ECON 2020 KT Magnusson The Nation Debt The national debt crisis is a very interesting topic that has created many differing opinions throughout the years. As found in the article Reining in the National Debt, it is an issue that has been around since the beginning of our nation. One that George Washington found necessary to address in his farewell address in 1796. George Washington in that speech advised against the building up of debt and encouraged the Americans, as well as the government, to stay out of debt. As also found in the article, that advice has not been well taken, or maybe not well followed, and as Bill Clinton gave his final State of the Union Address in 2000, the national debt had reached $5.5 trillion. With that, Bill Clinton gave us hope that with the correct fiscal policies we could eliminate the national debt within the next 13 years. However, in those 13 years we have seen the debt tripled (McGraw-Hill 2013). These alarming statistics leave many Americans wondering what will become of our nation if the debt continues to rise. In this essay some of the reasons and concerns for the national debt will be addressed, as well as some of the possible solutions for the national debt. The debts main source comes from the needs of the individual. A principle of economics is that want exceeds our scarce limited resources (McConnel-Brue-Flynn 2012). The government will often use an expansionary fiscal policy to try and boost the economy. This includes increased government spending, tax reductions or a combination of both. With such policies the budget deficit will grow even larger. We have seen this pattern in recent years with a growing budget deficit since the year 2001 where we saw the last budget surplus (McGraw-Hill 2013). With these statistics it seems that the national debt will be a continuing issue as our country continues progressing and growing. What are some of the concerns of a growing national debt? There are a few serious issues related with this topic; income distribution, incentives, foreign-owned debt, and the crowding-out effect from continuous refinancing. These concerns vary in seriousness but it is necessary to address and realize that the national debt is a problem and steps do need to be made to put an end to excessive government spending (McGraw-Hill 2013). In the article Reining in the National Debt some theories on how lowering the national debt may be achieved are discussed and analyzed. Annual budgets is one theory that has been brought up and tried in the past. In the past we havent seen much progress made with the annual budgets, in the article they are even called temporary band aids. That seems to be pretty accurate given that they havent really given any results and seem to not be followed much of the time. It seems that these budgets lack a long term approach, and it may be because the politicians that are creating these budgets arent thinking long term and are thinking about their little time in the position that they hold or in the following election, if they cut government spending and the economy is hurt for a while what will happen? Whatever the reason may be that these budgets havent had much success but it can change now. In order to avoid future problems, the government may need to seriously consider making long term goals and reduce spending. As annual budgets have begun to fail the government has tried to implement other tactics such as deficit ceilings, spending caps, PAYGO, sequestration, and even a balance budget amendment. With each idea there has been different benefits and different disadvantages. After the implementation of each plan, eventually nothing really gets done or the policy put in place gets ignored. Similar problems have been seen such as the problems formerly addressed with the annual budgets, politicians creating policies possibly with other motives. These policies have not had the effect wanted or needed. A problem that needs to be addressed are the policies taken to help our economy. Does an expansionary fiscal policy really help our economy? In the business cycle there will be times of recession and in these times government spending and reduced taxes does seem to be a quick, proven fix, at least temporarily. Also in times of wars this is a quick way to boost the economy. But in the long term government intervention may not be the best policy. With a policy of no government interference the economy will balance itself out with the law of supply and demand, and if we are allocating our resources efficiently. If we are using the resources that we already have and following debt ceilings that are put in place, or a budget system, we will see progress made in lowering the national debt and we can still obtain maximum economic efficiency if we are using our resources correctly. Sometimes the best thing a government can do is let the economy balance itself out. So what will actually be done to fix this problem? It seems that this is a question that has been asked often and the answer has yet to be found. But one thing is certain, if we continue spending more than we have we will never lower our national debt. In my opinion we need stiffer fiscal policies and officials who will follow what has been decided. It seems that we have no sense of direction on what to do with our national debt and we need to make some goals to make progress. I believe that George Washington had many good reasons for what he said about the national debt and if we follow his counsel, and the counsel of many other well respected officials as to this matter, and begin to lower our national debt, we will begin to create a sure foundation for many generations to come.
Works Cited:
McConnel-Brue-Flynn. Macroeconomics 19th edition. 2012. McGraw-Hill . "Reining in the National Debt ." The Economy Today News Flash, February 2013.