Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assessment Rubric 2009
Assessment Rubric 2009
Aspects 3, 4 How well was the purpose of the study, population and sample
described?
Criterion Mark Comments
Items above not described or unclear 0
Items mentioned but poorly expressed 1
Items mentioned partially & correctly described 3
Items correctly and clearly described 4
Aspect 6 A Was the data organised appropriately? (Tables & tallies all 12
questions –can combine answers into tables)
Criterion Mark Comments
Data not organised or inappropriate 0 x 12
Organisation partially appropriate 1 x 12
Data well organised & showing links 2 x 12
Aspect 6 B How well did the learner select and use a variety of methods (pie
charts, bar graphs, etc) to summarise & display data.(3 aspects to analyse)
Criterion Marks Comments
Badly presented 0
Mostly well presented (-1 for each 3x5
error)
All 3 questions well presented 15
Aspect 7 Summary -Do the conclusions follow from the data?
Criterion Mark Comments
Statements inappropriate & 0
unsupported by data
Only some statements correct 3
Statements correct with minor errors 6
Statements supported by data 10
Statements correct & insightful 16
Aspect 8 Bibliography
Criterion Mark Comments
No extra sources listed 0
Sources either relevant or correctly 3
listed
Sources relevant and correct 4
Learner
goals:___________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
Signed __________________________________________________________
Assessor Learner Date