The document discusses various employment issues that have arisen at a company preparing for an IPO. It analyzes whether termination would be appropriate for employees in different scenarios based on at-will employment law and its exceptions. It recommends termination for an employee who criticized an important customer on social media. For other issues like complaining about pay changes or attending jury duty, it finds termination would not be allowed. It also recommends adopting a whistleblower policy to encourage ethical reporting without fear of retaliation.
The document discusses various employment issues that have arisen at a company preparing for an IPO. It analyzes whether termination would be appropriate for employees in different scenarios based on at-will employment law and its exceptions. It recommends termination for an employee who criticized an important customer on social media. For other issues like complaining about pay changes or attending jury duty, it finds termination would not be allowed. It also recommends adopting a whistleblower policy to encourage ethical reporting without fear of retaliation.
The document discusses various employment issues that have arisen at a company preparing for an IPO. It analyzes whether termination would be appropriate for employees in different scenarios based on at-will employment law and its exceptions. It recommends termination for an employee who criticized an important customer on social media. For other issues like complaining about pay changes or attending jury duty, it finds termination would not be allowed. It also recommends adopting a whistleblower policy to encourage ethical reporting without fear of retaliation.
Tremayne Dais !trayer "niersity #$%$1% &ro'essor M()lanna*an AT-WILL TERMINATION + At-Will Termination: Taking Matters Into My Hands Re(ently-*ired as t*e )*ie' O,erating O''i(er -)OO. in a midsi/e (om,any ,re,aring 'or an Initial &u0li( O''ering -I&O.1 I dis(oered multi,le ,ersonnel ,ro0lems2 I must gie t*e ,ro0lems immediate attention2 I 3ill need to (onsider i' any o' t*e em,loyees *ae a(ted in 3ays t*at mig*t re4uire termination o' em,loyment2 In seeral instan(es1 termination may 0e a,,ro,riate5 *o3eer1 termination in ot*er instan(es 3ould iolate (ommon la3 e6(e,tions to t*e at-3ill em,loyment la3s2 At-3ill allo3s an em,loyer to terminate an em,loyee at any time 'or any reason -to in(lude no reason. 3it*out legal rami'i(ations2 At t*e same time1 an em,loyee may remoe *imsel' 'rom a 7o0 at-3ill 3it*out 'ear o' aderse (onse4uen(es2 8At-3ill also means t*at an em,loyer (an (*ange t*e terms o' t*e em,loyment relations*i, 3it* no noti(e and no (onse4uen(es2 9or e6am,le1 an em,loyer (an alter 3ages1 terminate 0ene'its1 or redu(e ,aid time o'': -Mu*l1 )2;21 +<<11 ,2 %.2 =elo31 I *ae listed a ,otential em,loyment issue and my re(ommendation: >;o*n ,osted a rant on *is 9a(e0ook ,age in 3*i(* *e (riti(i/ed t*e (om,any?s most im,ortant (ustomer2 W*ile most (om,anies dis(ourage em,loyees 'rom (om,laining a0out t*eir em,loyer1 re(ent legislation suggests t*at terminating em,loyees 'or su(* a(tions mig*t 4uali'y 'or ,rote(ted (on(erted a(tiity2 Ho3eer1 ;o*n did not merely (riti(i/e a (o-3orker1 a su,erisor1 or een t*e entire (om,any2 Instead1 *e (riti(i/ed t*e (om,any?s most im,ortant (ustomer2 T*us1 ;o*n 3ill 0e re(ommended 'or termination2 His a(tions (learly 7eo,ardi/e ,u0li( relations1 ,rodu(tiity1 and organi/ational (ulture -=ayer1 D2 L21+<1+1 ,2 1@1.2 >;im sent an email to ot*er sales,eo,le ,rotesting a (*ange in (ommission s(*edules and 0onuses and suggesting eeryone 0oy(ott t*e ne6t sales meeting2 ;im is ,ermitted to (om,lain a0out (ommission s(*edules and 0onuses t*roug* email2 Ho3eer1 *e may not en(ourage serious disru,tion to organi/ational stru(ture2 !uggesting t*at eeryone 0oy(ott t*e ne6t sales meeting *as t*e ,otential to 7eo,ardi/e ,rodu(tion and organi/ational (ulture2 T*is is o''ense mig*t (all 'or terminationAit (ertainly 3arrants a dis(ussion 3it* ;im2 I' *e is 3illing to reoke *is re4uest 'or a 0oy(ott1 *e may kee, *is 7o02 T*is situation mig*t not 0e 3ort* t*e ,otential la3suit t*at ;im mig*t 'ile (iting re(ent so(ial media (ases2 >Ellen started a 0log to ,rotest t*e )EO?s 0onus1 noting t*at no one 0elo3 dire(tor *as gotten a raise in t3o -+. years and ,ortraying *er 0osses as 8kno3-not*ings: and 8out-o'-tou(*: Ellen?s (ase is 4uite similar to t*e 9a(e0ook 9iring (ase o' +<1<2 T*e National La0or Relations =oard -NLR=. (laimed t*at em,loyees *ae t*e rig*t to (om,lain a0out t*eir 0osses t*roug* so(ial media as it is ,rote(ted s,ee(*2 8T*e NLRA ,rote(ts em,loyeesB rig*t to dis(uss Cterms and (onditions o' t*eir em,loyment 3it* (o-3orkers and ot*ers?: -=ayer1 D2 L21 +<1+1 ,2 1.2 Ellen?s 0log 3ould 0e (onsidered e6tremely (lose to t*e 9a(e0ook ,osting in t*e +<1< (ase 3*i(* (riti(i/ed 8a su,erisor 3it* res,e(t to C3ages1 *ours and 3orking (onditionsDB -=ayer1 D2 L21 +<1+1 ,2 E.2 >=ill *as 0een using *is (om,any-issued =la(k=erry to run *is o3n 0usiness on t*e side2 )om,any ,oli(y di(tates t*at (om,any-issued e4ui,ment s*ould not 0e used 'or non- (om,any 0usiness2 =ill (ould (ertainly 0e terminated5 *o3eer1 my re(ommendation 'or t*is AT-WILL TERMINATION E s(enario is to remind =ill o' t*is ,oli(y and o''er a 3arning2 My rationale *ere is 0ased on t*e assum,tion t*at =ill 3as (ondu(ting t*is 0usiness on *is o3n time2 I' =ill 3as running *is side 0usiness during (om,any *ours on (om,any e4ui,ment1 *e 3ould 0e terminated2 >T*e se(retaries in t*e a((ounting de,artment de(ided to dress in 0la(k-and-3*ite stri,es to ,rotest a memo announ(ing t*at t*e (om,any *as installed keylogger so't3are on all (om,any (om,uters2 9reedom o' s,ee(* a,,lies to t*is s(enario2 Em,loyees are 'ree to (riti(i/e (om,any ,oli(ies2 >A'ter 0eing dis(i,lined 'or (riti(i/ing a (ustomer in an email -sent 'rom *is ,ersonal email a((ount on a (om,any (om,uter.1 ;oe t*reatens to sue t*e (om,any 'or inasion o' ,ria(y2 ;oe mig*t do some resear(*2 His ,ria(y 3as not iolated as ,ersonal emails sent 'rom a (om,any (om,uter are not ,rote(ted2 8On Mar(* E<1 +<1<1 t*e Ne3 ;ersey !u,reme )ourt ruled t*at attorneys 'or an em,loyer iolated t*e ,ria(y rig*ts o' a 'ormer em,loyee and t*e rules o' ,ro'essional (ondu(t 0y reading emails t*e em,loyee sent to *er (ounsel on a (om,any la,to, t*roug* *er ,ersonal ,ass3ord-,rote(ted Fa*oo email a((ount: -Tra(king1 +<1<1 ,2 1.2 >One o' t*e de,artment su,erisors re4uests your a,,roal to 'ire *is se(retary 'or insu0ordination2 !in(e t*e se(retary *as al3ays re(eied glo3ing reie3s1 you (all *er into your o''i(e and determine t*at s*e *as re'used to ,re,are 'alse e6,ense re,orts 'or *er 0oss2 Re,orting a((ounting 'raud is ,rote(ted under 9lorida?s 3*istle0lo3ing A(t2 T*e se(retary 3ill not 0e 'ired5 instead1 *er su,erisor 3ill undergo an internal inestigation2 I' (laims o' 'raud are eri'ied1 t*e su,erisor 3ill 0e terminated2 >Anna?s 0oss re'used to sign *er leae re4uest 'or 7ury duty and no3 3ants to 'ire *er 'or 0eing a0sent 3it*out ,ermission2 T*e most 3idely re(ogni/ed (ommon la3 e6(e,tion to t*e at-3ill ,resum,tion ,rote(ts em,loyees against aderse em,loyment a(tions t*at iolate a ,u0li( interest2 9our (ategories e6ist in terms o' ,u0li( ,oli(y e6em,tion2 One o' t*ese e6em,tions a,,lies to Anna?s situation: engaging in a(ts t*at are in t*e ,u0li( interest2 Attending 7ury duty or re,orting to resere military o,erations are e6am,les o' t*is e6em,tion2 T*us1 Anna 3ill not 0e 'ired2 In order to limit lia0ility1 t*e manager 3*o suggested Anna 0e 'ired 3ill 0e s(*ooled on all o' t*e e6em,tions to at-3ill em,loyment la32 T*e state o' 9lorida *as a W*istle0lo3er a(t t*at ,roides ,rote(tion to em,loyees 3*o su0mit (om,laints or (laims inoling t*e mis(ondu(t o' em,loyers2 I 3ould re(ommend to t*e )EO o' my (om,any t*at 3e ado,t a 3*istle0lo3er ,oli(y2 T*is re(ommendation is 0ased on t*e idea t*at (om,anies t*at 0uild strong (or,orate (ultures do so 0y *iring and maintaining em,loyees 3*o 0eliee in and lie 0y t*e (om,any?s (ode o' et*i(s2 =uilding a 3*istle0lo3ing system 'or em,loyees to re,ort instan(es o' 3rongdoing or mis(ondu(t 3it*in t*e (om,any en(ourages em,loyees to do t*e rig*t t*ing 3it*out 'ear o' re,er(ussion2 Like3ise1 all em,loyees are 'urt*er en(ouraged to a0ide 0y rules ,ut in ,la(e2 A 3*istle0lo3er ,oli(y must in(lude seeral 'undamental items2 9irst1 t*e ,oli(y must (om,lement t*e (om,any?s (ode o' et*i(s2 Ty,i(ally1 all em,loyees read and a(kno3ledge t*eir understanding o' (om,any ,oli(ies1 ,ro(edures1 and et*i(al (onsiderations2 T*e 3*istle 0lo3er ,oli(y s*ould align 3it* t*ese as all em,loyees agree to maintain t*ese rules1 et(2 89or e6am,le1 AT-WILL TERMINATION % =arnett et al2 -1GGE. 'ound t*at em,loyees dis(losed more 3rongdoings 3*en (om,anies *ad internal ,oli(ies in ,la(e and !omers -+<<1. 'ound t*at (om,anies 3it* et*i(al (odes e6,erien(ed 'e3er 3rongdoings: -Lee1 H21 I 9arg*er1 N21 +<1E1 ,2 +JK.2 In addition1 t*e (om,any must esta0lis* an anonymous *otline 'or 3*istle 0lo3ers to re,ort t*eir (on(erns2 8In order to ,roide an e''e(tie 3*istle 0lo3ing system1 it is e6,e(ted t*at (om,anies 3ould ,roide em,loyees 3it* a *ig* leel o' dis(losure regarding t*e 3*istle-0lo3ing ,ro(ess: -Lee1 H21 I 9arg*er1 N21 +<1E1 ,2 +J%.2 9inally1 t*e 3*istle 0lo3er ,oli(y s*ould 0e ,u0li(ly adertised in ne3sletters1 internal mailings1 and t*e (om,any 3e0site2 Re'eren(es =ayer1 D2 L2 -+<1+.2 Em,loyers are not 'riends 3it* 'a(e0ook: *o3 t*e NLR= is ,rote(ting em,loyeesB so(ial media a(tiity2 Brooklyn Journal Of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law1 @-1.1 1KG-1G%2 Lee1 H21 I 9arg*er1 N2 -+<1E.2 )om,aniesB "se o' W*istle-=lo3ing to Dete(t 9raud: An E6amination o' )or,orate W*istle-=lo3ing &oli(ies2 ;ournal O' =usiness Et*i(s1 11%-+.1 +JE-+G#2 doi:1<21<<@$s1<##1-<1+-1E%J-G Mu*l1 )2 ;2 -;anuary +<<1.2 8T*e Em,loyment-At-Will Do(trine: T*ree Ma7or E6(e,tions1: Monthly Labor Review ,2E-112 AT-WILL TERMINATION # Tra(king WorkersB Eery Moe )an =oost &rodu(tiity - and !tress -Los Angeles Times1 A,ril J1 +<1E. *tt,:$$3332latimes2(om$0usiness$la-'i-*ars*-3ork-te(*-+<1E<%<J1<1K#JG#@1'ull2story