You are on page 1of 17

Bar to Bar Justice causes eccentric to saddle up to the Bar

A little learning is a dangerous thing;

Drink deep and taste not the Pierian spring;
There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain;
And drinking largely sobers us again.
Alexander Pope 1688 - 1744
Not sober yet
[] On Behalf Of Bob Hurt
Tuesday, March 23, 2010 4:16 AM
To: 'Lawmen'
[Lawmen: 3525] Attorney Brad Henschel on becoming an attorney and the practice of law
I thought you might appreciate this attorneys perspective on the practice of law and what it takes to
become an attorney.
Bob Hurt

2460 Persian Drive

Clearwater, FL
33763 +1
(727) 669-5511
Fund Jurisdictionary Law
Newsletter Archives Downloads GetZooks!

From: Brad Henschel

Monday, March 22, 2010 8:38 PM
To:; Bob
Hurt; Lawmen; John Findley
Subject: Re: Rich Cantwell's scurrilous screed about lawyers
I went to law school in 1984 in order to help others with Tax problems and following the great
example of Larry Becraft. I was 39 at the time.
It was really difficult, especially at age 39 to go back to school. I had to go day and night and I had to
study ALL THE TIME to get all the confusing information being presented to me. I found out later the
teaching methods used in law schools, known was the socratic method was different from paralegal

schools were the paralegals were simply told the truth of the course instead of just reading cases to
learn what the law really
was about, as was done in Law school. The cost was expensive even at UWLA, a State Bar but not
ABA approved law school. I had 325 classmates, 1/2 being women. Only about 40-43 graduated and
of them 20, including me, passed the State Bar Exam. 20 out of 325 people. Those 325 people were
ALL better educated than I was. Most of them were already successful business people. One brought
instant printing to the US from Japan. Another was a real estate investor who drove his rolls royce to
school. These two dropped out.
Another was the paralegal for King of Torts lawyer in San Francisco - she flunked out in Civil
Procedure class.
Another was a government employee.
- He moved to Texas never having passed the Bar Exam and he told me that information face to face.
Another was the former Iranian Health Minister. Another was the daughter of a lawyer who quit 8
weeks ahead of graduation because she didn't want to be a lawyer, her father pressured her into it, so
she quit. - She had the highest grade average in the school.
Learning the law is only 1/2 of the equation. Then you have to apply it, that's another learning curve.
The pressure on lawyers is so extreme and the loss of sleep so pervausive that lawyers usually die
before age 50. Cancer is rampant among lawyers as is mental illness due to the pressures.
IF you worked two jobs at minimum wage you would have more money and work less than most
lawyers work.
Most of my law school classmates only wanted to make money. I wanted to learn the law and be good
at it. When they saw me coming they would run away so they wouldn't have to talk law with me.
I won a lot of cases before the Bar entered my life. Then I learned about how the Bar is really in
place to prevent disruption to the large law firms, many of whom are now victims themselves of the
The law is like every other occupation, it has great people and it has scum and everything in between.
The Bar is used to silence people like Richard Fine.
But mainly the general public doesn't understand legal ethics. They are mainly the antithesis of real
world ethics. Clients think a bar complaint will force the attorney to be
better. Richard Fine was disbarred after exposing judicial corruption of

the highest order.

The Bar and the legislature covered it up.
had the State of Calif sanctioned $30k for programming their computers to violate the US Bankruptcy

won case after case in criminal court and my motions in bankruptcy court for my clients resulted in

the expungement of millions in taxes.

Clients in CA are now facing a lack of affordable attorneys or no attorneys to provide legal services to
them as the CAL bar took out thousands of attorneys, leaving these people without legal representation
and left them at the mercy of the government and it's lawyers. - Brad Henschel, JD, now an inactive
member of the State Bar of CA.


This message is private and confidential.
It contains confidential and privileged information which is both privileged & confidential under state
and federal law and/or exempt from disclosure under law, including but not limited to the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC 2510-2521. NO reader may disclose, distribute or copy this
email. If you get this e-mail in error, notify me immediately by electronic-mail reply and delete this
original message. No recording, printing or sharing of this email, which has been sent over telephone
lines, is allowed, and recording it is
illegal. Cal. Penal Code 632.

From: Bob Hurt

To: Lawmen
Sent: Mon, March 22, 2010 4:48:32
Subject: Rich Cantwell's scurrilous screed about lawyers
In your screed below, you denounce the MAJORITY of attorneys but supply NO facts to support your
allegation. Because the lawyers bathwater has become dingy you seem to want to drown them, spank
them, or toss them out. That seems a little crazy to me.
We Need Attorneys.
Lawyers comprise virtually the ONLY PEOPLE IN THIS NATION who can handle litigation
competently, so the non-lawyer world generally cannot do without them. Even the lawyers admit that
only a fool represents himself in court, and because of vexatious litigant laws, methods of blocking
evidence from juries, and frivolous argument standards, even THEY cannot get justice in courts. They
pay a fortune for education, pay a fortune to maintain offices, pay a fortune in personal time doing
legal research, and pay a fortune for online and other law research services. They risk terrible sanctions
and contempt citations whenever they stand up against deluded, incompetent, or corrupt judges, risk
absolute destruction of their careers by professional foes in the bar, and then suffer substantial losses of
income to clients who stiff them. Many, if not most, attorneys work 70-hour weeks, live on the edge of
financial disaster, and take 5 to 10 years to build up a law practice that will allow them enough time
and money to take their families on vacation every year. In spite of all that, most attorneys do pro bono
work, giving of themselves to help those they consider deserving and unable to afford legal services.
So why do you seek to excoriate them with colossally unfair generalizations like those in your obloquy
below? Methinks thou doth protest too much. Way too.
Furthermore, you err in your pronouncements about licensing. The Constitution of Florida in Article V
Section 15 empowers the Supreme Court to regulate the practice of law: The Supreme Court shall
have exclusive jurisdiction to regulate the admission of persons to the practice of law and the discipline

of persons admitted. It integrated the bar in 1949 partly for that purpose. It has established,
through the bar, rules for an independent examiner to determine the qualifications of applicants for
membership. Upon successful qualification, the bar issues a bar number and card to the new member,
and the Supreme Court clerk issues the LICENSE as attorney and counselor at law which the new
attorney typically frames and hangs on the wall in the law office. You have seen many of these
licenses, and if you visit the Florida Bar web site you will find the bar number (the equivalent of the
license number) for every attorney and jurist bar member in Florida.
A Note about Smart People.
You seem to imply that smart people (like most attorneys) screw other people (the relatively stupid, I
presume). You fail to note that in many, if not most, cases a screwing simply cannot be helped. Should
a teacher grind the education of a classroom of students to a snails pace in order to accommodate the
stupid children in the classroom? Before busing that did not present much of a problem
because smart people generally lived in different school districts from stupid people, owing to their
relative abilities to buy nice houses in nice neighborhoods. Now, after busing, schools have honors
classes to segregate the smart from the stupid. No matter what, stupid kids dont end up with as good
an education as smart kids for the same reason that a pint jar cannot hold the amount of water that a
quart jar can hold: inherent capacities simply cannot be exceeded.
So, naturally, smart people generally exhibit more sense in managing money and their other affairs,
and that can make them seem to take advantage of stupid people, particularly in a free-enterprise
capitalist economic system. OUR particular system has in the past 100 years become burdened with
thousands of laws and regulations that protect the stupid from the smart and the weak from the strong.
But at the same time, our nations states have eliminated every vestige of eugenics laws that might
eventually have obviated those protectionist laws. What do I mean here? Our land needs fewer stupid
people in it, by at least an order of magnitude. Then caveat emptor wont seem like such a dirty term
because far fewer people will seem screwed. And I mean that everybody, not just attorneys, need to
learn the equivalent of the first two years of law school in their public education.
Legitimate Complaints, with Solutions. Regardless of the licensing issue, you dont have a valid
point to make in your anti-lawyer tirade, even though you could make some very valid points. Please
allow me to make some of them for you:
Integration Destroys Republic.
The integration of the bar with the Supreme court makes every bar member a member
of the Judicial Branch of government. The Florida Constitution requires in Article II
Section 3 that The powers of the state government shall be divided into legislative,
executive and judicial branches. No person belonging to one branch shall exercise any
appertaining to either of the other branches unless expressly provided
herein. It does not permit bar members outside the judiciary except as Attorney
General and State Attorneys and their assistant attorneys. All legislator attorneys and
staff attorneys in the Legislative and Executive branches operate in violation of the
Constitution and to that extent create a judicial oligarchy because the Supreme Court
can and does exercise dominion over all of them. That violates CUSA Article IV

Section 4 which provides in pertinent part The United States shall guarantee to every
State in this Union a Republican Form of Government.
Solution: de-integrate the bar and turn the regulation of the practice of law over to the
Executive branch.
Attorneys dont regulate judges, but tolerate judicial immunity.
Attorneys form the pool from which judges rise to office, and so attorneys comprise the group best
suited to lead in judicial reform for eliminating judicial corruption. They have the requisite skills and
the proximity to judges, so they know better than any public other than victims of corruption which
jurists have become corrupt or downright evil. They have let the people down because they dont use
their bar to police the judiciary. In case you havent noticed, the bar governors and grievance
committees ignore grievances against jurists. But they can and should work to revoke the bar licenses
of corrupt judges, for that would disqualify the judges from office (the state constitutions typically
make bar membership a qualification for becoming a jurist). Many attorneys fail to hold the courts
accountable or engage in guerilla activism against crooked judges. By guerilla I mean a form of
activism like hiring a Private Investigator to dig up the dirt on a judge, and then hiring a Public
Relations agency to expose that dirt to the press and the public through blogs, etc, without the attorney
coming under fire for bring disrepute to the profession.
litigate and lobby against judicial immunity and for empowerment and independence of grand juries to
investigate government employee crimes.
Business Practices.
Some law firms overcharge for services rendered and overbill clients by charging for
services not rendered. Some attorneys suffer from incompetence or laziness and dont
give clients their best effort at advocacy. As a consequence, many people who need
advocacy simply cannot afford the service, and of those who manage to afford it, many
dont get adequate advocacy, and lose the case as a result. Pro bono work does not
balance this out. The bar seems to turn a blind eye to much of this, and the public has
no clue whether the attorney for hire will do a good job or not.
Lobby for laws to require attorneys to give clients satisfaction questionnaires and make
the results public.

Services Monopoly.
Attorneys seem loathe to campaign against the unfair Unlicensed Practice of Law
statutes with which the bar and state attorneys attack private citizens who help one
another with legal matters. They have helped create a legal services monopoly that has
led to their overcharging for legal services. Attorneys really should become leaders in
the communities of their residence, guiding people in ways to keep our governments
constitutional. Many dont seem to participate nearly to the extent they should or could.
Lobby for change in UPL to apply only to specifically defined activities that actually
require knowledge gained in law school or other special certification.
The law should allow anybody to practice an area of law upon a demonstration of
competent knowledge in that area.
have probably noticed that I offered solutions to each problem. Lawyers cannot implement three of the
solutions by themselves. They need public support. You could help educate the public about their need
to provide that support. You could encourage attorneys to do the lobbying.
Many Attorneys Deserve Our Appreciation. Bottom
line, instead of flaying the flesh off the stooped backs of overworked Patriot Attorneys, you ought to
bless them for their general goodness and generosity, and encourage more to join their ranks and help
them excise and bring to justice crooked judges and over-zealous prosecutors.
What law professionals do you know who have created web sites and led movements to educate
patriots in the law and constitutional principles, and to mobilize people to effective political activism?
Can you name any? I can name three:
Larry Becraft - for at least 20 years, Larry has at some expense hosted a web site that
does not sell his legal services, but educates people in the law and guides patriots away from harmful
myths that will land them in prison, and guides students toward sound principles of economics.
Larry spent hundreds of hours scanning and converting to searchable text the Statutes at Large for the
income tax laws and the related Code of Federal Regulations, put them on DVDs, and makes them
available via the web and on disk to serious students. He operates a radio show at his own expense
weekly to educate people about tax issues and patriot myths, encouraging people to learn and use the
law, and participate in honest government.
Tom Cryer
for the past 2+ years, Tommy has led patriots in attacking the errors of the IRS, making a public,
political issue of those errors (such as the Stop Thief rallies at post offices at tax time) and educating

people about income tax laws and issues. He has posted all of Larrys searchable laws and codes on his
web site, making them freely available to everyone. He co-hosts the radio show with Larry, as a public
service, free.
Jon Roland
Jon does not practice as an attorney, but as an educator and law philosopher he devotes his life to
helping our governments adhere to the Constitution and our people become better Citizens. He
interacts with many attorneys and leaders in the Patriot movement to encourage people to become
activists in reforming our government and courts. His web site constitutes a treasure trove of related
educational information, including Larrys searchable laws.
I love these men. I invoke Gods most precious blessings upon them. I honor them for their devotion to
truth and their selfless contributions to our nations underlying greatness. I dont examine them under a
microscope for their peccadilloes, vices, and sins. I dont expect perfection of them. But, I do
encourage them toward whatever perfection they can achieve in their short lives on this whirling rock.
I encourage you to do the same.
Bob Hurt

2460 Persian Drive

Clearwater, FL
+1 (727)
Fund Jurisdictionary Law
Newsletter Archives Downloads GetZooks!
You received this because you have membership in the "Lawmen" Google Group.
Comment to group owner - reply to the message (only the owner posts messages).
See the archives, change options - visit
/ Subscribe - send email to
Resign /
Unsubscribe- send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to or
reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.

*** Note****

I looked into it further to find that Richard Fine was not only dismissed from the Bar, but put behind
bars and has been in solitary confinement for over 18 months without charges laid against him
presumably holding him there until the Bilderberg New World Order is in place having been meeting
since 1954 began their initiative in 2007 with the world financial collapse that we ain't seen nothing

10 Years if you think Government corrupt USA

Richard a Fine example goes to jail

Please join the Facebook Cause: FREE THE LA-FIPs (Los Angeles
Falsely Imprisoned Persons)
English Intro:
Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that judges in Los Angeles County had
taken "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of
California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two
weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held
ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing
was ever entered in his case.
Richard Fine attempted to have his habeas corpus reviewed by the United States courts, from the US
District Court, through the US Court of Appeals, to the Supreme Court of the United States; however,
all United States courts involved in the matter denied Richard
The two records below, produced by the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, and by
the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department as the legal foundation for the holding of Richard Fine

are alleged as fraud, each on its own. Moreover, the production of contradictory records by the two
justice system agencies of Los Angeles County is alleged as additional fraud to top it off.
1) View the FALSE AND DELIBERATELY MISLEADING records provided by Sheriff Lee Baca in
letter to Los Angeles County Supervisor, Michael Antonovich, in response to request for access to the
California public records that were the non-existing warrant and booking records of Richard Fine. For
over a year, Sheriff Lee Baca insists on providing false records - claiming that Richard Fine was
arrested on location and by authority of the "San Pedro Municipal Court". No such court has existed
for almost a decade:
2) View the FALSE ON ITS FACE March 4, 2009 Judgment and Order of Contempt. Such judgment
record is missing any authentication at all. It was stamped on its face "FILED" with the date of March
4, 2009, but signed on its last page by Judge Yaffe and dated March 24, 2009. Such judgment was
never entered as required by California Code to make it "effectual for any purpose":
The case of Richard Fine documented a pattern of publication of false records in online public access
systems, and denial of access to or missing true judicial records:
1) The Los Angeles Superior Court in Marina v LA County (BS109420) published a false online
"Case Summary", but denied access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) in the case
management system of the court.
2) The Sheriff of Los Angeles County in re: Richard I Fine, (Inmate #1824367) published false
online arrest and booking records in its "Inmate Information Center", but denied access to the true Los
Angeles County Booking Record of Inmate Richard Fine.
3) The US District Court, Los Angeles in Fine v Baca (2:09-cv-01914) published a false online
"PACER docket", which the Clerk of the Court refuses to certify, but denied access to the NEFs
(Notices of Electronic Filing - the authentication records) in the case, and to the paper record, which
was Richard Fine's commencing record - the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which was allegedly
adulterated at the US District Court.
4) The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit in Fine v Sheriff (09-71692) and Fine v Sheriff (09-56073)
published false online "PACER dockets", but denied access to the NDAs
(Notices of Docket Activity - the authentication records), and also to critical records filed by
respondents in the appeal.
5) The US Supreme Court in Fine v Baca (09-A827)
published a false online "docket" noting denials on both March 12, 2010 and April 23/26, 2010, which
were not supported by the Court records in the case. Any evidence of valid judicial review of the
Application was missing from the Court file.
Below are links to two complaints filed with the office of US Attorney, Central District of California for public corruption and deprivation of rights in the case of Richard Fine:
1) View complaint filed with US Attorney Office, alleging public corruption and deprivation of rights
by the California Judicial Council and California Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald George, relative
to their conduct in the habeas corpus at the US District Court:
2) View the Complaint filed July 8, 2010 against Judge David Yaffe and Sheriff Lee Baca - for Public
Corruption and Deprivation of Rights in re: Imprisonment of Richard Fine:
3) View the Complaint filed July 1, 2010, against Counsel Danny Bickell, of the US Supreme Court,
alleging public corruption and deprivation of rights relative to his conduct in the Application Fine v
Baca (09-A827).
Executive Summary:
Instant petition is filed with Los Angeles County Sheriff LEE BACA, to use his due authority and
properly address the legal, civil and human rights of an American, inmate RICHARD FINE

Reconstructed Chronology:
- Prior to the March 4, 2009 proceeding, a request was forwarded by the court of Judge David Yaffe to
the Sheriff Department to have the Warrant Detail present in the proceeding, with the understanding
that the proceeding would end with the sentencing and jailing of Attorney Richard Fine for contempt.
- On March 4, 2009 Judge David Yaffe indeed pronounced such sentence in open court, as evidenced
in the Court Reporter's transcript. Through such oral directives, Judge Yaffe misled the Sheriff's
Warrant Detail to arrest Attorney Richard Fine at 11:05 am - albeit - with no written, valid, and
effectual warrant at all.
- On March 4, 2009, at 11:05 am, the Sheriff's Warrant Detail arrested Richard Fine in open court, at
the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles, albeit - with no warrant
at all.
- On March 4, 2009 Judge Yaffe then left the courtroom, and likewise - left the Warrant Detail with no
record as an adequate legal foundation for the arrest. Instead, Judge Yaffe proceeded to create a
second, contradictory record in the court file. The court file to this date does not reflect any sentencing
or jailing at all. In fact, the March 4, 2009 proceeding was entirely omitted from the record!
- On March 4, 2009, at 12:32 pm, the Sheriff's Warrant Detail, having no record as foundation for the
arrest and jailing, recorded the arrest and booking of Richard Fine as if they had taken place on
location, and pursuant to the authority of the non-existent "San Pedro Municipal Court." Such records
were a false and deliberately misleading records, and out of compliance with the law. They had no
valid court order or judgment as its foundation. No such court had existed for almost a decade! The
false and deliberately misleading booking record is the main subject of instant petition.
- On March 4, 2009, at 4:31 pm, papers were received by the Sheriff's Department through an
anonymous fax transmission, unauthenticated, and with no cover sheet, from "Judicial Services". Such
papers reflected yet a third, again false and deliberately misleading set of retroactive records for the
arrest and booking of Richard Fine. Such records included invalid records: (a) The March 4, 2009
Remand Order and (b) the March 4, 2009 Judgment for contempt.
On such background it was understandable why Sheriff Lee Baca refused to respond to Attorney
Richard Fine's habeas corpus petition, and likewise - why Sheriff Lee Baca has refused to allow access
to the California public records, which are the arrest and booking record of Richard Fine.
Pleading: We pray Sheriff Lee Baca review the arrest and booking records, and if such records are
found failing to conform with the fundamentals of the law - take corrective actions and immediately
release Attorney Richard Fine. With it, the Sheriff may mark a new beginning for the Los Angeles
County justice system, with dignity of the legal, civil, and human rights of
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
o:spt="75" o:preferrelative="t" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f"

Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human
Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles
County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case
management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United

Frank, You signed on May 25, 2010.

Your signature has been
delivered to:
Sheriff Lee Baca, Los Angeles County, California

What have the

experts said over the past decade?
* "Innocent people remain in prison"
* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the
justice system that the Blue Panel Report
recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have
not produced any response that we know of...
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
* judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they
did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000)
* This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police
states and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are
Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000)
Please see additional information and sign the petition:

Richard Fine is held under false records - he must be immediately released
Official reports show that thousands were falsely imprisoned as part of the Rampart scandal (19982000) - they must be immediately released.
Review of the computerized records of the Sheriff's Department documented routine ongoing false
imprisonments - they must be stopped.
US and/or international investigation must be instituted of the widespread public corruption in Los
Angeles County, California.

How large is the cause?

The innocent must be freed and the guilty made to recompense the victims

Ehe following was published on the web
Legal Associates | Everyone Deserves Equal Justice
We give Everyone Equal Access
Etched above the doors of the US Supreme Court are the words "Equal Justice Under Law."
It's one of the basic principles of democracy. Unfortunately, in reality we
receive about as much justice as we can afford.
The wealthiest ten percent can afford to have a lawyer on retainer, and are
accustomed to consulting with one before making decisions. On the other hand,
the bottom ten percent has access to public aid. But what about the rest of

For most people, the idea of calling a lawyer before taking legal action or
making an important decision just isn't an option -- either because we think we
don't need one or because it would simply cost too much.

But there is a solution.

Legal Associates is
currently serving the legal needs of well over one million families for less than a dollar a day!
Content copyright 2009. Legal Associates. All rights reserved.

So I sent them an e-mail

From: Frank Gallagher
Sent: October-22-09 2:31 PM
To: 'Jesse Magee'
Subject: RE: Legal Associates | Feldman, Kramer & Monico
Obviously any lawyer is in the business to cash in on the illegal administration and enforcement of
purported to be democratic governments that demands equality and they publicly proclaim it, but do
not enforce it, whereas private sector lawyers are set up to debate the non-debatable permitted by the
obvious criminal frauds as you people admit on your site as I am well aware that a person can buy or
rent all the rights they can afford, with the legal profession profiting from the woes of society that the
legal system responsible to deal with it refuse to do so.
The root of societys woes is the illegitimate legal system as CanLaw a Canadian
national Lawyer referral service states on their front page that the Law Society cannot be trusted as
they protect their members not the consumer.
I went on to read more published on their site that gave me the crazy idea that they would help me in
exposing the illegitimate legal system and they confirmed that I was a wild and crazy guy
It is time to change to a legitimate government legal system that protects every individuals equality
democratic rights internally as financed by the taxpayer to do so.
I am Frank Gallagher Director/Operations Charter Democracy Force Justice Inc.
federally incorporated to Solicit Victims of Crime for Class Action Suits against Government
Personnel whereas the majorities are victims 80 percent as you publish.
We are operating under company name 1 LIFE www.1life.cC and have the site being professionally
developed to sell membership and C-Note certificates for the express purpose to organize the majority
providing them the democratic voice they are entitled to with equality, an entity every individual of the
majority desires but not a probability unless equally supported to ensure the governments consistently
enforce it.
The Law Society is going down and abrupt change is eminent, not having a leg to stand on in an
informed populace.
I am considering attempting to bring a Law Firm on side with us though seemingly a venture into

futility but nothing ventured, nothing gained.

I provide you the opportunity to scrutinize my sites for consideration and eagerly await your response,
though well aware of the depth of thought required to do an about face and the length of time it will
take to study the evidence to be coherent to the validity and firmness of the rationale that can only
conclude with the collapse of the present government legal systems once the public become informed.
Please acknowledge receipt and your intention whether or not to consider
Thank you

I published on my Scribd site and not long after


their web site was gone

Not much longer
"Double Poof"

the document along with 250 others on my Scribd site were gone
Fiduciary Responsibly Accountable Nefarious Kink
Truths Holistic Interactive Retrospect Transcendental Electromagnetism Enslavers Nemesis
Illegal Aid Illegal
Law Society Act administered by the Attorney General Guardian of the Public Interest asserts we are
all entitled to competent legal representation consistent with the Roles and Responsibilities of the
Attorney General, however history, reality and all evidence irrefutably shows the Public Interest will
be supported only if consistent with the Law Society personnel personal interests and that of the Queen
Truth 4 Jabber
Trek 4 Justice

Satanic Attorney General Elite
An important part of the Crown's - and thus the Attorney General's - responsibility in conducting
criminal prosecutions is associated with the responsibility to represent the public interest - which
includes not only the community as a whole and the victim, but also the accused. The Crown has a
distinct responsibility to the court to present all the credible evidence available.
Wealth Order Monstery

Old Money Evolves Nefariously
Majority born too late!!!
Inherent precedence must keep the slaves working for SS Sustainable Satanic growth a most onerous
and formidable challenge for our purported to be representative PRICE puppets

Fiduciary Independent Governance -13 Conscience Order Monetary


You might also like