Secularism, Liberalism & Islam

http://islamicspiritualityk.wordpress.com/category/islamic-scholarly-tradition/ Posted in Acquiring Sacred Knowledge ['ilm], IBA Talks, Islamic Scholarly Tradition, Issues faced by Muslim Ummah, Karachi Talks, Muslim Youth, Taqwa with tags atheism, colonialism, diet Islam, harm principle, ideology based approach, knowledge based approach, liberalism, love for Allah, Muslim secularists, secularism on December 18, 2010 by Islamic Spirituality Download Full Lecture MP3 [Following are a few highlights derived by Ms. Fouzia Arif from the super-amazing Lecture given by Shaykh Kamaluddin at IBA, on 18th December 2010] Secularism refers to taking religion out of the state, society and humanity. It simply means you can be a good person without having taqwa (the act of staying away from sins for the sake of Allah), without adopting Sunnah, without Allah basically. Liberalism is based on the harm principal. It means, you can justify what youre doing to be right by saying it doesnt harm anyone. You say if I drink beer, I dont do anybodys nuqsan hence I can drink. Its like you get into IBA, dont set foot on the campus for four years, and then turn up on the graduation day and say I deserve a degree because I didnt harm any student or any professor for that matter. I havent done anyone harm. Why should I not get the degree? You cant get the degree because you didnt do what you were required to do even though you avoided harming people. There is a group of people called Muslim secularists. They critically analyse everything except the existence of God. They say everything has to be shown and proven even if its in Quran. It has to appeal to the aqal. They do not accept the superiority of wahy over aqal. There are things in Islam that are transrational. Why do you offer 2 rakaats in Fajr but 4 in Zuhr? Theres no explanation for it. You have to come to Allah on his terms and not on your terms. You have to submit to Allah, to His Commands and to His Will. This is what Islam is all about. People dont want to do whats in Quran and still please Ar-Rahman! Now thats a new type of Islam. Reform comes from the word reformulate. You reformulate something that is wrong. Its a universally accepted fact that deen-nabawi is perfect. Then what exactly are they trying to change? We look for a version of diet Islam. Its like having a double cheese burger with a diet coke and saying to yourself itll help me lose weight. Reformists keep on reducing the necessary things of the deen to make it more easy to follow and they kill the essence in the process. How to go about this mess then? One. Choose ilm over aqal. Two. Choose taqwa over nafs. Its not that we dont wont to be wali of Allah, its just that we have poor taqwa management. When we say choose taqwa over nafs, we mean fight your nafs and dont fulfill its desires. Take sin to be sin. Reformists today change the definition of sin. When people dont consider their act to be a sin, they dont feel the guilt and hence they dont do tauba. Bab-e-Taqwa of Jannah was already closed for us because we couldnt stay away from sins, by not considering our sins a sin and hence not doing tauba for them, we also close Bab-e-Tauba for ourselves! How will we enter Jannah then?! Acquiring of ilm is emphasized over using ones aqal because there are two approaches. The knowledge based approach and the ideology based approach. In the knowledge based approach, there is application of ilm with aqal. In the ideology based approach, there is application of aqal without ilm. This is

what the young generation is doing nowadays. Its like I attend an economics conference discussing the ideal model to be applied in the world. Three great economists put forward three models and their pros and cons and then decide that the first one is best. I then standup and object that no the third one is the best. They reject my claim because though Im sitting in this conference of theirs, I dont have ilm of this specific field of study i.e economics. I remain adamant that no I listened to your presentation for the past one hour and I am a really aqalmand insaan and so now you should accept what I say. They will not listen to me because one has to be able to master a particular field of study before they can express an opinion. You need to be aqalmand but your aqal can be applied only to the area of your ilm. Its only when you spend years studying something and have acquired its ilm that you can pass a judgment. You need to study Marx to disagree with him. You need to have the ilm of Islam and then apply your aqal to it. Islamic scholarship is as solid a subject as economics more than it in fact. Next, in the knowledge based approach, you read first and decide later. In the ideology based approach, you form opinions first, and then read. In the knowledge based approach, you keep the philosophy of dont disagree till you understand. In the ideology based approach, your philosophy is dont agree till you understand. In a nutshell, acquire ilm of the deen. The way to a university students heart is through his mind. The Shaykh said Aapki aqal mera mukhatib hai magar aap ka dil mera shikaar hai. Rationality can take you only to a certain level. Its submission to revelation and love for Allah in ones heart that does the main job.