Professional Documents
Culture Documents
http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=iJPFSNu_QNs
Why Pinky & The Brain? Because they set out to conquer the world, which is what you try to
do when studying strategic management. Maybe you don’t exactly aim for world domination,
but in general we develop strategies because they give us a sense of control over our future.
The idea of being able to predict the future, suggests that you are able to turn your own
current and future actions into your own advantage. Several questions rise, after all: maybe
we really can’t predict the future, in spite of all our efforts and models or maybe the future is
a specific result of our predications, a wonderful self-fulfilling prophecy or maybe we, like
Pinky & The Brain, are lab-rats as well, but just don’t know it (which would mean we would be
subjected to someone else’s models and predictions)
Maaike de Jong
e-mail: m.de.jong@stenden.com
Some tips & trics to make this module easier for you, based on the experiences of your
predecessors
Consider the following
• Blaise Pascal
“Je n'ai fait celle-ci plus longue que parce que je n'ai pas eu le loisir de la faire plus courte. (I
have made this letter so long only because I did not have the leisure to make it shorter.)”
This quote is addressed here, because of the paradox it reveals. [See also: ‘wicked questions’
later on in this slideshow]. Generally, we think we produce ‘more’ if we have ‘more time’. This
quote is a nice way of saying ‘less is more’, especially if you know how to properly pronounce
the French version of the quote :-)
Six pages, are you for
real?
• Yes
• Writing in a concise manner displays
analytic skill.
• It can be done, it has been done
• How?
And in fact, it has been done brilliantly by some. If you assume your tutor knows what you’re
talking about, you don’t have to explain the whole theory. Just make sure you apply it
properly. Your tutor knows what the PESTEL-framework is, you don’t have to explain the
framework. If you doubt s/he knows, refer to the literature, so s/he can check. This is a way
to briefly demonstrate you know what you are doing (unless of course, your tutor checks your
references and you’re sources don’t match your statements).
Often, in case texts we receive, a lot of theory is discussed. You tend to do this, not because
it is needed for the story you’re telling, but because you need to get the information clear;
you’re learning. So, for yourself, you may be writing down: “the PESTEL-framework is a way
to ....” Once your learning has taken place and you’ve developed your ‘expert’-opinion as a
consultant, you rewrite or delete these sections (you do leave a reference to the literature
though). They were useful to you, while learning, they’re no longer useful for the story you
want to tell: your strategy, your arguments for your strategy and your plan for
implementation.
A little bit aobut yuor
brian
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snO68aJTOpM
Your brain is able to read words ‘correctly’ even if they are misspelled.
A lot of different claims are made about the brain and learning. Some things are quite certain:
1) you’re always learning, any moment. That is: your brain is always busy, reorganizing and
restructuring. In the past, we thought the brain stops changing after age 21, this turns out not
to be the case. (before 21 it is easier to learn new things, after 21 it is easier to connect
information (verbanden leggen) Learning in a strategic fashion, i.e. actively and consciously,
does speed things up. Activating your brain in advance (prior knowledge) helps information to
‘land’ quicker.
2) Repetition is key (this has to do with neural pathways, think of a green field and a small
thread where people walk every time. The grass doesn’t grow back as fast, a path has been
made). Studying 1 hour every day, 5 days in a row is generally more effective than studying 5
hours in one day. (Also, having a good sleep enhances your understanding of difficult subject
matters) (See also: Woolfolk (2004) Educational Psychology.)
How?
• By developing a helicopterview
• By organizing the information in an active
way - don’t read, summarize
• By using the analytic tools provided in
Johnson & Scholes (Pestel, SWOT, TOWS,
Power matrix)
• The difference is in the doing
6
You can only develop a helicopter view if you also know what it is that you are looking at. If
you’re flying over the Alps, but you don’t know what they are, you won’t be able to navigate.
If you put in the (active) hours for creating a map of the landscape, you’ll notice it is easier to
find your way. This means: thoroughly reading the case text, connecting it to the literature,
discussing it with your peers, questioning one another, ‘mapping’ the information, ‘owning’
the problem, taking no short cuts. (So: don’t divide the work. If you split up your group and
one of you does the pestel analyses and the other the swot, you’re in for a weaker strategy.
You all need to be ‘in the know’ about the different subjects in the whole case.)
Other Tools
• Mindmaps
• Organizing charts
• Who is who?
• Timelines
• Key numbers
It is a very common thing to have to read the case text two or three times. One way of
reading while organizing the information is by highlighting certain years, persons, strategic
changes etc. A practical way might be to first peruse the case, get a feel for the subject
matter, write down the structure of the text, ask yourself why it is structured that way and
see if you already get an idea of the general contents. Then, you read the case in more detail
while taking notes (taking notes helps in processing the information. If you are more visually
than verbally oriented, you can also try to think of symbols that summarize the contents for
you, creating a mind map of symbols). Then, with your notes, you read the case again to see
if you’ve missed anything or whether the meaning of certain parts of the case has changed.
(If you read it once before and once after studying chapters 1 - 4, you may find that you’re
perspective is already different)
Keep in mind
In all the different cases you will be tempted to look for problems to solve and to come up
with a quick solution. However: if you think you’ve identified the problem easily, try to
consider whether what you’ve found is a problem in itself or maybe just a syptom of a ‘not-
so-visible’ problem. How do you know? Johnson & Scholes also discuss the concept of ‘causal
ambiguity’, see what you make of that. The term ‘problem’ may also be guiding you off track,
what happens if you rephrase it as a challenge? If a company doesn’t have ‘problems’, would
that mean you don’t need a strategy?
You’re the consultant
The image you see is quite a stereotypical image of consultants, confident people in nice
suits, somewhat reserved (body/posture/non verbal communication), yet smiling and willing
to lend a helping hand. What other images can you think of? Could you come up with images
of people that lend a helping hand as well, yet break through the ‘suit’-idea?
Some differences
An imperative for every
Your job
company
10
Imagine during this whole module that YOU are the consultant. Imagine that you are a really,
really good one, companies fly you in, pay for your travel expenses and your hotel room and
loads of so-called ‘billable’ hours because the advice you give them is so accurate and to the
point that they feel their companies are back in business. What did you tell them that was so
special? And how did you come up with it?
Some differences
Theory Practice
11
Mind you, this is one of the main reasons your analyses result in weaker strategies. The
company that hires you knows it needs to be aware of politics. They’re hiring you to tell them
how.
Resources
• Your book
• The case text
• www.chn.nl/sls (next slide)
• Library (Studielandschap)
• iTunes U
12
Ofcourse your book and the case text - try to read them actively
iTunes U: seriously, check it out. It contains hours and hours of speeches, lectures,
documentaries on subjects ranging from quantum physics, to arts to history to psychology
introductions to research methodology, a range of subjects by some great universities.
Stenden provides ...
13
What is there?
• marketline - full country profiles, sector
reports, company profiles and products
analyses
• lexis nexis - full text database of most
Dutch quality papers and magazines
• business source premier (ebsco.chn.nl)
(only one available from outside the
schoolnetwork)
14
Stats
15
Wicked Questions
• “Wicked questions, unlike “trick” questions,
have no right answers but can expose strait-
jacketed assumptions about an issue, context,
or situation, opening up options and
possibilities not considered before”
16
Hua Wang and Arvind Singhal (in press). Entertainment-Education through Digital Games. In
Ute Ritterfeld, Michael J. Cody, & Peter Vorderer (Eds.) Serious Games: Mechanisms and
Effects. New York: Routledge.
See also: Papa, M.J., Singhal, A. & Papa, W. H. (2006) . A Dialectic Journey of Theory and
Praxis. New Delhi: Sage Publications
“Polarity managers can uncover the power of opposing ideas by posing wicked questions,
questions that have an embedded paradox or tension in the question [ ... ] Wicked questions
have no obvious answers, but help expose people’s strait jacketed assumptions about an
issue, context or situation. For example: how can we set direction when we don’t know the
future? How can we be both a system and many interdependent parts? A wicked question is
not a trick question. With a trick question, someone knows the answer. The value of the
wicked question lies in their capacity to expose our assumptions, and open up new options
not considered before. Exposing these assumptions in a question is both uncomfortable and a
relief.” (2006, p. 242)
Some examples
17
Strategic management comes from the military. Is the customer our enemy?
APA
• www.apa.org
• http://www.uvt.nl/diensten/bibliotheek/
instructie/litond/
verwerken_bronvermelding_APA.html
18
This is a great opportunity to make sure you ‘master’ how to refer to literature. This will save
you a lot of time when writing your thesis. In these cases you’ll benefit from it, because it
allows you to keep them brief.