The US has just recently made the decision to attend talks with

Iran over the 'nuclear' issue, something the US refused to do

previously because Iran was said to be part of the Axis of Evil.
The Real Axis of Evil is today's western triumvirate of the US,
the UK and France. All three have attacked African, Asian and
middle-East countries and even some others as well at one time
or another or continuously since the end of WW2.

Iran is working towards power generation through nuclear fission,

and there is no evidence that there is a 'bomb' in the making,
so it is extremely evil of the West to judge and condemn the
country without a proper 'trial' where the required evidence
could be duly presented.

The US knows that using lies and half-truths to force its view
is not going to work in this particular case, especially now
that Afghanistan has started to feature so prominently in US
military policy. More troops are needed in Kabul, but sending
supplies to meet their needs is beginning to become a vexing
problem. The supply routes that go through Pakistan are now
getting exposed to increasing militia attacks and the one in
Kyrgyzstan is facing closure.

So, the White House has now decided to talk with Iran. Perhaps
a new supply route could be obtained, one that goes through
Iranian territory. What cunning deviousness. The US has never
been known for sincere conduct or behaviour in its dealings with
others. Obama is really not that much different from Bush.

Every country has the right to build a nuclear power plant as

long as it could afford to do so. There is no ground for other
nations to oppose it and certainly there is even less ground
for others to falsely accuse a certain country of trying to
build atomic weapons without obtaining proof of it. In Iran's
case the accusation was borne put of mere suspicion and bad
espionage on the part of the West.

In any case, the West should not hide from the fact that they
are the ones who are most deserving of criticism in nuclear-
related issues. The West were the ones who pioneered the so-
called 'atoms-for-peace' program that helped to raise interest
in nuclear power plants. Unfortunately, US political puppets
in many areas, including Persia, never lasted as long as the
atomic interest. What goes round comes round.

Also, the West, especially the US and France, have always been
unreceptive to the idea of a world without nuclear weapons. The
US is always fearful that without nuclear weapons, the country
would surely one day cease to be the bully-boy of the globe as
other nations obtained parity in conventional arms. Without that
status, the US would no longer be able to dictate terms to the
others as it pleased.

Even the idea of no-first-use is unacceptable to the Americans.

No nation should use a nuclear weapon against another nation
except in retaliation for a surprise nuclear attack but this
has never been acceptable by NATO. This military monster wants
its nuclear arsenal to balance out the supposedly conventional
superiority of its potential adversaries but now, this argument
no longer holds water. Today, the West has the world's mightiest
conventional war machines.

The West ought to be honest with the rest of the world and start
the ball rolling. Should the world get rid of all nuclear arsenals
and ban the keeping of such weapons in any country ( unlike the
smallpox virus) or should the world forbid all countries from ever
unleashing a first-strike nuclear attack ? These are the pertinent
issues that need to be discussed by the entire world. And not the
alleged wrongdoing by Iran.

Iran's allies in the Security Council must stand firm against any
trickery by the West to paint the country as evil because the real
evil is only found within the accuser and no one else. The real
axis of evil is made up of Paris, London and Washington. The
monsters who threaten world peace truly reside in these cities.