Heretic’s Foundation XIII: The End of High-Concept Shakespeare?

« Clyde Fitch Report 10/5/09 7:25 AM

The nexus of arts and politics

Search>>
Edited by Leonard Jacobs
[rss me] [tweet me]

The Clyde Fitch Report

Home
5 Questions
Announcements
Arts Advocacy Update
Baby Runaround Gossip
Burke’s Law
Bylines
About

CF Interviews
CF Video
Events
From the Blogroll
Heretic’s Foundation
Media
Pure Outrage
Pure Politics

Heretic’s Foundation XIII: The End of High-Concept Shakespeare?

Monday, October 5, 2009
Heretic’s Foundation

By John Hudson
darkladyplayers@aol.com
Special to the Clyde Fitch Report

For most of the 20th century and now into the 21st, high concept approaches to Shakespeare have driven
many productions, leaving trails of misunderstanding in their wake. Although I am usually skeptical about
the impact of theater reviews, the almost unanimous response to Peter Sellars’ recent Othello has given me
hope. The critical response will not help those poor souls who bought tickets to the now-closed show, but it
may give serious pause to any producers and directors contemplating future high concept productions of the

http://www.clydefitchreport.com/?p=4198 Page 1 of 6
Heretic’s Foundation XIII: The End of High-Concept Shakespeare? « Clyde Fitch Report 10/5/09 7:25 AM

Bard.

The Daily News, noting that “a stampede of people“ headed for the exits “with no plan of returning,” made
me suspect New York theater audiences are also getting fed up with paying good money for productions that
abuse the text and the playwright’s intention. John Simon of Bloomberg News, wielding his trademark
verbal scalpel, suggested that the audience should have stormed the box office seeking refunds, calling this
Othello an “obscenity,” “abysmal” and full of “absurdities.” Newsday’s Linda Winer noted that the
production discarded the play’s meaning and — like so much high concept Shakespeare — tries to make it
“a play about something else,” while New York magazine called it “painfully adrift,” an Othello that not
only “lost its moorings” (great pun) but has “almost nothing intelligible to say.”

I assert there is no need to resort to high concept for Othello to be exciting, interesting or relevant. As the
critics indicated, Sellars’ attempt at creating contemporary meanings, through high-tech staging and
alterations to the characters’ cores, made the play much less interesting.

Othello is a play about a handkerchief. If Sellars and his production team had read the academic research on
the play, they would have realized that one key element is the identity of the handkerchief itself. It is
referred to 27 times as a handkerchief and three as a napkin, like the same item of clothing in As You Like It.
Only one other piece of clothing in the early 17th century was oddly known both as a napkin and a
handkerchief: the soudarion, the face cloth laid over Jesus’ face in the tomb. The Geneva Bible translation
called it the “kerchief”; the Bishop’s Bible called it the “napkin” (John 20:7). This is why the playwright
adds in to Othello peculiar details about the handkerchief that are not in Cinthio’s original story: that it was
sewn in prophetic fury; it was “dyed in mummy” (III.iv. 74). That’s why the object is “proof of Holy Writ”
(III.iii.322-24), why it is a “wonder” (III.iii.101).

Understanding the identity of the handkerchief is key to understanding why Desdemona is smothered (V.ii.
83) — unlike in the source text, Cinthio’s Un Capitano Moro, where she is struck on the back and then has
her skull broken. It also explains why her death takes place on Holy Saturday, the day when Jesus lay in the
tomb with the handkerchief over his face. This is commemorated in church liturgy by the snuffing out of the
candle flame — just as Othello snuffs out Desdemona’s life like a light. Scholarship shows that Othello was
created as a rewriting, indeed a covert parody, of the characters of the jealous Joseph and the Virgin Mary
from the Mystery Plays, supplemented with texts from the canonical and apocryphal gospels. Othello is a
fascinating allegory — I believe an anti-Christian one. The playwright’s real underlying meanings are much
more compelling than Sellars’ attempts at contemporary relevance.

John Hudson is a strategic consultant who specializes in new industry models and has helped create
several telecoms and Internet companies. He has recently been consulting to a leading think tank on the
future of the theater industry and is pioneering an innovative Shakespeare theory, as dramaturge to the
Dark Lady Players. This fall he will be Artist in Residence at Eastern Connecticut State University. He
has degrees in Theater and Shakespeare, in Management, and in Social Science.

This entry was posted on Monday, October 5th, 2009 at 5:05 am and is filed under Heretic’s Foundation. You can follow any
responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

« Arts Advocacy Update CIV: “Why Oh Why Ohio — and Michigan” Edition

5 Questions I’ve Never Been Asked: Shirley Lauro »

http://www.clydefitchreport.com/?p=4198 Page 2 of 6
Heretic’s Foundation XIII: The End of High-Concept Shakespeare? « Clyde Fitch Report 10/5/09 7:25 AM

Leave a Reply

John Hudson Name (required)

JohnHudson9@aol.com Mail (will not be published) (required)

http://www.darkladyplayers.com/virgin.htm
Website

Submit Comment

http://www.clydefitchreport.com/?p=4198 Page 3 of 6
Heretic’s Foundation XIII: The End of High-Concept Shakespeare? « Clyde Fitch Report 10/5/09 7:25 AM

Roundtable on U.S.
political discourse

ADVERTISEMENT

Join msnbc.com Politics

http://www.clydefitchreport.com/?p=4198 Page 4 of 6
Heretic’s Foundation XIII: The End of High-Concept Shakespeare? « Clyde Fitch Report 10/5/09 7:25 AM

www.Fitness -Singles.com Ads by Google

» About CFR
Search for: Search

Twitter Posts
New Blog Post on Clyde Fitch Report From the Blogroll XII: "Boom Crunch!" Edition
http://www.clydefitchreport.com/?p=4215 1 hour ago
New Blog Post on Clyde Fitch Report From the Blogroll XII: "Boom Crunch!" Edition
http://www.clydefitchreport.com/?p=4215 1 hour ago
New Blog Post on Clyde Fitch Report 5 Questions I've Never Been Asked: Shirley Lauro
http://www.clydefitchreport.com/?p=4203 1 hour ago

Facebook Status
Leonard Seven things to get done today. Three already out of the way. The four left are carving
out Mt. Rushmore with a spoon, landing a man on Mars, getting decent healthcare for all
Americans and learning Esperanto. Hm. My spoon is ready. October 3, 2009
Leonard I stood on the stage of Broadway's Golden Theatre tonight for the talkback after the
preview performance of David Mamet's Oleanna. Cynthia Tornquist hosted excellently, and I
sat beside the equally excellent Professor Mitchell Moss of NYU. I was honored, truly, and had
a blast. October 2, 2009
Leonard Many thanks to everyone that turned out tonight for the theater blogger event! October
1, 2009

Recent Comments
RpMcD on The Impossibly Impossible Terry Teachout
Adam on 5 Questions I’ve Never Been Asked: Mimi Imfurst
Josh on 5 Questions I’ve Never Been Asked: Mimi Imfurst
Leonard on Are Artists, Arts Advocates and Arts Groups Ready for the GOP Takedown of the

http://www.clydefitchreport.com/?p=4198 Page 5 of 6
Heretic’s Foundation XIII: The End of High-Concept Shakespeare? « Clyde Fitch Report 10/5/09 7:25 AM

NEA?
Marc on 5 Questions I’ve Never Been Asked: Mimi Imfurst

Recent Posts
From the Blogroll XII: “Boom Crunch!” Edition
5 Questions I’ve Never Been Asked: Shirley Lauro
Heretic’s Foundation XIII: The End of High-Concept Shakespeare?
Arts Advocacy Update CIV: “Why Oh Why Ohio — and Michigan” Edition
Media Alert: Leonard Jacobs on FoxNews.com’s The Strategy Room, Oct. 5, 10am

Archives
Select Month

Menu
Arts Advocacy Update
Bylines
From the Blogroll
Media
Pure Outrage
Pure Politics

© 2009 by Leonard Jacobs. The Clyde Fitch Report is powered by Word Press and was
designed by Marc Almendarez.

http://www.clydefitchreport.com/?p=4198 Page 6 of 6