How to disseminate hyperlinks [each serving as a facet of a larger narrative] while attempting to prompt the reader to act [in

ways perhaps not previously pondered] will continue to entail composing prose that comprises a news-meta-analysis *with embedded-proofs] and additional citations with titles that are self-explanatory; due to the backlog of accumulated-data, contemporary and less-recent references will be provided, for each concept will thereby be demonstrated to have legs *rather than reflecting only a reflex-reaction to a headline]. It may appear a bit tiresome to request critique/input/corrections but, while people are added [and drop-outs have already dropped-out], the routine of recycling submissions will be followed [unless the e-mail contains something that is truly-redundant, in which case the info will serve as self-entertainment/enlightenment, the fusion of which has been popularized by Glenn Beck]. In the process, points regarding BHOs Foreign Policy will be given shorter-shrift, if only because his policy of following from behind has already been proven to be disastrous; despite what may have been the ambient tale from the Media, the fact is that the vast array of countries that grew to appreciate America during the first eight years of this millenniumhave demonstrated strong skepticism during the past half-decade of BHO. Certain alerts will seep through, again, to paint a larger picture of BHOs venal acts *pressuring BB is the most obvious, now bartering Pollard to attain more good faith+ and those who serve as accomplices to the Demssuch as AIPAC [silent while BHO kicks-around BB] and the local Federation [preferring to maintain a Dem-oriented line]. Anyone who challenges these conclusions is invited to provide a recitation of countries that have welcomed BHOs disengagement (among prior allies, not Iran/Russia/China) compared with those who are struggling with its impact (among potential allies, such as Georgia/Ukraine/Kazakhstan) and those for whom achievements by Bush-43 are being rapidly degraded (Iraq/Afghanistan/Pakistan); even those who try to remain loyal are disheartened (Saudi Arabia/India/Formosa) in the face of his focus on ObamaDontCare. When citing the local Federations predilection to championing the Dems [vide supra], the reach of such ideological purity (extending to topics the Exponent covers as news) has been disheartening (particularly when compared/contrasted with the impact of writers in the Jewish Press); its behavior has recently been summarized and to follow is a terse update of what is happening regarding the effort to ensure all Pennsylvania students are apprised of the Holocaust (recalling that a significant amount of research, homework, legwork and analysis was required, prior to the initiation of lobbying during the past month to help peopleparticularly erstwhile alliesto supplant pending-legislation that would foist what was perceived as an unfunded mandate upon Pennsylvanias 501 School Districts. Note Federations desire to receive $300K to provide a uniform, high-quality resource *read, taxation-funds+ to provide teacher education and certification, while eschewing attaining the greater goal of simply mandating education of all students on the Holocaust, Genocide, and Human Rights Violationsand then allowing for PAs 501 School Boards to be offered items that would satisfy local concerns (by grade-level, related coursework, and projected time-allotment), sourced by entities dedicated to this cause (e.g., PA Department of Education, Federation, Holocaust Awareness Museum). Because the Rs are currently dominant in Harrisburg (rather than beloved-Dems), Federation seems prepared to tolerate defeat of this decades-long goal, assuming the Dems are subsequently triumphant in 15 (particularly noting Corbetts dismal polling).

Yet, it seems intuitive that attaining what is desirable incrementally should be the unifying-task (starting NOW), even if this may yield to decreased pressure (projected over the years) to enlarge any resulting program (assuming its proven to be working). Of course, those who would want the perfect to destroy the good continue to recoil, raising the legitimate query into whether the Federations $-motives obscure the goals they profess to harbor. One would THINK a shared-goal would be to ensure all students cannot graduate High School while being clueless as to the past/present/future import of this unit that explores the ideology/impact of efforts to destroy vast populations. One would THINK they would concur with the intent to recognize myriad ways this has been achieved (from the convenience of simple-starvation to the logistical encumbrance of gaseous-technology) against those whose mere existence has become unsettling to imperious leaders of a squishy-to-the-import populace (such as was the case during the past century inter alia in Nazi Germany, in Armenia, in the Ukraine, and in Cambodia). What must be emphasized is the twofold recognition that the Rs are not thrilled with unfunded-mandates [fixed by the amended Senate bill, passed unanimously by the Appropriations Committee] and that there is strong precedent for mandating instruction in specific topic-areas [by whatever mechanism, for example, regardless of what (Common) Core may or may not have recognized]. Everyone will be able to share in this pending-victory (meshing the intent of Anthony Williams and Brendon Boyle, as they plan furtherance of their political ambitions), and no one will have compromised corevalues while having achieved common-ground (both philosophically and operationally). That the Exponent continued to block publication of a letter that had been submitted directly to its editor (as an op-ed) and via its Kvetch (as a letter-to-the-editor) has been obviated by using a just-discovered mechanism of uploading with simultaneous Facebook submission. Noting how easily-debunked the efforts of the PA Jewish Coalition were, push-back willhopefullydefuse its efforts to derail a bill that now promises to fly through the Senate, become approved by the House (dealing definitively with the issue) and get signed by Corbett (good PR). {When uploading a letter regarding a subsequent news-article that was comparable to the above-critique of its editorial, I learned how to give a presentationwith double-spaced graphsby typing elsewhere prior to cutting/pasting; the key points-of-disagreement are captured herein.} Because of Guzzardi, a state-level subtheme will be integrated [adding a spate of necessary reviews], although it must be emphasized that these blasts do not constitute his stances *for example, when gay marriage issues are raised+; they do suggest [to me] a method by which his long-awaited effort to disrupt the GOPs status-quo can be rationalized for those who might initially recoil @ any discordance. The Guzzardi-Campaign will be highlighted via reformatting of his emanations because, in addition to our intense interactions during this millennium, his efforts serve as a simple manifestation of a national groundswell within the GOP to purge the party of those professing conservatism (domestic, foreign-policy, social) while aiding/abetting Dems who invoke taxation-largess to fund special-interests (no matter how heartfelt). Thus, if the basic concept underlying Guzzardis campaign (characterized by a friend as Faith, Family and Individual Responsibility) is to inject a certain libertarianism that,

in turn, would refocus priorities (from abortion to economics), he must be commended. He doesnt abandon these issues (for they are elucidated on his website), but his goal is to achieve an alteration in the climate in Harrisburg (foiling lobbyists and dependents). Yet, he knows I will adopt a critical approach to his assumptions, namely, that politicians who accept labor-union largess will routinely vote for their interests due to this fact; Rep. Mike Vereb, for example, has been targeted, even as he lists his positions that are at-variance with those of organizations that have provided campaign-contributions. Here, Guzzardi predicted my estrangement from Mike Fitzpatrick correctly, even as I [along with those in the TEA Party Movement] afforded him wide-discretion until he has proven to be problematic [voting at-variance with TPM-principles and dissing Cruz]. Nevertheless, I afford people the benefit-of-the-doubt and, thus, will simultaneously (publicly and privately) support his challenge to Corbett (for overwhelming reasons aforementioned) and work with Mike to help to sharpen the statewide-GOPs message. I await a call from Mikes scheduler, John, to work-up a potential policy-compendium which would be used on the county-level, a goal his predecessor has professed but had failed to satisfyvia direct conversations during get-togethers during the past decade because ANY Republican would be preferable philosophically/operationally to Dems.) On issue-after-issue, the Rs are correct, even as Guzzardi rails against insufficient effort to achieve ends that are allegedly-shared (such as decreased taxation of fracking); reacting to an article noting that Corbett had awarded $133 million in state grants, Guzzardi wrote Democrats cannot be trusted with money. Some days I think Tom Corbett is Democrat. He, certainly, spends and taxes like a Democrat. Specifically, therefore, as a GOP-Committeeman, I will remain engaged in the party (maxing-out to whatever degree colleagues which to invite my studied-involvement); simultaneously, therefore, I will mainstream the values popularized by the TPM (and by Guzzardi), thereby meshing what is best viewed as oil and vinegar (rather than oil and water). Here is Guzzardis latest campaign-manifestation, phrased in his unique-style of content-with-candor; anyone who knows him will recognize that, for him, this is toned-down rhetoricbut no less precise ,particularly because he is serving as his own communications director per an e-mail just sent to Daniel S. Bixler (Assistant Producer, Pennsylvania Cable Network (PCN), 401 Fallowfield Road, Camp Hill, PA 17011, Ph (717) 730-6000 x215, http://www.pcntv.com) whose tag-line quotes Emerson, reflecting the view of The Bob (guzzardi & dr. bob): "Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm."-: Bob Guzzardi Corbett cannot win in November. If you do not accept that premise, then there is no reason to support me. To put it another way, I have as good a chance of winning in November as does Tom Corbett and Team Harrisburg Republican. The polls for the past year show ever increasing decline in Tom Corbett's electability. There is no reason to think the decline will turn around. Tom Corbett's numbers are worse than Rick Santorum. I am unaware of any poll or any evidence that I could (or Tom Corbett) win November 2014.

Deny Corbett the Nomination and Defeat Harrisburg Republican Leadership and Stage for electing a Constitutional Republican 2018 state House, Senate and Gubernatorial candidates for 2018 in open and competitive primaries. The 2014 Republican Primary 20 May is first play in the long game. My second goal is to encourage people to run for state and local committees on a Reform Republican promise of open and competitive primaries without endorsements from either local or county or state committees. My immediate goal is to convince enough people to circulate petitions to get on the ballot. Not to give the disaffected and disappointed Republicans who have been repeatedly betrayed by leadership an alternative choice means leadership stays in control and change becomes impossible. Republicans deserve an alternative choice. Not to oppose Corbett and Harrisburg Republican Leadership is to concede defeat. Complaining is not enough. I am an agent of change. Personally, I am not that important. I am cipher for the disconnected, the disaffected and the disappointed to have a voice. Please help me circulate petitions to collect signatures to get on the ballot. Mark Driver I have two questions Bob. Where do u stand on abortion and where did u stand on marriage? Please explain fully. Thxs. Bob Guzzardi Mark, you are asking the wrong question and don't seem to understand the purpose of my campaign. However, to answer your question, marriage is between a man and a woman. And Gay and Lesbian marriage are not a threat to Pennsylvania's fisc. FYI We do not need another costly, government bureaucracy to solve a problem that does not exist. I am not an abortionist but I am, also, not a member of the Pro-Life movement or the Pro Life community which includes many Pro-Lifers who have taken more and more of the Forgotten Taxpayer's money. The entire Pro-Life Lancaster delegation voted for Corbett's annual, perpetual $2.4 Billion dollar tax increase and, personally, I feel you should be ashamed of supporting people who take other people's money simply because they are Pro-Life. Limited government means lower taxes and more money in the community. It makes it more difficult to advance your agenda when you are taking my money. "Do Not Steal" is Biblical, too.

One final reminder is apt for those who still think Corbett is politically viable, noting that the Sandusky scandal fallout dominated PennLive's top stories in 2013 [with hyperlinks to these stories having been compiled by Penn-Live, the website of the Harrisburg Patriot-News]; the latest in the ping-pong occurring among attorneys (in an article that is replete with links) in the Sandusky-trial is that Graham Spanier's lawyer pushed-back against Cynthia Baldwin's grand jury testimony in alleged Sandusky coverup case. [Recall my view that this trial should also include Baldwin and McQuery as defendants, both for what transpired years ago and for what wasnt told to the PSU-Board during the past three years; anyone doubting my immediate reaction to the Freeh-Report are invited to draw their own conclusions and, in particular, concerns that it incompletely provided evidence of Paternos direct involvement (noting his absence from the extensive e-mail pathway comprising an extensive/impressive appendix), inasmuch as he was not (to my knowledge) a mandated-reporter (as would be Schultz/Spanier). I am aware of that JoePa would have been indicted, as well, for not having done more than tracked his having reported what he had been told had occurred had he not suddenly died; he may have acted as if he understood its import by distancing himself from Sandusky, regardless of the truth and its aftermath (by inter alia continuing to discount him as a potential-successor and, instead, replacing him as defense-coach). Also unknown are the inner-details of PSU-NCAA negotiations, but I suspect the latter (regardless of its motives) demanded elimination of all subsequent-wins by the former (no matter their history) because the alternative would have been suspension (justified or not, noting the extensive publicity this case had continued to garner). {Unique neologisms such as ObamaDontCare will be preserved philosophically, but their provision wont be uniform if they get in the way of conveying a particular point about the A.C.A., for example, noting how unaffordable is truly is, for most who necessarily pay health insurance premiums.}