Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DYNAMICS
The finite element involves the transformation of a continuous system (infinite degrees of freedom) into a discrete system (finite degrees of freedom). It is instructive therefore to examine the behaviour of simple discrete systems and associated variational methods as this provides real insight and understanding into the more complicated systems arising from the finite element method.
Spring-mass systems
A possible representation for the above 1-D problem is If A x = A then it may be reasonable to assume that
( )
F1 (t )
m1
F2 (t )
k=
EA AL and m 2 = m 1 = m = . L 2
m1 0
&1 k (u 2 u 1 ) = F1 and m 2 & & 2 + k (u 2 u 1 ) = F2 or in matrix form m1 & u u &1 k k u 1 F1 0 & u 0 m && + Ku = F . The matrix 1 = + succinctly written as Mu is known & 2 k k u 2 F2 m 2 & u 0 m2
An alternative form exists called the
as a lumped-mass matrix, with mass located along the principal diagonal only.
consistent-mass matrix, which has mass located off the principal diagonal, i.e. a matrix of the form
m11 m 21
m12 . The m 22
theory above provides no indication about how the mass should be distributed for accurate representation of the rod.
& m 1 u 1 2 1 1 &1 &2 + m2u m1 u Observe that the kinetic energy for the above system is T = 2 = &2 2 2 u 0
A more sophisticated approach is required, similar to the principle of virtual work, which in dynamics is replaced by Hamiltons principle. Hamiltons principle requires an understanding of variational calculus.
Hamiltons Principle
Let us consider the use of variational calculus in a dynamical setting. Hamilton suggested that we should consider the variation
t2
t2
called the Lagrangian. Hamilton's principle states that of all possible motions the dynamics of the system extremises the integral of the difference between the total kinetic energy and the total potential energy. Hence we consider
Ldt = (T - V )dt = Wa dt .
t1 t1 t1
t2
t2
Note that the work term Wa is not explicit in the above statement; if the virtual work is developable from a potential it could be included in V the total potential energy. However, if there is any dissipation during the motion caused by friction, viscosity, strain rate effect or hysteresis, then the virtual work done by these forces is not convertible to an energy-potential. Thus, for non-conservative systems, that component of virtual work, which is not developable from a potential, must be included in the last term of the above equation. Our focus is on the form
(T Wse )dt = Wa dt
t1 t1
t2
t2
Ldt = u
t2
L & u
t2
d L &i dt u
L u = Fi , where, i = 1 : n . i
1 1 & 2 ku 2 mu 2 2
k m x
F(t ) u (t )
Example
Consider the following single degree of freedom spring-mass system:
T=
1 1 & 2 , V = Wse = ku 2 , mu 2 2
Wa = Fu Thus, L = T Wse =
Ldt =
t1
t2
t2
t1
t1 t2
t1
Let
precisely the equation obtained with direct application of Newtons 2nd law.
Example
Consider a bar of constant cross section subdivided into three elements.
l1 F1 (1)
[1] x (2)
l2
(3) [2]
l3
(4) F4 [3]
Consider further, the following series of masses and springs representing the 3-element rod. u3 u1 u2 k k
1 2
k3 4
u4
1
1
m1
F1
m2
F2
m3
F3
m4
F4
Al 3 Al 1 A A , m2 = and (l 1 + l 2 ) , m 3 = (l 2 + l 3 ) , m 4 = 2 2 2 2 EA EA EA , k2 = , k3 = . the spring stiffnesses are k 1 = l1 l2 l3 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 &1 &2 &2 &2 + m2u T = (m1 u k 1 (u 2 u 1 ) + k 2 (u 3 u 2 ) + k 3 (u 4 u 3 ) 2 + m 3 u 3 + m 4 u 4 ) and Wse = 2 2 2 2 d L L = Fi gives Simple matter to check that the identity &i dt u u i m1 =
m1 0 0 0 0 m2 0 0 0 0 m3 0 & k u 0 & 1 1 & 2 k1 u 0 & + &3 0 u 0 & &4 u m4 0 & k1 k1 + k 2 k2 0 0 k2 k2 + k3 k3 0 u 1 F1 0 u 2 = F2 , i.e. Mu && + Ku = F . k 3 u 3 F3 k3 u 4 F4
Note that T =
t2 t2
&&dt u T Mu
t1
t2
t2
u
t1
Kudt =