Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Systems
The Goal
NWO
http://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2012/04/23/current-membership-list-of-the-illuminati-committee-of300/?year=2012&monthnum=04&day=23&like=1&_wpnonce=4be8bdfc2d
Inhabited until 2024 then 4 year end of Life Replace with New very Useful Space Solar Power Systems
Dr. D. C. Hyland Professor Texas A&M University 3141 TAMU 719B, H.R. Bright College Station Texas. 77843 Mobile: 979 255-7769 Email: dhiland@tamu.edu
Much smaller rectennas, serving local areas. Reduced ground-based power transport, reduced ground footprint
Reduced initial investment to obtain an operational system.
Weather Control
Turnkey Integration
6/10/2013
Selectable Ground Base Collection & Energy Storage System Performance Database & Software A Full Development & Integration Plan The Satellites to be planned & retrofitted with Beam Control; Earths Weather Control System
R & D Studies
1) if you are interested in this idea, then you should take a look at the Mirasolar (or Mirasolar) design developed by Dr Fraas [inventor of the triple junction solar cell], here are some web links: http://nextbigfuture.com/2012/03/mirrors-in-space-for-low-cost.html http://jxcrystals.com/solarPV/MiraSolar_Satellite_Concept.pdf
2) In LEO it is not possible to get global coverage from a SSO, because you can only see a small part of the Earth from the altitude of ~1000 kilometres. You can only supply power to the thin strip of the Earth which is near the day/night terminator
3) for a multi-satellite constellation in LEO outside of SSO, to achieve global coverage you need to have thousands of Earth ground stations on day one. For GEO you only need one ground station.
4) the changing line of sight distance and polarization makes the ground stations and the spacecraft much more expensive than for a GEO architecture, i.e. with active steering and adjustable gains. Thank You Charles Radley for in depth research & concerns
Solar/Energy Absorption
Solar Energy Satellite(s)
Studies:
1.
2.
3. 4. 5.
Best Solar Absorption/Conversion Modular, Expandable, Controllable & Shape Changing/Morphing Best Earth Orbit positions, or how many where?
SolutionCell Design optimization
2. 3.
2. Expandable 3. Controllable
EM Frequencies
Microwave / Antenna
The largest such array yet built and will serve as a test bed for a concept known as Massive MIMO. MIMO, or multiple-input, multiple-output, is a wireless networking technique aimed at transferring data more efficiently by having several antennas work together to exploit a natural phenomenon that occurs when signals are reflected en route to a receiver. The phenomenon, known as multipath, can cause interference, but MIMO alters the timing of data transmissions in order to increase throughput using the reflected signals.
Studies:
1. 2. 3.
4. 5.
Sizing per consumed kWh/population Storage Systems Types (Existing, piggyback or new) Modular & Expandable increased consumption & Population Spread & Placement Safety Improvements & Improved techniques over existing grid. 1. Less Susceptible to Nuclear or EMP
(Hardening Requires a 60 DB shrouding/insulation)
Requirements:
Orbital conditions for direct Delivery & Timing
Requirements:
Space Delivery vs. Requirements
Requirements:
Mirror Morphing System Requirements
How Many Satellites Required Optimal Orbital Positions Design Options & Build Schedules Boeing, Lockheed, Northrop, Honeywell, Raytheon, BAE, B/E, etc
Next Steps
Find a Better way to Web Conference Trello vs. Gmail vs. gotomeeting, etc
http://timothyhughes.sharedby.co/share/Ekz8Z3
Funding
http://blog.cleantech.com/tag/nrel/
Recently SunPower announced it broke the record for solar cell efficiency for a large area silicon wafers. NREL certified the SunPower cell at 24.2%. I anxiously pulled up one of my favorite solargeek charts, NRELs Best Research -Cell Efficiencies to plot SunPowers accomplishment. The key term in the title of this chart is Research -Cell. By definition a research cell is typically a one off and small (on the order of 1cm2). Researchers at University of South Wales still hold the record for single crystal silicon cells (aka monocrystalline) at 24.7%. SunPowers announced a full-scale solar cell that is a certified record holder for large area silicon wafers. SunPower, you overcame one challenge, making a large cell. This is impressive. I look forward to removing almost from my po st when you announce a new product line manufactured at scale with a 24+% efficiency OR you announce a research 24.8+% research cell.
http://en.openei.org/apps/TCDB/
SPS-ALPHA: The First Practical Solar Power Satellite via Arbitrarily Large PHased Array http://www.nasa.gov/offices/oct/stp/niac/mankins_sps_alpha.html#
The Co2 BS
B.S.
970 s, 11 deg sweep over 7743 km. 3286 m/s velocity gain
GEO
320km perigee
Part 1 Economics and transport technical Part 2 Building a seed propulsion laser Part 3 Completing the seed laser Part 4 Business and political case
Part 1
Power sats Economic analysis to undercut coal Lift cost limit $100 for 5 kg/kW Beamed energy & analysis 10 km air drop Laser progress
SPACEBORNE ARRAY
RECTENNA ON EARTH
Simple analysis
10 year return on capital, 80,000 hours $1600/kW can be paid back at 2 cents per kWh $200/kW rectenna, $900/kW parts and labor ($450 before transmission lost), $500/kW for transport to GEO At 5 kg/kW requires $100/kg or less to GEO
Current $20,000/kg to GEO SpaceX $4,000/kg $1,000/kg 20t/1400t, 1.4% payload Skylon ~$1000/kg $500/kg 7t/300t, 2.3% payload
Combine with:
Hydrogen combustion to 25 km, & Mach 5.5 Laser heated hydrogen above that point (laser beamed down from GEO)
Two GW of laser (1.8 GW actually) Performance analysis, 54 t to LEO Vehicle 24 t, (20% structure) plus 30 t second stage to LEO 2/3rd of second stage to GEO (20 t)
105 kW CW
Cost breakdown
Vehicle amortization $10/kg Hydrogen $6/kg Laser $50 B (written off in 5 years) $10 B/0.5 B kg is $20/kg $36/kg, well under the $100/kg number
Why Airdrop at 10 km
Huge Landing gear reduction Max landing is 54 tons, 120 t less 76 tons of LH2 dumped in an abort.
scale, 500 MW @ 10 kg/kW 5000 tons, Falcon Heavy @ 20 t per flight 250 flights at 0.1 B/flight, $25 B $5 B laser at $10/W 500 days at a launch every other day
Part 3, completing 2 GW
$15 B laser/power sat parts, 15,000 tons 60 scale vehicles, 5 tons to GEO 20 flights per day, 150 days, 2 years total Transport cost @ $100/kg $1.5 B Total cost $50-100 B Income @ $100/kg * 500,000 t $50 B/yr Payback from gross income ~2 years.
Falcons can't build power sats but they can build a very expensive laser?
2 GW electric power at 2 cent per kWh is worth $320 M/yr 2 GW of laser propulsion is worth $50 B/yr >100 times as much
It closes the business case for making 2 cent per kWh power and we know there is plenty of market at that price (TWs) It solves energy, energy security and carbon problems (carbon neutral synthetic fuel for a dollar a gallon) Even at two cents per kWh it makes huge profits
And oil, coal and gas industries will lobby against a real solution. So why should the government consider it?
SDI with the USSR or Russia was/is a losing business. It will be decades before Iran could overwhelm a multi GW propulsion laser and by that time the commercial demand for laser propulsion should be in the tens of GW Cheap power from space removes any legitimate reason to sort out uranium atoms
Google henson oil drum for a for a slightly out of datewhite paper on this topic
Part 1 months ago Part 2 and 3 a few weeks ago Part 4 last week This is unlikely to be the final evolution of the idea.
Stuff to do
Write arguments that oil, coal and gas industries will not be hurt Synthetic oil for the oil companies and they can sell gasoline for the next century Using coal for a while making synthetic oil Making hydrogen out of an awful lot of gas (230 tons an hour, shipload a week)