You are on page 1of 17

Reconstruction of LGM climate from the dust in ice cores and marine sediments Abstract Recent studies have

shown that mineral dust can affect the earth radiation budget, biogeochemical cycle, and precipitation. The Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has identified dust as a radiative forcing agent in its climate change reports and considered it as a climate change variable (Solomon et al., 2007). By examining the level of dust concentration in ice cores and marine sediment cores, we can infer important information about the climate of the past. Though dust in ice cores and marine sediments is a better indicator of dust deposition rather than emission, study of dust activity from various spatially distributed proxies can give a tentative picture of dust sources, transport and deposition in the past. In addition, analysis of dust particle size distribution and chemical composition can reveal information about the wind pattern and climate coupling among different regions of the earth (Xiao et al., 1995; Stuut et al., 2002). A number of ice cores and marine sediment samples have been studied to infer paleo dust activity in the earth (Basile et al., 1997; Ruddiman, 1997; Delmonte et al., 2004). In an effort to reconcile dust data from different sources, The Dust Indicators and Records of Terrestrial and Marine Paleoenvironments (DIRTMAP) data base has been established (Kohfeld and Harrison, 2001). This database provides a comprehensive information of dust at different time-scale and also provides basis for comparison with dust simulation from current earth system models. In this work, I review the studies of ice cores and marine sediments including DIRTMAP focusing on the dust preserved in these proxies in order to understand the last glacial maximum (LGM) climate. I also examine the discrepancy on dust information from different proxies and their possible causes. This study will provide a tentative picture of climate of the past along with the distribution of paleo dust sources during the last glacial maximum.

1. The dust cycle Atmospheric dust has implications for earth radiation budget, biogeochemical cycle, precipitation, human health and visibility. Dust cycle is very complex as the dust has a diverse origin and a number of atmospheric variables act on it between source and sink. Availability of fine sediment is a pre-condition for dust emission which has both organic and inorganic origin. In the paleo-perspective, dust was mainly of inorganic origin associated with rock weathering, volcanic activity, sea salt emission, and grinding and flouring under large mass such as ice sheets. In the present day, dust is further complicated by the addition of particles from biomass and fossil fuel burning. Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram of the dust cycle involving different stages such as origin, transport and deposition.

Figure 1. The dust cycle showing different stages of the dust cycle and their evolution, adapted from Shao et al., 2011.

2. Dust proxies 2.1 Ice cores Several ice cores have been drilled in Antartica and Greenland for paleoclimate reconstruction. Though these ice cores were not explicitly drilled for deriving dust records, their dust content have been extremely useful for climate reconstruction. In addition to temperature signal and samples of atmospheric gases, ice cores also contain deposited dust which can be used as a proxy for several climate variables including wind and precipitation. Because dust deposition in the ice cores results mainly from wet deposition, it also carries precipitation signal. Further, as the precipitation events involves isotope fractionation, stable oxygen isotope (18) can also indicate wet deposition. However, because the fractionation is affected by a number of factors such as source water, seasonality, altitude, latitude etc., precaution is necessary in interpreting 18 record in regards to wet deposition. The mineralogy, chemical composition and particle size distribution of the dust in the ice cores give indications about the various aspects of the dust cycle. For example, finer mode in the particle size distribution (PSD) would mean distant dust sources and coarser mode can imply proximity to the active dust sources. Ice cores may also contain signals of volcanic eruptions which can be identified by chemical analysis as the volcanic dust mainly consist of sulfate particles. In the present climate, dust PSD distribution is lognormally distributed in the range 0.1 to 10 as observed in different field studies. However, there are no such observations of atmospheric dust concentration in the Antarctic and Greenland where ice cores have been drilled. Dust concentration data in the ice cores are obtained mostly by direct measurements of particle mass/number concentrations made with either a Coulter Particle Counter or a laser sensor (e.g. Lambert et al., 2008). Deposited dust in the ice cores is most suitable for understanding the sink processes but it can also provide source and transport pathways as the particle size of deposited dust show

variable distribution depending upon the source and transport pathways. Dust deposition also depends upon the snow accumulation rate, vertical profile of the long-range transport, and the dry/wet deposition of the atmosphere associated with the hydrological cycle. Dust deposited in the ice core can be the result of both wet and dry deposition, dry deposition being more effective near source regions because coarser particles tend to settle first. Ice core records used for dust study has been compiled by DIRTMAP team (Kohfeld and Harrison, 2001) which have provided a broader understanding of the dust cycle. In addition to these studies, there are a number of recent studies based on additional ice cores, which are discussed later. 2.2 Marine sediments Inorganic material in marine sediments also provide useful information of paleoclimate. Weathering and erosion process creates a range of fine sediments which are carried to the ocean through various Aeolian and fluvial processes. Because the sedimentation rate is very low, ocean basin sediment cores are not very useful proxies. So, sediment cores are good from ocean-land margins or open ocean lands where there is high sedimentation rates. One main problem for using marine sediments to infer dust is that the organic or biogenic fraction must be removed to get useful information about the potential source and chemical composition of the deposited sediment. Interpretation of dust from marine sediment is more complicated than from ice cores because sediment in marine sediment is derived from various sources such as Aeolian, fluvial, weathering and deposition and melting of ice or glaciers. They can also be affected by resuspension, gyres, western boundary currents and upwelling. Biogenic fraction can be easily removed by separating the carbonate fraction but the problem is that some carbonate is also present in Aeolian dust, specially originating from Sahara, which can underestimate aeolin dust (Ruddiman, 1997).

3. Paleoclimate reconstruction 3.1 From ice cores Petit et al., 1999 analyzed dust concentration in vostok ice core dating back to 420,000 BP and showed that the dust flux is strongly affected by orbital forcing (Figure 2). They also compared that dust flux in Vostok ice core with ice core results from Greenland and found that dust concentration in Anatartica correlates well with that in Greenland ice cores dust concentration. This and many other studies have consistently shown that the dust flux was about 15-25 times higher during the last glacial maximum than the Holocene (Figure 2 (e)). This could be because of the strengthening of wind speed which is also supported by increased sodium concentration (sea salt proxy) during the glacial maximum (Figure 2(d)). Such a large increase in dust flux during the LGM must have affected the regional radiation budget considerably, given our present understanding of net cooling effect of dust as presented in the IPCC report (Bernstein et al., 2007). So the increased dust flux during the LGM could have positive feedback on temperature driven by the stronger orbital cycle. As a direct effect, dust layer scatters the shortwave radiation reaching the earth and it can enhance the formation of ice in Polar Regions, increasing the albedo. In the other hand, dust deposition on the snow enhances melting of ice which reduces the albedo and contributes to the ice volume. Given such complex feedbacks, our understanding of the effect of dust on radiation budget is still limited though climate system models have improved greatly both computationally and physically. One of the key problem behind is the complex dust-cloud interaction mechanism.

Figure 2. Time series of different proxies at Vostock Ice core (a) deuterium profile (temperature proxy) (b) 18Oatm (c) seawater 18O (ice volume proxy) (d) sodium profile (proxy for marine aerosol) (e) dust profile (volume of particles measured using a Coulter counter). Adapted from Petit et al., 1999. Lambert et al., 2008 analyzed the ice core dust concentration in EPICA dome C and found that dust depositional flux and temperature are well correlated during glacial times. They observed an interesting relationship between temperature (indicated by D) and dust depositional flux (Figure 3). The crescent shape of the dust flux vs. D relationship suggests that the dust fluxes have a higher temperature sensitivity as the climate becomes colder. As most of the present dust sources are located in the tropics, the above relationship means that the coupling of high and low latitude became stronger as the temperature becomes colder during the glacial times. The relation between dust and temperature is weak during the interglacial times ( D values greater than - 405 per mil) which can be due to a number of factors such as reduced wind speed, precipitation, increased transport towards high latitude etc. The particle size distribution of the

dust in EPICA ice core shows that the dust particle follows a lognormal distribution with a modal diameter of about 2 (Lambert et al., 2008), which is surprisingly similar to the PSD of present day atmospheric dust. As there are no dust sourses close to Antartica, the dust must have been advected from low lattitudes in the mid to lower troposphere. For such fine particles, dry deposition is inefficient so the dust deposited in Antartica could either be a result of wet deposition or because of increased transport.

Figure 3. Dust-temperature relationship at an Antartic ice core (EPICA dome C) adapted from Lambert et al., 2008. Green and blue dots represent data from 0-430 kyr BP and 430-800 BP, respectively. Delmonte et al., 2004 analyzed dust concentration and particle size distribution of dust in three Antartic ice cores. By analyzing samples (each of 5-6 cm thickness representing about 3

years of accumulation), they observed about 850 ppb dust concentration maxima during LGM and a minima of 10 ppb (about 12 kyr BP) during the pre-holocene. The dust isotopic signature (Sr-87/Sr-86) in three ice cores appear almost identical indicating that they all share a common dust source. Further, the isotopic signature was compared to the fine soil fraction from South America which also matched nicely, confirming the dust source to be of Patagonian origin. Strontium (Sr) and Neodimium (Nd) are used to trace the dust source locations (Biscaye, 1974). The ratio Sr-87 (radiogenic)/Sr-86(non-radiogenic) changes with time in rocks and soils and it is preserved wherever they are carried by fluvial/Aeolian action. Simmilarly, Nd isotope ratios are used to provide information on the source of igneous melts as well as to provide age data. The various reservoirs within the solid earth will have different values of initial especially with reference to the mantle (Biscaye, 1974). The Greenland ice cores have also been very useful for studying dust changes in millennial scale which is not seen in the Antartic ice cores. Fuhrer, Wolff, & Johnsen, 1999 studied the calcium concentration (mineral dust proxy) in the Greenland ice cores and found high levels of dust in colder periods than interstadials. The reason behind this change in dust concentration during stadials/interstadials is yet to be understood. D-O events are the result of calving of North American ice sheets which have also been related to the strengthening/weakening of Atlantic Meriodional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). Moreno et al., 2002 conducted another study based on lithogenic fraction of sediment in the Mediterranean region and showed that the aeolian dust transport varied with the millennial scale DansgaardOescher (DO) events, with higher dust transport from the Sahara during cold stadial periods of the DO cycles. Because the DO events occur in short time scale (about 1500 years), changes in dust concentrations in this time scale reflect changes in wind speed rather than the sediment availability in the dust source regions.
143

Nd/144Nd ratios,

3.2 From marine sediments Ruddiman, 1997 examined terrigenous sediment flux in 12 tropical atlantic marine sediment cores over the last 25,000 years. They assumed terrigenous sediment flux to be of Aeolian origin and subtracted CaCO3 and opal fraction (both organic) from the total sediment to get the Aeolian sediment flux. They obtained most of the cores from topographic highs which reduces the effect of turbidities and hemiplegic sediment. However, not all stations are in topographic highs and some are near the coast in west-Africa which can receive sediment from fluvial processes and some gravity deposits as well. They found that the terrigenous flux (Aeolian) was greater during the glacial times (Figure 4) in all cores, consistent with the ice core records. They also found that the dust input didnt change following the early Holocene moisture maximum which made them believe that the change in dust flux is less related to aridity than to the wind.

Figure 4. Mean dust flux for glacial and interglacial (now) period.

Another study by Sirocko, et al., 1991 investigated marine sediment cores in the Arabian gulf. Their method is similar to that of Ruddiman, 1997 but here they also separated biogenic opal by dissolving in potassium polytungstate solution. With this the net lithogenic sedimentation rate was calculated. Further, they separated biogenic and Aeolian carbonates using carbonate oxygen isotope and found that about 15% of carbonate in marine cores was of Aeolian origin. Results show that the average bulk lithogenic sedimentation rate in Arabian Sea didnt change over the last 27,000 years. The sedimentation rate gradually decreases northwest to southeast (which is also the direction of shamal wind, a dominant wind pattern in the region at the present) but again increases in the southern border of Indian subcontinent and east of Oman probably because of river borne sediment. The effect of Shamal wind on dust is also seen in the PSD, the fraction of coarse grains (greater than 6) which decreases northwest to southeast. The coarser grain size during the LGM could be because of the strengthening of wind. Magnetic susceptibility of marine sediment has also been studied for identifying breaks in paleo climate patterns and to verify regional climate trends from other proxies. Such studies are mainly focused in the Atlantic and Mediterranean region to track the input of Aeolian sediment especially from the Sahara. In general, marine sediment deposited during wet climate show lower magnetic susceptibility as a result of lower dust production. However, magnetic susceptibility is affected by the presence of magnetic (e.g. hematite) and paramagnetic (e.g. clay) substances and also by the digenetic dissolution of magnetic materials. Because of these issues, they are often interpreted together with chemical analysis of the sediment. Petit et al., 1990 compared the magnetic susceptibility of the sediment core from Indian Ocean to the dust flux from Vostok ice core and found that both of these proxies compare well in representing higher dust flux during the LGM.

4. Implications to biogeochemical cycle A large amount of dust is deposited on the ocean which can modify the biogechemical cycle as the dust contains nutrition (e.g. Iron and Phosphorous) for phytoplankton. As the productivity is essentially nutrition-limited, mineral dust input is one of the most important factor that governs the dust cycle, which ultimately affects the carbon cycle. Generally speaking, one may believe that the photosynthesis was suppressed during the glacial times which would increase the CO2 in the atmosphere. However, atmospheric CO2 results from the net effect of a number of carbon sources and sinks. Solubility of CO2 in the ocean depend upon a number of factors including salinity, pH and temperature. For example, atmospheric CO2 can be decreased by the increased solubility of CO2 in water at lower temperature. The so called Iron Hypotheses (Martin & Fitzwater, 1988) suggested that iron rich atmosphere during glacial times deposited a lot of iron in the subantartic region increasing the productivity and hence lowering the CO2. It should also be noted that the degassing of CO2 in the CO2 rich upwelling region would also increase atmospheric CO2. Given this relation of the dust cycle to the carbon cycle, the lower level of CO2 during the LGM cant be looked in isolation with the dust feedback. 5. Comparison with model results Mahowald et al., 1999 compared model simulated dust deposition with ice core and marine sediment data. Their results indicate that the model simulated dust depositional flux over tropical and mid-latitude regions is in good agreement with global reconstructions, but it failed to simulate the 15-25 fold increase observed in glacial dust input over Antarctica. This shortcoming is currently attributed to an incomplete representation of circulations in the current models. In the study, the concentration of dust in the ice core was converted to the deposition rate by multiplying with ice accumulation rate. However, precipitation field is one of the most problematic field in current GCM and the model doesnt simulate the precipitation/snowfall well in general. Their results suggest that vegetation played key role in expanding the dust sources during the LGM.

The precipitation was low during the LGM which reduced the vegetation consequently increasing the extent of dust sources in the tropics. They also found that lowered CO2 during LGM also reduced vegetation because it increased evapotranspiration, and reduced photosynthesis by the C3 plants. It should be noted that their model dont consider the radiative feedback of dust aerosols and its effect on albedo. Their model also doesnt consider effect of dust on increasing productivity on the ocean which has feedback through CO2. Albani et al. 2012 simulated LGM dust conditions using a state of the art coupled climate model (CESM). By comparing model simulated dust deposition with ice core dust concentration and particle size distribution, they showed that in addition to the Patagonian dust sources, Australian source also contributed to the increased dust flux in the Antarctica during the LGM. Though the land and atmosphere model used in their study is very advanced, the ocean model used is a slab model which dont really represent the existing ocean circulations including the atlantic meriodional overturning circulation (AMOC). For accurate dust simulation, instantaneous wind fields are extremely important as the dust emission is initiated when the wind speed exceeds a critical threshold known as threshold friction speed. In this regard, ability of the model can be questioned as the wind simulated by these models is 3-6 hourly average. The current model outputs show that the 6 hourly average wind doesnt exceed ~ 12 / so the dust emission due to large scale atmospheric phenomena such as thunderstorm and cyclone cant be simulated by these models. Also the current models have main problem in reproducing precipitation (which ultimately affect soil moisture that modifies threshold wind speed for dust emission). Another issue in modeling is that the simulation of the model is greatly sensitive to the temporal and spatial resolution of the model. Further, current dust model has the main problem that they cant accurately represent the spatial distribution of dust sources when compared to satellite measurements. So, they rely on tuning with the help of satellite datasets (which also have problems because the dust observed is a mixture of mineral dust, biomass burning and transported dust). In addition to the problems within the model configuration, inability of the

models to represent LGM climate conditions is also because of the unavailability of high resolution input data (soil types, soil moisture, vegetation data, etc) and boundary conditions. Lunt & Valdes, 2001 conducted a back trajectory analysis of the air mass at Dome C to understand the transport and sources of dust. They used Ice sheets and land-ocean mask from a previous study and used CO2 concentration of 200 ppm for forcing. Present day boundary conditions used were observed SST, ice sheet and orography and CO2 of 345 ppm. Results show that most of the back trajectories (no. of trajectories passing through each source in a 30 days period) belong to Patagonian dust source. However, present day back trajectory tracks the dust source back not only to South America, but also to Australia and South Africa driven mainly by the westerlies (Figure 5). Another interesting result they observed is that the seasonality is less pronounced for Patagonian dust sources compared to Australian and South African sources. It is also seen that present day transport is much stronger than that during the LGM. Given similar climatic conditions between the LGM and the present, Antarctic dust cant be attributed only to Patagonia during the LGM. It is interesting to note that present day major dust sources are located in the Middle East and North Africa and the Patagonian source doesnt exist at all. In this regard, model didnt show the dust sources that originate from the main dust sour ces of present day, so the model used in their study also has weaknesses. Further this work only simulate dry deposition and not the wet depositions which can be very high as the snow-scavenging is very important in the Antarctica. One important point to be noted is that since transport is more efficient in the present than LGM, higher dust during glacial cant be explained by transport, there must be some changes in the origin/sources or sinks of dust during the glacial time.

Figure. 5. Back trajectory of air mass for a destination at EPICA dome C, Antartica. It can be seen that dust to Antartica is directed from diverse source/direction. (Obtained by running HYSPLIT back trajectory model at http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php) 6. Conclusion Reconstructing climate of the past from paleo proxies is reliable only when sufficient observations across the globe are available since climate has large regional differences. Most of the studies based on ice cores and marine sediment proxies until now generally agree on the increased dust flux during the glacial times. However, there is an ongoing debate on the origin or the sources of dust during the LGM. Even with the increasing number of proxies in the future, we can expect that this debate will go a long way as the deposited dust is controlled by the aridity in the dust source regions as well as the strength of transporting wind. Chemical/mineral composition can constrain the distance of the dust sources but they cant completely describe the sources and direction of the dust especially when the dust originates from multiple sources. In

this context, climate system modeling has provided promising opportunity to understand the dust cycle as a component of the whole climate system. Using past boundary conditions, fully coupled global circulation model can be used to understand the dust transport and deposition processes. However, the boundary conditions such as topography and sea surface temperature cant be specified accurately for the past in coarse-resolution climate models. In addition, even the complex fully coupled models existing today have difficulty in simulating dust sources and distribution in longer time scale because of our poor understanding of basic physical processes such as dust-radiation interaction, dust-albedo feedback, biogeochemical cycle and dust-cloud interaction. With the improvements in modeling and increase in the no. and distribution of proxy records, we can expect that the various unsolved questions including increased dust flux up to 15-25 times of that of present in the high-lattitude will be resolved in the near future.

7. References Albani, S., Mahowald, N. M., Delmonte, B., Maggi, V., & Winckler, G. (2012). Comparing modeled and observed changes in mineral dust transport and deposition to Antarctica between the Last Glacial Maximum and current climates. Climate dynamics, 38(9-10), 17311755. Basile, I., Grousset, F. E., Revel, M., Petit, J. R., Biscaye, P. E., & Barkov, N. I. (1997). Patagonian origin of glacial dust deposited in East Antarctica (Vostok and Dome C) during glacial stages 2, 4 and 6. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 146(3), 573589. Bernstein, L., Bosch, P., Canziani, O., Chen, Z., Christ, R., Davidson, O., Kattsov, V. (2007). IPCC, 2007: climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I. II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva.< http://www. ipcc. ch/ipccreports/ar4-syr. htm. Biscaye, P. E. (1974). Deep sea sedimentation. Environmental Health Perspectives, 9, 177178. Delmonte, B., Basile-Doelsch, I., Petit, J.-R., Maggi, V., Revel-Rolland, M., Michard, A., Grousset, F. (2004). Comparing the Epica and Vostok dust records during the last 220,000 years: stratigraphical correlation and provenance in glacial periods. Earth-Science Reviews, 66(12), 6387. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2003.10.004 Fuhrer, K., Wolff, E. W., & Johnsen, S. J. (1999). Timescales for dust variability in the Greenland Ice Core Project (GRIP) ice core in the last 100,000 years. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (19842012), 104(D24), 3104331052. Kohfeld, K. E., & Harrison, S. P. (2001). DIRTMAP: the geological record of dust. Earth-Science Reviews, 54(1), 81114. Lambert, F., Delmonte, B., Petit, J.-R., Bigler, M., Kaufmann, P. R., Hutterli, M. A., Maggi, V. (2008). Dust-climate couplings over the past 800,000 years from the EPICA Dome C ice core. Nature, 452(7187), 616619. Lunt, D. J., & Valdes, P. J. (2001). Dust transport to Dome C, Antarctica, at the Last Glacial Maximum and present day. Geophysical research letters, 28(2), 295298. MAHOWALD, N., KOHFELD, K., HANSSON, M., BALKANSKI, Y., HARRISON, S., PRENTICE, I., RODHE, H. (1999). Dust sources and deposition during the last glacial maximum and current climate: A comparison of model results with paleodata from ice cores and marine sediments. Journal of geophysical research, 104(D13), 1589515916. Martin, J. H., & Fitzwater, S. E. (1988). Iron deficiency limits phytoplankton growth in the northeast Pacific subarctic. Nature, 331(6154), 341343. doi:10.1038/331341a0 Moreno, A., Cacho, I., Canals, M., Prins, M. A., Snchez-Goi, M.-F., Grimalt, J. O., & Weltje, G. J. (2002). Saharan Dust Transport and High-Latitude Glacial Climatic Variability: The Alboran Sea Record. Quaternary Research, 58(3), 318328. doi:10.1006/qres.2002.2383 Petit, J. R., Jouzel, J., Raynaud, D., Barkov, N. I., Barnola, J.-M., Basile, I., Stievenard, M. (1999). Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica. Nature, 399(6735), 429436. doi:10.1038/20859 Petit, J.-R., Mourner, L., Jouzel, J., Korotkevich, Y. S., Kotlyakov, V. I., & Lorius, C. (1990). Palaeoclimatological and chronological implications of the Vostok core dust record. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v343/n6253/abs/343056a0.html Ruddiman, W. F. (1997). Tropical Atlantic terrigenous fluxes since 25,000 yrs B.P. Marine Geology, 136(34), 189207. doi:10.1016/S0025-3227(96)00069-2 Shao, Y., Wyrwoll, K.-H., Chappell, A., Huang, J., Lin, Z., McTainsh, G. H., Yoon, S. (2011). Dust cycle: An emerging core theme in Earth system science. Aeolian Research, 2(4), 181204. Sirocko, F., Sarnthein, M., Lange, H., & Erlenkeuser, H. (1991). Atmospheric summer circulation and coastal upwelling in the Arabian Sea during the Holocene and the last glaciation. Quaternary Research, 36(1), 7293.

Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Miller, H. L. (2007). The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 235337. Stuut, J.-B. W., Prins, M. A., Schneider, R. R., Weltje, G. J., Jansen, J. H. F., & Postma, G. (2002). A 300-kyr record of aridity and wind strength in southwestern Africa: inferences from grainsize distributions of sediments on Walvis Ridge, SE Atlantic. Marine Geology, 180(14), 221233. doi:10.1016/S0025-3227(01)00215-8 Xiao, J., Porter, S. C., An, Z., Kumai, H., & Yoshikawa, S. (1995). Grain Size of Quartz as an Indicator of Winter Monsoon Strength on the Loess Plateau of Central China during the Last 130,000 Yr. Quaternary Research, 43(1), 2229. doi:10.1006/qres.1995.1003

You might also like