in time. It is thus fairly straight forward to calculate any imbalances between up and downlink, and to make sure the link is balanced. In CDMA systems on the other hand, base station output power is shared between all connections on the base stations, so the amount of power available for a certain connection will vary with load and positions of the connected mobiles. Since the same frequency is used on all cells, the link budget also needs to include margins for the interference created by other connections, both from the own cell and other cells. This interference is often treated as an additional noise that is added to the thermal noise. Load on the CDMA system may also be asymmetric, as some of the packet data services, such as web browsing, will likely generate more downlink than uplink data. In CDMA networks, the uplink is normally regarded as coverage limited, while the downlink is interference limited as a result of the load on the network. The basis for this is that the base station has typically 10-40 W (40-46 dBm) output power available, while the mobile unit has 0.125-0.250 W (21-24 dBm). This means that in low traffic situations, the uplink is the limiting link, while in high traffic situations, downlink becomes the limiting link. This gets even more complicated when a mobile is indoors, since penetration loss will also attenuate the interference on the downlink, but not on the uplink. Existing literature often ignores the downlink altogether when discussing the link budget for planning purposes. In this report we will assume uplink being the limiting link for coverage purpose, but also check that a sufficient interference margin is available on the downlink, under the assumption that no more than a certain percentage of the power is allocated to a single user.
HiQ Data AB Mster Samuelsgatan 17, Box 7421, 103 91 Stockholm. Tel 08-588 90 000, Fax 08-588 90 001.
Per Wirdemark
2004-09-02
PTS-ER-2004:32
5 (18)
The following example link budget is taken from the book WCDMA for UMTS[2], page 158. This link budget is not directly applicable to the requirements in Sweden, but serves as a starting point to explain the general maths of the link budget calculation, and establish a baseline that is commonly available in the literature. Deviations from this link budget will be explained throughout the report.
Transmitter (mobile) Max mobile transmit power [w] As above in dBm Mobile Antenna Gain Body Loss EIRP [dBm] Receiver (base station) Thermal Noise Density Base station receiver noise figure Receiver noise density Receive noise power Interference margin Receiver interference power Total effective noise + interference Processing Gain Required Eb / N0 Receive sensitivtity Base station antenna gain Cable loss in the base station Fast fading margin Max Path Loss Coverage probability Log Normal fading constant Propagation model exponent Log Normal fading margin Soft handover gain Indoor Loss Allowed propagation loss for cell range [w] [dbm] 0,25 24 2 0 26
a b c d=a+b-c
-174 5 -169 -103,2 3 -103,2 -100,2 14,3 1,5 -112,9 18 2 4 150,9 80% 12 3,52 4,2 2 15 133,7
s t u v=r-s+t-u
Already at this point it is important to point out that link budgets in literature normally includes a margin for the log normal fading, which can be described statistically, to arrive at a maximum path loss that can be used for radio planning purposes. When comparing the above link budget with the license requirements, it is important to understand that the margin for the statistical variation of the measured signal in the outdoor environment is already
HiQ Data AB Mster Samuelsgatan 17, Box 7421, 103 91 Stockholm. Tel 08-588 90 000, Fax 08-588 90 001.
Per Wirdemark
2004-09-02
PTS-ER-2004:32
6 (18)
taken care of in the license conditions[1] (with 95 % area probability) , but that the license condition indirectly also makes room for Building Penetration loss. Also, a coverage probability of 80 % is widely regarded as a very low value. Thus, the path loss to use when discussing the license conditions is to be found somewhere between Max Path Loss and Allowed path loss for cell range. Later we will split the link budget up to find the path losses that can be used in conjunction with the license conditions. It can also be noted that the above link budget assumes a data terminal with 24 dBm output power, which is not readily available on the market. An antenna gain of 2 dB is also a very optimistic value for a normal voice primarily handset.
3.4 Factors affecting the link budget 3.4.1 Services and service mix
A higher bit rate service requires a higher received power than a lower bitrate. This is included in the processing gain, line l above. A higher bit rate service require a lower Eb/N0 than a low bit rate service. This is due to a fixed amount of overhead for control channels, regardless of the service bit rate. (A in detail description can be found in chapter 11.2.1.1 in [2]). The Eb/N0values assumed normally includes the diversity gain, and thus the required Eb/N0 is normally lower in the uplink than downlink. License conditions in Sweden mention bit rates from 144-384 kbit/s indoors. In this report we assume - Minimum CS 128 on the uplink for good video quality or PS 144 for uploads. - Minimum PS 384 on the downlink for fast web browsing and downloads As uplink is normally the coverage limiting link, UL 144 kbit/s will be the dimensioning criteria.
HiQ Data AB Mster Samuelsgatan 17, Box 7421, 103 91 Stockholm. Tel 08-588 90 000, Fax 08-588 90 001.
Per Wirdemark
2004-09-02
PTS-ER-2004:32
7 (18)
3.4.2
It is difficult to find any conclusive scientific research on this subject, results vary greatly between different studies, and no research covers all aspects listed above. The COST 231 final report [3] attempts to summarize all studies within its framework to 3 equations to be used in 3 different scenarios 1. micro cellular 2. macro cellular with line of sight between base station and building 3. macro cellular with non line of sight between base station and building The third scenario seems most applicable when discussing signal strength on cell boundaries where the license conditions apply. The formula in this case is: L = Loutside + We + Wge + a * d - Gfh Where L is the total path loss LOutside is the path loss between the base station and a point at ground level just outside the building We is the attenuation in the external wall Wge is a compensation factor for non perpendicular radio wave arrival D is the how far away from the wall a receiver is A is a constant, 0.6 dB / m is recommended Gfh is the floor gain, i.e. the signal will normally be higher on higher floors Recommended values are We : 4-10 dB (4 dB for wood, 7 dB for concrete walls) Wge : 3-5 dB at 900 MHz, 5-7 dB at 1800 MHz
HiQ Data AB Mster Samuelsgatan 17, Box 7421, 103 91 Stockholm. Tel 08-588 90 000, Fax 08-588 90 001.
Per Wirdemark
2004-09-02
PTS-ER-2004:32
8 (18)
It is evident that a single penetration loss value will not apply to all environments. A small building normally has thinner walls than a large building. A small building also has windows in different directions, thus giving a lower penetration loss. In Sweden single family house are mainly constructed out of wood, while multi family and multistory buildings are normally made of concrete. Even if not all single family houses are constructed of wood, one should understand that the measurements conducted by COST members to arrive at a value specific for wood, have been carried out in small buildings (since no large buildings are made of wood). Hence, the wood value is to some extent applicable not only to wooden buildings, but also to small buildings in general. The following distinction is suggested: 1. 2. 3. 4. Single family houses (treated as wood) Radhus (treated as wood) Houses with more than 2 storeys (concrete) with large separation (urban) Houses with more than 2 storeys (concrete) with small separation (city, dense urban)
While all this is nice in theory, it must be possible to classify areas also in practice. Grna Kartan has the following classifications that seems useful Lg Bebyggelse (mainly single family houses, i.e. 1 and 2 above) Hg bebyggelse (3 above) Sluten bebyggelse (4 above) In a smaller building a user is more likely to be close to an external wall than in a large building. The following values are suggested based on the COST 231 formula above, assuming values for the ground floor, i.e. Gfh = 0. Class Lg Bebyggelse Hg bebyggelse Sluten bebyggelse We (dB) 4 7 10 Wge (db) 5 6 7 D (m) 3 5 5 Average Penetration Loss 11 dB 16 dB 20 dB Standard Deviation 4 6 8
Since the variation of the penetration loss is significant (> 1 dB), the variation needs to be included and dealt with statistically. Standard deviation figures for the different building types is not readily available from the COST report, but various other reports suggests values in the range 4-8 dB.
HiQ Data AB Mster Samuelsgatan 17, Box 7421, 103 91 Stockholm. Tel 08-588 90 000, Fax 08-588 90 001.
Per Wirdemark
2004-09-02
PTS-ER-2004:32
9 (18)
3.4.3
Traffic Load
Higher average traffic will result in higher noise rise on both up and downlink. On the uplink it is suggested to use 1 dB (corresponding to 20 % cell load) noise rise for low traffic cells (rural areas), and 3 dB noise rise (corresponding to 50 % cell load) for cells in more populated environments (dense urban, urban, suburban). Values are taken from [2]. The noise rise on the downlink is not so straightforward to calculate. In the literature it can be found to be modelled as a single value based on the results of some simulation, but in reality it will depend on the receiver location in the cell, and whether the receiver is indoors or not. Typically the noise rise is higher on the downlink than in the uplink, partly due to asymmetric load, partly due to other spreading techniques. The link budgets in this report calculates the path loss margin the downlink has over the uplink, i.e. how much noise rise can be tolerated on the downlink, and draws some conclusions from this.
3.4.4
Use of TMA
Coverage in UMTS networks is largely considered to be uplink limited in low traffic situations. The basis for this is that the base station has typically 10-20 W (40-43 dBm) output power available, while the mobile unit has 0.125 W (21 dBm). Even when considering the better Noise Factor of the base station (typically 4 dB compared to 7 dB in the mobile) and the approximately 4-5 dB lower Eb/N0 required in the uplink due to antenna diversity on the base station, downlink still has a 10-15 dB path loss advantage over the uplink in a symmetrical service. In case of asymmetrical load (higher bitrates in the downlink than in the uplink), the 10-15 dB advantage reduces to around 5-10 dB (assuming 384 kbits/s downlink and 128 kbit/s uplink). Uplink coverage can be improved by introducing Tower Mounted Low Noise Amplifiers, i.e. an amplifier directly after the antenna. The gain of this is that the feeder losses in the uplink can be ignored (expect for a short jumper cable between the antenna and the amplifier), and that the TMA often has a better Noise Factor (NF) than the base station (1.52 dB compared to 4-5 dB). TMA is widely used by the operators to improve coverage in rural areas.
3.4.5
HiQ Data AB Mster Samuelsgatan 17, Box 7421, 103 91 Stockholm. Tel 08-588 90 000, Fax 08-588 90 001.
Per Wirdemark
2004-09-02
PTS-ER-2004:32
10 (18)
3.4.6
Service Probability
Radio signals fluctuates significantly when a receiver is moving around, even within a fairly small area where the distance and angle to the base station remains fairly constant. Two mechanisms are often used to physically describe what is happening Large objects such as buildings and trees obstructing the signal. These variations are referred to as shadow fading, lognormal fading or slow fading and occurs when a receiver moves tens of metres. All objects in the vicinity of a receiver cause reflections of the radio signal. In the receiver these reflections will add to one another, with different phase as a result of different propagation distances. This gives rise to fast fading or rayleigh fading. When planning a network, margins need to be added for both these phenomena. The margin for fast fading is especially important for slow moving mobiles, since they run a higher probability of being still in a fading dip. An indoor user will of course always be slow moving. The fast fading margin is found in row q in the link budget. The margin for shadow fading, or lognormal fading margin on row s in the link budget above, is already included in the license conditions (with 95% area probability), but only for the outdoor scenario. When planning a cellular network, a planning margin for the variation in the penetration loss is normally also added. As shown in section 4.2, a 95 % requirement for the outdoor signal corresponds roughly to 90 % indoor probability, and therefore no additional margin is added.
3.4.7
HiQ Data AB Mster Samuelsgatan 17, Box 7421, 103 91 Stockholm. Tel 08-588 90 000, Fax 08-588 90 001.
Per Wirdemark
2004-09-02
PTS-ER-2004:32
11 (18)
3.4.8
HiQ Data AB Mster Samuelsgatan 17, Box 7421, 103 91 Stockholm. Tel 08-588 90 000, Fax 08-588 90 001.
Per Wirdemark
Service UL Service DL
2004-09-02
Dense kbit/s kbit/s
PTS-ER-2004:32
Urban 144 384 144 384 Suburban Rural 144 384 144 384
12 (18)
Rural TMA Rural TMA 144 64 384 384
Transmitter Max mobile transmit power Mobile Antenna Gain Body loss EIRP UL Receiver Thermal Noise NF Noise Density Noise Power Interference Margin Receiver interference Power noise + interference Processing Gain Required Eb/No Receiver Sensitivity Base station antenna gain Cable loss Max Path Loss Fast fading margin Max Fading Path Loss Average Penetration Loss Max outdoor UL Path loss Downlink Transmitter total available Power Cable Loss Antenna Gain Transmitter total ERP Max Service Power % Max Service ERP DL Receiver NF Noise density Thermal Noise Power Processing gain Required Eb/No RX sensitivity Max DL Path loss Fast Fading Margin Average Penetration Loss Max outdoor DL Pathloss Limiting Link Limiting PathLoss Downlink Margin Pilot Power % Pilot ERP Measured Outdoor Pilot Measured Outdoor Pilot
21 0 0 21
21 0 0 21
21 0 0 21
21 0 0 21
21 0 0 21
21 0 0 21
-174 4 -170,0 -104,2 3 -104,2 -101,2 14,3 1,5 -113,9 18 4 148,9 4 144,9 20 124,9
-174 4 -170,0 -104,2 3 -104,2 -101,2 14,3 1,5 -113,9 18 4 148,9 4 144,9 16 128,9
-174 4 -170,0 -104,2 3 -104,2 -101,2 14,3 1,5 -113,9 18 4 148,9 4 144,9 11 133,9
-174 4 -170,0 -104,2 1 -110,0 -103,2 14,3 2 -115,4 18 4 150,4 4 146,4 11 135,4
-174 2 -172,0 -106,2 1 -112,0 -105,2 14,3 2 -117,4 18 1 155,4 4 151,4 11 140,4
-174 2 -172,0 -106,2 1 -112,0 -105,2 17,8 2 -120,9 18 1 158,9 4 154,9 11 143,9
43 4 18 57 25% 51,0
43 4 18 57 25% 51,0
43 4 18 57 25% 51,0
43 4 18 57 50% 54,0
43 4 18 57 50% 54,0
43 4 18 57 50% 54,0
7 -167,0 -101,2 10,0 6 -105,2 156,1 4 20 132,1 UL 124,9 7,2 10% 47 -77,9 65,1
7 -167,0 -101,2 10,0 6 -105,2 156,1 4 16 136,1 UL 128,9 7,2 10% 47 -81,9 61,1
7 -167,0 -101,2 10,0 6 -105,2 156,1 4 11 141,1 UL 133,9 7,2 10% 47 -86,9 56,1
7 -167,0 -101,2 10,0 6 -105,2 159,1 4 11 144,1 UL 135,4 8,7 10% 47 -88,4 54,6
7 -167,0 -101,2 10,0 6 -105,2 159,1 4 11 144,1 UL 140,4 3,7 10% 47 -93,4 49,6
7 -167,0 -101,2 10,0 6 -105,2 159,1 4 11 144,1 UL 143,9 0,2 10% 47 -96,9 46,1
dB
dBm dBuV / m
The first part deals with the uplink calculation and follows the layout from the example in the beginning of the report, ending with a maximum allowed path loss as far as uplink is concerned. Then follows a calculation of the maximum allowed path loss on the downlink, to make sure we are not being downlink limited. First step is to decide the amount of power available for a single user. The assumption is a maximum of 25 % for a single user in high traffic areas (dense, urban, suburban), and up to 50 % in low traffic (rural areas).
HiQ Data AB Mster Samuelsgatan 17, Box 7421, 103 91 Stockholm. Tel 08-588 90 000, Fax 08-588 90 001.
Per Wirdemark
2004-09-02
PTS-ER-2004:32
13 (18)
Then comes a calculation on the base station receiver sensitivity. An Eb/N0 value of 6 dB has been assumed for all environments. The maximum outdoor path loss has been calculated from a downlink point of view has been calculated, without any margin taken for downlink interference and then the minimum of UL and Dl path loss values. Next, the downlink over uplink margin has been calculated. This value shows how much interference margin is allowed on the downlink. As can be seen, the link budget is uplink limited in all environments, except for the 384/64 kbit/s with TMA example, which seems to be almost exactly in balance, i.e. there is no margin at all for downlink interference. This example is not relevant for the license conditions, but shown as an example when link is being, or close to being, downlink limited. Before being able to calculate the minimum received pilot power, we need to decide the amount of power set aside form the pilot channel. The pilot power is parameterized in the base station and the operator can set virtually any value. In practice the range would be limited. In the lower end it will be limited by two factors: 1.The pilot signal must be strong enough to be heard over the thermal noise by all mobiles in the cell that are within uplink coverage range. This requirement means very little power is required. 2. As the pilot signal is used for measurements of target cells before a handover can take place, this means the pilot signal must be heard over the interference outside the own cell.
0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 Total Power Cell A "Pilot Power Cell A" "Total Power Cell B" 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
The figure above illustrates the received total power from two cells A and B and the received pilot power from cell A. When a mobile is moving from cell B towards cell A it must measure the signal strength on cell As pilot power some time before going into a soft
HiQ Data AB Mster Samuelsgatan 17, Box 7421, 103 91 Stockholm. Tel 08-588 90 000, Fax 08-588 90 001.
Per Wirdemark
2004-09-02
PTS-ER-2004:32
14 (18)
handover with cell A. Typically, cell As pilot must be detected when cell B is 5 dB stronger, in order to initiate a soft handover that will occur a little later. The required Eb/N0 on the pilot on the downlink is approximately 10 dB. The processing gain on the pilot is 10*log(3840 / 12.2) = 25 dB which means the minimum output power for the pilot is approximately 5 + 10 25 = -10 dB (= 10 %) compared to the output power of cell A and B. (This calculation is a little simplified. In reality interference is a sum of all signal from all cells) With a known percentage of the power set aside for the pilot power we can now calculate the received pilot signal corresponding to the maximum uplink path loss. It should be stressed that an operator can choose a higher value than 10 % of the total power for the pilot. Literature often suggests value in the range 5-20 %. An increase in pilot power over 10 % should affect the license requirement in direct proportion. It will however be in the interest of the operator not to increase the pilot power unnecessarily. Raising the pilot power will mean less power is available for services, and increase the interference level, thus also increase the required power for the service bearers, but as it is impossible to measure the amount of power set aside for the pilot, it may be very tempting for the operators to boost the pilot power over 10 % in order to achieve coverage according to the license conditions.
3.5 Current License Requirements and how it relates to the link budget above
As can be seen from the link budgets above, the existing license condition of 58 dBuV / m is right between the values calculated in urban and suburban areas, if the operator is not using TMA:s. It is approximately 7 dB to low for dense city centres and approximately 8 dB too strict in a rural environment, assuming operators are using TMA and 10% pilot power.
HiQ Data AB Mster Samuelsgatan 17, Box 7421, 103 91 Stockholm. Tel 08-588 90 000, Fax 08-588 90 001.
Per Wirdemark
2004-09-02
PTS-ER-2004:32
15 (18)
HiQ Data AB Mster Samuelsgatan 17, Box 7421, 103 91 Stockholm. Tel 08-588 90 000, Fax 08-588 90 001.
Per Wirdemark
2004-09-02
PTS-ER-2004:32
16 (18)
and then apply a margin to correspond to whatever percentage is required. fad normally varies between 6 dB (rural open areas) to 12 dB (cities, large buildings) while pen varies between 4 dB (small wooden houses) to 8 dB (large buildings). In our rural environment the fad is approximately 6dB and pen is 4 dB. That gives tot = 7.2 The 95 % outdoor area probability will in this case correspond to 92 % indoor probability (corrected for the average penetration loss) due to the higher to signal variation in the indoor environment. Changing the outdoor requirement to 90 % probability would mean indoor probability will go down to approximately 87 %. In order to achieve a 90 % indoor probability, outdoor probability needs to be around 93 %. For this reason a change in the outdoor area probability requirementto 90 % is not supported.
4.3 Measurements
The operators have very briefly presented some measurements that they suggest prove their point that 50 dBuV / m should be a relevant signal strength requirement. The exact point that they want to make is not totally clear, except showing that it is possible to maintain a 64 kbit/s uplink at a measured cpich level of 36 dBuV / m (3 dB noise rise included). This corresponds fairly well to the TMA link budget above if we correct for the following: The link budget assumes 11 dB penetration loss (+11) The link budget assumes 1 dB noise rise instead of 3 (-2) The link budget assumes a 144 kbit / s instead of 64 (+3) 36 + 11 2 + 3 = 48 dBuV / m. From the operators presentation of the measurement it is not clear exactly how the base station was configured, but this information has been submitted later on condition parts of it will be kept confidential. According to the information available and not under confidentiality the basestation on which the measurement was conducted was not equipped with TMA, which obviously makes the comparison with the TMA link budget invalid. What is also surprising is that the base station seems downlink limited even when not equipped with a TMA (downlink bit rate drops to 128 and 64 kbit /s at times, while uplink is not (?) affected). With so little measurement data and background information, it is difficult to draw any conclusions from the data presented.
HiQ Data AB Mster Samuelsgatan 17, Box 7421, 103 91 Stockholm. Tel 08-588 90 000, Fax 08-588 90 001.
Per Wirdemark
2004-09-02
PTS-ER-2004:32
17 (18)
5 5.1
HiQ Data AB Mster Samuelsgatan 17, Box 7421, 103 91 Stockholm. Tel 08-588 90 000, Fax 08-588 90 001.
Per Wirdemark
2004-09-02
PTS-ER-2004:32
18 (18)
REFERENCES
[1] Tillstndsgivningen fr UMTS I Sverige, 27 juni 2001 [2] WCDMA for UMTS. Harri Holma and Antii Toskal [3] Chapter 4.6, COST 231 final report [4] Microwave Mobile Communications, William C Jakes [5] Anskan om Andrade tillstndsvillkor fr tillhandahllande av ntkapacitet fr mobile rteletjnster av UMTS/IMT-2000 standard. PTS, Dnr 04-9599/10
HiQ Data AB Mster Samuelsgatan 17, Box 7421, 103 91 Stockholm. Tel 08-588 90 000, Fax 08-588 90 001.