RUBRIC DEVELOPMENT

STUDENT
ASSESSMENT RUBRIC
CLO PLO ATTRIBUTE SUB ATTRIBUTE ASSESSMENT
TASK % MARKS
STRATEGY
Objective 1
Methodology I 2
Methodology II 2
Perform (plan, conduct and Presentation of data 2
analyse outcomes of) scientific Lab Report
PLO2 Scientific skills Analysis of data I 2 Written Report
investigations in area of (20%)
mechanics. Analysis of data II 3
Discussion I 3
Discussion II 3
Conclusion 2
Independence 3
Values and
Dedication I 3
Attribute
Demonstrate good values in Dedication II 4 Video Presentation
Presentation
scientific investigations in the PLO4 Work Responsibility 4 (Group task/
(20%)
area of mechanics. Ethics and Work Relation 3 Online submission)
Professionalism Integrity 3
Work Ethics 3
 FACULTY OF APPLIED SCIENCES
DIPLOMA IN SCIENCE (AS120) PHY110
GRADING RUBRICS WRITTEN LABORATORY REPORT (20%) (PLO2, CLO2) PHYSICS

CRITERIA/MARKS
ITEM
0 1 2 3 MARKS
Objective The objective is not The objective is clearly
(Conceptualisation) written at all. written.
No method description Some method description Method description exactly reflects
Methodology presented. does not exactly reflect the the conducted experiment, and
(Conceptualisation - conducted experiment, follow scientific writing format.
description) and/ or does not follow
scientific writing format.
Methodology No setup drawing A non-labelled drawing is A labelled drawing of experimental
(Conceptualisation – presented. present. setup is presented.
setup drawing)
Incomplete data Number of data is Data is relevant; number of data is
Presentation of data
appropriate but not appropriate and tabulated properly.
(Implementation)
properly tabulated.
Analysis of data Wrong calculation, Correct formulae are used All calculations are presented using
(Analysis - missing some, or no but with minor errors. the correct formula and dimensions.
calculation) calculation presented.
No graph presented. Incorrect transfer of data or Graph is presented but some of the Graph is drawn with a title, suitable
Analysis of data major errors. items are missing. scale, labelled axes, the best fit line
(Analysis - graph) drawn and the gradient obtained,
errors are determined when needed.
No discussion given. No justification, but Justification does not really support Results are justified scientifically, and
suggestions on the the results, but suggestions on the deviation from the theoretical value is
Discussion
improvement of the improvement of the experiment are discussed, and suggestions on the
(Context)
experiment are made. made. improvement of the experiment are
made.
Sources of error are not General sources of error Analyzes sources of error as seen Analyzes various sources of error as
Discussion analyzed or discussed. are discussed, but do not in the data, but suggestions on the seen in the data and suggestions on
(Experimental Error) clearly arise from the data. improvement lack detail or the improvement of the experiment
relevance. are made.
Conclusion is not Conclusion is far from the Conclusion is stated according to
Conclusion
written. objectives, and/or results the objective, results are written with
(Synthesis &
are not written with/without the uncertainties.
Evaluation)
the uncertainties
TOTAL MARKS /20
 FACULTY OF APPLIED SCIENCES
DIPLOMA IN SCIENCE (AS120) PHY110
GRADING RUBRICS FOR VIDEO PRESENTATION (20%) (PLO4, CLO3)
Attrib Sub CRITERIA/MARKS
ute attribute 0 1 2 3 4 MARKS
Reluctantly accept and Accept and carry out Accept and carry out Accept and carry out
carry out tasks, with tasks with positive tasks with positive tasks with positive
Independen results below the attitude, however attitude and performs attitude and performs
course expectations. performs results below results according to the results more than the
Values and Attitudes

ce
the course expectations. course expectations. course expectations.

No attempt to explain. Attempt to explain with Attempt to explain with Attempt to explain
Dedication incorrect both theory and correct theory or with correct theory
equation. equation. and equation.
No sources/ Sources/ references/ Some sources/ Sources/ references/ A good variety of
references/ examples examples are exclusively references/ examples examples presented sources/ references/
Dedication presented. one type. variety. Most sources meet the required examples presented
used are weighted variety in the in terms of scholarly/
towards certain type. assignment. published sources.
Work Late submit task after Late submit task after Late submission, and Late submission Submission on time.
Responsibil notified by lecturer and notified by lecturer, after notified by
ity does not provide however provide lecturer.
(Timeline) acceptable notification. acceptable notification.
Does not demonstrate Demonstrate the ability to Consistently
Ethics and Professionalism

Work the ability to work with work with others in demonstrates active
Relation others in groups. groups. and independent ability
(Collegiality) to work with others in
groups.
The contents are The contents are not very The contents are clear
unclear and inaccurate. much clear, and doubly and accurate.
The contents are accurate. The contents are
Integrity reported inaccurately The contents are reported accurately and
and contain false and reported inaccurately and in a way that can be
misleading data cannot be clearly clearly understood.
understood.
Majority of information Most information in All information in
Work Ethics was copied, and no student’s own words, student’s own words
(Plagiarism) referencing occurred. with little references and used references
occurred. where needed.
TOTAL MARKS /20