Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Future Prospect
WHO/UNICEF recommended ORS solution for the treatment of all causes of diarrhea in all age groups
Ingredients Sodium (mmol/L) Potassium (mmol/L) Chloride (mmol/L) Citrate (mmol/L) Glucose (mmol/L) Osmolarity (mosml/L) Year of recommendation Old-ORS (WHOORS) 90 20 80 10 111 311 1975 New-ORS (Reduced osmolarity ORS) 75 20 65 10 75 245 2004
Development of ORT
Pre-physiologic era
- Empirical use of oral fluid for cholera- advocated by Sushruta
(Sushruta Samita, Volume III, BC 3000 yrs; Chatterjee, Lancet,1953; Harrison, 1954)
- In 1950, MRC, UK recommended glucose-electrolyte solution for treatment of diarrhea in children - Meneghello, 1960, reported similar experience in children in Chile
Glucose/aminoacid linked sodium absorption Glucose and sodium absorption in equimolar proportion glucose linked sodium absorption is unaffected in
cholera
Riklis, Quastel, Schultz, Curran and others (1950 1964) Phillips et al, 1964)
Duggan, 2004
Field trial in most adverse situation occurred during a Case fatality rate reduced
(Mahalanabis, 1973) from 30% to 1%
cholera epidemic in West Bengal refugee camps during the Bangladesh war of independence.
Oral rehydration therapy (ORT), using a mixture of water, sugar and salt, potentially the most important medical advances of this century (The Lancet, 1978)
CDD programme (1978) for promotion of ORS in the developing countries because it was proved to be:
Safe, effective Simple Less expensive Effective in reducing diarrhoea morbidity and mortality and hospital admission
Limitations
Reasons for replacing glucose with rice: -Rice is digested slowly in small intestine producing glucose and amino acids and stimulate sodium and water absorption -Rice does not increase osmolality of ORS - Rice contains antisecretory factor that -Some unabsorbed starch are fermented -in the colon producing SCFAs
Limitations -Unavailability of ready to use -It needs boiling -Once prepared cant be kept for long time -Short shelf life -Cost is at least 3 times higher than standard glucose ORS
-30, -50%
less impact
Reduced osmolarity ORS (low sodium and low glucose ORS): is it a better alternative?
Disagreement persists about its ideal composition in the developed world because: - Cholera is rare there - Children mostly suffer from viral diarrhoea where sodium excretion is much less (40 mmol/L) than in the WHO-ORS - Some animal and human perfusion studies have shown better water and sodium absorption with hypotonic ORS than WHO-ORS - Some clinical studies already have shown positive results
WHO/UNICEF recommended ORS solution for the treatment of all causes of diarrhoea in all age groups
Ingredients Sodium (mmol/L) Potassium (mmol/L) Chloride (mmol/L) Citrate (mmol/L) Glucose (mmol/L) Osmolarity (mosml/L) Year of recommendation Old-ORS (WHOORS) 90 20 80 10 111 311 1975 New-ORS (Reduced osmolarity ORS) 75 20 65 10 75 245 2004
a) its osmolarity is within the range of reduced osmolarity ORS solution studied to date b) this formulation has already been evaluated in two trials c) its sodium content is only modestly less than in standard ORS which may be important for treatment of cholera d) its glucose content at least balance that of sodium
Meta-analysis of all randomized clinical trials in children with acute watery diarrhea
Difference in mean stool output Odds ratio for children new ORS when compared to those receiving Old ORS (95% CI)) 0.61 (0.47-0.81)* -0.214 (-0.305 to 0.123)* 0.71 (0.55-0.92)* 1.45 (0.93-2.26)
*p<0.05
Alam NH et al.1999
New ORS formulation (reduced osmolarity ORS) should be manufactured and used for all causes of diarrhoea in all age groups
Further monitoring (post marketing surveillance) is required to better assess the risk if any, of symptomatic hyponatraemia, especially in adult patients with cholera
ICDDR,B introduced the new ORS for treatment of diarrhea and a surveillance study (post marketing monitoring) was undertaken in January 2003 for its safety Objectives To examine whether patients given the new ORS formulations for their diarrhoea irrespective of etiology and age, experience major adverse events (seizure) that might influence its routine clinical use Significance Data from this type of post marketing surveillance is crucial for reassuring the policy makers, manufacturers, social marketing companies, and users of ORS of the safety of the new ORS
Study design: Phase IV Clinical trial Study site: Dhaka and Matlab hospital of ICDDR,B Study Period: One year for surveillance and 3 months for data analysis Sample size: about 50000 to 60000 patients in Dhaka hospital and 10000 to 15000 patients in Matlab hospital Children <6 months received glucose ORS ( Low osmolarity) Children above 6 months and adults received Rice ORS
- Admission in special care unit - Clinical history and detailed investigation (blood biochemistry, Culture and CSF studies, stool culture etc.) - Treatment - To identify the cause of seizure and control the seizure by anticonvulsant
Results
Frequency of symptomatic (seizure/altered consciousness) hyponatraemia (serum Na <130 mmol/L) in one year of observation was 21
Conclusion
The new hypoosmolar oral rehydration solution in the treatment of all causes of diarrhea in all age groups is safe and its recommendation by WHO and UNICEF for use in diarrhea universally is justified
Results of some studies using ARS or SF: Ramakrishna BS et. Al. 2000 Glucose ORS vs. Glucose ORS ARS in adult Cholera Stool wt (g) 27% in ARS group (stat. sig) Duration of diarrhea 37% in ARS group (stat. sig) Raghupathy P et. al. 2006 Glucose ORS (old formula) vs. Glucose ORS+ARS in children with acute diarrhea Stool wt (g) Duration of diarrhea 30% (NS) 15% (sig)
Ramakrishna BS et al. 2008 Glucose ORS (New formula) vs. ARS ORS (without glucose) in Adult dehydrating diarrhea Stool wt (g) Duration of diarrhea (h) 65% (stat. sig) 55% (stat. sig)
Alam NH et al. 2000 Glucose ORS (old formula) vs. Glucose ORS + PHGG 20 g/L in the treatment of acute diarrhea in children Stool wt (g) Duration of diarrhea (h) 16% (NS) 20% (stat. sig)
Prospective ORS Trial with addition of Lactoferrin and Lysozyme with existing rice based or glucose based ORS Objectves
In children with acute watery diarrhea, treatment with the new ORS containing Lactoferrin and Lysozyme will - Reduce 24 hours/total stool output by 25/30% - Reduce the duration of diarrhea by 20/25% when compared with treatment with standard WHO and UNICEF recommended reduced osmolarity ORS/ rice ORS
Objectves
Design: Randomized double blind controlled clinical trial Subjects: Children 6 months to 36 months -
assessment Short Stay Ward (Adult male) Short Stay Ward (Adult female)
SCU
LSW
STW
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
THANK YOU