Source: http://www.activistpost.com/2014/02/request-for-investigation-of-documented.

html
Full version
Monday, February 17, 2014
Request for an Investigation of Documented Weather
Modification
Jerry Leonard
Activist PostIm an engineer residing in the suburbs of Charlotte, NC and I have been
documenting large-scale, aerial chemical-dispersals from aircraft over the city through time-
lapse photography.Here is a time-lapse video of a massive, all-day dispersal on Sunday
1/26/14.Here it is sped up by 2x, for those pressed for time: http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=uh1aJsr4DcM
Photos and real-time video of the skies over Charlotte being nearly completely covered in a
chemical haze on this same day can be found here (from various spots around the city).
These spraying operations can change a clear blue sky to a chalky white sky, from horizon to
horizon, in a matter of hours.
My research to understand the reasons behind these chemical dispersals over my house and
city (through what looks like jet contrail amplification) has led me to propose that these jet-
aerosol spraying events are a sub-project of a global geoengineering program known as
solar radiation management which is being conducted through so-called stratospheric
particle injections. (Geoengineering is the large-scale manipulation of earths physical
systems.)
Indeed, a survey of the patent and technical literature reveals that the deliberate
intensification of jet contrail formation is considered the most cost-effective method under
consideration as a technique for weather modification and global warming amelioration. To
implement this agenda with jet-aircraft, geoengineers are discussing the use of fuel additives,
customized engines, after-burner injections, and extra fuel tanks for dispensing experimental
chemicals.
The scope of these stratospheric aerosol geoengineering projects needs to be understood by
the public because, despite their far-reaching goals, they are being implemented under the
radar, all over the world, even as their well-paid proponents admit these programs could
create a global ice age or alter global rainfall patterns and affect the food supply for billions of
people.
Alarmingly, the intensity of the spray incidents over Charlotte, N.C. seems to have increased
dramatically in 2014. I have posted numerous time-lapse videos of these chemical dispersals
on youtube.com, the most recent being a massive, all-day chemical spray incident that
occurred Sunday, 2/2/14. Here are two time-lapse views of the afternoon:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG9Zf9Pl_jc
http://youtu.be/GU0Spikqftw?t=2m19s
And here is a recent time-lapse video of a chemical sheet being dumped over my house on
January 9, 2014:
http://youtu.be/fI2exyqUFUE?t=2m49s
The pervasive white haze in the sky that resulted from the spreading of persistent contrails
over Charlotte on these days is curiously consistent with the predicted side-effect of
proposed climate engineering programs discussed in recent news articles (Geoengineering
would turn blue skies whiter).
Some of these articles advocate the deployment of dedicated fleets of aircraft as part of a
Climate Change Manhattan Project effort [Stanford Environmental Law Journal] to inject
millions of tons of reflective atmospheric aerosols over cities. This would, in effect, create
artificial volcanoes to reflect sunlight back into space.
Other means proposed for launching millions of tons of chemicals into the stratosphere for
geoengineering operations include particle-spewing smokestacks on ships at sea, tethered
balloons dispensing chemical slurries pumped up from the ground, and exploding artillery
shells packed with experimental chemicals.
Although it may be shocking to the uninitiated, field studies have already been conducted and
published on the large-scale creation of man-made clouds using controlled particle sources
dispersed from smokestacks on ships, so that the reflectivity of the atmosphere could be
modified and measured.
For example, here is a recent technical article describing a large-scale field experiment
(named E-PEACE) which employed ships at sea involved in engineering air pollution to
brighten clouds. In this experiment the controlled emission of smoke-generated particles
was exploited to create reflective clouds so that the effect on localized solar warming could be
measured.
And the controversial SPICE project (Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering),
which was a UK government-funded field-test designed to assess the feasibility of injecting
particles into the stratosphere from a tethered balloon for the purposes of solar radiation
management, was only halted at the last moment due to a patent dispute.
While researchers are exploring large-scale field trials with ships and balloons for
stratospheric aerosol experiments, numerous feasibility studies have been published showing
that the aircraft delivery system is the most cost-effective method for reengineering the
atmosphere on a truly global scale.
Along those lines, field experiments have recently been conducted in which military aircraft
induced man-made cirrus clouds over England through persistent contrails, so that changes
to the reflectivity of the atmosphere could be measured. And, as is discussed below, a custom
fleet of drone aircraft has already been designed for a longer term effort aimed at dispersing
one million tons of sulfuric acid per year into the stratosphere, for twenty years.
As a result of several years of investigation and observation, I believe this strategy of
employing aircraft for a stratospheric aerosol geoengineering effort is already being quietly
implemented through the US government by self-serving billionaires, like Bill Gates, under the
pretext of fighting global warming.
Consequently, I have written an extensive request for a congressional investigation into
aerosol experimentation over North Carolina, which can be found here:
Request for Congressional Investigation Into Geoengineering (pdf):
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/21200363/geoengineering_investigation.pdf
I have also started an online petition at Change.org to call attention to these chemical
dispersions over my house and city.
Indeed, these geoengineering programs must be put under intense scrutiny.
Recent revelations of US government programs which sprayed radioactive particles over
American cities, not to mention Operation Large Area Coverage, and the Green Run
Experiments, or more recently the catastrophic showering of Iraqi cities with depleted
uranium and white phosphorus, show the dangers of blindly assuming that these current
aerial spraying incidents over US cities will not contain harmful chemicals.
And apparently, the EPA has no interest in protecting the public from experiments that will
expose them to deadly particles. In fact, the EPA is carefully conducting such experiments, all
over the country.
Recent exposs concerning lethal EPA gas-chamber/particulate-exposure
experiments being conducted at universities around the country (including North Carolina
with the blessing of the state medical boards) on the elderly and children only reinforce the
need for vigilance. For example, the progress reports on one project conducted at the
University of Southern California openly state they are trying to induce repeatable genetic
changes in children through exposure to calibrated pollutant mixtures (in order to validate
their asthma causation models).
I cant help wonder if the EPA is trying to determine the likely health impact of these
stratospheric particle injection experiments, much like the Atomic Energy Commission
injected plutonium and other radioactive substances into pregnant women, as the atom
bombs were being developed.
Democracy Now described this long-range test program:
In a gruesome plot that spanned 30 years, doctors and scientists working with the US atomic
weapons program, exposed thousands of unwilling and unknowing Americans to radiation
poisoning to study its effects. Plutonium Files: How the U.S. Secretly Fed Radioactivity to
Thousands of Americans Democracy Now (Source)A Closer Look: The Pretext For Large-
Scale Exposure To Particulates
I propose that what I am documenting in the alarming time-lapse videos taken over my house
are field trial experiments in which the spatial coverage of jet contrails is artificially amplified
so that their reflectivity and therefore their resultant impact on global warming can be more
accurately measured and differentiated from natural cirrus clouds.
This type of amplified contrail experimentation to create man-made cirrus clouds in order to
increase radiative perturbations for modeling accuracy (increasing the signal-to-noise ratio)
was called for in a publication by a British defense agency (DERADefense Evaluation and
Research Agency):
The global temperature response to such a small radiative perturbation from contrails is
unlikely to be detectable in most climate models unless the signal is artificially amplified A
better calculation of radiative forcing from contrails is feasible using an artificially amplified
forcing. This would help understand the climate response particularly as there is evidence
that the climate may be more sensitive to inhomogeneous forcings (e.g. from aircraft) than
forcings from other well-mixed gases. This could be done in parallel with refining contrail
coverage input data. Identifying the uncertainties in radiative forcing of climate from aviation
contrails and aviation-induced cirrus, (Source)The BBC recently published time-lapse photos
of military aircraft doing exactly this -- flying in circular loops deliberately creating contrail-
induced cirrus clouds so that the cooling effect of the man-made, sun-blocking clouds could
be measured:
The strange coil-like feature on the right of the image is a contrail left by a military aircraft
flying in a circular holding pattern. Eventually, these became indistinguishable from clouds
that arise naturally. Dr Haywood and his colleagues investigated the impact of these man-
made clouds. In an article published in the Journal of Geophysical Research, they describe
how it had both a cooling and a warming effect. How aircraft contrails form
cloud (Source) Here is the technical paper (The radiative forcing due to a distinct pattern of
persistent contrails that form into contrail-induced cirrus) summarizing the measurements of
the radiative forcing (the net reflectivity change in the atmosphere measured from satellites
and ground stations) that these aircraft were able to achieve by inducing artificial cirrus clouds
over an area of 50,000 square kilometers with persistent jet contrailsjust as the Defense
Evaluation and Research Agency had recommended.
Is the heavy spraying by aircraft that I have been documenting over Charlotte, NC a
component of this large-scale experimentation?
As jets create an artificial haze of aviation-induced clouds over Charlotte, it is intriguing that a
recent article on geoengineering in Scientific American predicted just such a scenario:
The white haze that hangs over many major cities could become a familiar sight everywhere if
the world decides to try geoengineering to create a cooler planet. Geoengineering Could
Turn Skies White, Scientific American, June 1, 2012It seems likely that the jet-induced haze I
have been observing and recording is part of a global geoengineering agenda.
An expansion of this type of aerosol spraying program to the international realm was recently
given tacit approval (under the guise of regulating climate engineering or geoengineering) by
both the US Congress and the British House of Commons.
To carry out this agenda, Bill Gates (a major funding-source for geoengineering efforts) even
commissioned an aerospace company called Aurora Flight Sciences to design a custom
drone aircraft designed to disperse one million tons of sulfuric acid droplets per year (for
twenty years) into the atmosphere for solar radiation management/geoengineering purposes
(the study can be downloaded here). (Gates has investments in stress-tolerant seed
companies that could gain in value due to the controlled introduction of these climate and
soil/precipitation stressors. Conveniently, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation also helps
manage and operate the Svalbard Global Seed Vault in Norway (colloquially referred to as
the Doomsday Seed Vault). The seed vault is an attempt to insure against the loss of seeds
in other genebanks in case of large-scale regional or global crises. Will a Bill Gates managed
enterprise control what remains of the worlds non-patented seeds, as his sulfuric acid drones
circle the earth destroying native agriculture in favor of stress-tolerant plants?)
I believe my observations are capturing part of this global effort to put reflective particles into
the atmosphere, as summarized by John Holdren (President Obamas top science adviser),
so that the potential for increasing the earths reflection coefficient (also known as its albedo)
to fight global warming can be evaluated:
There are a variety of schemes that have been discussed for geoengineering. The classic
example, is injecting reflecting particles into earth orbit that would deflect some of the sunlight
that would otherwise be warming the earth. -- Dr. John Holdren, President Obamas Science
AdvisorThis high-level support for the geoengineering of our atmosphere has resulted in it
being intensely studied by scientists around the world, although the general public remains
largely unaware of this development.
Harvard Professor and Bill Gates climate modification consultant David Keith has made
numerous statements at geoengineering conferences and other venues suggesting that
mass-spraying of both aluminum and sulfuric acid from aircraft could be used to reduce global
warming. Keith has even boasted that he could create a global ice age with this technology.
And as the New York Times prints editorials by Keith, under cartoonish titles such as
Blocking The Sky To Save The Earth, NASA is conducting closed-door sessions on methods
to blot out the sun:
at the weekend scientists gathered in a closed session organized by NASA and Stanford
University to discuss researching such a strategy. The idea is called geo-engineering: using
technology to tinker with the Earths delicate climate balance. NASA looks at plan to blot out
Sun (Source)Are such experiments to blot out the sun being conducted over Charlotte?
If so, what chemicals are being used to make the skies white and who approved this?
Professor David Keith of Harvard has written numerous articles and studies proposing the
mass-dispersion of condensable vapor from aircraft as a geoengineering tool. The chemical
he seems to favor dispensing by the mega-ton is sulfuric acid (H2SO4):
Here we describe an alternate method in which aerosol is formed rapidly in the plume
following injection of H2SO4, a condensable vapor, from an aircraft. This method gives better
control of particle size and can produce larger radiative forcing with lower sulfur loadings than
SO2 injection. Efficient formation of stratospheric aerosol for climate engineering by emission
of condensible vapor from aircraft, GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 37,
L18805, 5 PP., 2010 (Source)Keith also oversaw the Bill Gates-funded effort to design a
drone aircraft to spray the stratosphere with 20 million tons of sulfuric acid. As The Economist
summarized:
The most straightforward option, according to the report, would be to develop a vehicle
capable of flying at altitudes of 20-25km (about 65,000-80,000 feet), distributing ten tonnes of
acid a flight. About 80 such planes would allow the delivery to the stratosphere of a million
tonnes of acid every year at a cost of one or two billion dollars over an operational life of 20
years. "Geoengineering: Lift-off": Research into the possibility of engineering a better climate
is progressing at an impressive rateand meeting strong opposition, The
Economist, (Source)Based on my research, the chemical dispersions over Charlotte look like
the 2nd phase of a 3-phase implementation scheme outlined in the British House of
Commons investigation into the regulation of geoengineering. This phase was described as
enlarging the scope of limited field-studies of the geoengineering technology now being
developed and tested in phase 1.
In his editorial in the New York Times entitled Blocking the Sky to Save the Earth, Professor
Keith also proposes a multi-phased approach to flooding the atmosphere with man-made
particles using aircraft. In this approach, Keith envisions blocking the sky with synthetic
particles made from metals or ceramics designed to scatter sunlight selectively using aircraft
in an increasingly expansive series of real-world tests of various technologies to reduce the
uncertainty surrounding geo-engineering:
At first, tests might use existing research aircraft like NASAs ER-2, a heavy version of the U-
2, to release small payloads of particles and then measure the effects on solar radiation and
the ozone layer. If these early tests showed the risks were low, enough material could then be
released to have a detectable climate impact David Keith, et al, Blocking the Sky to Save
the Earth, New York Times, September 19, 2008 (Source)In Congressional testimony, Keith
laid out a similar multiphase ramp-up for large-scale atmospheric geoengineering with aircraft:
experiments should expand gradually to scales big enough to produce barely detectable
climate effects and reveal unexpected problems, yet small enough to limit resultant risks. To
provide a specific example related to my own work, NASA's ER-2 high-altitude research plane
might be used to release a ton of sulfuric acid vapor along a 10 km plume in the stratosphere,
and fly through the plume to assess the formation of aerosol and its sun scattering ability and
its impact on ozone chemistry. Such tests take a few years to plan and cost a few million
dollars. -- Prepared Statement of David Keith, Learning to manage sunlight: Research needs
for Solar Radiation Management "GEOENGINEERING: PARTS I, II, AND III" HEARING
BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES (Source)The preliminary experiments described by Keith have already
been conducted by NASA, which has published papers over the years describing the creation
of man-made cirrus clouds through the dispersing of rapidly expanding, figure-eight and oval-
shaped contrail patterns from both research aircraft and civilian aircraft off the west coast:
It may be concluded from these limited results that aircraft exhaust can produce cirrus clouds
that cover much more area than the simple linear features commonly observed in satellite
data. Transformation of Contrails into Cirrus during SUCCESS, Geophysical Research
Letters, SUCCESS Special Issue, November 1997 (Source)Could what we are now
witnessing in the sky be the implementation of the final phases of a long-range plan for a
ramped approach to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering? And are they dispersing sulfuric
acid, as recommended by Professor Keith in his books, articles, editorials, speeches, media
appearances and design studies?
The plans for the implementation of such a weather modification/geoengineering
strategy go back decades.
In the late 1960s, A Recommended National Program In Weather Modification by NASA
foresaw a long-term, Federal cloud-seeding operation that would explore national weather
modification with cloud condensation nuclei using various seeding agents, dispersal
methods and diversified types of aircraft. They recommended that
...a program of carefully planned precipitation-oriented field experiments should be carried out
under complete control of the scientists, embodying the required technical knowledge,
possessing continuity over a period needed for conclusiveness, and on sufficient scale to
permit geographic conclusions, as well as statistical stratification according to the type of
seeding agent, mode of injection, cloud type, etc... 'We recommend that the civil research
aircraft facilities be enlarged to include diversified types of aircraft and supporting data-
gathering systems to meet the requirements placed upon them. These operations with aircraft
(which now include cloud-seeding operations to suppress precipitation, as well as to enhance
it) would supersede local authorities and provide contractors with legal immunity from any
damage inflicted on the public through this Federal program:
Legal and Legislative Aspects The Commission recommends that the Federal Government by
appropriate legislation be empowered to: 1. Delay or halt all activities -- public or private -- in
actual or potential conflict with weather and climate modification programs of the Federal
government, whether carried on by the government itself for by its grantees or contractors; 2.
Immunize Federal agents, grantees, and contractors engaged in weather and climate
modification activities from State and local government interference; and 3. Provide to Federal
grantees and contractors indemnification or other protection against liability to the public for
damages caused by Federal programs of weather and climate modification.More recently,
the media has reported on NASAs closed-session meetings to blot out the sun with such
cloud condensation nuclei projects.
In the 1970s, consistent with these NASA recommendations, a top-secret military spraying
program to create artificial clouds was carried out over areas of the United States to develop
and test cloud-seeding weather modification techniques that were subsequently used as a
weather weapon over Vietnam.
For 7 years we have been conducting, through a contractor, North American Weather
Consultants, and with help from the Bureau of Reclamation, a rainfall augmentation
experiment in the Santa Barbara area. The works has gradually passed, from experiments
with single clouds to whole groups of clouds, and to components of storm
systems. WEATHER MODIFICATION: BRIEFING ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
WEATHER MODIFICATION ACTIVITY, UNITED STATES SENATE: NINETY-THIRD
CONGRESS, [Top Secret hearing held on March 20, 1974; made public on May 19, 1974]
In the 1990s, a National Academy of Sciences publication announced that cloud-stimulating
technology used on a much larger scale (dispersing cloud condensation nuclei by aircraft)
could be a low-cost, technically feasible option for counteracting CO2-induced global
warming:
Cloud stimulation by provision of cloud condensation nuclei appears to be a feasible and low-
cost option capable of being used to mitigate any quantity of CO2 equivalent per year.And
more recently, expert testimony before the House of Commons investigation revealed that
these technologies appeared to be relatively cheap and therefore relatively technically
simplistic.
The use of entire fleets of aircraft in such cloud-whitening operations has also been deemed
as cost-effective and technically feasible in numerous studies. See here, for example:
Climate Engineering (NOVIM study) (Source)
o Aircraft: Lofting megaton quantities into the stratosphere requires heavy lift aircraft that can
fly at these altitudes. would require ~100,000 sorties to be flown each year (or ~300 sorties
per day.) With each craft assumed capable of two sorties per day, this would require a fleet of
150 aircraft.
Cost analysis of stratospheric albedo modification delivery systems, Environmental
Research Letters, Volume 7 Number 3, (Source).
o We conclude that the basic technological capability to deliver material to the stratosphere
at million tonne per year rates exists today Recent work has shown that directly emitting
H2SO4 allows better control of particle size One should not take too lightly Bill Gates well-
financed efforts to disperse millions of tons of sulfuric acid into the atmosphere under the
pretext of saving the earth.
Harvard Magazine recently outlined a potential scenario for the use of these craft to dump
millions of tons of sulfuric acid into the stratosphere:
One suggestion involves modifying a fleet of jets to spray sulfates into the stratosphere,
where they would combine with water vapor to form aerosols. Dispersed by winds, these
particles would cover the globe with a haze that would reflect roughly 1 percent of solar
radiation away from Earth.And Boston University Today magazine projected a scenario in
which this fleet of aircraft might be sent on a mission to reengineer the atmosphere by
dispersing sufficient sulfuric acid on a global scale to cool the planet efficiently and
affordably:
Such a mission would, however, be one of last resort. Sending a fleet of sulfuric acidbearing
aircraft on high-altitude sorties for years on end would amount to a form of geoengineering, or
deliberate modification of the environment, to mitigate the effects of man-made greenhouse
gas emissions after the fact, rather than nipping them in the bud. Reengineering the
Atmosphere, 12/11/12, (Source)In addition to the use of custom-designed drone aircraft, the
use of commercial passenger aircraft is being discussed for such large-scale cloud-seeding
operations. According to a technical article published in Environmental Research Letters:
A potential delivery mechanism for the seeding material is already in place: the airline
industry.As noted in the article,
The distribution of seeding material could be done relatively inexpensively through the airline
industry. Seeding along conventional flight corridors should increase OLR [outgoing longwave
radiation] preferentially over the northern high latitudes where global warming is most
severe. Modification of cirrus clouds to reduce global warming Environ. Res. Lett. 4 (October-
December 2009) (Source)Other papers have discussed the modifications (added sulfur
content in the fuel and extra tanks) that might be made to commercial craft for full
implementation of atmospheric geoengineering):
Technically, if a 50-fold sulfur enhancement were used, the [commercial] aeroplanes would
probably need two separate fuel tanks: one for fuel with the current sulfur concentration to be
used in lower altitudes where air pollution is an issue, and another for sulfur-enhanced fuel to
be used in the stratosphere. Stratospheric passenger flights are likely an inefficient
geoengineering strategy (Source)Is this the method that is being implemented now? And
are they using chemicals other than sulfates?
Geoengineering proponents have advocated for and patented the use of various metals, salts
and polymers for dispersal in the atmosphere to modify its reflectivity. (For
example, aluminum, titanium & silica gels, bismuth triiodide andAnatase crystal.) We need to
know how far these plans have gotten.
As mentioned above, I have written a request for a state and federal congressional
investigation into what I believe are ongoing field-trials preparatory to the full-scale
implementation of the "stratospheric aerosol geoengineering" agenda. This is based on my
photographic observations and time-lapse videography over Harrisburg and Charlotte, NC, in
combination with a detailed survey of the patent literature, technical articles, popular press
summary articles, legislative investigations, video documentaries and observational reports.
This request can be found here:
Request for Congressional Investigation Into Geoengineering (pdf):
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/21200363/geoengineering_investigation.pdf
I have also started an online petition on change.org calling for a congressional
investigation into these geoengineering operations.
Such an investigation is all the more urgent, as my research shows that these large-scale
geoengineering spraying programs have been
deemed feasible by the National Academy of Sciences and numerous recent technical
studies,
recommended by agencies of the Federal Government (and billionaires like Bill Gates through
his personal climate modification consultants),
the object of imminent government-industry managed field-trials (e.g. the SPICE project)
the subject of numerous patents, and hardware design studies
the subject of detailed technical papers touting the necessity of their implementation
increasingly propagandized for in the popular press
I believe it is this agenda which is being witnessed and documented by the public throughout
the world as they photograph and video-tape the creation of massive amounts of chemtrails
over their houses and cities.
While the dangerous plans to dump millions of tons of toxic chemicals into the atmosphere to
fight the effects of pollution may seem to be beyond the realm of possibility, history reveals
numerous precedents for large-scale, long-term spraying operations that have been
conducted across the globe without the consent of the public. For example:
the aerial defoliation and aerial weather warfare used against Vietnam in
o Operation Ranch Hand (herbicidal warfare with millions of tons of chemicals targeting
crops for maximum strategic and psychological effect), and o Operation Popeye
(weaponized cloud-seeding operations that altered rainfall patterns and created monsoons);
the secret, seven year cloud-seeding experiments conducted over the US that were used to
develop these weather modification weapons used against Vietnam (as declassified, top-
secret congressional records now show);
the Operation Large Area Coverage, and radioactive particle spraying over cities in the US
In these operations, populations were sprayed with dangerous chemicals on a massive scale
without their consent. Likewise, we have not been asked if we want this dangerous
geoengineering experimentation with various cloud condensation nuclei being conducted
on our behalf in the name of fighting global warming. Nor have we been informed about the
chemical nature of the experimental agents now being dispersed into the air that we breathe
(or how these chemical agents may be serving multiple purposes).
I believe the public has the right to know what is being sprayed into the atmosphere,
especially when the spraying of millions of tons of sulfuric acid and aluminum with dedicated
fleets of aircraft have been proposed as cost-effective options.
I am also calling for the media to demand a congressional investigation into these
geoengineering operations. As summarized on Wikipedia, it was public exposure of the
environmental warfare against Vietnam through Operation Popeye by columnist Jack
Anderson that ultimately resulted in its cessation:
Reporter Jack Anderson published a story in March 1971 concerning Operation Popeye. The
name Operation Popeye (Pop Eye) entered the public space through a brief mention in the
Pentagon Papers and a July 3, 1972, article in the New York Times. Operations in Laos
ceased two days after the publication of the Times article.And Congressional demands for
information soon followed:
The press stories led to demands from members of the U.S. Congress, led by Senator
Claiborne Pell, for more information. U.S. House and Senate resolutions in favor of banning
environmental warfare were passed ... I am calling for similar actions today. In spite of
continuous government denials that such a geoengineering program exists, we have this
Vietnam-era weather modification program as a precedent showing that a high-level, large-
scale, illegal and dangerous weather modification project can be developed, tested and
implemented in complete secrecy, while top government officials lie about the programs very
existence (in Congressional testimony, no less), even as it is being exposed in the media.
As Ryan Dube summarized:
While the Air Force leadership in charge of operations in Vietnam considered weather
modification to be just one more important tool in the entire arsenal at the militarys disposal,
the moment Jack Anderson released details about the operation in the Washington Post on
March 18, 1971, things took a turn for the worst. The first reaction to the release of the secret
memo about Operation Popeye was denial. U.S. Defense Secretary Melvin Laird testified
before Congress in 1972 that Andersons wild tales were completely false. However, in a
private letter from Laird that was leaked to the press in January of 1974 regarding Operation
Popeye, Laird admitted that he had lied in his 1972 testimony. The Defense Secretary was
forced to attend a top secret Senate hearing where he and other military leaders were finally
forced to admit that Andersons wild conspiracy theory was absolutely true that the military
had been seeding clouds over Cambodia, Laos, as well as North and South Vietnam from
1966 through 1972. The last tally once the operation ceased in 1972 included 2,600 flights,
releasing over 47,000 units of material (mostly silver iodide or lead iodide) into the clouds.A
study for the Air Force, entitled Owning the Weather in 2025, has led me to believe that these
spraying experiments for military purposes have not stopped. The 2025 White Paper
discusses the use of jets spraying carbon dust for both precipitation enhancement and
suppression:
If precipitation enhancement techniques are successfully developed and the right natural
conditions also exist, we must also be able to disperse carbon dust into the desired location.
Transporting it in a completely controlled, safe, cost-effective, and reliable manner requires
innovation. Numerous dispersal techniques have already been studied, but the most
convenient, safe, and cost-effective method discussed is the use of afterburner-type jet
engines to generate carbon particles while flying through the targeted air. This method is
based on injection of liquid hydrocarbon fuel into the afterburners combustion gases. This
direct generation method was found to be more desirable than another plausible method (i.e.,
the transport of large quantities of previously produced and properly sized carbon dust to the
desired altitude). The carbon dust study demonstrated that small-scale precipitation
enhancement is possible and has been successfully verified under certain atmospheric
conditions. In addition to using carbon dust absorption technology for precipitation
enhancement, this delivery method could also be used for precipitation suppression. Weather
as a Force Multiplier, Owning the Weather in 2025 A Research Paper Presented To Air Force
2025 (1996)This research paper also discusses the chilling scenario in which drone aircraft
(uninhabited aerospace vehicles or UAVs) use stealth technology to disperse carbon or other
effective modification agents at any desired place as a weather force support element
(WFSE), which is a part of the commander in chiefs (CINC) air operations center (AOC):
If this UAV technology were combined with stealth and carbon dust technologies, the result
could be a UAV aircraft invisible to radar while en route to the targeted area, which could
spontaneously create carbon dust in any location.Thus the development of this aerosol
weather modification technology might allow military control of weather on a large scale
without detection. Perhaps that has been the goal of civilian research all along. As far back as
1965 John von Neuman, one of the most influential American science advisors to the Dept.
of Defense, stated:
After global climate control becomes possible, perhaps all our present involvements will seem
simple. We should not deceive ourselves: once such possibilities become actual, they will be
exploited WEATHER MODIFICATION: THE EVOLUTION OF AN R&D PROGRAM INTO A
MILITARY OPERATIONI believe that public exposure of this modern-day weather
modification program is the only tool we have to force the perpetrators to admit its
existence and halt it. Hopefully the information and links I have provided will be helpful
in this regard.
Enter Your Email To Receive Our Daily Newsletter
BE THE CHANGE! PLEASE SHARE THIS USING THE TOOLS BELOW
If you enjoy our work, please donate to keep our website going.
Posted by Activist at 7:10 AM Labels: Chemtrails, climate
change, environment, geoengineering, Global Warming, Health News, Jerry
Leonard, politics, video, weather modification


+++