Professional Documents
Culture Documents
=
= I
Where s is the number of span
e
I +
=
ch
N j
j j i
o
i
i
i
p n
p
OSNR
,
14. Optimize the OSNR for each channel using ROADM optimization algorithm
END
The above mentioned equations are responsible for implementation of ROADM for improving the OSNR of considered
optical network. The system reconfigures the network for enhancing the traffic performance. Moreover, the equations
have the potential features of adding and dropping the channel according to the traffic requirement as well as network
priority. Using the above technique, the channel capacity can be effectively improved. The system basically automates the
scheduling of optical capacity in the network that efficiently manages the operational cost and time needed to schedule
the channel capacity.
Algorithm-2: Final OSNR Computation
Input: Target OSNR (), System matrix ( I )
Output: OSNR
OPT
START
1. Initialize desired channels OSNR
2. If (P
total
>Sum (Individual channel power) )
3. Evaluate associated log function of individual channel
CH
i i i
i
i i
Num i
OSNR
a
P e
|
|
.
|
\
|
I
+ = ,
/ 1
1 ln
,
International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering& Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org
Volume 3, Issue 3, March 2014 ISSN 2319 - 4847
Volume 3, Issue 3, March 2014 Page 525
4. Estimate the cost of each channel
( )
i i i i i i
p p p C ln =
5. Determine the T and B matrix.
6. Estimate the barrier function
i
( ) { } ( )
6
, 0 max 100
i i i i
x b x =
Where x
i
=row
i
(T
1
) pi
7. Compute vector s
i
( ) ( )
i i i
T row t s
1
=
8. Estimate the input power P
i
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) t s t p C k t p
i i
t
i i i
=
9. Calculate OSNR using estimated input power
10. Iterate till it reaches desired OSNR
11. End
END
The above equations are designed for the purpose of computing the final OSNR value after implementing ROADM. It
considers target OSNR and system matrix as its input while after processing it yields optimized OSNR. The system
attempts to optimize the input channel signal power every time in order to get the desired target OSNR. For effective
outcome, the algorithm performs iterations in order to monitor the each channel signal power outcome matching the
desired input power. The system considers different channels travelling different path and the previous equations
essentially filters the channel noise power between the communication channels as a part of routing.
9. RESULT DISCUSSION
For the purpose of benchmarking our study, the accomplished result is compared with the similar study done by Pan et al
[24]. The study [24] has formulated a system optimization problem for accomplishing better throughput in terms of
OSNR for every individual channel along with satisfying the cumulative power constraint. The author has transformed
the original problem to a relaxed system problem deploying barrier function and used distributed iterative algorithms. The
significant effects of the parameters are evaluated using game theory on OSNR. Hence, the proposed model ECON uses
ROADM for enhancing the OSNR while prior Pan et al. approach [24] doesnt use ROADM. The result attempts to
investigate that whether there is a significant effect on ROADM in enhancing the OSNR.
2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6
22
22.5
23
23.5
24
24.5
25
25.5
26
26.5
equalization algorithmOSNR
Time
d
B
Channel-1
Channel-2
Channel-3
Channel-4
Channel-5
Channel-6
Figure 7: Equalization Technique of Pan yet al [24]
Figure 8: Analysis of OSNR for 10 channels
International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering& Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org
Volume 3, Issue 3, March 2014 ISSN 2319 - 4847
Volume 3, Issue 3, March 2014 Page 526
Figure 7 represents the equalization techniques of normal MUX, where it can be seen that using 10 channels the system
has attempted to optimize the OSNR of all the considered channels. However, the outcome was found with linear values
of OSNR which is detrimental for performance in optical network. The prime purpose of Figure
8 was to exhibit the nature of outcome in existing MUX. Hence, using the same normal MUX with same 10 channels and
integrating with an efficient algorithm for distributive improvement of OSNR, the outcome as shown in Figure
8 is arrived.
Figure 9: Final outcome of ROADM implementation
Figure 9 discusses about the final outcome after introducing ROADM in the proposed study, where it can be seen that out
of 10 channels, 3 channels (channel-7, channel-8, and channel-9) were dropped while 1 channel is added. Any channel
with higher priority is transmitted over the lower priority channels so that the required data will be transmitted to the user
quickly. Therefore, it increases packet delivery ratio and thereby increases system performance.
Figure 10: Performance Comparative Analysis of ECON
Figure 10, shows the comparative performance analysis of the proposed ECON with the study of Pan et al [24]. In the
figure it can be seen that the ECON has outperformed the prior work with respect to OSNR. Hence, in a nutshell, it can
be said that by introducing ROADM in the proposed model, the scope of optimization has increased which is found
missing in Pan et al work [24].
10. CONCLUSION
The proposed system ECON analyzed about ROADM based model that has the capability to enhance the OSNR of the
optical channels. A new mechanism is adopted by chalking out a mathematical model using a single point-to-point link.
The constraint based optimization principle and its respective modelling shows that it is quite possible to enhance the
OSNR using ROADM for many number of channels. Prior systems has experimented till 6 channels while our system is
being evaluated over 10 channels posing that adding or dropping number of channels using ROADM can actually
enhanced better service quality and system performance in optical network.
References
[1] Govind P. Agrawal, Fiber-Optic Communication Systems, John Wiley & Sons, 23-Feb-2012 - Science - 600 pages.
[2] http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk482/tk184/tsd_technology_support_protocol_home.html
[3] R. K. Wade, Wavelength division multiplexing/demultiplexing devices using polymer lenses, US Patent, US 6298182
B1, 2001
[4] http://www.oneunified.net/glossary.html
International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering& Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org
Volume 3, Issue 3, March 2014 ISSN 2319 - 4847
Volume 3, Issue 3, March 2014 Page 527
[5] M. Krishna Sivalingam, Suresh Subramaniam, Optical WDM Networks: Principles and Practice, Springer, 31-Mar-
2000 - Computers - 352 pages
[6] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiber-optic_communication
[7] G. Ramesh, S. Sundara Vadivelu, Jose Anand, A Survey on Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) Networks,
ICTACT Journal Of Communication Technology, Issue: 01, March 2010,
[8] G.P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Effects in Optical Fiber, University of Rochester, 2006
[9] R.U.Kale, P.M. Ingale, R. T. Murade, Comparison of SRS & SBS (Non Linear Scattering) In Optical Fiber,
International Journal of Recent Technology & Engineering(IJRTE),ISSN:2277-3878,Volume-2,Issue-1,March 2013
[10] S. Perrin, The Need for next-Generation ROADM Networks, Whitepaper of HEAVY READING, 2010
[11] J. H. Lee, D. K. Jung, C. H. Kim, Y. C. Chung, OSNR Monitoring Technique Using Polarization-Nulling Method,
IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2001
[12] L. B.-Meflah, S. Savory, B.Thomsen, J.Mitchell,P. Bayvel, In-Band OSNR Monitoring Using Spectral Analysis
After Frequency Down-Conversion, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2007
[13] L.Pavel, A Noncooperative Game Approach to OSNR Optimization in Optical Networks, IEEE Transactions On
Automatic Control, Vol. 51, No. 5, 2006
[14] Bart Baekelandt, C. Mlange, J. Bauwelinck, P. Ossieur, T. D. Ridder, X.-Z. Qiu,J. Vandewege, OSNR Penalty
Imposed by Linear In-Band Crosstalk Caused by Interburst Residual Power in Multipoint-To-Point Networks , IEEE
Photonics Technology Letters, Vol. 20, No. 8, 2008
[15] M-H. Cheung, L-K. Chen, C-K. Chan, PMD-Insensitive OSNR Monitoring Based on Polarization-Nulling With
Off-Center Narrow-Band Filtering, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, VOL. 16, NO. 11, 2004
[16] L. Pavel, Power Control for OSNR Optimization in Optical Networks: A Noncooperative Game Approach, 43rd
IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2004
[17] L. Pavel, A Noncooperative Game Approach to OSNR Optimization in Optical Networks, IEEE Transactions On
Automatic Control, VOL. 51, NO. 5, 2006
[18] F. N. Khan, A.P.T.Lau, Z. Li, C. Lu, P. K. A. Wai, OSNR Monitoring for RZ-DQPSK Systems Using Half-Symbol
Delay-Tap Sampling Technique, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 22, NO. 11, 2010
[19] Y. Kim, M. E. Mousa Pasandi, S. Doucet, L. A. Rusch, S. LaRochelle, OSNR requirements for Optical Multicarrier
Generator for Short Range Radio-Over-Fiber Systems, Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. Optical Society of
America, 2009
[20] A. D-Legrand, C. Simonneau, D. Bayart, A. Mussot, T. Sylvestre, E. Lantz, H. Maillotte, Impact of Pump OSNR on
Noise Figure for Fiber-Optical Parametric Amplifiers,IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Vol. 17, No. 6, 2005
[21] M. R. Chitgarha, S. Khaleghi, W. Daab, M. Ziyadi, A. Mohajerin-Ariaei, D. Rogawski1, M. Tur, J. D. Touch, V.
Vusirikala, W. Zhao, A. E. Willner, Demonstration of WDM OSNR Performance Monitoring and Operating
Guidelines for Pol-Muxed 200-Gbit/s 16-QAM and 100-Gbit/s QPSK Data Channels, Optical Fiber Communication
Conference and Exposition and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference (OFC/NFOEC), pp.1,3, 17-2,1 2013
[22] C. H. Kim, Y. B. Lee, S. K. Ji, S. D. Choi, M. W. Park, M. S. Kim, S. P. Hamn, S. K. Shin, I. B. Kim, H. C. Ji, J. H.
Lee, Y. C. Chung, Performance of OSNR Monitor based on Polarization-Nulling Technique in Aerial Fiber Link,
Optical Fiber Communication Conference. Optical Society of America, 2004
[23] M. Menif, A. Bononi, L. A. Rusch, M. Karasek, A New Method to Equalize Static and Dynamic OSNR in Cascades
of EDFAs without In-Line Optical Filters, International Conference on Applications of Photonic Technology
(Photonics North), SPIE, Vol.4087, pp. 335-42, 2000
[24] Y.Pan, T.Alpcan, L.Pavel, A System Performance Approach to OSNR Optimization in Optical Networks,
Communications, IEEE Transactions, Vol. 58(4), pp. 1193-1200, 2010
[25] M.S. A.-Rahman, L. S. Supian, H.G. Safnal, M. H. Harun, K. Jumari, Osnr Performance on Hand-Made
Demultiplexer Using Thin-Film Filter and Splitter in Wdm-Pof Network Design for Short-Haul Communication
System Applications, World Applied Sciences Journal, Vol. 20 (6), pp. 801-805, 2012
[26] Q. Zhu, L. Pavel, State-space Approach to Pricing Design in OSNR Nash Game, Proceedings of the 17th World
Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Seoul, 2008
[27] L. Pavel, Hierarchical Iterative Algorithm for a Coupled Constrained OSNR Nash Game, In Global
Telecommunications Conference, GLOBECOM'06. IEEE, pp. 1-6, 2006
[28] International Electrotechnical Commission, ISBN 978-2-88910-477-2,
http:s//webstore.iec.ch/preview/info_iec61280-2-9%7Bed2.0%7Db.pdf